切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 168 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

CT值对原发性肝癌肝周淋巴结转移的诊断价值
王晓耘1, 黑振宇1, 靳龙洋1, 韩超1, 沈军1, 王健东1,()   
  1. 1. 200092 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-28 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 王健东
  • 基金资助:
    国家十二五科技重大专项(2012ZX10002016)

Diagnostic value of CT value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer

Xiaoyun Wang1, Zhenyu Hei1, Longyang Jin1, Chao Han1, Jun Shen1, Jiandong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2016-01-28 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jiandong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jiandong, Email:
引用本文:

王晓耘, 黑振宇, 靳龙洋, 韩超, 沈军, 王健东. CT值对原发性肝癌肝周淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 168-172.

Xiaoyun Wang, Zhenyu Hei, Longyang Jin, Chao Han, Jun Shen, Jiandong Wang. Diagnostic value of CT value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 168-172.

目的

探讨CT值在原发性肝癌(肝癌)肝周淋巴结转移中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2001年10月至2015年1月在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院行肝癌切除+淋巴结清扫术的14例患者临床资料。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男8例,女6例;年龄36~73岁,中位年龄51岁。14例患者经术前增强扫描检查发现15组淋巴结可疑阳性,根据术后病理学检查分为阳性组(8组)和阴性组(7组)。比较两组淋巴结平扫、动脉期CT值及动脉期CT值变异系数(CV)的差异等,并分析上述指标诊断淋巴结转移的准确率。两组观察指标比较采用t检验,诊断淋巴结转移的准确率分析采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

阳性组平扫CT值、动脉期CT值及其CV分别为(30±4)HU、(45±10)HU、(30±10)%,阴性组相应为(43±5)HU、(65±18)HU、(17±6)%,两组差异有统计学意义(t=-5.400,-2.660,2.990;P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示平扫CT值、动脉期CT值及其CV诊断分界值分别为38 HU、54 HU及22%,诊断准确率分别为100%、80%、80%。

结论

CT值定量分析对肝癌肝周淋巴结转移具有诊断价值。当肝周淋巴结平扫CT值<38 HU、动脉期CT值<54 HU、动脉期CT值CV>22%时,提示转移可能性大。

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Clinical data of 14 patients undergoing PLC resection + lymph node dissection in Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine between October 2001 and January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among the patients, 8 were males and 6 were females with the age ranging from 36 to 73 years old and the median of 51 years old. Fifteen groups of suspicious positive lymph nodes of the 14 patients were detected by enhanced CT scan before operation, and were divided into the positive group (n=8) and the negative group (n=7) according to the postoperative pathological examination. The differences in plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and coefficient of variation (CV) of arterial phase CT value of the lymph nodes between two groups were compared. And the diagnostic accuracy of the lymph node metastasis by these indexes was analyzed. The observation indexes of two groups were compared using t test and the analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastasis was conducted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

The plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and CV of arterial phase CT value were respectively (30±4) HU, (45±10) HU and (30±10)% in the positive group, and were respectively (43±5) HU, (65±18) HU and (17±6)% in the negative group, and significant differences were observed between two groups (t=-5.400, -2.660, 2.990; P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off value of plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and CV of arterial phase CT value was respectively 38 HU, 54 HU and 22%, and the diagnostic accuracy was respectively 100%, 80% and 80%.

Conclusions

CT value has certain diagnostic value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of PLC. Perihepatic lymph node metastasis is likely to occur when plain CT value<38 HU, arterial phase CT value<54 HU and CV of arterial phase CT value>22%.

表1 肝癌患者淋巴结阳性组与阴性组各期CT值及其变异系数比较(
图1 肝癌患者淋巴结平扫CT值的ROC曲线
图2 肝癌患者淋巴结动脉期CT值的ROC曲线
图3 肝癌患者淋巴结动脉期CT值变异系数的ROC曲线
[1]
Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, et al. Impact of histologically confirmed lymph node metastases on patient survival after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a Japanese nationwide survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(1): 166-170.
[2]
Garden OJ. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery[M]. 4th ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, 2009: 230-230.
[3]
Awazu M, Fukumoto T, Takebe A, et al. Lymphadenectomy combined with locoregional treatment for multiple advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastases[J]. Kobe J Med Sci, 2013, 59(1): E17-27.
[4]
Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, et al. Impact of histologically confirmed lymph node metastases on patient survival after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a Japanese nationwide survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(1):166-170.
[5]
Lee CW, Chan KM, Lee CF, et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastasis: clinicopathological analysis and survival outcome[J]. Asian J Surg, 2011, 34(2):53-62.
[6]
张明迪,王健东.肝细胞肝癌淋巴结转移的研究进展[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2012,1(3): 202-204.
[7]
Xia F, Wu L, Lau WY, et al. Positive lymph node metastasis has a marked impact on the long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e95889.
[8]
Yazici C, Niemeyer DJ, Iannitti DA, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: an update[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 8(1): 63-82.
[9]
Wald C, Russo MW, Heimbach JK, et al. New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(2): 376-382.
[10]
Ohtani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, et al. Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation[J]. Abdom Imaging, 1996, 21(3): 195-201.
[11]
Harisinghani MG. Atlas of lymph node anatomy[M]. Springer: New York, 2013: 59-88.
[12]
Grobmyer SR, Wang L, Gonen M, et al. Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(2): 260-264.
[13]
周瀚,杨志刚,闵鹏秋.消化系统肿瘤腹部淋巴结转移的病理学基础及影像学特征[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(11): 1404-1406.
[14]
肖格林,张海涛,余水全,等.多层螺旋CT对结肠癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2015,13(5): 97-99.
[15]
叶小青,潘昌远.多层螺旋CT在消化系统常见肿瘤淋巴结转移诊断中的临床价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2015,25(4): 735-737.
[16]
王翔,罗春海.多层螺旋CT检查诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的临床研究[J].现代肿瘤医学,2015,23(20): 3036-3038.
[17]
Ichikawa T, Okada M, Kondo H, et al. Recommended iodine dose for multiphasic contrast-enhanced mutidetector-row computed tomography imaging of liver for assessing hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: multicenter prospective study in 77 general hospitals in Japan[J]. Acad Radiol, 2013, 20(9): 1130-1136.
[18]
张文,于长海,李英杰,等.肺癌CT值与肿瘤分化程度、病理类型及淋巴结转移相关性的临床研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2011,16(10): 1554-1555.
[19]
马文超,徐文贵,朱湘,等.18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax及CT值双定量分析在肺癌纵隔淋巴结鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中国肿瘤临床,2011,38(5): 284-287.
[20]
Lim JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2003, 181(3): 819-827.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[3] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 达热拜·热达提, 刘林, 赵为民, 孟涛, 雷程, 金博, 毕建军, 李新宇, 王海江. 中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后侧方淋巴结清扫术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-418.
[8] 林逸, 钟文龙, 李锴文, 何旺, 林天歆. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第15期)——转移性膀胱癌的综合治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 648-652.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[11] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[12] 林小勇, 张兰霞, 曾庆劲, 贺需旗, 谭雷, 郭光辉, 龙颖琳, 李凯, 吴宇轩. 负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的初步应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 694-698.
[13] 雷永琪, 刘新阳, 杨黎渝, 铁学宏, 俞星新, 耿志达, 刘雨, 陈政良, 惠鹏, 梁英健. 肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤合并贫血一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 710-718.
[14] 欧阳佳裕, 李刚, 贺露瑶, 罗娜. 双层探测器光谱CT在早期原发性肝癌中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 557-561.
[15] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?