切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 278 -282. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.03.017

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

ASTN1表达与肝细胞癌侵袭转移及预后的关系
陈奇峰1, 黄涛1, 沈露俊1, 李旺1, 吴沛宏1,()   
  1. 1. 510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心微创介入科 华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室 肿瘤医学协同创新中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-06 出版日期:2020-06-10
  • 通信作者: 吴沛宏
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81801804)

Relationship between ASTN1 expression and invasion, metastasis, prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Qifeng Chen1, Tao Huang1, Lujun Shen1, Wang Li1, Peihong Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2020-01-06 Published:2020-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Peihong Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Peihong, Email:
引用本文:

陈奇峰, 黄涛, 沈露俊, 李旺, 吴沛宏. ASTN1表达与肝细胞癌侵袭转移及预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 278-282.

Qifeng Chen, Tao Huang, Lujun Shen, Wang Li, Peihong Wu. Relationship between ASTN1 expression and invasion, metastasis, prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(03): 278-282.

目的

探讨星形肌动蛋白1(astrotactin 1,ASTN1)与肝细胞癌(HCC)侵袭转移的关系及其对患者预后的影响。

方法

从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)公共数据库下载HCC的RNA表达谱数据和临床信息,比较HCC组织和癌旁对照组织ASTN1 mRNA的表达水平。ASTN1 mRNA在癌与癌旁组织差异分析采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验。根据ASTN1表达高低绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,两组生存分析采用Log-rank检验。Cox比例风险回归模型分析ASTN1的表达与预后的关系。采用siRNA技术沉默HCC细胞中的ASTN1基因,Transwell小室检测细胞侵袭能力的变化,细胞划痕实验检测细胞迁移能力的变化。穿膜细胞数比较采用单因素方差分析和LSD-t检验。

结果

HCC组织ASTN1 mRNA相对表达量为0.022(0~0.137),明显低于癌旁组织的0.037(0.004~0.216) (Z=-12.297,P<0.05)。生存分析显示ASTN1高表达组患者的总体生存预后更好(HR=0.480,P<0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,ASTN1低表达是影响HCC患者总体生存预后的独立危险因素(HR=1.852,95%CI:1.635~2.313,P<0.05)。Transwell侵袭实验显示,siRNA-1和siRNA-2组穿膜细胞数为(88±7)、(89±5)个,明显高于对照组的(38±3)个(LSD-t=11.720,15.150;P<0.05)。细胞划痕实验显示,沉默ASTN1基因后细胞的侵袭转移能力增强。

结论

ASTN1高表达是影响HCC患者总体生存预后的独立保护因素,ASTN1低表达患者预后更差。ASTN1可作为判断HCC患者生存预后的生物学标志物。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between astrotactin 1 (ASTN1) and the invasion, metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its effect on clinical prognosis of HCC patients.

Methods

RNA expression profile data and clinical information of HCC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public database. The expression levels of ASTN1 mRNA in the liver cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues were statistically compared by Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was delineated according to the expression level of ASTN1. The survival analysis between two groups was analyzed by Log-rank test. The relationship between ASTN1 expression and prognosis was assessed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model. ASTN1 gene in the HCC cells was silenced by siRNA technology. The change of cell invasion ability was evaluated by Transwell chamber test. The change of cell migration ability was assessed by cell scratch test. The number of membrane-penetrating cells was compared by one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test.

Results

The relative expression level of ASTN1 mRNA in the HCC tissues was 0.022(0-0.137), significantly lower than 0.037(0.004-0.216) in the paracancerous tissues (Z=-12.297, P<0.05). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with high ASTN1 expression obtained better overall survival (HR=0.480, P<0.05). Cox's proportional hazards model showed that the low expression of ASTN1 was an independent risk factor for the overall survival of HCC patients (HR=1.852, 95%CI: 1.635-2.313, P<0.05). Transwell chamber demonstrated that the number of membrane-penetrating cells in siRNA-1 and siRNA-2 groups was respectively 88±7 and 89±5, significantly higher than 38±3 in control group (LSD-t=11.720, 15.150; P<0.05). Cell scratch test revealed that the invasion and metastasis ability of cells was enhanced after the silencing of ASTN1 gene.

Conclusions

High expression of ASTN1 is an independent protective factor for the overall survival of HCC patients. Patients with low expression of ASTN1 obtain poor clinical prognosis. ASTN1 can serve as a biomarker to predict the survival and prognosis of HCC patients.

图1 TCGA数据库中HCC患者ASTN1的表达水平
表1 ASTN1表达与HCC患者预后关系多因素Cox回归分析
图2 ASTN1表达与肝细胞癌患者预后的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
图3 97H肝癌细胞划痕实验
[1]
中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局.原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017, 16(7):635-647.
[2]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Hepatol, 2018, 69(1):182-236.
[3]
Fan ST, Mau Lo C, Poon RT, et al. Continuous improvement of survival outcomes of resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 20-year experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(4):745-758.
[4]
吴孟超.肝癌在中国[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2012, 1(1):3-4.
[5]
黄涛,沈露俊,陈奇峰,等.TFAP 4在肝细胞癌中表达及其与预后的关系[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2019, 8(1):72-75.
[6]
Morse MA, Sun W, Kim R, et al. The role of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 25(3):912-920.
[7]
Yan X, Hu Z, Feng Y, et al. Comprehensive genomic characterization of long non-coding RNAs across human cancers[J]. Cancer Cell, 2015, 28(4):529-540.
[8]
Llovet JM, Zucman-Rossi J, Pikarsky E, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2016(2):16018.
[9]
Chen QF, Li W, Wu PH, et al. Significance of tumor-infiltrating immunocytes for predicting prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(35):5266-5282.
[10]
Chen QF, Li W, Wu P, et al. Alternative splicing events are prognostic in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Aging, 2019, 11(13):4720-4735.
[11]
Chen QF, Huang T, Si-Tu QJ, et al. Analysis of competing endogenous RNA network identifies a poorly differentiated cancer-specific RNA signature for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Cell Biochem, 2019, DOI: 10.1002/jcb.29454[Epub ahead of print].
[12]
Yang L, Peng X, Li Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR promotes exosome secretion by regulating RAB35 and SNAP23 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1):78.
[13]
Zhong DN, Luo YH, Mo WJ, et al. High expression of long noncoding HOTAIR correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis and metastasis[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2018, 17(1):1148-1156.
[14]
Ono H, Motoi N, Nagano H, et al. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR is relevant to cellular proliferation, invasiveness, and clinical relapse in small-cell lung cancer[J]. Cancer Med, 2014, 3(3):632-642.
[15]
Li R, Qu H, Wang S, et al. GDCRNATools: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of lncRNA, miRNA and mRNA data in GDC[J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(14): 2515-2517.
[16]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132.
[17]
Chen QF, Huang T, Shen L, et al. Predictive value of a nomogram for hepatocellular carcinoma with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis:a population-based study[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(1):e0209293.
[18]
Chen QF, Xia JG, Li W, et al. Examining the key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma development from hepatitis B viruspositive cirrhosis[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2018, 18(6):4940-4950.
[19]
Chen QF, Wu PH, Huang T, et al. Efficacy of treatment regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(40):e17460.
[20]
Yi S, Wang S, Zhao Q, et al. miR-sc3, a novel microRNA, promotes Schwann cell proliferation and migration by targeting Astn1[J]. Cell Transplant, 2016, 25(5):973-982.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[7] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[10] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[11] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[12] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[13] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[14] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?