切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 619 -626. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.04.017

临床研究

肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型构建及分级护理策略
丁育1,2, 林倩2, 王志3, 吴文睿4, 张克林5, 赵海璇1,2,()   
  1. 1 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院护理部
    2 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院南院手术室
    3 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院麻醉科
    4 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院胆胰外科
    5 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院ICU
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-02 出版日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 赵海璇
  • 基金资助:
    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2024A1515010376)

Construction of a simplified scoring model for the risk of early postoperative infection after liver transplantation and its hierarchical nursing strategies

Yu Ding1,2, Qian Lin2, Zhi Wang3, Wenrui Wu4, Kelin Zhang5, Haixuan Zhao1,2,()   

  1. 1 Nursing Department, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Southern Hospital Campus), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
    2 Operation Room, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Southern Hospital Campus), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
    3 Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Southern Hospital Campus), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
    4 Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Southern Hospital Campus), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
    5 ICU, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Southern Hospital Campus), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2026-02-02 Published:2026-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Haixuan Zhao
引用本文:

丁育, 林倩, 王志, 吴文睿, 张克林, 赵海璇. 肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型构建及分级护理策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 619-626.

Yu Ding, Qian Lin, Zhi Wang, Wenrui Wu, Kelin Zhang, Haixuan Zhao. Construction of a simplified scoring model for the risk of early postoperative infection after liver transplantation and its hierarchical nursing strategies[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(04): 619-626.

目的

基于术后24 h内客观护理指标构建肝移植术后感染风险简易评分模型,并探讨其在分级护理策略中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院156例接受同种异体肝移植术受者的临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男133例,女23例;年龄18~74岁,中位年龄52岁。采用Lasso回归筛选肝移植术后早期关键特征指标,通过多因素Logistic回归构建术后早期感染预测模型并转化为术后感染简易评分。采用ROC曲线分析及Bootstrap内部验证评价模型效能,并基于截断值制定分层护理策略。

结果

肝移植术后早期感染60例,感染发生率为38.5%(60/156)。Lasso回归筛选出标准化系数排名前4位的变量依次为术后第1天(POD1)引流液量、POD1-WBC、术中输血总量及BMI,阈值分别为POD1引流液量≥600 ml、POD1-WBC≥9.0×109/L、术中输血总量≥1 800 ml、BMI≥24 kg/m2。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,POD1引流液量≥600 ml(OR=4.06,95%CI:1.92~8.59)、POD1-WBC≥9.0×109/L(OR=2.12,95%CI:1.03~4.37)、术中输血总量≥1 800 ml(OR=2.43,95%CI:1.15~5.15)是术后感染的独立危险因素(P<0.05);BMI≥24 kg/m2呈边缘相关(OR=2.04,95%CI:0.96~4.32,P=0.063),为增强床旁可操作性纳入评分。简易评分模型ROC曲线分析显示,AUC为0.70(95%CI:0.62~0.77),校准度良好(Brier评分=0.211)。趋势性检验显示,感染发生率随评分增加而呈升高趋势(χ2=28.15,P<0.001),其中0分组感染率为8.0%,3~4分组达71.4%。以评分≥1分为初筛截断值,灵敏度为0.97;以评分≥3分为强化干预截断值,特异度为0.94。

结论

该简易评分模型系统取材简便、客观,具有良好的风险分层能力。基于“1分初筛、3分强化”的双阈值分级护理策略,有助于实现肝移植ICU护理资源的精准配置与早期预警。

Objective

To construct a simplified scoring model for the risk of early postoperative infection after liver transplantation based on objective nursing indexes within postoperative 24 h, and to evaluate its application value in hierarchical nursing strategies.

Methods

Clinical data of 156 recipients who underwent allogeneic liver transplantation at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 133 patients were male and 23 female, aged from 18 to 74 years, and a median age of 52 years. Lasso regression was used to screen key characteristic indexes early after liver transplantation. Multivariate Logistic regression was adopted to construct a prediction model for early postoperative infection and convert it into a simple scoring of postoperative infection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Bootstrap internal validation were used to evaluate the efficiency of this prediction model, and stratified nursing strategies were formulated based on the cut-off value.

Results

60 recipients developed infection early after liver transplantation, with an infection rate of 38.5%(60/156). The variables with the top four standardized coefficients screened by Lasso regression included drainage volume on postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD1-WBC, intraoperative blood transfusion and body mass index (BMI). The cut-off value of POD1 drainage volume was ≥600 ml, POD1-WBC≥9.0×109/L, intraoperative blood transfusion≥1 800 ml and BMI≥24 kg/m2, respectively. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that POD1 drainage volume≥600 ml (OR=4.06, 95%CI: 1.92-8.59), POD1-WB≥9.0×109/L (OR=2.12, 95%CI: 1.03-4.37), and intraoperative blood transfusion≥1 800 ml (OR=2.43, 95%CI: 1.15-5.15) were the independent risk factors for postoperative infection (all P<0.05). BMI≥24 kg/m2 was marginally correlated with postoperative infection (OR=2.04, 95%CI: 0.96-4.32, P=0.063), which was included in the scoring for enhancing bedside operability. ROC curve analysis of the simplified scoring model showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.62-0.77) with a high degree of calibration (Brier score=0.211). Trend test showed that the infection rate was increased with the increase of the score (χ2=28.15, P<0.001). The infection rate was 8.0% in the score=0 group and 71.4% in score=3-4 group. When score≥1 was taken as the cut-off value of initial screening, the sensitivity was 0.97. Taking the score≥3 as the cut-off value of intensified interventions, the specificity was 0.94.

