切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 568 -574. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.04.010

临床研究

机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较
韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超()   
  1. 550001 贵阳,贵州医科大学附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 喻超
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82360519); 贵州医科大学附属医院2023年学科领军人才项目(gyfyxkyc-2023-03); 第八批百层次人才项目(黔科合平台人才-GCC[2023]082号); 贵州省抗癌协会科技项目(抗协科技[2023]011); “942”临床重点专科分层建设计划(攀峰计划)(GZWJWPF2025005)

Comparison of safety and efficacy between robot-assisted and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy

Xiaozhao Han, Nenghong Yang, Min Han, Yongning Li, Xun Ran, Hong Zhang, Zhiwei He, Jianong Luo, Chao Yu()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, China
  • Received:2025-12-22 Published:2026-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Chao Yu
引用本文:

韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超. 机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 568-574.

Xiaozhao Han, Nenghong Yang, Min Han, Yongning Li, Xun Ran, Hong Zhang, Zhiwei He, Jianong Luo, Chao Yu. Comparison of safety and efficacy between robot-assisted and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(04): 568-574.

目的

对比机器人辅助保留脾脏胰体尾切除术(RSPDP)与传统腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术(LSPDP)治疗胰腺体尾部良性或低度恶性病变患者围手术期的安全性和临床疗效,探讨RSPDP患者临床获益情况。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2024年12月在贵州医科大学附属医院行保留脾脏胰体尾切除术的35例胰腺体尾部良性或低度恶性患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男12例,女23例;平均年龄(51±19)岁。根据手术方式不同分为RSPDP组(14例)和LSPDP组(21例),两组患者根据术中具体情况选择Kimura法和Warshaw法行保留脾脏胰体尾切除术。两组围手术期指标比较采用秩和检验,并发症发生率等比较采用Fisher确切概率法。

结果

两组患者均手术顺利,无围手术期死亡。RSPDP组采用Kimura术式9例,LSPDP组Kimura术式14例;两组术中脾脏血管保留率分别为64%(9/14)、67%(14/21),差异无统计学意义(P>0.999)。RSPDP组术中出血量中位数为40 (20,63) ml,明显少于LSPDP组的100(50,300) ml(Z=-2.638,P=0.007)。两组手术时间、输血情况等比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后引流液淀粉酶量、拔管时间及脾梗死、胰瘘、腹腔感染发生率比较差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于胰腺体尾部良性或低度恶性病变患者,采用RSPDP和LSPDP术均是安全的,两组手术时间、术后恢复情况无明显差异,但相较于LSPDP,RSPDP术中出血量更低。

Objective

To compare perioperative safety and efficacy of robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (RSPDP) and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of pancreatic body and tail, and to evaluate clinical benefits of RSPDP patients.

Methods

Clinical data of 35 patients with benign or low-grade malignant lesions of pancreatic body and tail undergoing spleen-preserving distal splenectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 12 patients were male and 23 female, aged (51±19) years on average. According to different surgical methods, all patients were divided into the RSPDP group (n=14) and LSPDP group (n=21). According to specific conditions during the surgery, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed using Kimura or Warshaw technique. Perioperative indexes between two groups were compared by rank-sum test, and the incidence of complications was compared by Fisher's exact test.

Results

All patients in two groups successfully completed the surgery, and no perioperative death occurred. In the RSPDP group, Kimura technique was adopted in 9 cases, and 14 cases in the LSPDP group. The splenic vessel-preserving rates in two groups were 64%(9/14) and 67%(14/21), with no statistical significance (P>0.999). The median intraoperative blood loss in the RSPDP group was 40(20,63) ml, significantly less than 100(50,300) ml in the LSPDP group (Z=-2.638, P=0.007). No significant difference was observed in operation time and blood transfusion amount between two groups (all P>0.05). No significant difference was found in the amount of amylase in drainage fluid, extubation time and the incidence of splenic infarction, pancreatic fistula and abdominal infection rate between two groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

Both RSPDP and LSPDP are safe for patients with benign or low-grade malignant lesions of pancreatic body and tail. No significant difference is observed in operation time and postoperative recovery between two groups. Compared with LSPDP, RSPDP leads to a lower amount of intraoperative bleeding.

