切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 158 -164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.02.009

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效对比研究
王伟龙1, 温子龙1, 郑宗敏1, 朱文峰1, 郑强1, 薛平1,†()   
  1. 1. 510260　广州医科大学附属第二医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-10 出版日期:2021-04-10
  • 通信作者: 薛平
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201607010033)

Comparison of clinical efficacy between ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis

Weilong Wang1, Zilong Wen1, Zongmin Zheng1, Wenfeng Zhu1, Qiang Zheng1, Ping Xue1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
  • Received:2020-12-10 Published:2021-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Ping Xue
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王伟龙, 温子龙, 郑宗敏, 朱文峰, 郑强, 薛平. ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效对比研究[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 158-164.

Weilong Wang, Zilong Wen, Zongmin Zheng, Wenfeng Zhu, Qiang Zheng, Ping Xue. Comparison of clinical efficacy between ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 158-164.

目的

比较ERCP联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）与腹腔镜胆总管探查术（LCBDE）联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2016年6月至2019年6月广州医科大学附属第二医院收治的147例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。其中男77例，女70例；年龄24～65岁，中位年龄53岁。根据治疗方法不同分为ERCP+LC组和LCBDE+LC组。观察两组围手术期情况和疗效。两组住院时间、住院费用等比较采用t 检验，并发症等发生率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

ERCP+LC组单次净石率为92%（67/73），LCBDE+LC组为92%（60/65），差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.013，P>0.05）。ERCP+LC组胆总管最大直径≤ 8 mm者14例、>15 mm者9例，LCBDE+LC组相应为0、19例，差异有统计学意义（χ2=-，6.077；P<0.05）。ERCP+LC组平均住院时间、住院费用分别为（12±3）d、（6.6±1.1）万元，均明显高于LCBDE+LC组的（9±3）d、（4.6±1.0） 万元（t=4.223，11.149；P<0.05）。ERCP+LC组术后急性胰腺炎、胆漏分别为7、0例，LCBDE+LC组相应为0、6例，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。ERCP+LC组和LCBDE+LC组术后结石复发分别为14、11例，差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.209，P>0.05）。

结论

ERCP+LC和LCBDE+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效相当，两种微创术式各有优势，胆总管无扩张者首选ERCP+LC，而胆总管明显扩张、结石较大者LCBDE+LC更具优势。

关键词: 胆囊结石病, 胆总管结石, 胆囊切除术, 腹腔镜, 胰胆管造影术, 内窥镜逆行, 腹腔镜胆总管探查术
Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combined with LC in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 147 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from June 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 77 patients were male and 70 female, aged from 24 to 65 years, with a median age of 53 years. All patients were divided into the ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC groups according to different treatments. Perioperative conditions and clinical efficacy were observed between two groups. The length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense were statistically compared between two groups by t test. The incidence of complications and other parameters were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

The single-time stone removal rate was 92%(67/73) in ERCP+LC group and 92%(60/65) in LCBDE+LC group, where no significant difference was noted (χ2=0.013, P>0.05). In ERCP+LC group, the maximum diameter of single common bile duct ≤8 mm was observed in 14 cases and >15 mm in 9 cases, significantly differed from 0 and 19 cases in LCBDE+LC group (χ2=-, 6.077; P<0.05). In ERCP+LC group, the mean length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses were (12±3) d and (6.6±1.1)×104 yuan, which were significantly higher than (9±3) d and (4.6±1.0)×104 yuan in LCBDE+LC group (t=4.223, 11.149; P<0.05). In ERCP+LC group, acute pancreatitis were observed in 7 cases and no bile leakage, significantly differed from 0 and 6 cases in LCBDE+LC group (P<0.05). Stone recurrence was observed in 14 and 11 cases respectively in ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC groups, where no significant difference was noted (χ2=0.209, P>0.05).

Conclusions

ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC yield equivalent efficacy in treating cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis. These two minimally invasive operations have its own advantages. ERCP+LC is recommended for patients without common bile duct dilatation, whereas LCBDE+LC is suitable for those with significant common bile duct dilatation and larger stones.

