切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 294 -298. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.03.016

临床研究

125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌疗效
李健鹏1, 顾俊鹏1, 张海潇1, 朱帝文1, 鲍应军1, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木1, 曹耿飞1, 任伟新1,()   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学附属第一医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-04 出版日期:2022-06-10
  • 通信作者: 任伟新

Clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Jianpeng Li1, Junpeng Gu1, Haixiao Zhang1, Diwen Zhu1, Yingjun Bao1, Hasimu Asihaer·1, Gengfei Cao1, Weixin Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2022-03-04 Published:2022-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Weixin Ren
引用本文:

李健鹏, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 朱帝文, 鲍应军, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 曹耿飞, 任伟新. 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 294-298.

Jianpeng Li, Junpeng Gu, Haixiao Zhang, Diwen Zhu, Yingjun Bao, Hasimu Asihaer·, Gengfei Cao, Weixin Ren. Clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(03): 294-298.

目的

探讨125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年9月至2021年4月新疆医科大学附属第一医院采用125I粒子条联合胆道金属支架植入治疗的20例Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型HCCA患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男8例,女12例;平均年龄(69±12)岁;Ⅲa型2例,Ⅳ型18例。DSA透视下经皮经肝穿刺至肝内胆管,放置胆道金属支架和125I粒子条。观察患者手术情况及并发症发生情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存时间及支架通畅率。

结果

20例患者均成功植入胆道金属支架及125I粒子条,手术成功率100%。共植入胆道金属支架40枚和125I放射性粒子417枚。术后寒战、高热及疼痛2例,胆道感染1例,未出现胆道穿孔、出血等并发症。随访时间2~28个月,中位时间12个月。支架中位通畅时间382 d,术后3、6、12个月累积支架通畅率分别为95.0%、86.4%、59.2%。患者中位生存时间353 d,术后3、6、12个月累积生存率分别为89.2%、75.3%和45.2%。

结论

125I粒子条联合胆道支架是治疗Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ/Ⅳ型HCCA的一种安全有效方法,能提高支架通畅时间及延长生存期,且不增加并发症发生率。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 125I seed strip combined with biliary stent in the treatment of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

Methods

Clinical data of 20 patients with Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ HCCA treated with 125I seed strip combined with biliary metallic stent implantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from September 2016 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 8 patients were male and 12 female, aged (69±12) years on average, 2 cases of type Ⅲa and 18 type Ⅳ HCCA. Biliary metallic stent and 125I seed strip were implanted into the intrahepatic bile duct via percutaneous transhepatic puncture under digital subtraction angiography. Surgical conditions and postoperative complications were observed. The survival time and stent patency rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

biliary metal stents and 125I seed strips were successfully implanted in 20 patients, with a surgical success rate of 100%. 40 biliary metal stents and 417 125I radioactive seeds were implanted. Postoperatively, 2 patients suffered from chill, high fever and pain, and 1 case developed biliary tract infection. No postoperative complications, such as biliary perforation and bleeding, occurred. All patients received postoperative follow-up for 2 to 28 months, with a median of12 months. The median stent patency time was 382 d. The 3-, 6- and 12-month cumulative stent patency rates were 95.0%, 86.4% and 59.2%, respectively. The median survival time of all patients was 353 d. The 3-, 6- and 12-month cumulative survival rates were 89.2%, 75.3% and 45.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

125I seed strip combined with biliary stent is a safe and efficacious treatment for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ/Ⅳ HCCA, which can prolong the stent patency time and survival time without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications.

