切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 574 -579. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.06.009

临床研究

多模态影像技术在精准肝癌肝切除中的应用
刘文瑛1, 欧阳再兴1, 朱剑华1, 吴黎明1, 谭勇1, 宋灏1, 朱玉珍1, 黄从云1,()   
  1. 1. 512025 广东省韶关市,汕头大学医学院附属粤北人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-29 出版日期:2022-12-10
  • 通信作者: 黄从云
  • 基金资助:
    韶关市科技计划项目(210805174532225); 韶关市卫生健康科研项目(Y21128)

Application of multi-modality imaging in precise resection for liver cancer

Wenying Liu1, Zaixing Ouyang1, Jianhua Zhu1, Liming Wu1, Yong Tan1, Hao Song1, Yuzhen Zhu1, Congyun Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan 512025, China
  • Received:2022-06-29 Published:2022-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Congyun Huang
引用本文:

刘文瑛, 欧阳再兴, 朱剑华, 吴黎明, 谭勇, 宋灏, 朱玉珍, 黄从云. 多模态影像技术在精准肝癌肝切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 574-579.

Wenying Liu, Zaixing Ouyang, Jianhua Zhu, Liming Wu, Yong Tan, Hao Song, Yuzhen Zhu, Congyun Huang. Application of multi-modality imaging in precise resection for liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(06): 574-579.

目的

探讨多模态影像技术在精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌(肝癌)中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年1月粤北人民医院行精准肝切除的69例肝癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男52例,女17例;年龄21~77岁,中位年龄55岁。根据术前采用数字医学影像技术不同,将患者分为多模态影像技术指导组(多模组,32例)和三维可视化技术指导组(单模组,37例)。多模组采用三维可视化重建、3D打印、增强现实(AR)技术指导多模块进行术前评估、手术规划和手术导航。单模组术前采用三维可视化技术进行术前规划。比较两组患者围手术期情况及预后。两组手术时间、术中出血量等比较采用t检验或秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

69例患者均成功建立三维可视化重建模型。多模组术中所见与三维可视化、3D打印及AR技术一致,手术团队对手术方案理解和手术配合高度一致。所有患者均顺利完成手术,无围手术期死亡,术后均未发生严重并发症。多模组平均手术时间、入肝血流阻断时间分别为(203±59)、(27±13)min,明显少于单模组的(235±62)、(34±13)min(t=-2.193,-2.178;P<0.05);术中出血量中位数分别为165(235)ml,亦明显少于单模组的200(100)ml(Z=-2.472,P<0.05)。单模组术后复发转移4例,多模组3例,两组无复发生存率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.032,P>0.05)。

结论

多模态影像技术具有多信息化优势,可弥补单一模式的不足,通过精准的术前规划和手术导航,可提高精准肝癌肝切除术的精准性和安全性。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical application value of multi-modality imaging in precise resection for primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Clinical data of 69 patients with PLC who underwent precise liver resection in Yuebei People's Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 52 patients were male and 17 female, aged from 21 to 77 years, with a median age of 55 years. According to different digital medical imaging techniques used preoperatively, all patients were divided into the multi-modality imaging guiding group (multi-modality group, n=32) and three-dimensional (3D) visualization guiding group (single-modality group, n=37). In the multi-modality group, 3D visualization reconstruction, 3D printing and augmented reality (AR) were employed for preoperative evaluation, surgical planning and surgical navigation. In the single-modality group, 3D visualization was utilized for surgical planning before operation. Perioperative conditions and clinical prognosis were compared between two groups. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss between two groups were statistically compared by t test or rank-sum test. The rate comparison was conducted by Chi-square test.

Results

3D visualization reconstruction models were successfully established for 69 patients. In the multi-modality group, intraoperative findings were consistent with those of 3D visualization, 3D printing and AR. Understanding on the surgical plan was highly consistent with the cooperation of the surgical team. All patients successfully completed the surgery. No perioperative death and severe postoperative complications were observed. In the multi-modality group, the average operation time and hepatic blood inflow occlusion duration were (203±59) min and(27±13) min, significantly shorter than (235±62) min and (34±13) min in the single-modality group (t=-2.193, -2.178; P<0.05). In the multi-modality group, the median intraoperative blood loss was 165(235) ml, significantly less than 200(100) ml in single-modality group (Z=-2.472, P<0.05). In the single-modality group, 4 cases developed postoperative recurrence and metastases and 3 cases in the multi-modality group. No significant difference was noted in the recurrence-free survival rate between two groups (χ2=0.032, P>0.05).

