切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 509 -514. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.04.012

所属专题: 临床研究

临床研究

保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生危险因素分析
冀旭1, 朱峰1, 冯业晨1,()   
  1. 1. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-04 出版日期:2024-08-10
  • 通信作者: 冯业晨
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81772950,82073249)

Risk factors of biliary complications after organ-preserving pancreatectomy

Xu Ji1, Feng Zhu1, Yechen Feng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2024-03-04 Published:2024-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yechen Feng
引用本文:

冀旭, 朱峰, 冯业晨. 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 509-514.

Xu Ji, Feng Zhu, Yechen Feng. Risk factors of biliary complications after organ-preserving pancreatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 509-514.

目的

探讨保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生的影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2015年5月到2022年4月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院行保留器官功能的胰腺切除术的210例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男79例,女131例。根据有无并发症分为胆道并发症组和非胆道并发症组,其中胆道并发症组50例,平均年龄(39±4)岁;非胆道并发症组160例,平均年龄(37±3)岁。所有患者均随访至术后90 d,比较两组围手术期指标差异,并分析术后胆道并发症发生的影响因素。两组手术方式比较采用χ2检验,术后胆道并发症发生的独立影响因素分析采用Logistic回归分析。

结果

纳入的病例术后90 d内胆道并发症发生率23.8%(50/210)。术后胆道并发症发生与手术方式、肿瘤部位、肿瘤大小、胰腺质地、手术时间有关,其中肿瘤局部剜除术患者胆道并发症发生率最低4%(2/50) (χ2=14.19,P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,术前糖尿病史、术后ALT升高、术后AST升高、术后进食半流食时间延长及奥曲肽使用总量增多是术后胆道并发症发生的独立危险因素(OR=2.63,1.03,1.02,1.06,1.14;P<0.05)。

结论

术前糖尿病史、术后进食半流食时间、奥曲肽的使用量是保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道系统并发症发生的独立危险因素。手术方式、肿瘤大小及胰腺质地与术后胆道并发症有关。术前控制好血糖,尽可能选择肿瘤局部剜除术,减少生长抑素类似物的使用以降低胆道系统并发症发生风险。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of biliary complications after organ-preserving pancreatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 210 patients who underwent organ-preserving pancreatectomy in Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from May 2015 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 79 patients were male and131 female. According to the incidence of complications, all patients were divided into the biliary complication group and non-biliary complication group. 50 patients were assigned into the biliary complication group, aged (39±4) years on average, and 160 cases in the non-biliary complication group, aged (37±3) years on average. All patients were followed up for 90 d after surgery. The differences in perioperative indexes were compared between two groups. The risk factors of postoperative biliary complications were also analyzed. Surgical methods between two groups were compared by Chi-square test. The independent risk factors of postoperative biliary complications were assessed by Logistic regression analysis.

Results

The incidence of biliary complications within postoperative 90 d was 23.8%(50/210). The incidence of postoperative biliary complications was associated with surgical method, tumor site, tumor size, pancreatic texture, operative time. The incidence of biliary complications in patients treated with local tumoral enucleation was 4%(2/50), the lowest among all groups (χ2=14.19, P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that history of preoperative diabetes mellitus, postoperative ALT elevation, postoperative AST elevation, prolonged postoperative taking of semi-liquid diet and increased total dosage of octreotide were the independent risk factors for postoperative biliary complications (OR=2.63, 1.03, 1.02, 1.06, 1.14; P<0.05).

Conclusions

History of preoperative diabetes mellitus, time of postoperative semi-liquid diet and dosage of octreotide are the independent risk factors for biliary complications after organ-preserving pancreatectomy. The incidence of postoperative biliary complications was associated with surgical method, tumor site, tumor size, pancreatic texture, operative time. Selection of local tumoral enucleation, and reducing the use of somatostatin analogues contribute to lowering the risk of biliary complications.

