切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 239 -243. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.03.009

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生危险因素分析及预测模型建立
张永国1, 胥瑾2, 樊海宁3, 祁之俊1, 孔广玺1, 周虎3, 许晓磊3, 王展3,†()   
  1. 1. 810007　西宁，青海省福利慈善医院普通外科
    2. 810001　西宁，青海大学
    3. 810001　西宁，青海大学附属医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-06 出版日期:2020-06-10
  • 通信作者: 王展
  • 基金资助:
    青海省卫生计生委指导性重点项目(2016-wjzd-04); 青海省包虫病临床医学研究中心项目(2017-SF-L2)

Analysis of risk factors and establishment of prediction model for biliary leakage in cystic echinococcosis patients undergoing surgery

Yongguo Zhang1, Jin Xu2, Haining Fan3, Zhijun Qi1, Guangxi Kong1, Hu Zhou3, Xiaolei Xu3, Zhan Wang3,†()   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Qinghai Welfare Charity Hospital, Xining 810007, China
    2. Qinghai University, Xining 810001, China
    3. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810001, China
  • Received:2020-02-06 Published:2020-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Zhan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Zhan, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

张永国, 胥瑾, 樊海宁, 祁之俊, 孔广玺, 周虎, 许晓磊, 王展. 肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 239-243.

Yongguo Zhang, Jin Xu, Haining Fan, Zhijun Qi, Guangxi Kong, Hu Zhou, Xiaolei Xu, Zhan Wang. Analysis of risk factors and establishment of prediction model for biliary leakage in cystic echinococcosis patients undergoing surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(03): 239-243.

目的

探讨肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生的危险因素，并建立相应的回归预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2018年12月于青海省福利慈善医院行手术治疗的183例肝囊型包虫病患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。其中男67例，女116例；年龄12～78岁，中位年龄41岁。采用Logistic回归筛选出胆漏危险因素，森林图显示多因素Logistic回归的各个指标效应大小，建立肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏Logistic回归预测模型。通过Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评价预测模型的拟合度，采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线评价模型的预测价值。

结果

本组患者胆漏发生率为22.4% （41/183）。多因素Logistic回归结果显示，ALP>135 U/L（OR=10.797，95%CI：4.860～23.927，P<0.05）、囊肿直径>10 cm（OR=3.576，95%CI：1.911～6.268，P<0.05）是肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生的独立危险因素。将这两个因素纳入Logistic回归方程：Logit（P）=-2.580+2.412XALP+1.215X囊肿直径。概率模型为：P=1/[1+Exp（-2.580+2.412XALP+1.215X囊肿直径）]。ROC曲线下面积为0.792（95%CI：0.719～0.864，P<0.05），敏感度为0.74，特异度为0.70。

结论

ALP、囊肿直径是肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生的危险因素，根据回归分析建立的预测模型能比较有效地预测肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏的发生。

关键词: 棘球蚴病，肝, 胆漏, 危险因素
Objective

To explore the risk factors of bile leakage in patients with cystic echinococcosis undergoing surgery, and to establish a regression prediction model.

Methods

Clinical data of 183 patients with cystic echinococcosis who underwent surgical treatment in Qinghai Welfare Charity Hospital from June 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 67 cases were male and 116 female, aged 12-78 years old with a median age of 41 years old. The risk factors of bile leakage were selected by Logistic regression analysis. The effect of every index in Logistic regression analysis was illustrated in the forest plot. The Logistic regression prediction model for bile leakage of cystic echinococcosis patients undergoing surgery was established. The fitting degree of the prediction model was evaluated by Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The prediction value of this model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

The incidence of bile leakage was 22.4% (41/183). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ALP>135 U/L (OR=10.797, 95%CI: 4.860-23.927, P<0.05) and cyst diameter>10 cm (OR=3.576, 95%CI: 1.911-6.268, P<0.05) were the independent risk factors for bile leakage in cystic echinococcosis patients undergoing surgery. These two factors were included in the Logistic regression equation: logit (P)=-2.580+2.412XALP+1.215Xcyst diameter. The probability model was: P=1/[1+Exp(-2.580+2.412XALP+1.215Xcyst diameter)]. The area under ROC curve was 0.792 (95%CI: 0.719-0.864, P<0.05), the sensitivity was 0.74 and the specificity was 0.70.

Conclusions

ALP and cyst diameter are the risk factors for bile leakage in cystic echinococcosis patients undergoing surgery. The prediction model established by regression analysis can effectively predict the incidence of bile leakage in patients with cystic echinococcosis undergoing surgery.

