切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 294 -298. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.03.016

临床研究

125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌疗效
李健鹏1, 顾俊鹏1, 张海潇1, 朱帝文1, 鲍应军1, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木1, 曹耿飞1, 任伟新1,()   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学附属第一医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-04 出版日期:2022-06-10
  • 通信作者: 任伟新

Clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Jianpeng Li1, Junpeng Gu1, Haixiao Zhang1, Diwen Zhu1, Yingjun Bao1, Hasimu Asihaer·1, Gengfei Cao1, Weixin Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2022-03-04 Published:2022-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Weixin Ren
引用本文:

李健鹏, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 朱帝文, 鲍应军, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 曹耿飞, 任伟新. 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 294-298.

Jianpeng Li, Junpeng Gu, Haixiao Zhang, Diwen Zhu, Yingjun Bao, Hasimu Asihaer·, Gengfei Cao, Weixin Ren. Clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(03): 294-298.

目的

探讨125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年9月至2021年4月新疆医科大学附属第一医院采用125I粒子条联合胆道金属支架植入治疗的20例Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型HCCA患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男8例,女12例;平均年龄(69±12)岁;Ⅲa型2例,Ⅳ型18例。DSA透视下经皮经肝穿刺至肝内胆管,放置胆道金属支架和125I粒子条。观察患者手术情况及并发症发生情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存时间及支架通畅率。

结果

20例患者均成功植入胆道金属支架及125I粒子条,手术成功率100%。共植入胆道金属支架40枚和125I放射性粒子417枚。术后寒战、高热及疼痛2例,胆道感染1例,未出现胆道穿孔、出血等并发症。随访时间2~28个月,中位时间12个月。支架中位通畅时间382 d,术后3、6、12个月累积支架通畅率分别为95.0%、86.4%、59.2%。患者中位生存时间353 d,术后3、6、12个月累积生存率分别为89.2%、75.3%和45.2%。

结论

125I粒子条联合胆道支架是治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型HCCA的一种安全有效方法,能提高支架通畅时间及延长生存期,且不增加并发症发生率。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent in the treatment of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

Methods

Clinical data of 20 patients with Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ HCCA treated with 125I seed strip combined with biliary metallic stent implantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from September 2016 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 8 patients were male and 12 female, aged (69±12) years on average, 2 cases of type Ⅲa and 18 type Ⅳ HCCA. Biliary metallic stent and 125I seed strip were implanted into the intrahepatic bile duct via percutaneous transhepatic puncture under digital subtraction angiography. Surgical conditions and postoperative complications were observed. The survival time and stent patency rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

biliary metal stents and 125I seed strips were successfully implanted in 20 patients, with a surgical success rate of 100%. 40 biliary metal stents and 417 125I radioactive seeds were implanted. Postoperatively, 2 patients suffered from chill, high fever and pain, and 1 case developed biliary tract infection. No postoperative complications, such as biliary perforation and bleeding, occurred. All patients received postoperative follow-up for 2 to 28 months, with a median of12 months. The median stent patency time was 382 d. The 3-, 6- and 12-month cumulative stent patency rates were 95.0%, 86.4% and 59.2%, respectively. The median survival time of all patients was 353 d. The 3-, 6- and 12-month cumulative survival rates were 89.2%, 75.3% and 45.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

125I seed strip combined with biliary stent is a safe and efficacious treatment for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ HCCA, which can prolong the stent patency time and survival time without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications.