表1 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后发生胆道并发症的术前相关因素分析
表2 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后发生胆道并发症的术中、术后相关因素分析
表3 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生影响因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Sauvanet A. Surgical complications of pancreatectomy[J]. J Chir, 2008, 145(2):103-114.
[2]
林青, 余敏, 陈汝福. 胰腺良性及低度恶性肿瘤的外科治疗[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 29(6):405-407.
[3]
Xu J, Li F, Zhan H, et al. Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic tumours: a single-institution experience of 66 cases[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(1/2):106-110.
[4]
张磊, 楼文晖. 重视胰腺切除术后远期并发症的诊治[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2022, 60(7):655-659.
[5]
Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, et al. Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2013, 37(3):230-239.
[6]
Cioffi JL, McDuffie LA, Roch AM, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy stricture after pancreatoduodenectomy: outcomes after operative revision[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 20(2):293-299.
[7]
Yu X, Li H, Jin C, et al. Splenic vessel preservation versus Warshaw's technique during spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(2):183-191.
[8]
Jiang Y, Jin JB, Zhan Q, et al. Robot-assisted duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with pancreaticogastrostomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic head lesions: a single-centre experience[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2018, 14(4):e1903.
[9]
Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome[M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.
[10]
Trauner M, Fickert P, Stauber RE. Inflammation-induced cholestasis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1999, 14(10):946-959.
[11]
Maatman TK, Butler JR, Quigley SN, et al. Leukocytosis after distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy as a marker of major complication[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 220(2):354-358.
[12]
沈红波, 傅德良, 蒋永剑, 等. 胰腺切除术后常见并发症的临床因素分析[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2012, 17(5):481-485.
[13]
Kim SH, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, et al. Comprehensive complication index or clavien-dindo classification: which is better for evaluating the severity of postoperative complications following pancreatectomy?[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(3):849-856.
[14]
Schroeder SM. Perioperative management of the patient with diabetes mellitus: update and overview[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2014, 31(1):1-10.
[15]
Tan DJH, Yaow CYL, Mok HT, et al. The influence of diabetes on postoperative complications following colorectal surgery[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2021, 25(3):267-278.
[16]
傅红兴, 许昌, 田阳, 等. 全胰腺切除联合自体胰岛移植治疗儿童慢性胰腺炎疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(2):118-122.
[17]
Yuan S, Gill D, Giovannucci EL, et al. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, lifestyle factors, and risk of gallstone disease: a Mendelian randomization investigation[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 20(3):e529-537.
[18]
Alghamdi AA, Jawas AM, Hart RS. Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Surg, 2007, 50(6):459-466.
[19]
李永杰, 周耿, 方孟园, 等. 肝功能指标在诊断胆囊结石合并无症状胆总管结石中的作用[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2014, 20(6):431-434.
[20]
李华, 李光明, 胡坚方, 等. 急性胆汁淤积诱导大鼠肝细胞损伤的机制研究[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2009, 25(5):700-702.
[21]
Donati A, Ruzzi M, Adrario E, et al. A new and feasible model for predicting operative risk[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 93(3):393-399.
[22]
Schorn S, Vogel T, Demir IE, et al. Do somatostatin-analogues have the same impact on postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy? -asystematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials[J]. Pancreatology, 2020, 20(8):1770-1778.
[23]
Fazel A, Li SC, Burton FR. Octreotide relaxes the hypertensive sphincter of Oddi: pathophysiological and therapeutic implications[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97(3):612-616.
[24]
Velõsy B, Madácsy L, Szepes A, et al. The effects of somatostatin and octreotide on the human sphincter of Oddi[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1999, 11(8):897-901.
[25]
Han ZH, He ZM, Chen WH, et al. Octreotide-induced acute life-threatening gallstones after vicarious contrast medium excretion: a case report[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(25):7484-7489.
[26]
Brighi N, Lamberti G, Maggio I, et al. Biliary stone disease in patients receiving somatostatin analogs for neuroendocrine neoplasms. a retrospective observational study[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2019, 51(5):689-694.
[27]
Brighi N, Panzuto F, Modica R, et al. Biliary stone disease in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogs: a multicenter study[J]. Oncologist, 2020, 25(3):259-265.
[28]
Hussaini SH, Pereira SP, Murphy GM, et al. Composition of gall bladder stones associated with octreotide: response to oral ursodeoxycholic acid[J]. Gut, 1995, 36(1):126-132.
[29]
于汉卿, 王培林. 3125例体检者年龄、性别与胆囊结石发病率的分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2015, 15(9):128-129.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要