Key words: Echinococcosis, hepatic, Biliary fistula, Risk factors
表1 胆漏组和无胆漏组肝囊型包虫病患者一般资料
参数 无胆漏组 胆漏组
性别 ? ?
? 男 55 12
? 女 87 29
年龄（岁，） 35±12 38±14
身高（cm，） 167±7 164±8
体重（kg，） 64±13 59±11
Hb（g/L，） 136±21 133±22
Plt（109/L，） 279±74 244±89
EOS [×109/L，M(Q25，Q75)] 0.35(0.19, 0.54) 0.37(0.22, 0.53)
ALT[U/L，M(Q25，Q75)] 33(23, 54) 37(32, 58)
ALP[U/L，M(Q25，Q75)] 93(62, 125) 203(137, 290)
GGT[U/L，M(Q25，Q75)] 36(26, 57) 45(31, 88)
TB [μmol/L，M(Q25，Q75)] 12.3(8.31, 43.2) 15.1(12.3, 46.6)
ALB（g/L，） 38±4 36±5
囊肿直径[cm，M(Q25，Q75)] 7.5(5.3, 9.7) 9.7(7.7, 12.3)
包虫位置（例） ? ?
? 左半肝 16 2
? 右半肝 84 28
? 左、右半肝 42 11
包虫病灶数目（例） ? ?
? 单个 105 19
? 多个 37 22
表2 不同指标对肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生的Logistic回归分析
指标 单因素 多因素
OR值 95%CI P值 OR值 95%CI P值
ALP>135 U/L 14.718 6.350～29.021 <0.001 10.797 4.860～23.927 <0.001
GGT>40 U/L 1.835 1.367～6.210 0.037 1.343 0.871～4.575 0.191
囊肿直径>10 cm 5.366 3.031～7.486 <0.001 3.576 1.911～6.268 0.002
图1 肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生的危险因素森林图
图2 肝囊型包虫病手术患者胆漏发生预测模型的ROC曲线
[1]
Velasco-Tirado V, Alonso-Sardón M, Lopez-Bernus A, et al. Medical treatment of cystic echinococcosis: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2018, 18(1):306-325.
[2]
Dezsényi B, Somorácz Á, Danka J, et al. Human cystic echinococcosis in Hungary (2000-2014): a retrospective case series analysis from a single-center study[J]. Infection, 2018, 46(4):477-486.
[3]
Secchi MA, Pettinari R, Mercapide C, et al. Surgical management of liver hydatidosis: a multicentre series of 1412 patients[J]. Liver Int, 2009, 30(1):85-93.
[4]
Kilic M, Yoldas O, Koc M, et al. Can biliary-cyst communication be predicted before surgery for hepatic hydatid disease: does size matter?[J]. Am J Surg, 2008, 196(5):732-735.
[5]
Avcu S, Ünal Ö, Arslan H. Intrabiliary rupture of liver hydatid cyst:a case report and review of the literature[J]. Cases J, 2009(2):6455.
[6]
Valle-Sanz Yd Yd, Lorente-Ramos RM. Sonographic and computed tomographic demonstration of hydatid cysts communicating with the biliary tree[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2004, 32(3):144-148.
[7]
Pedrosa I, Saíz A, Arrazola J, et al. Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications[J]. Radiographics, 2000, 20(3):795-817.
[8]
Surmelioglu A, Ozer I, Reyhan E, et al. Risk factors for development of biliary complications after surgery for solitary liver hydatid cyst[J]. Am Surg, 2017, 83(1):30-35.
[9]
Wang H, Lu SC, He L, et al. A study on risk factors and diagnostic efficiency of posthepatectomy liver failure in the nonobstructive jaundice[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(8):e9963.
[10]
Atahan K, Küpeli H, Deniz M, et al. Can occult cystobiliary fistulas in hepatic hydatid disease be predicted before surgery?[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2011, 8(4):315-320.
[11]
Atli M, Kama NA, Yuksek YN, et al. Intrabiliary rupture of a hepatic hydatid cyst: associated clinical factors and proper management[J]. Arch Surg, 2001, 136(11):1249-1255.
[12]
Unalp HR, Baydar B, Kamer E, et al. Asymptomatic occult cysto-biliary communication without bile into cavity of the liver hydatid cyst: a pitfall in conservative surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2009, 7(4):387-391.
[13]
Daradkeh S, El-Muhtaseb H, Farah G, et al. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in the surgical management of hydatid cyst of the liver[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2007, 392(1):35-39.
[14]
Kayaalp C, Bzeizi K, Demirbag AE, et al. Biliary complications after hydatid liver surgery: incidence and risk factors[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2002, 6(5):706-712.
[15]
El Nakeeb A, Salem A, El Sorogy M, et al. Cystobiliary communication in hepatic hydatid cyst: predictors and outcome[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2017, 28(2):125-130.
[16]
Dolay K, Akbulut S. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of hepatic hydatid disease[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(41):15253-15261.
[17]
Kim HJ, Lee SK, Ryu CH, et al. The clinical usefulness of simultaneous placement of double endoscopic nasobiliary biliary drainage[J]. Clin Endosc, 2015, 48(6):542-548.
[18]
杨宏强，彭心宇，张示杰，等．囊性肝包虫病合并胆瘘的手术治疗[J]．中国综合临床，2006, 22(4):360-362.
[19]
卫东，张海峰．肝囊性包虫病的手术治疗分析[J]． 实用医学杂志，2011, 27(10):1785-1787.
[20]
罗布顿珠，边伊啦，于洪亮．肝包虫病术后胆汁漏的原因及预防措施[J]．临床医学，2018, 38(8):70-72.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[8] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[9] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[10] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[13] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
[14] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
[15] 孙培培, 张二明, 时延伟, 赵春燕, 宋萍萍, 张硕, 张克, 周玉娇, 赵璨, 闫维, 吴蓉菊, 宋丽萍, 郭伟安, 马石头, 安欣华, 包曹歆, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病情况及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-719.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号