切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 141 -143. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

超声吸引刀联合高频电刀在活体肝移植供肝切取中的应用价值
刘猛1,(), 陈国勇1, 孙建军1, 汤高枫1, 魏思东1   
  1. 1. 450053 郑州人民医院肝脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-11 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 刘猛

Application value of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator combined with high-frequency electrosurgical scalpel in liver graft procurement for living donor liver transplantation

Meng Liu1,(), Guoyong Chen1, Jianjun Sun1, Gaofeng Tang1, Sidong Wei1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatic Surgery, Zhengzhou People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450053, China
  • Received:2016-03-11 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Meng Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Meng, Email,
引用本文:

刘猛, 陈国勇, 孙建军, 汤高枫, 魏思东. 超声吸引刀联合高频电刀在活体肝移植供肝切取中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 141-143.

Meng Liu, Guoyong Chen, Jianjun Sun, Gaofeng Tang, Sidong Wei. Application value of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator combined with high-frequency electrosurgical scalpel in liver graft procurement for living donor liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 141-143.

目的

探讨超声吸引刀(CUSA)联合高频电刀在活体肝移植供肝切取中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2012年5月至2015年7月在郑州人民医院行活体肝移植的8例供者临床资料,供肝切取均采用CUSA联合高频电刀的方法。其中男4例,女4例;年龄30~56岁,中位年龄45岁。所有供者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。供肝切取手术中充分游离肝脏,解剖第一肝门,不阻断第一肝门血流,术中超声确定脉管走行及肝切除线,高频电刀切开肝被膜,CUSA分离肝实质。观察供者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肝功能变化、住院时间、并发症发生情况、围手术期死亡率,并对供者进行术后随访。

结果

本组供者均手术顺利,6例行右半肝切除术,其中1例含肝中静脉切除;2例行左半肝切除术,均不含肝中静脉切除,平均手术时间(437±96)min,术中出血量(467±216)ml,所有供者术中均未输血。供者术后1、7 d血清ALT水平分别为(221±56)、(77±25)U/L,血清TB水平分别为(34±11)、(16±6)μmol/L。术后住院时间(18±5)d,术后伤口脂肪液化1例,经保守治疗后治愈,无供者死亡。

结论

CUSA联合高频电刀在活体肝移植供肝切取中有一定的临床应用价值,是一种安全、有效的供肝切取方法。

Objective

To explore the application value of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) combined with high-frequency electrosurgical scalpel in liver graft procurement for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Clinical data of 8 donors who underwent LDLT in Zhengzhou People's Hospital between May 2012 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. CUSA combined with high frequency electrosurgical scalpel were used in the liver graft procurement of all the donors. Among the donors, 4 were males and 4 were females with the age ranging from 30 to 56 years old and the median of 45 years old. The informed consents of all donors were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. During the graft procurement, the liver was fully dissociated, and the first porta hepatis was dissected without blood occlusion. Blood vessel distribution and liver resection line were determined by intraoperative ultrasound examination. Liver capsule was incised with high frequency electrosurgical scalpel and liver parenchyma was seperated with CUSA. The length of operation, intraoperative blood loss, changes of liver function and length of stay after operation, incidence of complications and perioperative mortality of the donors were observed. All the donors were followed up after operation.

Results

All donors completed the operations successfully. Six cases underwent right hemihepatectomy and one of them had middle hepatic vein resected. Two cases underwent left hemihepatectomy without resecting the middle hepatic vein. The average length of operation was (437±96) min and the intraoperative blood loss was (467±216) ml. No blood transfusion during operation was observed. The serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level was respectively (221±56) and (77±25) U/L, and the serum total bilirubin (TB) level at 1, 7 d after operation was respectively (34±11) and (16±6) μmol/L. The length of stay after operation was (18±5) d. Fat liquefaction of wound after operation was observed in 1 case and was cured after conservative treatment. No death was observed.

