切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 334 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.03.013

临床研究

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石疗效分析
邹瑞1, 王一尧1, 黄泽鹏1, 李铎1,()   
  1. 1. 570312 海口,海南省肿瘤医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-22 出版日期:2024-06-10
  • 通信作者: 李铎
  • 基金资助:
    海南省重点研发项目(ZDYF2022SHFZ118); 海南省肿瘤医院科研基金(2023ZD05); 海南省'南海新星’医疗卫生人才平台项目

Clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of cholecystolithiasis

Rui Zou1, Yiyao Wang1, Zepeng Huang1, Duo Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou 570312, China
  • Received:2024-02-22 Published:2024-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Duo Li
引用本文:

邹瑞, 王一尧, 黄泽鹏, 李铎. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 334-338.

Rui Zou, Yiyao Wang, Zepeng Huang, Duo Li. Clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of cholecystolithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 334-338.

目的

探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2018年6月至2022年6月在海南省肿瘤医院行LC的201例胆囊结石患者临床资料。其中男91例,女110例;年龄27~74岁,中位年龄51岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据手术方式,将患者分为单孔LC组(单孔组,107例)和三孔LC组(三孔组,94例)。两组手术时间、满意度评分等比较采用t检验,并发症发生率、中转开腹率等比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

两组患者均手术顺利,单孔组中转开腹1例,三孔组无中转开腹,差异无统计学意义(P=0.347)。两组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);亚组分析显示,对于胆囊结石>2 cm的患者,单孔组平均手术时间为(44±8)min,明显短于三孔组的(55±7)min(t=-12.685,P<0.05)。单孔组术后并发症发生率为1.9%(2/107),三孔组相应为2.1%(2/94),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.418,P>0.05)。单孔组患者满意度评分为(42.8±2.8)分,明显高于三孔组(33.7±4.9)分(t=32.710,P<0.05)。

结论

经脐单孔LC治疗胆囊结石安全、有效,且具有美容效果更佳,患者满意度高等优势;对于大于2 cm的胆囊结石,单孔法手术时间更短。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 201 patients with cholecystolithiasis who underwent LC in Hainan Cancer Hospital from June 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 91 patients were male and 110 female, aged from 27 to 74 years, with a median age of 51 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to surgical methods, all patients were divided into single-port LC group (single-port group, n=107) and three-port LC group (three-port group, n=94). Operation time and satisfaction score between two groups were compared by t test. The incidence of complications and the conversion rate to open surgery were compared by using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

All patients intwo groups successfully completed the surgery. 1 patient in the single-port group was converted to open surgery, and none in the three-port group, with no statistical significance between two groups (P=0.347). No statistical significance was found in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between two groups (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with cholecystolithiasis of >2 cm, the average operation time in the single-port group was (44±8) min, significantly shorter than (55±7) min in the three-port group (t=-12.685, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the single-port group was 1.9%(2/107), and 2.1%(2/94) in the three-port group, with no statistical significance (χ2=0.418, P>0.05). In single-port group, the satisfaction score of patients was 42.8±2.8, significantly higher than 33.7±4.9 in the three-port group (t=32.710, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Transumbilical single-port LC is safe and efficacious treatment of cholecystolithiasis, which has the advantages of better cosmetic effect and higher satisfaction score. For patients with cholecystolithiasis of >2 cm, the operation time of single-port LC is shorter.

表1 单孔与三孔组LC患者术前一般情况比较
图1 一例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术情况注:a为脐部切开方法;b为手套与Trocar建立的单孔通道;c为术后切口
表2 胆囊切除术后患者满意度调查问卷[5,6]
表3 单孔组和三孔组LC患者围手术期情况比较(±s
表4 单孔组和三孔组LC患者术后并发症及镇痛情况比较(例)
[1]
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 1997, 84(5):695.
[2]
Moreno Alfonso JC, Molina Caballero A, Ros Briones R, et al. Single-port transumbilical pediatric cholecystectomy: any benefits for the patient?[J]. Cir Pediatr, 2023, 36(2):67-72.
[3]
Barutcu AG, Klein D, Kilian M, et al. Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(1):126-132.
[4]
魁发瑞,张帅. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术用于胆囊结石的临床疗效探究[J]. 甘肃科技, 2022, 38(19):120-122.
[5]
Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JFM, et al. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001, 44(12):1800-1807.
[6]
Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, et al. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease[J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12(11):1334-1340.
[7]
付振刚,成广海,胡博, 等. "缝线悬吊减鞘卡法"单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术1 118例报告[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2022, 26(4):255-260.
[8]
敖锋,赵中浩,古文华, 等. 经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效对比[J]. 中国临床医学, 2022, 29(4):664-668.
[9]
王泽升,张琪,高金伟, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病的临床经验[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(15):1980-1982.
[10]
林填,余江,胡彦锋, 等. 两孔法腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的初步经验[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(1):35-42.
[11]
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Guillaumes S, et al. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(6):1205-1213.
[12]
Raakow J, Klein D, Barutcu AG, et al. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery comparing long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(12):5533-5539.
[13]
郑立忠,王保红,丁峰. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2023, 50(13):33-36.
[14]
Raakow J, Klein D, Barutcu AG, et al. Safety and efficiency of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients: a case-matched comparative analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(8):1005-1010.
[15]
齐放. 经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗结石性胆囊炎的疗效分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(28):17-20.
[16]
叶大才,陈潇,范显文, 等. 常规器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床应用价值[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(8):986-989.
[17]
汤晓东,韩天,姚成汉. 经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石患者的安全性及满意度分析[J]. 名医, 2022(12):63-65.
[18]
邱凌. 经脐单孔腹腔镜切除术对胆囊结石患者术后恢复及腹壁美容满意度的影响[J]. 当代医学, 2021, 27(12):32-34.
[19]
曹嵘,王贵阳,李可为, 等. 单中心317例日间单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床疗效分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(12):750-754.
[20]
严小鹏,张苗苗,张东, 等. 磁锚定经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术1例报告[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2021, 26(11):879-880.
[21]
钟稳萍. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生并发症的影响因素[J]. 医疗装备, 2021, 34(3):106-107.
[1] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[2] 易明超, 苏怀东, 陈淋, 郎成, 张伟. 自制超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 132-132.
[3] 刘斌, 朱慧, 席江伟, 郑卫, 王新波. 健康饮食模式降低胆结石风险的相关因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 188-191.
[4] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[7] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[8] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[9] 牛斌, 饶兰英, 刘晓晨, 何龙林, 秦培鑫. 基于孟德尔随机化分析胆囊切除与结直肠肛管恶性肿瘤发生的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 313-318.
[10] 彭子洋, 王志博, 王丹, 彭浩茜, 王蕾, 彭薇, 王娟娟, 李宇, 刘学民, 吴荣谦, 向俊西, 吕毅. 智能化辅助图像实时去雾技术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 328-333.
[11] 孟塬, 巴合提·卡力甫, 马志刚, 王锦国, 张杰, 李玉鹏, 宋巍, 田广磊, 陈雄. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度评分系统在急性胆囊炎治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 169-175.
[12] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-50.
[13] 王晓栋, 蔡凤军, 白燕萍, 杨永生. ICG荧光导航在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用的关键问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 16-20.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要