切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 43 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.01.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

载药微球栓塞联合索拉非尼治疗不可切除肝癌安全性和疗效
曹耿飞1, 张海潇1, 顾俊鹏1, 朱帝文1, 鲍应军1, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木1, 任伟新1,()   
  1. 1. 830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 任伟新

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead chemoembolization combined with sorafenib in treatment of unresectable liver cancer

Gengfei Cao1, Haixiao Zhang1, Junpeng Gu1, Diwen Zhu1, Yingjun Bao1, hasimu Asihaer·1, Weixin Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2020-11-04 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Weixin Ren
引用本文:

曹耿飞, 张海潇, 顾俊鹏, 朱帝文, 鲍应军, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 任伟新. 载药微球栓塞联合索拉非尼治疗不可切除肝癌安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 43-47.

Gengfei Cao, Haixiao Zhang, Junpeng Gu, Diwen Zhu, Yingjun Bao, hasimu Asihaer·, Weixin Ren. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead chemoembolization combined with sorafenib in treatment of unresectable liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 43-47.

目的

探讨载药微球栓塞(DEB-TACE)联合索拉非尼治疗不可切除中晚期原发性肝癌(肝癌)的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年4月至2018年9月新疆医科大学第一附属医院采用DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼治疗的31例不可切除中晚期肝癌患者临床资料。其中男24例,女7例;年龄35~78岁,中位年龄55岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据改良版实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)评价标准评估肿瘤反应,观察DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼的不良反应情况,同时分析患者总体生存、无疾病进展生存情况。

结果

术后肝脓肿2例,引流后好转;Ⅲ级高血压2例,Ⅲ级腹泻1例,予对症处理并减半服药后可耐受,余患者不良反应可耐受。本组随访时间7~37个月,中位随访时间24个月;27例患者死亡,4例存活。术后1、3、6、12个月的客观缓解率和疾病控制率分别为61.3%、67.8%、64.5%、42.9%和96.8%、90.3%、87.1%、71.4%。中位总体生存期和无疾病进展期分别为25、14个月。

结论

DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼治疗不可切除中晚期肝癌显示出良好的安全性、耐受性,同时具有更好的临床获益。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable middle/advanced-stage primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Clinical data of 31 patients with unresectable middle/advanced-stage PLC treated with DEB-TACE combined with sorafenib in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from April 2017 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 24 patients were male and 7 female, aged from 35 to 78 years with a median age of 55 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), the tumor response was evaluated. The adverse events of DEB-TACE combined with sorafenib were observed. The overall survival and disease-free survival of patients were analyzed.

Results

2 patients developed liver abscess after operation, which were mitigated after drainage. 2 cases suffered from grade Ⅲ hypertension and 1 case of grade Ⅲ diarrhea, which could be tolerated after symptomatic treatments and half-dose medication. The remaining cases experienced tolerable adverse events. The follow-up time was 7-37 months, with a median time of 24 months. 27 cases died and 4 cases survived. The objective response rate and disease control rate at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12 months were 61.3%, 67.8%, 64.5%, 42.9%, and 96.8%, 90.3%, 87.1%, 71.4%, respectively. The median overall survival and disease-free progression time were 25 and 14 months, respectively.

Conclusions

DEB-TACE combined with sorafenib yields good safety and tolerance in the treatment of unresectable middle/advanced-stage PLC, which can bring favorable clinical benefits.

表1 DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝癌患者不良反应发生情况(例)
图1 DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝癌患者总体生存及无疾病进展生存Kaplan-Meier曲线
表2 DEB-TACE联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝癌患者术后肿瘤反应情况
[1]
Wu B, Zhou J, Ling G, et al. CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1):69.
[2]
Covey AM, Hussain SM. Liver-directed therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview of techniques, outcomes, and post-treatment imaging findings[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2017, 209(1):67-76.
[3]
Megías Vericat JE, García Marcos R, López Briz E, et al. Trans-arterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting particles versus conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of effectiveness, safety and costs[J]. Radiologia, 2015, 57(6):496-504.
[4]
Huang K, Zhou Q, Wang R, et al. Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 29(5):920-925.
[5]
Ranieri G, Ammendola M, Marech I, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and tryptase changes after chemoembolization in hepatocarcinoma patients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(19):6018-6025.
[6]
Cao G, Li X, Qin C, et al. Prognostic value of VEGF in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib: a meta-analysis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015(21):3144-3151.
[7]
Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival[J]. Hepatology, 2003, 37(2):429-442.
[8]
Aliberti C, Carandina R, Sarti D, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with DC bead LUMITM radiopaque beads for primary liver cancer treatment: preliminary experience[J]. Future Oncol, 2017, 13(25):2243-2252.
[9]
Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N, et al. Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2016, 48(6):571-577.
[10]
Zhu K, Huang J, Lai L, et al. Medium or large hepatocellular carcinoma: sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(1):300-307.
[11]
Ren B, Wang W, Shen J, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib versus TACE alone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study[J]. J Cancer, 2019, 10(5):1189-1196.
[12]
Wu FX, Chen J, Bai T, et al. The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib and sorafenib mono-therapy in patients with BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2017, 17(1):645.
[13]
Zhong BY, Ni CF, Chen L, et al. Early sorafenib-related biomarkers for combination treatment with transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Radiology, 2017, 284(2):583-592.
[14]
Meyer T, Fox R, Ma YT, et al. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 2(8):565-575.
[15]
Kudo M, Ueshima K, Ikeda M, et al. Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial[J]. Gut, 2019, DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318934[Epub ahead of print].
[16]
Lencioni R, Llovet JM, Han G, et al. Sorafenib or placebo plus TACE with doxorubicin-eluting beads for intermediate stage HCC: the SPACE trial[J]. J Hepatol, 2016, 64(5):1090-1098.
[17]
Xiao YD, Ma C, Zhang ZS, et al. Safety and efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and arterioportal shunt: a single-center experience[J]. Cancer Manage Res, 2019(11):1551-1557.
[18]
Li H, Wu F, Duan M, et al. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: a comparison of efficacy and safety[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(21):e15314.
[19]
Nouri YM, Kim JH, Yoon HK, et al. Update on transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2019, 20(1):34-49.
[20]
Melchiorre F, Patella F, Pescatori L, et al. DEB-TACE: a standard review[J]. Future Oncol, 2018, 14(28):2969-2984.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[4] 孟令展, 朱震宇. 达芬奇机器人辅助肝中叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-373.
[5] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[6] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[7] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[8] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[9] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[10] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[11] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
[12] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[13] 杨发才, 游川, 雷正清, 李伟男, 段安琪, 邱应和, 李敬东, 程张军. 肿瘤负荷评分联合淋巴结分期对肝内胆管细胞癌患者术后生存预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 389-394.
[14] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
[15] 李映安, 晋云, 储心昀, 胡苹苹, 王峻峰. 混合现实技术在腹腔镜肝切除术中导航的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 401-406.
阅读次数
全文


摘要