表1 两组胰腺肿瘤患者胰体尾切除术前一般资料比较
表2 两组胰腺肿瘤患者胰体尾切除术中情况比较
表3 两组胰腺肿瘤患者胰体尾切除术后情况比较
表4 两组胰腺肿瘤患者胰体尾切除术后并发症比较 [例(%)]
[1]
李爽, 张标, 刘航宇, 等. 基于SELECT理念腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 776-779. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.07.029.
[2]
黄锡泰, 谢锦钊, 蔡建鹏, 等. 机器人辅助胰腺肿瘤局部切除术在治疗胰腺良性或低度恶性肿瘤中的应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2022, 35(5): 313-316. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5591.2022.05.003.
[3]
Nakata K, Shikata S, Ohtsuka T, et al. Minimally invasive preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat, 2018, 25(11): 476-488. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.569.
[4]
Bronte V, Pittet MJ. The spleen in local and systemic regulation of immunity[J]. Immunity, 2013, 39(5): 806-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.010.
[5]
刘颖斌, 吴文广. 胰体尾癌根治性切除的范围探讨[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(1): 11-13.
[6]
崔鑫涛, 王骥, 马红钦, 等. 达芬奇机器人在胰腺手术中的应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(8): 594-601, 606. DOI: 10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2024.08.594.
[7]
胡剑翀, 邹浩, 朱呈瞻, 等. 达芬奇机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(2): 75-80. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.02.003.
[8]
王巍, 姜翀弋, 涂彦渊, 等. 机器人辅助胰体尾切除: 从切脾到保脾[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 6(5): 351-356. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2013.05.009.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会胰腺病专业委员会. 胰腺术后外科常见并发症诊治及预防的专家共识(2017)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2017, 8(Z1): 139-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2017.03.011.
[10]
陶绍霖, 李青元, 康珀铭, 等. 经前侧入路机器人辅助肺叶切除术180例临床分析[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2020, 27(10): 1140-1144. DOI: 10.7507/1007-4848.202007093.
[11]
Eskander MF, Bliss LA, Tseng JF. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. Curr Probl Surg, 2016, 53(3): 107-154. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2016.01.001.
[12]
屈敏. 达芬奇机器人手术系统及其进展分析[J]. 科学与信息化, 2025(6): 156-158.
[13]
赵之明. 达芬奇机器人在肝胆胰外科手术中的应用与前景[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(12): 2659-2662. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.12.005.
[14]
Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T. Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future?[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2001, 11(3): 309-320. DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00012.
[15]
Kimura W, Moriya T, Ma J, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(10): 1493-1499. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i10.1493.
[16]
Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB, et al. Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(10): 3364-3372. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1727-9.
[17]
Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?[J]. Surgery, 2010, 148(4): 814-823. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.027.
[18]
van Ramshorst TME, Giani A, Mazzola M, et al. Benchmarking of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by using two different methods[J]. Br J Surg, 2022, 110(1): 76-83. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac352.
[19]
钱剑锋, 秦凯, 金佳斌, 等. 机器人手术在肝胆胰外科中的应用与进展[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2023, 4(1): 12-17. DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2023.01.002.
[20]
李鹏禹. 机器人腹腔镜微创技术在胰体尾切除术应用的优势和手术难度预测的研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2023. DOI: 10.27648/d.cnki.gzxhu.2023.001020.
[21]
Rompianesi G, Montalti R, Ambrosio L, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(6): 552. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060552.
[22]
