切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 82 -86. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.01.016

所属专题： 临床研究；

临床研究

术前胆道引流对壶腹周围癌患者术后并发症和远期生存的影响
武帅1, 吴含雪2, 莫建涛1, 杨沛泽1, 程亚丽1, 仵正1,†()   
  1. 1. 710061　西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科
    2. 710061　西安交通大学医学部
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-09 出版日期:2023-02-10
  • 通信作者: 仵正
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技资源开放共享平台(2022PT-35); 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2020JQ-510); 西安交通大学第一附属医院科研发展基金(2021QN-24)

Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative complications and long-term survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma

Shuai Wu1, Hanxue Wu2, Jiantao Mo1, Peize Yang1, Yali Cheng1, Zheng Wu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
    2. Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2022-09-09 Published:2023-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Zheng Wu
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

武帅, 吴含雪, 莫建涛, 杨沛泽, 程亚丽, 仵正. 术前胆道引流对壶腹周围癌患者术后并发症和远期生存的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 82-86.

Shuai Wu, Hanxue Wu, Jiantao Mo, Peize Yang, Yali Cheng, Zheng Wu. Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative complications and long-term survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 82-86.

目的

探讨术前胆道引流（PBD）对壶腹周围癌患者术后并发症和远期生存的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年6月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行胰十二指肠切除术的114例壶腹周围癌患者临床资料。其中男75例，女39例；年龄39~78岁，中位年龄62岁。壶腹癌55例，远端胆管癌52例，十二指肠乳头癌7例。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。根据术前是否进行PBD，将患者分为PBD组（36例）和未引流组（78例）。比较两组围手术期、术后并发症和远期生存情况。两组围手术期指标比较采用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验，并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

PBD组术后TB中位数为110（132）μmol/L，明显小于未引流组的156（117）μmol/L（Z=-2.588，P<0.05）。PBD组术后TB变化值为43（163）μmol/L，明显大于未引流组的25（87）μmol/L（Z=2.140，P<0.05）。PBD组术后总并发症发生率为72%（56/78），未引流组为67%（24/36），差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.310，P>0.05）。生存分析显示，PBD组中位生存期为24个月，未引流组为20个月，两组总体生存率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.551，P>0.05）。

结论

对于壶腹周围癌患者，术前PBD仅能明显改善黄疸情况，而对术后并发症和长期生存并无明显获益，不推荐常规PBD减黄。

关键词: 壶腹周围癌, 引流术, 黄疸，阻塞性, 手术后并发症, 预后
Objective

To evaluate the effect of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on postoperative complications and long-term survival of patients with periampullary cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 114 patients with periampullary cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 75 patients were male and 39 female, aged from 39 to 78 years, with a median age of 62 years. 55 patients were diagnosed with ampullary carcinoma, 52 cases of distal cholangiocarcinoma and 7 cases of carcinoma of the duodenal papilla. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were divided into the PBD (n=36) and non-drainage groups (n=78) according to whether preoperative PBD was performed. Perioperative and postoperative complications and long-term survival were compared between two groups. Perioperative parameters betweentwo groups were compared by t test or Mann-Whitney U test. The incidence of complications was compared byChi-square test. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

In the PBD group, the median postoperative TB level was 110(132) μmol/L, significantly lower than 156(117) μmol/L in the non-drainage group (Z=-2.588, P<0.05). The change value of postoperative TB level in the PBD group was 43(163) μmol/L, significantly higher than 25(87) μmol/L in the non-drainage group (Z=2.140, P<0.05). In the PBD group, the total incidence of postoperative complications was 72%(56/78), and 67%(24/36) in the non-drainage group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.310, P>0.05). Survival analysis showed that the median overall survival was 24 months in the PBD group and 20 months in non-drainage group, where no significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=0.551, P>0.05).

Conclusions

For patients with periampullary cancer, preoperative PBD can significantly mitigate jaundice, whereas it brings no significant benefits for postoperative complications and long-term survival. Hence, PBD is not routinely recommended for patients with periampullary cancer complicated with obstructive jaundice.