Conclusions

CUSA combined with high frequency electrosurgical scalpel has certain clinical application value in the liver graft procurement for LDLT. It is a safe and effective method for liver graft procurement.

[1]
Tanoglu A, Artis T, Donmez R, et al. Liver transplantation from living donors with Gilbert's syndrome is a safe procedure for both donors and recipients[J]. Clin Transplant, 2015, 29(11):965-970.
[2]
Benini BB, Salzedas-Netto AA, de Azevedo RA, et al. Clinical evaluation of hepatic transection on pediatric liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(6): 1778-1780.
[3]
Dayangac M, Taner CB, Balci D, et al. Use of middle hepatic vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation[J]. Transpl Int, 2010, 23(3): 285-291.
[4]
Shiba H, Wakiyama S, Futagawa Y, et al. Assessment of graft selection criteria in living-donor liver transplantation: the Jikei experience[J]. Int Surg, 2015, 100(7/8): 1229-1232.
[5]
Liu B, Yan LN, Wang WT, et al. Clinical study on safety of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in both donors and recipients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(6):955-959.
[6]
Nadalin S, Capobianco I, Königsrainer I, et al. Living liver donor: indications and technical aspects[J]. Chirurg, 2015, 86(6): 609-621.
[7]
Brown RS Jr, Smith AR, Dew MA, et al. Predictors of donor follow-up after living donor liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2014, 20(8): 967-976.
[8]
Adcock L, Macleod C, Dubay D, et al. Adult living liver donors have excellent long-term medical outcomes: the University of Toronto liver transplant experience[J]. Am J Transplant, 2010, 10(2): 364-371.
[9]
Roll GR, Parekh JR, Parker WF, et al. Left hepatectomy versus right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation: shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient[J]. Liver Transpl, 2013, 19(5): 472-481.
[10]
Guler N, Yaprak O, Gunay Y, et al. Major complications of adult right lobe living liver donors[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2015, 14(2):150-156.
[11]
Hori T, Oike F, Ogura Y, et al. Graft harvest of right posterior segment for living-donor liver transplantation[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2014, 5(8):516-522.
[12]
Rauchfuss F, Bauschke A, Bärthel E, et al. Living donor liver transplantation-past and present[J]. Zentralbl Chir, 2013, DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328347[Epub ahead of print].
[13]
Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Friess H, et al. Living related liver transplantation: the ultimate technique to expand the donor pool?[J]. Transplantation, 2005, 80(1 Suppl): S138-141.
[14]
范上达,任祖海.成人活体肝移植的现状和争议[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(1): 8-9.
[15]
杭化莲,张祺琪,张建军,等.精准肝脏外科理念在儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术中的临床价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2014,13(10): 806-810.
[16]
Lochan R, Ansari I, Coates R, et al. Methods of haemostasis during liver resection--a UK national survey[J]. Dig Surg, 2013, 30(4/5/6): 375-382.
[17]
S Hammond J, Muirhead W, Zaitoun AM, et al. Comparison of liver parenchymal ablation and tissue necrosis in a cadaveric bovine model using the Harmonic Scalpel, the LigaSure, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and the Aquamantys devices[J]. HPB, 2012, 14(12):828-832.
[18]
El Moghazy WM, Hedaya MS, Kaido T, et al. Two different methods for donor hepatic transection: cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with bipolar cauteryversus cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator with radiofrequency coagulator-a randomized controlled trial[J]. Liver Transpl, 2009, 15(1): 102-105.
[19]
Yamada N, Amano R, Kimura K, et al. Two-surgeon technique for liver transection using precoagulation by a soft-coagulation system and ultrasonicdissection[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, 62(138): 389-392.
[20]
文天夫,米凯,李川,等.活体肝移植右半供肝切取的临床经验总结(附157例报告)[J].器官移植,2013,4(1): 28-32.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[9] 祝丽娜, 杨子祯, 张迪, 张勇, 蔡金贞, 王建红. 超声造影在肝移植术后肝动脉并发症中的应用价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 240-245.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
阅读次数
全文


摘要