切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 135 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

CT门静脉成像分型个体化手术治疗在肝硬化门静脉高压症中的应用价值
余继海1, 许戈良1,(), 马金良1, 荚卫东1, 李建生1, 葛勇胜1, 刘文斌1, 张传海1, 胡宇1, 张努1, 邵峰1, 马杰1   
  1. 1. 230001 合肥,安徽医科大学附属省立医院肝脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-10 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 许戈良
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省卫生厅医学科研课题项目(2010B008)

Application value of individualized surgical treatment based on CT portal venograpy classification in cirrhotic portal hypertension

Jihai Yu1, Geliang Xu1,(), Jinliang Ma1, Weidong Jia1, Jiansheng Li1, Yongsheng Ge1, Wenbin Liu1, Chuanhai Zhang1, Yu Hu1, Nu Zhang1, Feng Shao1, Jie Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2016-03-10 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Geliang Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Geliang, Email:
引用本文:

余继海, 许戈良, 马金良, 荚卫东, 李建生, 葛勇胜, 刘文斌, 张传海, 胡宇, 张努, 邵峰, 马杰. CT门静脉成像分型个体化手术治疗在肝硬化门静脉高压症中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 135-140.

Jihai Yu, Geliang Xu, Jinliang Ma, Weidong Jia, Jiansheng Li, Yongsheng Ge, Wenbin Liu, Chuanhai Zhang, Yu Hu, Nu Zhang, Feng Shao, Jie Ma. Application value of individualized surgical treatment based on CT portal venograpy classification in cirrhotic portal hypertension[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 135-140.

目的

探讨CT门静脉成像(CTPV)分型个体化手术治疗在肝硬化门静脉高压症中的应用价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2010年6月至2014年12月在安徽医科大学附属省立医院行手术治疗的156例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者。根据手术方式的不同分为CTPV分型个体化手术组(分型组)和传统手术组(传统组)。其中分型组84例,男56例,女28例;年龄19~67岁,中位年龄45岁。传统组72例,男47例,女25例;年龄23~62岁,中位年龄43岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。分型组患者根据术前CTPV分型采取个体化手术方式,传统组行脾切除术+贲门周围血管离断术。观察两种手术方式对患者门静脉高压症、术中和术后情况以及术后生存率的影响。两组观察指标比较采用t 检验,生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

分型组患者术后自由门静脉压(FPP)为(27±3)cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),明显低于传统组的(33±8)cmH2O(t=-3.355,P<0.05);手术前后FPP下降幅度为(13±6)cmH2O,明显大于传统组的(9±5)cmH2O(t=3.016,P<0.05)。分型组的手术时间、术中出血量为(188±84)min、(378±49)ml,明显少于传统组的(240±76)min、(463±57)ml(t=-2.687,-3.015;P<0.05)。分型组的术后住院时间、住院费用为(12±4)d、(3.1±1.5)万元,明显低于传统组的(15±5)d、(3.6±1.5)万元(t=-2.061,-2.104;P<0.05)。分型组的1、3年累积生存率分别为94.05%、85.71%,传统组分别为87.50%、68.05%,分型组的总体生存率明显高于传统组(χ2=7.000,P<0.05)。

结论

对肝硬化门静脉高压症患者进行术前CTPV分型并采取个体化手术治疗,能有效降低门静脉压力,且具有创伤较小、预后较好等优点。

Objective

To explore the application value of individualized surgical treatment based on the CT portal venograpy (CTPV) classification in cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-six patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who received surgical treatment in Anhui Province Hospital between June 2010 and December 2014 were enrolled in this prospective study. According to different surgical procedures, the patients were divided into two groups: the individualized surgery based on CTPV classification group (classification group) and traditional surgery group (traditional group). Among the 84 patients in the classification group, 56 were males and 28 were females with the age ranging from 19 to 67 years old and the median of 45 years old. Among the 72 patients in the traditional group, 47 were males and 25 were females with the age ranging from 23 to 62 years old and the median of 43 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The patients in the classification group underwent individualized surgery according to the pre-operative CTPV classification, while the patients in the traditional group underwent splenectomy + pericardial devascularization. The effects of two surgical procedures on the portal hypertension, intraoperative and postoperative conditions and postoperative survival rate of the patients were observed. The observation indexes of two groups were compared using t test and survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

The postoperative free portal pressure (FPP) in the classification group was (27±3) cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), significantly lower than (33±8) cmH2O in the traditional group (t=-3.355, P<0.05). The FPP decrease range before and after surgery in the classification group was (13±6) cmH2O, significantly higher than (9±5) cmH2O in the traditional group (t=3.016, P<0.05). The length of surgery and intraoperative blood loss in the classification group were respectively (188±84) min and (378±49) ml, significantly less than (240±76) min and (463±57) ml in the traditional group (t=-2.687, -3.015; P<0.05). The postoperative length of stay and hospitalization expense in the classification group were respectively (12±4) d and (31 000 ± 15 000) yuan, significantly lower than (15±5) d and (36 000±15 000) yuan in the traditional group (t=-2.061, -2.104; P<0.05). The 1, 3-year accumulative survival rate were respectively 94.05% and 85.71% in the classification group, and were respectively 87.50% and 68.05% in the traditional group. The overall survival rate in the classification group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (χ2=7.000, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Pre-operative CTPV classification and individualized surgical treatment for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension can effectively reduce the portal vein pressure and has the advantages of smaller injury and better prognosis.

