切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.01.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果
陈冰锋1, 潘楚芝1, 陈署贤1, 凌云彪1, 汤照峰1, 许瑞云1, 潘卫东1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-01 出版日期:2016-02-10
  • 通信作者: 潘卫东

Clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery

Bingfeng Chen1, Chuzhi Pan1, Shuxian Chen1, Yunbiao Ling1, Zhaofeng Tang1, Ruiyun Xu1, Weidong Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2015-12-01 Published:2016-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Pan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pan Weidong, Email:
引用本文:

陈冰锋, 潘楚芝, 陈署贤, 凌云彪, 汤照峰, 许瑞云, 潘卫东. 索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 38-42.

Bingfeng Chen, Chuzhi Pan, Shuxian Chen, Yunbiao Ling, Zhaofeng Tang, Ruiyun Xu, Weidong Pan. Clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 38-42.

目的

探讨索拉非尼预防原发性肝癌(肝癌)患者根治性治疗术后复发的临床效果。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2009年6月至2012年6月在中山大学附属第三医院行肝癌根治性治疗术的70例患者。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据术后治疗方案的不同,将患者分为索拉非尼组和对照组。索拉非尼组24例,男22例,女2例;平均年龄(48±10)岁;给予索拉非尼400 mg口服,一日两次,连续服用6个月。对照组46例,男40例,女6例;平均年龄(48±11)岁;给予安慰剂口服。患者术后均接受随访。观察患者术后肿瘤复发率、生存率及药物不良反应。两组患者术后肿瘤复发率、不良反应发生率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,术后生存率的比较采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

索拉非尼组的1、2、3年复发率分别为25%(6/24)、42%(10/24)、50%(12/24),对照组相应为28%(13/46)、46%(21/46)、53%(25/46),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.020,0.102,0.120;P>0.05)。索拉非尼组的1、2、3年累积生存率分别为95.83%、87.50%、70.83%,对照组相应为91.30%、82.61%、63.04%,两组总体生存率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.078,P>0.05)。索拉非尼组手足皮肤反应、腹泻、高血压、红斑的不良反应发生率为42% (10/24)、29% (7/24)、21%(5/24)、25%(6/24),明显高于对照组的7%(3/46)、7%(3/46)、2%(1/46)、4%(2/46) (χ2=10.663,4.885,4.828,4.762;P<0.05)。

结论

索拉非尼既不能减少肝癌患者根治性治疗术后肿瘤复发,也不能提高总体生存率。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sorafenib in preventing the recurrence of primary liver cancer after radical surgery.

Methods

Seventy patients with primary liver cancer undergoing radical surgery in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between June 2009 and June 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. According to different postoperative therapies, the patients were divided into the sorafenib group (n=24) and control group (n=46). In the sorafenib group, there were 22 males and 2 females with a mean age of (48±10) years. A dose of 400 mg sorafenib was orally administered twice daily for consecutive 6 months. In the control group, there were 40 males and 6 females with a mean age of (48±11) years. The patients were orally administered with placebo. All patients received postoperative follow-up. Postoperative recurrence rate, survival rate and drug-induced adverse reactions were observed. Postoperative recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions of two groups were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability test. Postoperative survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot and Log-rank test.

Results

In the sorafenib group, the 1-, 2- and 3-year recurrence rates were 25% (6/24), 42% (10/24), 50% (12/24) respectively, and 28% (13/46), 46% (21/46), 53% (25/46) respectively in the control group. No significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=0.020, 0.102, 0.120; P>0.05). The 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative survival rates in the sorafenib group were 95.83%, 87.50% and 70.83%, and no significant difference was observed compared with 91.30%, 82.61% and 63.04% in the control group (χ2=0.078, P>0.05). In the sorafenib group, the incidence of hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, hypertension and erythema were 42% (10/24), 29% (7/24), 21% (5/24) and 25% (6/24), which were significantly higher compared with 7% (3/46), 7% (3/46), 2% (1/46) and 4% (2/46) in the control group (χ2=10.663, 4.885, 4.828, 4.762; P<0.05).

Conclusion

Sorafenib can neither decrease postoperative recurrence of peimary liver cancer after radical surgery nor enhance the overall survival rate.

图1 索拉非尼组与对照组肝癌根治性治疗术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线图
表1 索拉非尼组和对照组患者肝癌根治性治疗术后不良反应的比较(例)
[1]
Bellissimo F, Pinzone MR, Cacopardo B, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(42): 12003-12021.
[2]
Nishikawa H, Kimura T, Kita R, et al. Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a literature review[J]. J Cancer, 2013, 4(8):635-643.
[3]
Fan ST. Hepatocellular carcinoma--resection or transplant?[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol, 2012, 9(12):732-737.
[4]
Song P, Feng X, Zhang K, et al. Screening for and surveillance of high-risk patients with HBV-related chronic liver disease: promoting the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in China[J]. Biosci Trends, 2013, 7(1):1-6.
[5]
Kudo M. Surveillance, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of liver cancer in Japan[J]. Liver Cancer, 2015, 4(1):39-50.
[6]
Yang JD, Roberts LR. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol, 2010, 7(8):448-458.
[7]
Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update[J]. Hepatology, 2011, 53(3):1020-1022.
[8]
Lacaze L, Scotté M. Surgical treatment of intra hepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(13):1755-1760.
[9]
Colagrande S, Regini F, Taliani GG, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and sorafenib: diagnosis, indications, clinical and radiological follow-up[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(8):1041-1053.
[10]
De Simone P, Crocetti L, Pezzati D, et al. Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with everolimus and sorafenib for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(1):241-244.
[11]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822): 1245-1255.
[12]
Lai R, Peng Z, Chen D, et al. The effects of anesthetic technique on cancer recurrence in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 114(2):290-296.
[13]
Schlachterman A, Craft WW Jr, Hilgenfeldt E, et al. Current and future treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(28):8478-8491.
[14]
Finn RS. Drug therapy:sorafenib[J]. Hepatology, 2010, 51(5):1843-1849.
[15]
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1):25-34.
[16]
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(4): 378-390.
[17]
McNamara MG, Le LW, Horgan AM, et al. A phase II trial of second-line axitinib following prior antiangiogenic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(10):1620-1627.
[18]
Faye E, Bondon-Guitton E, Olivier-Abbal P, et al. Spontaneous reporting of serious cutaneous reactions with protein kinase inhibitors[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2013, 69(10):1819-1826.
[19]
Nishikawa H, Takeda H, Tsuchiya K, et al. Sorafenib therapy for BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma; clinical outcome and safety in aged patients: a multicenter study in Japan[J]. J Cancer, 2014, 5(7):499-509.
[20]
D'Avola D, Iñarrairaegui M, Pardo F, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to treatment across BCLC stages[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(7):1964-1971.
[1] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[7] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[8] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[9] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[10] 傅斌生, 冯啸, 杨卿, 曾凯宁, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 易慧敏, 易述红, 陈规划, 杨扬. 脂肪变性供肝在成人劈离式肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 789-794.
[11] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[12] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[13] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[14] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?