Conclusions

The simplified scoring model is simple, objective and has high risk stratification capability. Nursing strategies stratified based on double cut-off value grading of "score=1 for initial screening and score=3 for intensified intervention" contribute to achieving precise allocation and early warning of ICU nursing resources for liver transplantation.

表1 肝移植术后早期感染影响因素单因素分析
图1 肝移植术后早期感染简易风险Lasso筛选
表2 肝移植术后早期感染影响因素各连续变量截断值取整依据及模型效能对比
表3 肝移植术后早期感染影响因素多因素Logistic回归分析
图2 肝移植术后早期感染风险评分与感染发生率关系
图3 肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型ROC曲线
图4 肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型校准曲线
图5 肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型决策曲线分析
[1]
Shinde AS, Kapoor D. Infections after liver transplant-timeline, management and prevention[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2024, 14(3): 101316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.101316.
[2]
Abbo LM, Grossi PA, AST ID Community of Practice. Surgical site infections: guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice[J]. Clin Transplant, 2019, 33(9): e13589. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13589.
[3]
Taddei R, Riccardi N, Tiseo G, et al. Early intra-abdominal bacterial infections after orthotopic liver transplantation: a narrative review for clinicians[J]. Antibiotics (Basel), 2023, 12(8): 1316. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081316.
[4]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 81(6): 1040-1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.07.032.
[5]
卞炳皓, 徐朋, 郭璇, 等. 肝移植术后医院感染患者的经济负担[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2025, 24(5): 687-693. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20255448.
[6]
崔丽娜, 魏昌伟, 吴丹, 等. 肝移植手术后肺部感染的危险因素分析[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(1): 13-17. DOI: 10.12089/jca.2024.01.003.
[7]
DA-Silva DFM, Becker Júnior OM, Schirmer J, et al. Economic impact of graft's cold ischemia time on infection and post-liver transplant costs[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2025, 52: e20253842. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20253842-en.
[8]
Martin-Mateos R, Martínez-Arenas L, Carvalho-Gomes Á, et al. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after liver transplantation: prevalence, impact, and risk factors[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 80(6): 904-912. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.02.023.
[9]
Sharma P, Izzy M, Ghabril MS, et al. AASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: diagnosis and post-transplant management of non-graft-related complications[J]. Liver Transpl, 2025. DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000785.
[10]
Yu J, Xu Y, Jiang J, et al. Risk factors for bacterial infection after liver transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2025, 23(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.6002/ect.2024.0238.
[11]
Amjad W, Hamaad Rahman S, Schiano TD, et al. Epidemiology and management of infections in liver transplant recipients[J]. Surg Infect, 2024, 25(4): 272-290. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.346.
[12]
Shbaklo N, Tandoi F, Lupia T, et al. Bacterial and viral infections in liver transplantation: new insights from clinical and surgical perspectives[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(7): 1561. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071561.
[13]
韩琳秋, 冯志仙, 万鹏夏, 等. 肝移植患者护理结局分类系统的应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(22): 2723-2730. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.22.005.
[14]
冯志仙, 沈鸣雁, 鲁剑芳, 等. 肝移植高级护理实践模式的构建与实施效果[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(5): 650-653. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.05.003.
[15]
Guo J, Wang Y, Ma J, et al. Post-liver transplantation bacterial infection: current status, prevention and treatment[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2025, 15: 1698937. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1698937.
[16]
Barchiesi F, Montalti R, Castelli P, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae influences the outcome of early infections in liver transplant recipients[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2016, 16(1): 538. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1876-5.
[17]
Schwarz C, Soliman T, Györi G, et al. Abdominal drainage after liver transplantation from deceased donors[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(7): 813-819. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1338-3.
[18]
Ishioka K, Hokuto D, Nomi T, et al. Significance of bacterial culturing of prophylactic drainage fluid in the early postoperative period after liver resection for predicting the development of surgical site infections[J]. Surg Today, 2018, 48(6): 625-631. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1629-8.
[19]
