切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (03) : 175 -181. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2012.03.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝细胞肝癌胆道侵犯患者的临床病理学特点及手术疗效
张谞丰1, 刘学民1, 李慕行1, 魏涛1, 吕毅1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-08 出版日期:2012-12-10
  • 通信作者: 吕毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(30830099); 国家自然科学基金(81101873); 陕西省自然科学基金(2011JQ4007)

Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion

Xu-feng ZHANG1, Xue-min LIU1, Mu-xing LI1, Tao WEI1, Yi LYU1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • Received:2012-10-08 Published:2012-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Yi LYU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: LYU Yi, Email:
引用本文:

张谞丰, 刘学民, 李慕行, 魏涛, 吕毅. 肝细胞肝癌胆道侵犯患者的临床病理学特点及手术疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2012, 01(03): 175-181.

Xu-feng ZHANG, Xue-min LIU, Mu-xing LI, Tao WEI, Yi LYU. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2012, 01(03): 175-181.

目的

探讨肝细胞肝癌(肝癌)侵犯胆管患者的临床病理学特点及手术疗效。

方法

本组回顾研究对象为2001年1月至2010年1月在西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院行根治性肝切除术治疗的446例肝癌患者。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据有否胆道侵犯,将446例肝癌患者分成胆道侵犯组(35例)和胆道未侵犯组(411例)。胆道侵犯组男性24例,女性11例,年龄(51.3±2.0)岁,采用根治性肝切除或根治性肝切除+胆肠吻合术或癌栓切除+T管引流术。胆道未侵犯组男性329例,女性82例,年龄(50.5±0.5)岁,采用根治性肝切除术。收集两组患者的临床资料,比较两组患者的临床与病理学资料、手术情况;患者术后接受随访,记录生存情况,进行生存分析。两组患者的年龄、术前实验室检查、手术时间、术中输血量、住院时间比较采用U检验或t检验;两组患者的性别、合并肝炎及肝硬化、肝功能分级、肿瘤病理学参数、术后并发症发生率比较用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行分类变量差异性检验;采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验进行生存分析。

结果

胆道侵犯组和胆道未侵犯组术前血清总胆红素分别为(54±19)μmol/L、(22±2)μmol/L,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.945,P=0.003)。胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组患者的肿瘤直径、肿瘤数目、门静脉侵犯、小血管侵犯比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.715、10.232、12.543、20.423,均为P<0.05);两组的肿瘤包膜、卫星灶、组织学分化程度比较差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05);胆道侵犯组患者的肿瘤切缘<1 cm者23例、≥1 cm者12例,胆道未侵犯组<1 cm者180例、≥1 cm者231例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.248,P=0.012)。胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组的手术时间、术中输血量、住院时间分别为(5.6±1.2)h、(603±87)ml、(24.6±1.6)d和(4.2±0.5)h、(666±25)ml、(23.6±0.8)d,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.275、0.779、0.688,均为P>0.05)。胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组的术后并发症发生率分别为26%(9/35)和41%(168/411),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.253,P>0.05)。胆道侵犯组1、3年生存率分别为46%、25%,胆道未侵犯组分别为75%、42%;胆道侵犯组术后中位生存期18.5个月,胆道未侵犯组为46个月,两组生存曲线比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.594,P<0.001)。胆道侵犯分型B1与B0、B3与B0间生存率比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=20.962、12.119,P<0.001),B3与B0间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.314,P>0.05)。

结论

黄疸为肝癌胆道侵犯患者的临床特点,当肝癌患者出现黄疸时应怀疑合并胆道侵犯。肿瘤直径>5 cm、肿瘤数目多发、门静脉侵犯、小血管侵犯的患者易发生胆道侵犯,胆道侵犯患者病理恶性程度较高,预后较差。根治性切除仍是肝癌胆道侵犯患者获得长期生存的有效治疗方法。

Objective

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion (BDI).

Methods

Clinical data of 446 patients with HCC undergoing curative hepatectomy from January 2001 to January 2010 was studied retrospectively. Local ethical committee approval had been received and that the informed consent of all participating subjects was obtained. The patients were divided into bile duct invasion group(BDI group) and non-BDI group. There were 24 males and 11 females in BDI group with the madian age of (51.3±2.0) years. Patients in this group underwent curative hepatectomy or curative hepatectomy plus choledochojejunostomy or tumor thrombectomy plus T tube drainage. There were 329 males and 82 females in non-BDI group with the median age of (50.5±0.5) years. Patients in this group underwent curative hepatectomy. Clinicopathological parameters were collected and the operation data were compared. All the patients were followed up after the operation. The survival rate were recorded and analyzed. The age, preoperative examinations, operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay of all patients in two groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U test or t test. The gender ratio, cases with combined hepatitis and cirrhosis, evaluation of liver function according to Child-Pugh grading, pathological parameters of tumors, the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were compared by χ2 or Fisher’s exact test; The survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by Log-rank test.

