切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 284 -288. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.04.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

PTCD术前减黄在肝门部胆管癌半肝切除术中的应用
田峰1, 赵鑫1, 崔劲驰1, 李大江1, 陈志宇1, 李智华1, 何宇1,(), 王曙光1   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院全军肝胆外科研究所
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-11 出版日期:2018-08-10
  • 通信作者: 何宇
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81402406)

Application of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in partial hepatectomy of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Feng Tian1, Xin Zhao1, Jingchi Cui1, Dajiang Li1, Zhiyu Chen1, Zhihua Li1, Yu He1,(), Shuguang Wang1   

  1. 1. Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-05-11 Published:2018-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yu He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Yu, Email:
引用本文:

田峰, 赵鑫, 崔劲驰, 李大江, 陈志宇, 李智华, 何宇, 王曙光. PTCD术前减黄在肝门部胆管癌半肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 284-288.

Feng Tian, Xin Zhao, Jingchi Cui, Dajiang Li, Zhiyu Chen, Zhihua Li, Yu He, Shuguang Wang. Application of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in partial hepatectomy of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(04): 284-288.

目的

探讨经皮经胆道引流(PTCD)术前减黄在肝门部胆管癌半肝切除中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年1月陆军军医大学第一附属医院行半肝联合尾状叶切除的78例肝门部胆管癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理规定。根据是否行PTCD术前减黄分为PTCD组和非PTCD组。PTCD组57例,男34例,女23例;平均年龄(57±9)岁。非PTCD组21例,男12例,女9例;年龄(54±6)岁。两组患者TB、手术时间比较采用t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验,生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

PTCD组入院时TB为(295±131)μmol/L,明显高于非PTCD组的(137±37)μmol/L(t=3.768,P<0.05);而PTCD后TB降为(67±25) μmol/L,明显低于非PTCD组(t=-5.784,P<0.05)。PTCD相关并发症发生率16%(9/57),其中胆管炎发生率12%(7/57),出血和种植转移发生率均为2%(1/57)。PTCD组、非PTCD组手术时间分别为(490±153)、(488±93)min,差异无统计学意义(t=0.040,P>0.05)。PTCD组输血率、R0切除率、并发症发生率分别为79%、79%、42%,与非PTCD组的71%、86%、38%相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.157,0.122,0.102;P>0.05)。两组术后均无发生肝衰竭和死亡。两组总体生存率和无瘤生存率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.469,1.384;P>0.05)。

结论

PTCD应用于肝门部胆管癌术前减黄可明显降低胆红素水平,并不增加半肝切除手术风险,是安全、有效的,也不影响切除术后远期存活。

Objective

To evaluate the value of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) before partial hepatectomy of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 78 patients with hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent partial hepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy in the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University between January 2008 and January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to whether preoperative PTCD was performed, patients were divided into the PTCD group (n=57) and non-PTCD group (n=21). In PTCD group, 34 patients were males and 23 were females, aged (57±9) years on average. In non-PTCD group, 12 cases were males and 9 werefemales, aged (54±6) years on average. Total bilirubin (TB) levels and operative time were compared between two groups using t test. The comparison of rates was performed using Chi-square test. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Upon admission, the TB level in PTCD group was (295±131) μmol/L, which was significantly higher than (137±37) μmol/L in non-PTCD group (t=3.768, P<0.05). TB level decreased to (67±25) μmol/L after PTCD, significantly lower than that in non-PTCD group (t=-5.784, P<0.05). The incidence of PTCD-related complications was 16%(9/57), where cholangitis was 12%(7/57), bleeding 2%(1/57) and implantation metastasis 2%(1/57). The operation time in the PTCD and non-PTCD groups was (490±153) and (488±93) min respectively, where no significant difference was observed (t=0.040, P>0.05). In PTCD group, the blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate, and incidence of complications were 79%, 79% and 42% respectively, compared with 71%, 86% and 38% in non-PTCD group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.157, 0.122, 0.102; P>0.05). No liver failure or death occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in the overall survival and disease-free survival between two groups (χ2=1.469, 1.384; P>0.05).

Conclusions

It is safe and effective to apply PTCD before partial hepatectomy of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, which can significantly reduce the TB level, while does not increase the risk of surgery and does not affect the postoperative long-term survival.

表1 PTCD组和非PTCD组一般临床资料比较
图1 PTCD组和非PTCD组患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
[1]
项灿宏,童翾.肝门部胆管癌外科治疗的进展与争议[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(2):137-142.
[2]
张东,李文智,陶杰,等.389例肝门部胆管癌外科治疗回顾性分析——单中心11年经验总结[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2017,6(6):464-468.
[3]
隋鑫磊,汤恢焕,肖广发,等.322例肝门部胆管癌的临床疗效及预后因素分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017,16(4):391-397.
[4]
Iacono C, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(2):191-204.
[5]
Moole H, Bechtold M, Puli SR. Efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2016, 14(1):182.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组,解放军全军肝胆外科专业委员会.肝门部胆管癌诊断和治疗指南(2013版)[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(10):865-871.
[7]
Ito Y, Nakai Y, Isayama H, et al. Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcomes in periampullary and hilar malignancy: a single-center experience[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(2):150-155.
[8]
Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(12):1589-1596.
[9]
Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the "new era": the Nagoya University experience[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2010, 17(4):449-454.
[10]
Jo JH, Chung MJ, Han DH, et al. Best options for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with Klatskin tumors[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(1):422-429.
[11]
Cai Y, Tang Q, Xiong X, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage versus direct surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study at a single center[J]. Biosci Trends, 2017, 11(3):319-325.
[12]
Hwang S, Song GW, Ha TY, et al. Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tractrecurrence after resection of perihilar bile duct cancer[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(2):379-385.
[13]
Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, et al. Multicentre European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(2):274-283.
[14]
Ruys AT, Heuts SG, Rauws EA, et al. Delay in surgical treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does time impact outcomes?[J]. HPB, 2013, 16(5):469-474.
[15]
Hameed A, Pang T, Chiou J, et al. Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. HPB, 2016, 18(5):400-410.
[16]
Zhang XF, Beal EW, Merath K, et al. Oncologic effects of preoperative biliary drainage in resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: percutaneous biliary drainage has no adverse effects on survival[J].J Surg Oncol, 2017, DOI:10.1002/jso.24945 [Epub ahead of print].
[17]
Tang Z, Yang Y, Meng W, et al. Best option for preoperative biliary drainage in Klatskin tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(43):e8372.
[18]
Liu JG, Wu J, Wang J, et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, DOI:10.1089/lap.2017.0744[Epub ahead of print].
[19]
Al Mahjoub A, Menahem B, Fohlen A, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: is percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage safer and more effective than endoscopic biliary drainage? a meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(4):576-582.
[20]
Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E, et al. Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(1):121-127.
[21]
Nagino M. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's viewpoint on current topics[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2012, 47(11):1165-1176.
[1] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[2] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[5] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[6] 王兴, 张峰伟. 腹腔镜肝切除联合断面射频消融治疗伴微血管侵犯肝细胞癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 580-583.
[7] 刘波, 涂志坚, 李传富, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人解剖性左半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-486.
[8] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[9] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[10] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[11] 马俊永, 王毅州, 李锡锋, 吴雅丽, 张小峰. 浅谈腹腔镜肝切除术出血防控策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 495-498.
[12] 李双喜, 胡宗凯, 赵静, 黄洁. 肝血管瘤治疗指征及治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 504-510.
[13] 李斌奎. 不可切除肝内胆管细胞癌的转化治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 511-516.
[14] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[15] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
阅读次数
全文


摘要