Xu X, Zhang Y, Gan J, et al. Association between perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and infection after clean-contaminated surgery: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021, 127(3): 405-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.031.
[20]
Taha M, Shafique U, Rashid W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the early detection of post-surgical infections: a systematic review[J]. Cureus, 2025, 17(4): e81853. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.81853.
[21]
Diaz-Nieto R, Lykoudis PM, Davidson BR. Recipient body mass index and infectious complications following liver transplantation[J]. HPB, 2019, 21(8): 1032-1038. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.002.
[22]
Ruck JM, Shui AM, Jefferis AA, et al. Association of body mass index with post-liver transplant outcomes[J]. Clin Transplant, 2024, 38(1): e15205. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15205.
[23]
Zhang K, Zhang X, Ding W, et al. National early warning score does not accurately predict mortality for patients with infection outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Med, 2021, 8: 704358. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.704358.
[24]
Qian YB, Chen F, Hang HL, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of early infection in liver transplant recipients with acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Dig Dis, 2022, 23(11): 642-650. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13151.
[25]
Rae PJL, Pearce S, Greaves PJ, et al. Outcomes sensitive to critical care nurse staffing levels: a systematic review[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2021, 67: 103110. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103110.
[26]
Mitchell BG, Gardner A, Stone PW, et al. Hospital staffing and health care-associated infections: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2018, 44(10): 613-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.02.002.
[27]
夏欣华, 张紫君, 王宇霞, 等. 预防呼吸机相关性肺炎集束化护理方案的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(3): 353-359. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.03.006.
[28]
Thapa D, Liu T, Chair SY. Multifaceted interventions are likely to be more effective to increase adherence to the ventilator care bundle: a systematic review of strategies to improve care bundle compliance[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2023, 74: 103310. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103310.
[29]
Burke C, Jakub K, Kellar I. Adherence to the central line bundle in intensive care: an integrative review[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2021, 49(7): 937-956. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.014.
[30]
Martinez-Reviejo R, Tejada S, Jansson M, et al. Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia through care bundles: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Intensive Med, 2023, 3(4): 352-364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.04.004.
[31]
Bou Hamdan D, Hatahet S, Khalil H, et al. Strategies to enhance nurses' adherence to central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in the ICU setting: a systematic review[J]. Heart Lung, 2025, 71: 98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.02.009.
[1] 刘洵, 毕亮, 郎韧, 吴安石. 同种异体原位肝移植术后早期死亡的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 150-156.
[2] 吕斐翠, 卢芳燕, 王璐. 肝移植受者体力活动的范围综述[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 137-143.
[3] 马建惠, 白洁, 赵叶, 张丽. 奥瑞姆自护理论干预模式在食管裂孔疝术后患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 289-295.
[4] 郭芸青, 周敏露, 郁烨. 基于生物反馈理论的术前心理干预在腹股沟疝修补术患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 346-350.
[5] 胡燕, 王静, 张怡, 李丽华, 杨程, 杨莎. 播散型荚膜组织胞浆菌病合并肺部嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 350-352.
[6] 汪祖宇, 刘笑安, 王汉譞, 吕少诚, 郎韧. 终末期良性肝病肝移植术后顽固性脾亢影响因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 606-611.
[7] 林婉琪, 任芳菲, 钟伟航, 杨卿, 马玲, 陈海丽, 向莎, 陈孟娇, 朱丽萍, 何心念, 张献玲. 基于多维度评估的前瞻性干预策略在肝癌肝移植围手术期的应用及效果[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 612-618.
[8] 杨健良, 张爱玲, 王晓明, 代天星, 袁峰, 朱灿华, 蓝岚, 杨汉宇, 汪国营. 早期拔除气管插管快通道麻醉在肝移植中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 398-404.
[9] 叶晓勇, 周林. 耐受性树突状细胞在肝移植免疫耐受中应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 420-425.
[10] 张洪涛, 于大中, 王静怡. 基于微血流成像联合超声造影的回归模型评估肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 248-255.
[11] 孔琴, 岳慧玲, 侯卫华, 郑智, 何阿祥, 赵松, 陆群峰. 基于互联网技术赋能的医护康协作模式在前交叉韧带重建术后患者康复中的应用与评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 265-274.
[12] 张雪儿, 郝婧, 赵贝, 陈紫薇, 韩优, 阳柳柳, 陈倩倩. 复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合西甲硅油肠道准备的护理方案构建与应用效果[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 130-133.
[13] 尹星, 杜健, 王俊雅, 崔琴琴, 杜康, 王盈盈. 急性阑尾炎患者经肛超级微创术的护理经验分享[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 139-140.
[14] 杨妍, 俞素英, 张慧嫔, 何睿, 蒋永萍, 李小芳. 脑心健康管理师主导的互联网+延续性护理对脑卒中患者自我管理行为的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 301-307.
[15] 胡佳敏, 廖佳怡, 邹菲燕, 刘相伶, 周振宇, 刘红华. 基于CiteSpace的脑卒中跌倒护理领域的研究热点和趋势的可视化分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 320-326.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?