切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 543 -546. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.06.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝硬度值及标准残肝体积在肝癌半肝切除术后肝功能不全中的预测价值
吴金柱1, 王建新1,(), 蔡卫华1, 陈琳1, 肖锋1, 朱任飞1   
  1. 1. 226006 江苏省南通大学附属南通第三人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-15 出版日期:2020-12-10
  • 通信作者: 王建新
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省南通市科技局重点项目(MS12019021); 江苏省南通市卫健委面上项目(MA2019008)

Predictive value of liver stiffness measurement and standard remnant liver volume for hepatic insufficiency in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hemihepatectomy

Jinzhu Wu1, Jianxin Wang1,(), Weihua Cai1, Lin Chen1, Feng Xiao1, Renfei Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nantong Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong 226006, China
  • Received:2020-07-15 Published:2020-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Jianxin Wang
引用本文:

吴金柱, 王建新, 蔡卫华, 陈琳, 肖锋, 朱任飞. 肝硬度值及标准残肝体积在肝癌半肝切除术后肝功能不全中的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 543-546.

Jinzhu Wu, Jianxin Wang, Weihua Cai, Lin Chen, Feng Xiao, Renfei Zhu. Predictive value of liver stiffness measurement and standard remnant liver volume for hepatic insufficiency in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hemihepatectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(06): 543-546.

目的

探讨肝硬度值(LSM)及标准残肝体积(SRLV)在肝细胞癌(HCC)半肝切除术后肝功能不全中的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2016年6月至2020年2月南通大学附属南通第三人民医院行半肝切除的28例HCC患者临床资料。其中男20例,女8例;平均年龄(57±9)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。以肝脏瞬时弹性成像测定患者的LSM,CT测定SRLV。根据术后有否发生肝功能不全分为肝功能不全组(10例)和非肝功能不全组(18例)。术后肝功能不全的相关因素分析采用χ2检验和多因素Logistic回归,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估LSM及SRLV预测术后肝功能不全的价值。

结果

肝功能不全组LSM、SRLV分别为(27±6)kPa、(267±46)ml/m2,非肝功能不全组相应为(17±5)kPa 、(366±60)ml/m2,差异有统计学意义(t=23.730,-20.422;P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,LSM≥25 kPa、SRLV≤290 ml/m2为术后肝功能不全发生的独立危险因素(OR=17.448,24.690;P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,当LSM=17 kPa、SRLV=266 ml/m2时预测术后并发症发生的敏感度和特异度最佳,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.894、0.903(Z=6.684,6.763;P<0.05)。

结论

术前LSM和SRLV检测对HCC半肝切除术后肝功能不全有较高的预测价值。

Objective

To assess the predictive value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and standard remnant liver volume (SRLV) for hepatic insufficiency in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after hemihepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 28 HCC patients who underwent hemihepatectomy in Nantong Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University from June 2016 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 patients were male and 8 female, aged (57±9) years on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. LSM was measured by transient elastography, and SRLV was measured by CT scan. According to the incidence of hepatic insufficiency, all patients were divided into the hepatic insufficiency (n=10) and non-hepatic insufficiency (n=18) groups. The risk factors for postoperative hepatic insufficiency were identified by Chi-square test and multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The predictive value of LSM and SRLV for postoperative hepatic insufficiency was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

In the hepatic insufficiency group, LSM and SRLV were (27±6) kPa and (267±46) ml/m2, which significantly differed from (17±5) kPa and (366±60) ml/m2 in the non-hepatic insufficiency group (t=23.730, -20.422; P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that LSM≥25 kPa and SRLV≤290 ml/m2 were the independent risk factors for postoperative hepatic insufficiency (OR=17.448, 24.690; P<0.05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that LSM=17 kPa and SRLV=266 ml/m2 yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting postoperative complications, and the areas under ROC curve were 0.894 and 0.903 (Z=6.684, 6.763; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative detection of LSM and SRLV can be utilized to predict hepatic insufficiency in HCC patients after hemihepatectomy.

表1 以术前LSM和SRLV建立的预测肝细胞癌半肝切除术后患者肝功能不全发生影响因素Logistic回归分析
图1 肝细胞癌半肝切除术后肝功能不全患者术前LSM及SRLV的ROC曲线
[1]
陈世发,赵礼金.肝癌发生发展机制的研究进展及其治疗现状[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018, 27(7):910-923.
[2]
Sakamoto Y. Editorial for liver cancer in Asia[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2018, 48(11):955-956.
[3]
Salimi S, Pandya K, Sastry V. Impact of having a planned additional operation at time of liver transplant on graft and patient outcomes[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(2):E608.
[4]
孙惠川,沈英皓,李小龙.肝脏储备功能与肝癌术式选择[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018, 38(4):473-476.
[5]
Zhang Y, Wang C, Li H, et al. Decreased liver stiffness by transient elastography indicates lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(3): e13929.
[6]
Hwang JY, Yoon HM, Kim JR, et al. Diagnostic performance of transient elastography for liver fibrosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 211(5): W257-266.
[7]
van Wissen J, Bakker N, Doodeman HJ, et al. Preoperative methods to reduce liver volume in bariatric surgery: a systematic review[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(2):251-256.
[8]
Furlan A, Tublin ME, Yu L, et al. Comparison of 2D shear wave elastography, transient elastography, and MR elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2020, 214(1):W20-26.
[9]
Maruyama M, Yoshizako T, Araki H, et al. Future liver remnant indocyanine green plasma clearance rate as a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure after portal vein embolization[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(12):1877-1884.
[10]
曾柏强,吴祥,冉义洪,等. 大范围肝切除术后肝衰竭危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 7(2):143-146.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会肝脏外科学组. 肝切除术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(5):525-530.
[12]
Gong WF, Zhong JH, Lu Z, et al. Evaluation of liver regeneration and post-hepatectomy liver failure after hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Biosci Rep, 2019, 39(8): BSR20190088.
[13]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会.肝硬化患者肝切除术后肝功能不全的预防与治疗专家共识(2019版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019, 18(4):297-302.
[14]
李贤杰,冯雪峰,周善学,等.经腹腔镜行肝切除术的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者手术并发症的危险因素及预测价值分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2019, 25(12):32-37.
[15]
侯建存,张雅敏,李阳,等.功能性残肝体积与脾体积比预测肝切除术后肝功能不全[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2018, 24(10):671-675.
[16]
Fitzpatrick JA, Kim JU, Cobbold JF, et al. Changes in liver volume in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing antiviral therapy[J].J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2016, 6(1):15-20.
[17]
欧阳高雄,刘剑勇,张志明,等.标准残肝体积联合肝纤维化评分指标对HCC肝切除术安全性评估[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2018, 25(7):499-505.
[18]
王青娟,郑剑,古日珍,等.声触诊弹性测量与声脉冲辐射力成像检测肝脾硬度的比较研究[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2019, 13(5):398-401.
[19]
孟玉丽,张红旭,余祖江,等.瞬时弹性成像技术与APRI指数判定慢性肝病肝纤维化程度的临床研究[J].中国实用内科杂志,2016, 36(6):485-488.
[20]
Serra-Burriel M, Graupera I, Torán P, et al. Transient elastography for screening of liver fibrosis: cost-effectiveness analysis from six prospective cohorts in Europe and Asia[J]. J Hepatol, 2019, 71(6): 1141-1151.
[21]
黄杨卿,朱慧,余良河,等.瞬时弹性超声预测肝切除安全性的临床研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016, 22(6):419-421.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[6] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[9] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[10] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[11] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[12] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[13] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
阅读次数
全文


摘要