切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 375 -379. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.05.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝内胆管细胞癌与混合性肝癌临床特点对比分析
朱应钦1, 王骏成1, 陈锦滨1, 张耀军1, 周仲国1, 陈敏山1, 徐立1,()   
  1. 1. 510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心肝胆胰科 华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室 肿瘤医学协同创新中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-19 出版日期:2018-10-10
  • 通信作者: 徐立
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2013B021800074)

Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

Yingqin Zhu1, Juncheng Wang1, Jinbin Chen1, Yaojun Zhang1, Zhongguo Zhou1, Minshan Chen1, Li Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2018-06-19 Published:2018-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Li Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Li, Email:
引用本文:

朱应钦, 王骏成, 陈锦滨, 张耀军, 周仲国, 陈敏山, 徐立. 肝内胆管细胞癌与混合性肝癌临床特点对比分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(05): 375-379.

Yingqin Zhu, Juncheng Wang, Jinbin Chen, Yaojun Zhang, Zhongguo Zhou, Minshan Chen, Li Xu. Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(05): 375-379.

目的

探讨肝内胆管细胞癌(ICC)和混合性肝癌(cHCC-CC)的临床特点、预后及其影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2004年1月至2014年12月中山大学肿瘤防治中心行手术切除的184例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男115例,女69例;平均年龄(54±11)岁;ICC患者122例,cHCC-CC患者62例。分析两组患者临床特征、生存预后及影响因素。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验,预后影响因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。

结果

ICC患者发病年龄为(55±11)岁,明显高于cHCC-CC的(51±12)岁(t=2.75,P<0.05)。ICC患者HBsAg阳性率、合并肝硬化比例、AFP阳性率分别为35%、20%、10%,明显低于cHCC-CC患者的82%、42%、55%(χ2=36.360,10.740,44.403;P<0.05);而ALP阳性率为39%,明显高于cHCC-CC患者的11%(χ2=15.556,P<0.05)。ICC患者的术后1、3、5年总体生存率分别是63.9%、28.7%、8.2%,cHCC-CC患者相应为75.6%、38.7%、21.0%,ICC患者术后总体生存率明显低于cHCC-CC患者(χ2=19.390,P<0.05)。Cox多因素生存分析显示,术前CEA和肿瘤直径是ICC患者术后生存的独立影响因素(HR=2.730,1.177;P<0.05);而肿瘤直径、肝外转移是cHCC-CC患者术后生存的独立影响因素(HR=2.243,0.193;P<0.05)。

结论

cHCC-CC患者更年轻,HBV感染为其重要致病因素,而ICC发病可能与慢性胆道感染有关。ICC患者术后生存较差,术前CEA和肿瘤直径是其术后生存的独立影响因素,而肿瘤直径、肝外转移是cHCC-CC患者术后生存的独立影响因素。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics, prognosis and its impact factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC).

Methods

Clinical data of 184 patients with liver cancer undergoing surgical resection in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 115 patients were male and 69 female, aged (54±11) years on average. 122 patients were diagnosed with ICC and 62 with cHCC-CC. Clinical characteristics, prognosis and impact factors were analyzed between two groups. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. The impact factors of prognosis was analyzed using Cox's proportional hazards regression model.

Results

The onset age of ICC patients was (55±11) years, significantly higher than (51±12) years of cHCC-CC patients (t=2.75, P<0.05). The positive rate of HBsAg, proportion of patients complicated with liver cirrhosis, and positive rate of AFP in ICC patients were 35%, 20% and 10%, significantly lower than 82%, 42% and 55% in cHCC-CC patients (χ2=36.360, 10.740, 44.403; P<0.05). The positive rate of ALP was 39% in HCC patients, significantly higher than 11% of cHCC-CC patients (χ2=15.556, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of ICC patients were 63.9%, 28.7%, 8.2%, and 75.6%, 38.7%, 21.0% for cHCC-CC patients. The overall survival rate of ICC patients was significantly lower compared with that of cHCC-CC patients (χ2=19.390, P<0.05). Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that the preoperative CEA level and tumor diameter were the independent impact factors for postoperative survival of ICC patients (HR=2.730, 1.177; P<0.05), whereas tumor diameter and extrahepatic metastasis were the independent impact factors for cHCC-CC patients (HR=2.243, 0.193; P<0.05).

