切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -38. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.01.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌局限性切除和扩大肝切除疗效比较
张大伟1, 李海燕2, 蒋小峰1, 江德灿1, 谢炬平1, 卢海武1, 薛平1,()   
  1. 1. 510260 广州医科大学附属第二医院肝胆外科
    2. 510650 广州,中山大学附属第六医院肝胆甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-18 出版日期:2019-02-10
  • 通信作者: 薛平
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81602109); 广东省科技计划项目(2016A020215216,2016A020215038); 广州市科技计划项目(201607010033,201707010469)

Comparison of clinical efficacy between limited resection and extended hepatectomy for type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Dawei Zhang1, Haiyan Li2, Xiaofeng Jiang1, Decan Jiang1, Juping Xie1, Haiwu Lu1, Ping Xue1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Thyroid Breast Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510650, China
  • Received:2018-10-18 Published:2019-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Ping Xue
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xue Ping, Email:
引用本文:

张大伟, 李海燕, 蒋小峰, 江德灿, 谢炬平, 卢海武, 薛平. Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌局限性切除和扩大肝切除疗效比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 08(01): 35-38.

Dawei Zhang, Haiyan Li, Xiaofeng Jiang, Decan Jiang, Juping Xie, Haiwu Lu, Ping Xue. Comparison of clinical efficacy between limited resection and extended hepatectomy for type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(01): 35-38.

目的

比较Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌局限性切除和扩大肝切除疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年2月至2014年10月在广州医科大学附属第二医院收治的73例Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男47例,女26例;平均年龄(54±6)岁。根据不同手术方式将患者分为局限组和扩大组,局限组采用肝门区域不规则切除,扩大组采用半肝联合尾状叶切除。两组患者肿瘤切除率和并发症发生率等比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Log-rank检验。

结果

扩大组肿瘤切除率为90%(37/41),明显高于局限组的53%(17/32) (χ2=2.650,P<0.05)。两组患者出血、感染、胆漏、胸腔积液、肝衰竭发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。扩大组患者术后1、3、5年生存率分别为82%、38%、15%,明显高于局限组的58%、16%、3%(χ2=4.869,4.221,4.607;P<0.05)。扩大组中位生存时间为32个月,局限组20个月,扩大组总体生存明显优于局限组(χ2=2.825,P<0.05)。

结论

相对于局限性切除术,扩大肝切除术可提高Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌患者肿瘤切除率和生存率,并不增加术后并发症发生率。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy between limited resection and extended hepatectomy for type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 73 patients with type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from February 2010 to October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 47 cases were male and 26 were female, aged (54±6) years on average. According to different surgical procedure, the patients were divided into the limited and extended groups. In limited group, irregular resection of portal region was performed, and hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy was performed in extended group. The tumor resection rate and incidence of complications were compared between two groups by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Log-rank test.

Results

The tumor resection rate in extended group was 90%(37/41), significantly higher than 53%(17/32) in limited group (χ2=2.650, P<0.05). The incidence of bleeding, infection, bile leakage, pleural effusion and liver failure did not significantly differ between two groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in extended group were 82%, 38%, and 15%, significantly higher than 58%, 16% and 3% in limited group (χ2=4.869, 4.221, 4.607; P<0.05). The median survival time was 32 months in extended group and 20 months in limited group. The overall survival in extended group was significantly better than that in limited group (χ2=2.825, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with limited resection, extended hepatectomy can improve the tumor resection rate and survival rate of patients with type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma, whereas does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

表1 局限组和扩大组肝门部胆管癌患者一般资料比较
表2 局限组和扩大组肝门部胆管癌患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 局限组和扩大组肝门部胆管癌患者并发症发生情况比较(例)
图1 局限组和扩大组肝门部胆管癌患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线图
[1]
张秋学,赵连利,刘汝海,等.肝门胆管癌术后胆道系统并发症的防治[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2014, 20(6):440-442.
[2]
Zaydfudim VM, Rosen CB, Nagorney DM, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2014, 23(2):247-263.
[3]
王坚.Bismuth Ⅳ型肝门胆管癌的治疗[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015, 27(6):441-444.
[4]
李景林,姜兴明,冷开明,等.肝门部胆管癌肝切除范围的变化[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017, 32(12):1077-1079.
[5]
Murakami S, Ajiki T, Ueno K, et al. Curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a 25-year-old woman: report of a case[J]. Surgery today, 2014, 44(7):1350-1354.
[6]
陈孝平,项帅.精准医学时代肝门部胆管癌的治疗[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018, 17(1):3-8.
[7]
Chen W, Ke K, Chen YL, et al. Combined portal vein resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(5):489-495.
[8]
彭承宏,邓侠兴,张天.肝门胆管癌手术中的关键技术[J].肝胆外科杂志,2014, 22(5):321-322, 370.
[9]
谢应海,王琦,李瑞,等.经皮肝穿刺胆管腔内射频消融联合植入支架治疗肝门胆管癌伴恶性梗阻临床疗效研究[J].临床军医杂志,2017, 45(9):894-897.
[10]
李可为,施维锦.肝门胆管癌的姑息性治疗[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015, 27(6):445-449.
[11]
Welling TH, Feng M, Wan S, et al. Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy, capecitabine, and liver transplantation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Liver Transpl, 2014, 20(1):81-88.
[12]
Feo CF, Ginesu GC, Barmina M, et al. Curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: single-center experience with long-term follow-up[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(1):9-10.
[13]
Chen Y, Liu Z, Duan W, et al. Modified arterioportal shunting in radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61(129):9-11.
[14]
董家鸿,项灿宏,石军,等.以围肝门切除为本的肝门部胆管癌治愈性切除术的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017, 16(10):1053-1060.
[15]
Yoo T, Park SJ, Han SS, et al. Proximal resection margins: more prognostic than distal resection margins in patients undergoing hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2018, 50(4): 1106-1113.
[16]
Chen YT, Yao HR, Xu LF, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with endogenetic hyperthermia treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61(129):151-155.
[17]
Zhang XF, Squires MH, Bagante F, et al. The impact of intraoperative re-resection of a positive bile duct margin on clinical outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(5):1140-1149.
[18]
王冬冬,孙万亮,鲁正,等.ⅢⅣ型肝门部胆管癌扩大肝切除临床疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2016, 43(6):250-254.
[19]
黄庆国,朱载阳,李鹏泽.扩大肝切除术治疗Ⅲ至Ⅳ期肝门部胆管癌的临床价值[J].癌症进展, 2017, 15(3):325-327.
[20]
Gomez D, Patel PB, Lacasia-Purroy C, et al. Impact of specialized multi-disciplinary approach and an integrated pathway on outcomes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(1):77-84.
[1] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[2] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[3] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[6] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[7] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[8] 马俊永, 王毅州, 李锡锋, 吴雅丽, 张小峰. 浅谈腹腔镜肝切除术出血防控策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 495-498.
[9] 李双喜, 胡宗凯, 赵静, 黄洁. 肝血管瘤治疗指征及治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 504-510.
[10] 李斌奎. 不可切除肝内胆管细胞癌的转化治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 511-516.
[11] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[12] 张海涛, 贾哲, 马超, 张其坤, 武聚山, 郭庆良, 曾道炳, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 手术切除与射频消融治疗血管周围型单发小肝癌临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 523-527.
[13] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[14] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[15] 田驹, 孙伯洋, 杨荣华, 赵向前. 术中意外发现肝外胆管绒毛管状腺瘤的外科处理经验:附两例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 567-571.
阅读次数
全文


摘要