Conclusions

Multi-modality imaging possesses the advantage of multi-informatization and resolves the limitations of single-modality imaging. Besides, it can improve the accuracy and safety of precise resection for PLC through accurate preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation.

表1 多模组和单模组肝癌患者一般资料比较
表2 多模组和单模组肝癌患者三维可视化重建模型术前规划指标比较
图1 一例肝癌患者多模态影像技术指导肝癌精准肝切除术注:a为CT示肝中叶肿瘤与门静脉左支及肝中静脉关系密切;b为肝脏三维重建模型;c为三维可视化模型立体显示肝脏解剖、肿瘤位置;d为手术平面的确定(拟行扩大左半肝切除)及体积计算;e为肿瘤与血管的关系,肿瘤毗邻门静脉左支、侵犯肝中静脉;f为3D打印模型实景化显示肝脏解剖;g为AR技术实时导航手术;h为肿瘤切除术后肝断面;AR为增强现实
表3 多模组和单模组肝癌患者围手术期情况及预后比较
[1]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(2):121-138.
[2]
Sun Y, Wu L, Zhong Y, et al. Single-cell landscape of the ecosystem in early-relapse hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(2):404-421, e16.
[3]
Shindoh J, Kobayashi Y, Umino R, et al. Successful anatomic resection of tumor-bearing portal territory delays long-term stage progression of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(2):844-853.
[4]
杨世忠, 冯晓彬, 董家鸿. 精准外科理念指导下的肝癌外科治疗[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2018, 33(3):189-192, 196.
[5]
中华医学会数字医学分会, 中国研究型医院学会数字智能化外科专业委员会, 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会. 中央型肝癌三维可视化精准诊疗中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(4):361-368.
[6]
Chen H, He Y, Jia W. Precise hepatectomy in the intelligent digital era[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2020, 16(3):365-373.
[7]
方驰华, 胡浩宇, 刘允怡, 等. 数字智能化诊疗技术在解剖性肝切除中应用价值[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(6):545-551.
[8]
杨剑, 王壮雄, 方驰华. 多模态影像技术在原发性肝癌外科中的应用[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 8(1):1-5.
[9]
张鹏, 祝文, 方驰华, 等. 多模影像技术在解剖性肝切除手术导航中应用价值研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(5):480-486.
[10]
Tang R, Ma LF, Rong ZX, et al. Augmented reality technology for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during hepatobiliary surgery: a review of current methods[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(2):101-112.
[11]
Chen H, He Y, Jia W. Precise hepatectomy in the intelligent digital era[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2020, 16(3):365-373.
[12]
中华医学会数字医学分会, 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会, 中国医师协会精准医学专业委员会, 等. 原发性肝癌三维可视化技术操作及诊疗规范(2020版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(9):991-1011.
[13]
Fang C, An J, Bruno A, et al. Consensus recommendations of three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and management of liver diseases[J]. Hepatol Int, 2020, 14(4):437-453.
[14]
Fang C, Zhang P, Qi X. Digital and intelligent liver surgery in the new era: prospects and dilemmas[J]. EBioMedicine, 2019(41):693-701.
[15]
方驰华, 陈青山. 数字智能化诊疗技术在围肝门胆道疾病术前评估中的意义[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(2):126-130.
[16]
Zhang W, Zhu W, Yang J, et al. Augmented reality navigation for stereoscopic laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of primary liver cancer: preliminary experience[J]. Front Oncol, 2021(11):663236.
[17]
中华医学会数字医学分会, 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会, 中国医师协会临床精准医学专业委员会, 等. 复杂性肝脏肿瘤三维可视化精准诊治指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(8):766-774.
[18]
赵頔, 叶进冬, 李华丽, 等. 肝脏三维可视化重建技术在儿童复杂肝母细胞瘤肝切除术中的应用价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(9):2130-2135.
[19]
方驰华, 田捷, 张鹏, 等. 数字医学技术在肝胆胰外科的应用: 20年历史回顾与未来展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2021, 59(10):807-811.
[20]
刘文瑛, 杨剑, 欧阳再兴, 等. 3D打印技术在复杂性肝癌精准肝切除术中的应用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2019, 31(7):399-403.
[21]
Lang H, Huber T. Virtual and augmented reality in liver surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(1):e8.
[22]
Hu Z, Fang C, Li B, et al. First-in-human liver-tumour surgery guided by multispectral fluorescence imaging in the visible and near-infrared-Ⅰ/Ⅱwindows[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2020, 4(3):259-271.
[1] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[2] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[6] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[7] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[8] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[9] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[10] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[11] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[12] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要