Conclusions

The onset age of cHCC-CC is younger. HBV infection is a pivotal pathogenic factor for cHCC-CC, whereas the occurrence of ICC may be related to chronic biliary tract infection. ICC patients has worse postoperative survival than cHCC-CC patients. Tumor diameter and preoperative CEA level are the independent impact factors for postoperative survival in ICC patients, whereas tumor diameter and extrahepatic metastasis are the independent impact factors for cHCC-CC patients.

表1 ICC与cHCC-CC组患者临床病理特征比较(例)
表2 ICC与cHCC-CC患者的肿瘤及手术情况
[1]
Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 145(6):1215-1229.
[2]
Moeini A, Sia D, Bardeesy N, et al. Molecular pathogenesis and targeted therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2016, 22(2):291-300.
[3]
Cong WM, Wu MC. New insights into molecular diagnostic pathology of primary liver cancer: advances and challenges[J]. Cancer Lett, 2015, 368(1):14-19.
[4]
Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States[J]. Hepatology, 2001, 33(6): 1353-1357.
[5]
Wood R, Brewster DH, Fraser LA, et al. Do increases in mortality from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reflect a genuine increase in risk? insights from cancer registry data in Scotland[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2003, 39(14):2087-2092.
[6]
粟立红,朱新宇,张缭云.肝内胆管癌的诊断策略[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017, 331(1):180-183.
[7]
Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, et al. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase?[J]. J Hepatol, 2004, 40(3):472-477.
[8]
Ramanan P, Cummins NW, Wilhelm MP, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of infections in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Clin Transplant, 2017, 31(8):e13023
[9]
Kim SH, Park YN, Lim JH, et al. Characteristics of combined hepatocelluar-cholangiocarcinoma and comparison with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(8):976-981.
[10]
Parchur AK, Ansari AA, Singh BP, et al. Enhanced luminescence of CaMoO(4): Eu by core@shell formation and its hyperthermia study after hybrid formation with Fe(3)O(4): cytotoxicity assessment on human liver cancer cells and mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Integr Biol, 2014, 6(1):53-64.
[11]
Sapisochin G, de Lope CR, Gastaca M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a Spanish matched cohort multicenter study[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(5):944-952.
[12]
Lee CH, Hsieh SY, Chang CJ, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and other primary liver cancers[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 28(1): 122-127.
[13]
Koh KC, Lee H, Choi MS, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Am J Surg, 2005, 189(1):120-125.
[14]
Yano Y, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, et al. Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 26 resected cases[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2003, 33(6):283-287.
[15]
Hsing AW, Gao YT, McGlynn KA, et al. Biliary tract cancer and stones in relation to chronic liver conditions: a population-based study in Shanghai, China[J]. Int J Cancer, 2007, 120(9):1981-1985.
[16]
张文宏,翁心华,庄辉.《慢性乙型肝炎防治指南》专家解读[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006, 27(6):461-463.
[17]
Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, et al. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 208(1):134-147.
[18]
Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Frühauf NR, et al. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? single center experience with 27 resections in50 patients over a 5-year period[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(1):134-143.
[19]
Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, et al. Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival[J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(12):1525-1531.
[20]
Chu KJ, Lu CD, Dong H, et al. Hepatitis B virus-related combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of 390 cases[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 26(2):192-199.
[21]
Jarnagin WR, Weber S, Tickoo SK, et al. Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma: demographic, clinical, and prognostic factors[J]. Cancer, 2002, 94(7):2040-2046.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[8] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[9] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要