切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 319 -322. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.04.015

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

大剂量乌司他丁对肝内胆管结石患者术后肝肾功能及炎症因子的影响
罗慧1, 甘弘利1, 胡丹1, 胡爱玲2, 黄勇3,()   
  1. 1. 510530 广州,中山大学附属第三医院岭南医院外科
    2. 510530 广州,中山大学附属第三医院护理部
    3. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-10 出版日期:2018-08-10
  • 通信作者: 黄勇
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2010B060900024)

Impacts of high-dose ulinastatin on hepatic, renal function and inflammatory factors in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones

Hui Luo1, Hongli Gan1, Dan Hu1, Ailing Hu2, Yong Huang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Lingnan Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510530, China
    2. Department of Nursing, Lingnan Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510530, China
    3. Department of Gastroenterology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2018-05-10 Published:2018-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Yong, Email:
引用本文:

罗慧, 甘弘利, 胡丹, 胡爱玲, 黄勇. 大剂量乌司他丁对肝内胆管结石患者术后肝肾功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 319-322.

Hui Luo, Hongli Gan, Dan Hu, Ailing Hu, Yong Huang. Impacts of high-dose ulinastatin on hepatic, renal function and inflammatory factors in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(04): 319-322.

目的

探讨大剂量乌司他丁治疗对肝内胆管结石患者术后肝肾功能及炎症因子的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2014年11月至2016年7月在中山大学附属第三医院行肝切除术的41例肝内胆管结石患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据围手术期是否采用大剂量乌司他丁治疗,将患者分为乌司他丁组和对照组。其中乌司他丁组23例,男12例,女11例;平均年龄(52±10)岁;对照组18例,男8例,女10例;年龄(50±9)岁。乌司他丁组患者术前1 d至术后7 d连续静脉注射大剂量乌司他丁治疗,对照组患者未采用乌司他丁抗炎治疗。观察两组患者围手术期肝肾功能、炎症因子变化。两组检测数据比较采用t检验。

结果

乌司他丁组术后1、3 d AST、ALT、TB、Scr、BUN水平明显低于对照组(t=-2.03,-2.40,-2.08,-2.09,-2.21和-2.06,-2.12,-2.08,-2.11,-2.59;P<0.05);ALB水平明显高于对照组(t=2.11和2.48;P<0.05)。乌司他丁组术后7 d ALT、TB、Scr明显低于对照组(t=-2.56,-2.41,-2.35;P<0.05)。乌司他丁组术后1、3、7 d IL-6和TNF-α水平明显低于对照组(t=-2.05,-2.39和-2.69,-2.70和-2.45,-2.62;P<0.05);IL-10明显高于对照组(t=2.41,2.67,2.54;P<0.05)。

结论

大剂量乌司他丁治疗可有效保护肝内胆管结石患者术后肝肾功能,控制机体炎症反应,促进患者术后康复。

Objective

To investigate the impacts of high-dose ulinastatin on the postoperative hepatic, renal function and inflammatory factors in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones.

Methods

Clinical data of 41 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones who underwent hepatectomy at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from November 2014 to July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Patients were divided into the ulinastatin group (n=23) and control group (n=18) according to whether high-dose ulinastatin was administered during the perioperative period. In ulinastatin group, 12 patients were males and 11 were females, aged (52±10) years on average. In control group, 8 patients were males and 10 were females, aged (50±9) years on average. Patients in ulinastatin group received continuous intravenous administration of high-dose ulinastatin from 1 d before surgery to 7 d after surgery, whereas those in control group did not receive ulinastatin anti-inflammatory treatment. Perioperative hepatic, renal function and level of inflammatory factors were observed in both groups. Clinical data were compared between two groups using t test.

Results

In ulinastatin group, the levels of AST, ALT, TB, Scr, and BUN on the 1st and 3rd day after operation were significantly lower than those in control group(t=-2.03, -2.40, -2.08, -2.09, -2.21 and -2.06, -2.12 ,-2.08,-2.11, -2.59; P<0.05), whereas the levels of ALB were significantly higher than those in control group (t=2.11 and 2.48; P<0.05). At postoperative 7 d, the levels of ALT, TB and Scr in ulinastatin group were significantly lower than those in control group (t=-2.56, -2.41, -2.35; P<0.05). At postoperative 1, 3, and 7 d, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in ulinastatin group were significantly lower than those in control group (t=-2.05, -2.39 and -2.69, -2.70 and -2.45, -2.62; P<0.05), whereas the levels of IL-10 were significantly higher than those in control group (t=2.41, 2.67, 2.54; P<0.05).