Key words: Cholecystolithiasis, Choledocholithiasis, Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
表1 ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者一般资料比较
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 男/女 （例） 合并症（例） 腹部手术史 （例） 胆源性胰腺炎（例）
高血压 糖尿病 冠心病
ERCP+LC组 78 50±10 40/38 25 19 3 10 11
LCBDE+LC组 69 52±11 37/32 12 9 1 8 5
统计值   t=-0.779 χ2=0.080 χ2=4.178 χ2=3.040 χ2=0.147 χ2=0.051 χ2=1.774
P值   0.437 0.777 0.041 0.081 0.701 0.821 0.183
表2 ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者结石及胆管情况比较
组别 例数 结石最大直径（mm，±s） 结石多发（例） 胆总管最大直径（mm，±s） 胆总管最大直径（例）
≤8 mm 8～10 mm 10～15 mm >15 mm
ERCP+LC组 78 9.6±2.9 25 11.7±3.3 14 18 37 9
LCBDE+LC组 69 10.3±2.3 21 13.2±2.9 0 11 39 19
统计值   t=-1.563 χ2=0.044 t=-2.961 - χ2=1.177 χ2=1.210 χ2=6.077
P值   0.120 0.833 0.004 0.000 0.306 0.322 0.020
表3 ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者近期并发症发生情况比较（例）
组别 例数 急性胰腺炎 急性胆管炎 出血 伤口感染 胆漏 合计
ERCP+LC组 73 7 5 2 0 0 14
LCBDE+LC组 65 0 1 1 2 6 10
χ2值   - 1.230 0.000 - - 0.344
P值   0.014 0.267 1.000 0.220 0.010 0.557
表4 ERCP+LC与LCBDE+LC组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者远期疗效比较（例）
组别 例数 急性胆管炎 胆总管狭窄 结石复发 总并发症 再次手术
ERCP+LC组 69 5 1 14 20 12
LCBDE+LC组 64 2 4 11 17 12
χ2值   0.456 0.996 0.209 0.097 0.041
P值   0.500 0.318 0.647 0.755 0.839
[1]
Nakajima M, Kizu M, Akasaka Y, et al. Five years experience of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Japan: a collective study from25 centres[J]. Endoscopy, 1979, 11(2):138-141.
[2]
秦鸣放. 肝内外胆管结石治疗方案的选择[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志，2010，15(11)：820-822.
[3]
Kroh M, Chand B. Choledocholithiasis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2008, 88(5):1019-1031.
[4]
Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, et al. Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(24):3156-3166.
[5]
黄志强. 半个世纪以来肝胆胰外科的发展[J]. 中华外科杂志，2001，39(1)：9-16.
[6]
Strasberg SM. Cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis[J]. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol, 1997, 11(4):643-661.
[7]
Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K. Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies[J]. Am Surg, 2000, 66(3):262-268.
[8]
Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Management of common bile duct stones[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006, 10(4):612-619.
[9]
Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, et al. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones[J]. Lancet, 1998, 351(9097):159-161.
[10]
Ding G, Cai W, Qin M. Single-stage vs two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 18(5):947-951.
[11]
马大喜，李可为，王坚，等. LC+LCBDE和ERCP/EST+LC在胆囊合并胆总管结石中应用的随机对照研究[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志，2016，28(6)：448-453.
[12]
Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(3):875-885.
[13]
田开亮，朱立新，谢坤，等. LC联合ERCP/LCBDE治疗胆囊结石-胆总管结石疗效Meta分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2013，33(10)：881-886.
[14]
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Li T, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10):3275-3286.
[15]
Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(9):3763-3776.
[16]
陈小勋，黄顺荣，林源，等. 腔镜胆总管切开取石与内镜乳头括约肌切开取石术的远期疗效比较[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志，2009，15(5)：335-336.
[17]
陆晔，刘皓慈，陈胜，等. ERCP联合EST治疗胆总管结石的术后远期并发症[J]. 外科理论与实践，2015，20(2)：116-120.
[18]
石玉琪，许春芳. ERCP联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石术后胆总管结石复发的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志，2016，33(10)：689-692.
[19]
Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(4):457-463.
[20]
Kuzela L, Oltman M, Sutka J, et al. Prospective follow-up of patients with bile duct strictures secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treated endoscopically with multiple stents[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2005, 52(65):1357-1361.
[21]
杨彦，张剑，楼健颖，等. 腹腔镜胆总管探查取石免留置鼻胆管引流一期缝合术临床疗效的多中心回顾性研究(附312例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志，2018，17(1)：68-75.
[22]
余海峰，鲁光锐，殷佩，等. 经胆囊管胆总管探查术与三镜联合术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志，2017，25(6)：431-433.
[23]
Di Mauro D, Ricciardi E, Siragusa L, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comparative study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(11):1391-1396.
[24]
慎华平，张国雷，张鸣杰，等. ERCP+EST联合LC治疗胆囊结石伴胆总管结石的疗效评价[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志，2014，26(5)：359-361.
[25]
谢凯祥，涂湘炎，汤俊，等. 三镜联合治疗胆囊并胆总管结石的临床研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志，2008，14(9)：970-973.
[26]
徐月梅，陈磊，王金波，等. 十二指肠乳头小切开+大气囊扩张治疗直径1.0～2.5 cm胆总管结石的临床分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志，2016，22(3)：37-42.
[27]
周利国，唐才喜，周红兵. 腹腔镜内窥镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石两种术式的临床分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志，2009，15(9)：679-681.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术（TAPP）[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术（NOSES Ⅳ式）中的应用（附视频）[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号