刘兴成, 陈艳浩, 马红钦, 等. 达芬奇机器人在胰体尾切除手术中的应用分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2022, 28(11): 843-847. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20220712-00282.
[23]
Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, et al. The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre[J]. HPB, 2015, 17(7): 580-586. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12412.
[24]
Xu Q, Liu T, Zou X, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy: a single-center experience of 301 cases[J]. J Pancreatol, 2022, 5(3): 118-124. DOI: 10.1097/jp9.0000000000000096.
[25]
蒋启涛, 金巍巍, 牟一平. 机器人辅助腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的研究进展[J]. 浙江医学, 2023, 45(5): 552-555. DOI: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2023.45.5.2022-2594.
[26]
Kawaida H, Kono H, Watanabe M, et al. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy using a triple-row stapler[J]. Surg Today, 2018, 48(1): 95-100. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1554-2.
[27]
Bergholz M, Ferle M, Weber BM. The benefits of haptic feedback in robot assisted surgery and their moderators: a meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 19215. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46641-8.
[28]
Amirabdollahian F, Livatino S, Vahedi B, et al. Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature[J]. J Robot Surg, 2018, 12(1): 11-25. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4.
[29]
黄德阳, 郭纪旭, 陆世鎏, 等. 达芬奇机器人在肝胆胰外科复杂手术中的应用[J]. 微创医学, 2025, 20(1): 6-12.
[30]
赖全友, 高远, 贾鹏, 等. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术Kimura法和Warshaw法围术期临床疗效对比[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2024, 36(7): 416-421. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2024.07.006.
[1] 冉苏叶, 喻超, 孙诚谊. 胰腺癌生存期提升的破局点:从基础研究到临床实践的转化困境[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 179-186.
[2] 刘荣. 机器人右半肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 324-324.
[3] 王兰, 杨雪, 聂阿娜, 郭伟林, 谷坤熙, 赵建红, 翟佳琪, 张伟, 李杨, 陈晓丽, 尚培中. 胰腺头部巨大实性假乳头状瘤行门静脉保留型非整块胰头十二指肠切除一例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 300-302.
[4] 孙丕绛, 崔上, 杨永君, 冉超. 腹腔镜下胰头癌扩大淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 220-220.
[5] 刘光年, 杨尹默. 数字智能化在胰腺癌微创外科应用的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 205-209.
[6] 李坚, 陈国胜, 赵丽, 范韶卿, 袁昊, 高文涛, 蒋奎荣, 吴俊立, 苗毅, 肖斌. 术前经内镜植入胆胰管支架在胰腺头颈部肿瘤局部切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 222-225.
[7] 陈智溢, 张恩溥, 戴平, 姜刚刚, 甘露, 黄谋, 张文娟, 杨江根, 黄桂晓. 机器人手术治疗盲肠膀胱瘘一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 226-230.
[8] 周哲琦, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李义亮, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 玉素江·图荪托合提, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠及食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 259-264.
[9] 鲁丁维, 郭洪瑞, 刘迪, 毛显龙, 易泓霖, 王汝娟, 邹春莉, 李鹏. 3+2+1解剖缝合策略在完全机器人食管裂孔疝修补+胃底折叠术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 265-271.
[10] 李赞林, 祖母乃提·玉山, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 李义亮. 机器人3+1模式在食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 272-276.
[11] 苏德强, 田晓丰, 李梓康, 杨佳, 丁绪鹏, 曹宏. 血液病脾切除治疗中的热点问题与发展方向[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 515-522.
[12] 李中宇, 杨谨闻, 麻勇. 微创脾部分切除术的发展现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 545-550.
[13] 徐荣, 韩伟, 张威. 单孔腹腔镜脾部分切除术的临床应用:微创革新与功能保全[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 551-557.
[14] 张婧萱, 郭佳星, 李紫红, 陈怡颖, 乔媛, 宝莹娜. 多线治疗失败后31例复发转移性结直肠癌局部挽救性放射治疗的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 206-211.
[15] 梁玮龙, 王鹏飞, 高怀新. 氟比洛芬酯联合腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的麻醉效果及对COX-2、MMP-9水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 256-261.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?