图1 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者的CT门静脉成像四种分型
表1 分型组和传统组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者手术前后FPP的变化( cmH2O,
表2 分型组和传统组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术前、术后肝动脉血流量和门静脉血流量及宽度的比较(
图2 分型组与传统组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术后累积生存率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
[1]
Zhao LQ, He W, Li JY, et al. Improving image quality in portal venography with spectral CT imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(8):1677-1681.
[2]
Du L, Wu W, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of modified splenocaval shunt plus devascularization on esophagogastric variceal bleeding: a comparative study of this treatment and devascularization only in cirrhotic portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2010, 17(5):657-665.
[3]
Lee JY, Kim TY, Jeong WK, et al. Clinically severe portal hypertension: role of multi-detector row CT features in diagnosis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2014, 59(9): 2333-2343.
[4]
余杨红,丁山,邓克学.多层螺旋CT门静脉成像对食管胃底静脉曲张出血的评价[J].安徽医科大学学报,2013,48(11):1376-1379.
[5]
李永兵,文明.多层螺旋CT在门脉高压外科治疗中的临床价值[J].海南医学院学报,2012,18(8): 1114-1116.
[6]
刘星伟,李坚,蔡潮农,等.门脉侧支循环状态与肝硬化门脉高压的术式选择[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2011,5(3): 227-229.
[7]
Cheng Z, Li JW, Chen J, et al. Therapeutic effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization on liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension in 204 cases[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(9): 612-616.
[8]
Rajalingam R, Javed A, Sharma D, et al. Management of hypersplenism in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: a surgical series[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2012, 11(2): 165-171.
[9]
Zong GQ, Fei Y, Liu RM. Comparison of effects of devascularization versus shunt on patients with portal hypertension: a meta-analysis[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, 62(137): 144-150.
[10]
贺文,赵丽琴,马大庆.多排螺旋CT门静脉成像对门静脉高压食管、胃底静脉曲张的评价[J].世界华人消化杂志,2010,18(5): 462-466.
[11]
奚剑波,谭玉林,严国度,等.损伤控制性外科在门静脉高压症治疗中的应用[J].医学研究杂志,2010,39(12): 127-129.
[12]
中华医学会消化病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会内镜学分会.肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治共识(2008,杭州)[J].内科理论与实践,2009,4(2): 152-158.
[13]
孔德帅,叶荣强,伍天崇,等.食管胃底静脉曲张的CT分型及临床价值[J].山东医药,2013,53(37):88-90.
[14]
杨镇.选择性贲门周围血管离断术的发展与手术技巧[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(5): 450-451.
[15]
殷照才,许戈良,马金良,等.CTA对选择性断流术前后门静脉系统状态及对手术疗效的评估[J].中国普通外科杂志,2010,19(8):946-950.
[16]
龙涤,闭永浩,方富义,等.选择性断流术和联合断流术治疗门脉高压症的临床评价[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28(4):594-596.
[17]
冷希圣.门静脉高压症治疗的现状与展望[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2013,20(1):1-3.
[18]
辜国军,周健,肖斌,等.选择性贲门周围血管断流术与传统断流术治疗门脉高压症对比研究[J].中外医学研究,2013,11(13): 35-36.
[19]
Lu H, Liu S, Zhang Y,et al. Therapeutic effects and complications of simplified pericardial devascularization for patients with portal hypertension[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(8): 14036-14041.
[20]
Ni YB, Gao PJ, Wang D, et al. Esophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy in portal hypertension: safe and effective?[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2015, 14(3):276-280.
[1] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[2] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[3] 贺健, 张骊, 王洪海, 蒋文涛. 肝移植术后脾功能亢进转归及治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 310-314.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 蔡艺丹, 方坚, 张志强, 陈莉, 张世安, 夏磊, 阮梅, 李东良. 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术对肝硬化门脉高压患者肠道菌群及肝功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-293.
[6] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[7] 刘起帆, 蒋安. 肝硬化门静脉高压症门静脉压力无创测量进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 270-275.
[8] 杨竞, 周光文. 肝硬化门静脉高压症治疗后再出血危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 296-301.
[9] 张宇, 余灵祥, 赵亮, 张宁, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 刘佳, 李鹏, 任辉. 利伐沙班在脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉血栓预防中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 195-199.
[10] 苏日顺, 卢逸, 庄宝鼎, 张译, 李彦杰, 徐见亮. 肝硬化脾亢脾切除术后门静脉血栓形成影响因素[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 39-44.
[11] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[12] 秦相清, 朱陈, 张海银. 构建诺模图模型预测肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张出血的风险[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 330-335.
[13] 刘燚隆, 党荣广, 艾蓉, 张凯. 肝硬化合并静脉曲张出血患者内镜治疗后再出血风险的模型建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 336-342.
[14] 戚泽雪, 赵连晖, 王广川, 张春清. 从国内专家共识推荐意见更新探讨经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 193-196.
[15] 王秀, 王义国. 益生菌联合恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化临床疗效的meta分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 164-171.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?