Key words: Periampullary carcinoma, Drainage, Jaundice, obstructive, Postoperative complications, Prognosis
表1 PBD组和未引流组壶腹周围癌患者一般资料比较
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 性别（例） 病理类型（例） TNM分期（例） TB[μmol/L，M（QR）] WBC[×109/L，M（QR）] ASA分级（例） 手术方式（例）
男 女 壶腹癌 远端胆管癌 十二指肠乳头癌 Ⅰ期 Ⅱ期 Ⅲ期 Ⅱ级 Ⅲ级 OPD LPD
PBD组 36 61±10 22 14 23 11 2 8 20 8 177（195） 6（3） 27 9 31 5
未引流组 78 63±9 53 25 32 41 5 9 55 14 173（120） 6（2） 53 25 68 10
统计值   t=-1.225 χ2=0.512 χ2=5.314 χ2=2.956 Z=0.463 Z=0.302 χ2=0.585 χ2=0.025
P值   0.159 0.474 0.070 0.228 0.643 0.763 0.444 0.875
表2 PBD组与未引流组壶腹周围癌患者围手术期情况比较
组别 例数 手术时间[min，M（QR）] 术中出血量（ml） 术后TB[μmol/L，M（QR）] TB变化值[μmol/L，M（QR）] 术后WBC[×109/L，M（QR）] 术后住院时间（d，±s） 住院费用（万元，±s） 二次手术（例）
PBD组 36 343（120） 400（400） 110（132） 43（163） 12（8） 19±9 13±4 1
未引流组 78 338（123） 400（300） 156（117） 25（87） 12（6） 18±7 12±4 4
统计值   Z=0.772 Z=0.808 Z=-2.588 Z=2.140 Z=0.079 t=0.784 t=0.931 χ2=0.324
P值   0.440 0.419 0.010 0.032 0.937 0.101 0.354 0.569
表3 PBD组与未引流组壶腹周围癌患者术后并发症发生情况比较（例）
组别 例数 腹腔感染 腹腔积液 胆漏 胃排空延迟 出血 胰瘘
B级 C级
PBD组 36 17 15 1 14 9 11 2
未引流组 78 41 27 1 44 12 17 3
χ2值   0.281 0.526 0.320 3.026 1.515 1.314
P值   0.596 0.468 0.572 0.082 0.218 0.518
图1 PBD组与未引流组壶腹周围癌患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线 注：PBD为术前胆道引流
[1]
Lee H, Han Y, Kim JR, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage adversely affects surgical outcomes in periampullary cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25(3):206-213.
[2]
Wang C, Xu Y, Lu X. Should preoperative biliary drainage be routinely performed for obstructive jaundice with resectable tumor?[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2013, 2(5):266-271.
[3]
Sapisochin G, Ivanics T, Subramanian V, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review of the general principles[J]. Int J Surg, 2020(82S):77-81.
[4]
Nakai Y, Yamamoto R, Matsuyama M, et al. Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: E-POD hilar study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(5):1146-1153.
[5]
Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY. The current status of preoperative biliary drainage for patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: a comprehensive review[J]. Surgeon, 2014, 12(5):290-296.
[6]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(3):584-591.
[7]
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(1):20-25.
[8]
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(5):761-768.
[9]
Iacono C, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(2):191-204.
[10]
van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(2):129-137.
[11]
Wu JM, Ho TW, Yen HH, et al. Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage causes intra-abdominal abscess in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients: an important but neglected risk factor[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(4): 1086-1092.
[12]
Lin SC, Shan YS, Lin PW. Adequate preoperative biliary drainage is determinative to decrease postoperative infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2010, 57(101):698-705.
[13]
Saxena P, Kumbhari V, Zein ME, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage[J]. Dig Endosc, 2015, 27(2):265-277.
[14]
Cho JH, Yoon YS, Kim EJ, et al. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial for preoperative biliary drainage with uncovered metal versus plastic stents for resectable periampullary cancer[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(10):690-699.
[15]
Bonin EA, Baron TH. Preoperative biliary stents in pancreatic cancer[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011, 18(5):621-629.
[16]
Rungsakulkij N, Thongchai V, Suragul W, et al. Association of the rate of bilirubin decrease with major morbidity in patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2021(9):20503121211039667.
[17]
Fujiwara Y, Haruki K, Hamura R, et al. A novel prognostic score combining preoperative biliary drainage and inflammatory status for patients with periampullary cancers[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(4):813-822.
[18]
王锦程, 余佩和, 苏松, 等. 经内镜鼻胆管引流术与经内镜胆道支架置入术在低位恶性梗阻性黄疸术前胆道引流效果比较的Meta分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(4):863-867.
[19]
Ito Y, Nakai Y, Isayama H, et al. Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcomes in periampullary and hilar malignancy: a single-center experience[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(2):150-155.
[20]
Shabunin AV, Lebedev SS, Tavobilov MM, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: to drain or not to drain? and if drain, in what way?[J]. Khirurgiia, 2021(6):101-105.
[21]
Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R, et al. Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer[J]. Gut, 2016, 65(12):1981-1987.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[3] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[4] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[11] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[12] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号