Conclusions

High-doseulinastatin can effectively protect the hepatic and renal function, control the inflammatory response and promote the postoperative recovery of patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones.

表1 乌司他丁组和对照组肝内胆管结石患者围手术期肝肾功能比较(±s
表2 乌司他丁组和对照组肝内胆管结石患者炎症指标比较(ng/L,±s
[1]
何小东,刘乔飞.肝胆管结石病的诊断与治疗[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(4):275-279.
[2]
黄志强,黄志强院士集[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2014:73-76.
[3]
李景铧,李前进,钱锋.不同剂量乌司他丁对胃癌患者腹腔镜术后免疫功能及炎症反应的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展, 2016,19(7):531-535.
[4]
吕德珍,滕成玲,赵玉.乌司他丁对腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术患者POCD的影响及机制探讨[J].实用药物与临床,2016,19(5):591-594.
[5]
王坚.复杂肝内胆管结石的诊断与处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(3):292-295.
[6]
吴晓,夏灏,吴健,等.规则肝切除术治疗复杂肝内胆管结石的临床体会[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016,32(9):1756-1759.
[7]
樊华,张生军.乌司他丁对肝切除术后患者肝功能影响机制研究[J].肝胆外科杂志,2015,23(4):255-258.
[8]
Atal SS, Atal S. Ulinastatin-a newer potential therapeutic option for multiple organ dysfunction syndrome[J]. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 2016, 27(2):91-99.
[9]
Wang LZ, Luo MY, Zhang JS, et al. Effect of ulinastatin on serum inflammatory factors in Asian patients with acute pancreatitis before and after treatment: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2016, 54(11):890-898.
[10]
赵旭,梁平,思美丽,等.乌司他丁对体外循环患者心肌酶谱、炎性状态及再灌注损伤的影响研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(19):1913-1916.
[11]
Honore PM, Spapen HD. Ulinastatin to prevent acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: does serum creatinine tell the whole story?[J]. Crit Care, 2016, 20(1):183.
[12]
邱晓俊.乌司他丁抗肝缺血/再灌注损伤作用机制的研究进展[J].医学综述,2014,20(21):3944-3946.
[13]
林淑瑜,陈志民,甘惠贞,等.乌司他丁肝损伤保护作用的研究进展[J].解放军药学学报,2016(6):546-550.
[14]
孙小聪,邵义明,黄河,等.乌司他丁对脓毒症急性肾损伤肾功能的保护作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(4):910-912.
[15]
Kraakman MJ, Kammoun HL, Allen TL, et al. Blocking IL-6 trans-signaling prevents high-fat diet-induced adipose tissue macrophage recruitment but does not improve insulin resistance[J]. Cell Metab, 2015, 21(3):403-416.
[16]
Luig M, Kluger MA, Goerke B, et al. Inflammation-induced IL-6 functions as a natural brake on macrophages and limits GN[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015, 26(7):1597-1607.
[17]
Amaral FA, Bastos LF, Oliveira TH, et al. Transmembrane TNF-α is sufficient for articular inflammation and hypernociception in a mouse model of gout[J]. Eur J Immunol, 2016, 46(1):204-211.
[18]
Chitul A, Voiosu AM, Marinescu M, et al. Different effects of anti-TNF-alpha biologic drugs on the small bowel macroscopic inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis[J]. Rom J Intern Med, 2017, 55(1):44-52.
[19]
尤娜,褚萨萨,朱进,等.生物活性透明质酸对脂多糖诱导的人树突状细胞和巨噬细胞炎症应答作用[J/CD].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2017,11(1):14-19.
[1] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[2] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[5] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[6] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[7] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[8] 贾成朋, 王代宏, 陈华, 孙备. 可切除性胰腺癌预后术前预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-570.
[9] 刘波, 涂志坚, 李传富, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人解剖性左半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-486.
[10] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[11] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[14] 马俊永, 王毅州, 李锡锋, 吴雅丽, 张小峰. 浅谈腹腔镜肝切除术出血防控策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 495-498.
[15] 屈霄, 王靓, 陆萍, 何斌, 孙敏. 外周血炎症因子及肠道菌群特征与活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者病情的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 466-470.
阅读次数
全文


摘要