图1 一例Bismuth-Corlette Ⅳ型HCCA患者治疗过程注:a为术前CT示肝门部胆管增厚并强化,肝内胆管扩张;b为经皮经肝胆道造影示肝门部胆管梗阻,左右肝管不通;c为放置胆道支架通畅,125I粒子条位置良好;HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图2 20例HCCA患者125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗前后肝功能变化注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图3 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗HCCA患者支架通畅的Kaplan-Meier分析注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图4 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗HCCA患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
[1]
刘钢山, 吴硕东, 范莹. 肝门部胆管癌的分类、治疗及预后因素概述[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(19):3442-3446.
[2]
张明雄, 刘立鑫, 郑梦秋, 等. 肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2020, 32(2):116-121.
[3]
陈泰安, 熊永福, 杨发才, 等. 肝门部胆管癌外科治疗进展和争议[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(2):133-138.
[4]
徐红豆, 许晨, 顾杰, 等. 两种经皮胆道支架植入技术治疗肝门部恶性胆管梗阻的临床疗效比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(4):403-407.
[5]
李文会, 罗剑钧, 戴真煜, 等. 腔内近距离放疗联合及支架植入治疗恶性胆道梗阻[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2015, 24(3):215-218.
[6]
Luo JJ, Zhang ZH, Liu QX, et al. Endovascular brachytherapy combined with stent placement and TACE for treatment of HCC with main portal vein tumor thrombus[J]. Hepatol Int, 2016, 10(1):185-195.
[7]
贺皓, 林明明, 韩雨, 等. Y型支架联合粒子条植入治疗Ⅳ型胆管癌的疗效[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2018, 38(3):564-569.
[8]
杨安, 刘玉娥, 申景. 肝门部胆管癌的介入治疗现状及研究进展[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(3):312-316.
[9]
金龙, 邹英华. 梗阻性黄疸经皮肝穿刺胆道引流及支架植入术专家共识(2018)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(3):504-508.
[10]
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline-updated October 2017[J]. Endoscopy, 2018, 50(9):910-930.
[11]
Zhu HD, Guo JH, Huang M, et al. Irradiation stents vs. conventional metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction:a multicenter trial[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 68(5):970-977.
[12]
李敬东, 张立鑫, 赵芷藜. 微创技术在肝细胞癌合并胆管癌栓治疗中的价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 7(6): 437-439.
[13]
Rodriguez VM, Grove J, Yelich S, et al. Effects of brachytherapy on intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistulas in a porcine model[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002, 13(12):1239-1246.
[14]
Hasimu A, Gu JP, Ji WZ, et al. Comparative study of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement with or without iodine-125 seeds for treating patients with malignant biliary obstruction[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(4):583-593.
[15]
朱超, 刘会春, 胡小四, 等. 胆道双支架联合125I粒子腔内照射治疗恶性肝门部胆道梗阻的疗效分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29(11):1100-1104.
[16]
Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi JH, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent versus stent-by-stent deployment for inoperable advanced malignant hilar biliary stricture[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 90(2):222-230.
[17]
唐卫东, 邓杰文, 姜超,等. 64排螺旋CT联合多模式重建图像在肝门部胆管癌可切除性术前评估中的应用[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2020, 43(4):680-683.
[18]
陈旭, 朱光宇, 滕皋军, 等. 胆管内照射支架应用的实验研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2012, 21(5):399-404.
[19]
姜继华, 姜仁鸦, 汪正飞,等. 肝门部胆管癌患者经内镜下射频消融和金属支架植入治疗后胆道感染病原菌与影响因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(18):2794-2798.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 胡文钰, 徐东东, 李南林. 早期乳腺癌全身辅助治疗的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 297-303.
[3] 潘荔生, 刘忠强, 周莹莹, 陈勃, 李晏宁, 徐金锋, 蔡隆梅, 王宏梅. 乳腺癌内乳淋巴结的诊断和治疗[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 308-314.
[4] 刘正宇, 刘春风, 王振. 改良后外侧入路半髋置换治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 409-413.
[5] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[8] 蔡定钦, 孙建国, 陈旭. 外泌体非编码RNAs与肺癌放射治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 655-658.
[9] 陈旭, 牛凯, 孙建国. 放疗联合免疫治疗对驱动基因阴性NSCLC的困惑分析及应对策略[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 341-348.
[10] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[11] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
[12] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[13] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[14] 郑鑫蓥, 张惠勇, 黄星, 邱磊, 方庆亮, 鹿振辉, 王蕾. TGF-β在放射治疗中的双重调控作用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 309-314.
[15] 陈丽, 陈敏江, 任建敏, 谢艳茹, 涂建飞, 纪建松. 125I放射性粒子条联合胆道支架与单纯胆道支架植入治疗恶性胆道梗阻的术后院内感染发生率及临床疗效的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 144-149.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?