Results

The average preoperative total bilirubin level was (54±19) μmol/L and (22±2) μmol/L in BDI group and non-BDI group. There were significant differences in tumor size, tumor numbers, portal vein and microvascular invasion between the two groups were significant (χ2=9.715, 10.232, 12.543, 20.423; all in P<0.05) , but no significant differences in the tumor capsule, satellite nodules or tumor differentiation (all in P>0.05) ; There were 23 cases with surgical margin less than 1 cm in BDI group and 12 cases lager or equal to 1 cm. There were 180 cases with surgical margin smaller than 1 cm in non-BDI group and 231 cases lager or equal to 1 cm. There were significant differences between two groups (χ2=6.248, P=0.012) . The operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay time for BDI and non-BDI group were (5.6±1.2) h, (603±87) ml, (24.6±1.6) d and (4.2±0.5) h, (666±25) ml, (23.6±0.8) d respectively, in which there were no significant differences (t=0.275, 0.779, 0.688; all in P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications were 26% (9/35) in BDI group and 41% (168/411) in non-BDI group, in which there were no significant differences (χ2=1.253, P>0.05) . The 1- and 3-year survival rate were 46%, 25% in BDI group, and 75%, 42% in non-BDI group respectively. The median survival time was 18.5 months in BDI group and 46 months in non-BDI group (χ2=16.594, P<0.001) . For the subclassification of BDI, there was significant difference in the survival rate between B1 and B0, B1 and B3 (χ2=20.962, 12.119; all in P<0.001) , but was not between B3 and B0 (χ2=0.314, P<0.05) .

Conclusions

Preoperative jaundice is a clinical characteristic of HCC with bile duct invasion. BDI should be suspected when HCC patients complained with jaundice. Tumor size larger than 5 cm, multiple tumor numbers, portal vein and microvascular invasion are highly correlated with BDI. HCC with BDI indicates high degree of pathological malignancy and poor outcome. Curative resection remains the optimal therapy for patients with long term survival.

表1 胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组患者的术前一般临床资料比较(例)
表2 胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组患者的术前实验室检查资料比较(±s
表3 胆道侵犯组与未侵犯组的病理学参数比较[例(%)]
图1 胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
图2 不同类型胆道侵犯组与胆道未侵犯组术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
表4 既往有关原发性肝癌胆道侵犯的临床研究资料列表
[1]
Zhang XF, Meng B, Qi X, et al. Prognostic factors after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: surgeon’s role in survival. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35(6):622-628.
[2]
Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Makino I, et al. Risk factors for early death after liver resection in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2005, 12(5):399-404.
[3]
Lin TY, Chen KM, Chen YR, et al. Icteric type hepatoma. Med Chir Dig, 1975, 4(5/6):267-270.
[4]
Kojiro M, Kawabata K, Kawano Y, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as intrabile duct tumor growth: a clinicopathologic study of 24 cases. Cancer, 1982, 49(10):2144-2147.
[5]
Qin LX, Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. World J Gastroenterol, 2003, 9(3):385-391.
[6]
Lau WY, Leung JW, Li AK. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as obstructive jaundice. Am J Surg,1990, 160(3):280-282.
[7]
Satoh S, Ikai I, Honda G, et al. Clinicopathologic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct thrombi. Surgery, 2000, 128(5):779-783.
[8]
Yeh CN, Jan YY, Lee WC, et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice due to biliary tumor thrombi. World J Surg, 2004, 28(5):471-475.
[9]
Lau W, Leung K, Leung TW, et al. A logical approach to hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with jaundice. Ann Surg,1997, 225(3):281-285.
[10]
Ikenaga N, Chijiiwa K, Otani K, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(3):492-497.
[11]
Qin LX, Ma ZC, Wu ZQ, et al. Diagnosis and surgical treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis in bile duct: experience of 34 patients. World J Gastroenterol, 2004, 10(10):1397-1401.
[12]
Yu XH, Xu LB, Liu C, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of 20 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct tumor thrombi. Dig Dis Sci, 2011, 56(1):252-259.
[13]
Peng SY, Wang JW, Liu YB, et al. Surgical intervention for obstructive jaundice due to biliary tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg, 2004, 28(1):43-46.
[14]
Lau WY, Leung KL, Leung TW, et al. Obstructive jaundice secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol, 1995, 4(6):303-308.
[15]
Shiomi M, Kamiya J, Nagino M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with biliary tumor thrombi: aggressive operative approach after appropriate preoperative management. Surgery, 2001, 129(6):692-698.
[16]
Lee NW, Wong KP, Siu KF, et al. Cholangiography in hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice. Clin Radiol, 1984, 35(2):119-123.
[17]
Jan YY, Chen MF. Obstructive jaundice secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma rupture into the common bile duct: choledochoscopic findings. Hepatogastroenterology, 1999, 46(25):157-161.
[18]
Huang JF, Wang LY, Lin ZY, et al. Incidence and clinical outcome of icteric type hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2002, 17(2):190-195.
[19]
Buckmaster MJ, Schwartz RW, Carnahan GE, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma embolus to the common hepatic duct with no detectable primary hepatic tumor. Am Surg, 1994,60(9):699-702.
[1] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[2] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[3] 曹钰彬, 潘剑. 阻生牙拔除的为与不为[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 389-393.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[6] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[7] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[8] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[9] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[10] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[11] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[12] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要