图1 一例Bismuth-Corlette Ⅳ型HCCA患者治疗过程注:a为术前CT示肝门部胆管增厚并强化,肝内胆管扩张;b为经皮经肝胆道造影示肝门部胆管梗阻,左右肝管不通;c为放置胆道支架通畅,125I粒子条位置良好;HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图2 20例HCCA患者125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗前后肝功能变化注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图3 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗HCCA患者支架通畅的Kaplan-Meier分析注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
图4 125I粒子条联合胆道支架治疗HCCA患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线注:HCCA为肝门部胆管癌
[1]
刘钢山, 吴硕东, 范莹. 肝门部胆管癌的分类、治疗及预后因素概述[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(19):3442-3446.
[2]
张明雄, 刘立鑫, 郑梦秋, 等. 肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2020, 32(2):116-121.
[3]
陈泰安, 熊永福, 杨发才, 等. 肝门部胆管癌外科治疗进展和争议[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(2):133-138.
[4]
徐红豆, 许晨, 顾杰, 等. 两种经皮胆道支架植入技术治疗肝门部恶性胆管梗阻的临床疗效比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(4):403-407.
[5]
李文会, 罗剑钧, 戴真煜, 等. 腔内近距离放疗联合及支架植入治疗恶性胆道梗阻[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2015, 24(3):215-218.
[6]
Luo JJ, Zhang ZH, Liu QX, et al. Endovascular brachytherapy combined with stent placement and TACE for treatment of HCC with main portal vein tumor thrombus[J]. Hepatol Int, 2016, 10(1):185-195.
[7]
贺皓, 林明明, 韩雨, 等. Y型支架联合粒子条植入治疗Ⅳ型胆管癌的疗效[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2018, 38(3):564-569.
[8]
杨安, 刘玉娥, 申景. 肝门部胆管癌的介入治疗现状及研究进展[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(3):312-316.
[9]
金龙, 邹英华. 梗阻性黄疸经皮肝穿刺胆道引流及支架植入术专家共识(2018)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(3):504-508.
[10]
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline-updated October 2017[J]. Endoscopy, 2018, 50(9):910-930.
[11]
Zhu HD, Guo JH, Huang M, et al. Irradiation stents vs. conventional metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction:a multicenter trial[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 68(5):970-977.
[12]
李敬东, 张立鑫, 赵芷藜. 微创技术在肝细胞癌合并胆管癌栓治疗中的价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 7(6): 437-439.
[13]
Rodriguez VM, Grove J, Yelich S, et al. Effects of brachytherapy on intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistulas in a porcine model[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002, 13(12):1239-1246.
[14]
Hasimu A, Gu JP, Ji WZ, et al. Comparative study of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement with or without iodine-125 seeds for treating patients with malignant biliary obstruction[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(4):583-593.
[15]
朱超, 刘会春, 胡小四, 等. 胆道双支架联合125I粒子腔内照射治疗恶性肝门部胆道梗阻的疗效分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29(11):1100-1104.
[16]
Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi JH, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent versus stent-by-stent deployment for inoperable advanced malignant hilar biliary stricture[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 90(2):222-230.
[17]
唐卫东, 邓杰文, 姜超,等. 64排螺旋CT联合多模式重建图像在肝门部胆管癌可切除性术前评估中的应用[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2020, 43(4):680-683.
[18]
陈旭, 朱光宇, 滕皋军, 等. 胆管内照射支架应用的实验研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2012, 21(5):399-404.
[19]
姜继华, 姜仁鸦, 汪正飞,等. 肝门部胆管癌患者经内镜下射频消融和金属支架植入治疗后胆道感染病原菌与影响因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(18):2794-2798.
[1] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[4] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[5] 闫兆龙, 张镇斌, 李广兴, 赵璋, 张业勇, 殷鲁旭, 李树锋. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的早期效果及影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 492-499.
[6] 江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇, 杜美芳. 多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.
[7] 李佳隆, 韩青雷, 宋铭杰, 古丽米拉·亚森江, 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 郭强, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅. Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌行扩大肝切除与围肝门切除的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 438-443.
[8] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[9] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[10] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[11] 黎熊, 曹永宽. 不同远切缘距离的ISR在局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 443-446.
[12] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[13] 吴周宇, 周宝勇, 李明. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 384-388.
[14] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[15] 吕喆, 高庆坤, 常天静, 董含微, 王晓鹏, 那曼丽, 张滨. 磁共振3D-T2WI-FFE序列结合曲面重组观察直肠癌放疗对骶神经形态的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 513-518.
阅读次数
全文


摘要