切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.01.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果
陈冰锋1, 潘楚芝1, 陈署贤1, 凌云彪1, 汤照峰1, 许瑞云1, 潘卫东1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-01 出版日期:2016-02-10
  • 通信作者: 潘卫东

Clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery

Bingfeng Chen1, Chuzhi Pan1, Shuxian Chen1, Yunbiao Ling1, Zhaofeng Tang1, Ruiyun Xu1, Weidong Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2015-12-01 Published:2016-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Pan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pan Weidong, Email:
引用本文:

陈冰锋, 潘楚芝, 陈署贤, 凌云彪, 汤照峰, 许瑞云, 潘卫东. 索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 38-42.

Bingfeng Chen, Chuzhi Pan, Shuxian Chen, Yunbiao Ling, Zhaofeng Tang, Ruiyun Xu, Weidong Pan. Clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 38-42.

目的

探讨索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌(肝癌)患者根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2009年6月至2012年6月在中山大学附属第三医院行肝癌根治性治疗术的70例患者。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据术后治疗方案的不同,将患者分为索拉非尼组和对照组。索拉非尼组24例,男22例,女2例;平均年龄(48±10)岁;给予索拉非尼400 mg口服,一日两次,连续服用6个月。对照组46例,男40例,女6例;平均年龄(48±11)岁;给予安慰剂口服。患者术后均接受随访。观察患者术后肿瘤复发率、生存率及药物不良反应。两组患者术后肿瘤复发率、不良反应发生率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,术后生存率的比较采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

索拉非尼组的1、2、3年复发率分别为25%(6/24)、42%(10/24)、50%(12/24),对照组相应为28%(13/46)、46%(21/46)、53%(25/46),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.020,0.102,0.120;P>0.05)。索拉非尼组的1、2、3年累积生存率分别为95.83%、87.50%、70.83%,对照组相应为91.30%、82.61%、63.04%,两组总体生存率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.078,P>0.05)。索拉非尼组手足皮肤反应、腹泻、高血压、红斑的不良反应发生率为42% (10/24)、29% (7/24)、21%(5/24)、25%(6/24),明显高于对照组的7%(3/46)、7%(3/46)、2%(1/46)、4%(2/46) (χ2=10.663,4.885,4.828,4.762;P<0.05)。

结论

索拉非尼既不能减少肝癌患者根治性治疗术后肿瘤复发,也不能提高总体生存率。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing the recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery.

Methods

Seventy patients with primary liver cancer undergoing radical surgery in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between June 2009 and June 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. According to different postoperative therapies, the patients were divided into the sorafenib group (n=24) and control group (n=46). In the sorafenib group, there were 22 males and 2 females with a mean age of (48±10) years. A dose of 400 mg sorafenib was orally administered twice daily for consecutive 6 months. In the control group, there were 40 males and 6 females with a mean age of (48±11) years. The patients were orally administered with placebo. All patients received postoperative follow-up. Postoperative recurrence rate, survival rate and drug-induced adverse reactions were observed. Postoperative recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions of two groups were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability test. Postoperative survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot and Log-rank test.

Results

In the sorafenib group, the 1-, 2- and 3-year recurrence rates were 25% (6/24), 42% (10/24), 50% (12/24) respectively, and 28% (13/46), 46% (21/46), 53% (25/46) respectively in the control group. No significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=0.020, 0.102, 0.120; P>0.05). The 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative survival rates in the sorafenib group were 95.83%, 87.50% and 70.83%, and no significant difference was observed compared with 91.30%, 82.61% and 63.04% in the control group (χ2=0.078, P>0.05). In the sorafenib group, the incidence of hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, hypertension and erythema were 42% (10/24), 29% (7/24), 21% (5/24) and 25% (6/24), which were significantly higher compared with 7% (3/46), 7% (3/46), 2% (1/46) and 4% (2/46) in the control group (χ2=10.663, 4.885, 4.828, 4.762; P<0.05).

Conclusion

Sorafenib can neither decrease postoperative recurrence of peimary liver cancer after radical surgery nor enhance the overall survival rate.

图1 索拉非尼组与对照组肝癌根治性治疗术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线图
表1 索拉非尼组和对照组患者肝癌根治性治疗术后不良反应的比较(例)
[1]
Bellissimo F, Pinzone MR, Cacopardo B, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(42): 12003-12021.
[2]
Nishikawa H, Kimura T, Kita R, et al. Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a literature review[J]. J Cancer, 2013, 4(8):635-643.
[3]
Fan ST. Hepatocellular carcinoma--resection or transplant?[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol, 2012, 9(12):732-737.
[4]
Song P, Feng X, Zhang K, et al. Screening for and surveillance of high-risk patients with HBV-related chronic liver disease: promoting the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in China[J]. Biosci Trends, 2013, 7(1):1-6.
[5]
Kudo M. Surveillance, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of liver cancer in Japan[J]. Liver Cancer, 2015, 4(1):39-50.
[6]
Yang JD, Roberts LR. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol, 2010, 7(8):448-458.
[7]
Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update[J]. Hepatology, 2011, 53(3):1020-1022.
[8]
Lacaze L, Scotté M. Surgical treatment of intra hepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(13):1755-1760.
[9]
Colagrande S, Regini F, Taliani GG, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and sorafenib: diagnosis, indications, clinical and radiological follow-up[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(8):1041-1053.
[10]
De Simone P, Crocetti L, Pezzati D, et al. Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with everolimus and sorafenib for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(1):241-244.
[11]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822): 1245-1255.
[12]
Lai R, Peng Z, Chen D, et al. The effects of anesthetic technique on cancer recurrence in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 114(2):290-296.
[13]
Schlachterman A, Craft WW Jr, Hilgenfeldt E, et al. Current and future treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(28):8478-8491.
[14]
Finn RS. Drug therapy:sorafenib[J]. Hepatology, 2010, 51(5):1843-1849.
[15]
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1):25-34.
[16]
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(4): 378-390.
[17]
McNamara MG, Le LW, Horgan AM, et al. A phase II trial of second-line axitinib following prior antiangiogenic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(10):1620-1627.
[18]
Faye E, Bondon-Guitton E, Olivier-Abbal P, et al. Spontaneous reporting of serious cutaneous reactions with protein kinase inhibitors[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2013, 69(10):1819-1826.
[19]
Nishikawa H, Takeda H, Tsuchiya K, et al. Sorafenib therapy for BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma; clinical outcome and safety in aged patients: a multicenter study in Japan[J]. J Cancer, 2014, 5(7):499-509.
[20]
D'Avola D, Iñarrairaegui M, Pardo F, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to treatment across BCLC stages[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(7):1964-1971.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[5] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[6] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[7] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[8] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[9] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[10] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[11] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[12] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[13] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[14] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要