切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 96 -102. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.01.019

临床研究

腹腔镜脾部分切除术在脾脏良性占位性病变中的应用价值
李硕1, 周金婵1, 李宇1, 王卫东1,()   
  1. 1. 528308 广东省佛山市,南方医科大学顺德医院肝胆胰脾外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-28 出版日期:2023-02-10
  • 通信作者: 王卫东
  • 基金资助:
    佛山市医学骨干人才项目(600016)

Application value of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for benign space-occupying lesions in spleen

Shuo Li1, Jinchan Zhou1, Yu Li1, Weidong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Splenic Surgery, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan 528308, China
  • Received:2022-10-28 Published:2023-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Wang
引用本文:

李硕, 周金婵, 李宇, 王卫东. 腹腔镜脾部分切除术在脾脏良性占位性病变中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 96-102.

Shuo Li, Jinchan Zhou, Yu Li, Weidong Wang. Application value of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for benign space-occupying lesions in spleen[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 96-102.

目的

探讨腹腔镜脾部分切除术(LPS)在治疗脾脏良性占位性病变中的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2007年6月至2021年9月在南方医科大学顺德医院行腹腔镜手术治疗的28例脾脏良性占位性病变患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男10例,女18例;平均年龄(40±17)岁。根据手术方式不同将患者分为LPS组(15例)和腹腔镜全脾切除术(LTS)组(13例)。LPS组与LTS组均以单发病灶为主;LPS组肿瘤分布主要位于脾脏上下极,LTS组主要位于脾门处。观察两组患者围手术期情况,以及手术方式、术后时间对外周血常规指标的影响。手术前后血常规指标比较采用重复测量方差分析。

结果

患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹。两组手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血比例、术后肛门排气时间、术后引流时间、术后住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LPS组术后3 d及3个月WBC分别为(9.0±2.7)×109/L、(6.0±1.9)×109/L,明显低于LTS组的(14.1±4.5)×109/L、(8.2±1.3)×109/L(t=-3.694,-3.488;P<0.05) ;手术方式(t=-2.775,P<0.05)和术后时间(F=53.182,P<0.05)均为影响WBC的主效应因素,二者存在交互效应(F=5.574,P<0.05)。LPS组术后3个月Plt为(236±92)×109/L,明显低于LTS组的(301±59)×109/L(t=-2.199,P<0.05);术后时间是影响Plt的主效应因素(F=10.490,P<0.05)。

结论

对于脾脏良性占位性病变患者,LPS是一种安全可行、疗效确切的手术方式。LPS在一定程度上保留了脾脏的正常生理功能,对WBC和Plt恢复正常有一定促进作用,可能降低术后感染及血栓形成风险。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in the treatment of benign space-occupying lesions in the spleen.

Methods

Clinical data of 28 patients with benign space-occupying lesions in the spleen who underwent LPS in Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University from June 2007 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 10 patients were male and 18 female, aged (40±17) years on average. All patients were divided into the LPS (n=15) and laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) groups (n=13) according to different surgical methods. In both LPS and LTS groups, all patients were mainly diagnosed with single lesion. In the LPS group, the lesions were mainly located in the upper and lower segments of the spleen, and primarily distributed in the hilum of the spleen in the LTS group. Perioperative conditions, and the impacts of surgical methods and postoperative time on the routine peripheral blood indexes were also observed between two groups. Routine peripheral blood indexes before and after surgery were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

All patients successfully completed the surgery without conversion to open surgery. No significant differences were noted in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, proportion of intraoperative blood transfusion, time to first flatus, postoperative drainage time and length of postoperative hospital stay between two groups (P>0.05). In the LPS group, the postoperative 3-d and 3-month WBC was (9.0±2.7)×109/L and (6.0±1.9 )×109/L, significantly lower than (14.1±4.5)×109/L and (8.2±1.3)×109/L in the LTS group (t=-3.694, -3.488; P<0.05). Surgical method (t=-2.775, P<0.05) and postoperative time (F=53.182, P<0.05) were the main factors that affected WBC, and two factors exerted interactive effects (F=5.574, P<0.05). In the LPS group, the Plt was (236±92)×109/L at postoperative 3 months, significantly lower than (301±59)×109/L in the LTS group (t=-2.199, P<0.05). Postoperative time was the main influencing factor for Plt (F=10.490, P<0.05).

Conclusions

LPS is a safe, feasible and effective surgical method for patients with benign space-occupying lesions in the spleen. LPS can preserve normal physiological function of the spleen to certain extent, promote the WBC and Plt to normal level, and may reduce the risk of postoperative infection and thrombosis.

图1 腹腔镜脾上极切除术过程及术后CT 注:a为术中分离出脾动脉主干,预置血管吊带;b为分离出脾上极分布的脾蒂血管,以Hem-o-lok夹结扎;c为脾上极血管结扎后脾脏表面出现明显分界线;d为术中超声检查并确认病灶位置;e为腔镜下应用Habib 4X沿着缺血线对脾组织进行消融凝固;f为Habib 4X消融凝固后用超声刀离断脾脏实质;g为用Hem-o-lok夹结扎处理脾断面管道;h为保留的脾下极供血良好;i为术后CT示脾上极已切除
表1 LPS组和LTS组脾脏良性占位性病变患者一般情况比较
表2 LPS组和LTS组脾脏良性占位性病变患者围手术期情况比较
表3 不同手术方式对腹腔镜脾切除术患者WBC的影响(×109/L,±s
表4 不同手术方式对腹腔镜脾切除术患者Hb的影响(g/L,±s
表5 不同手术方式对腹腔镜脾切除术患者Plt的影响(×109/L,±s
[1]
张国伟, 周杰. 原发性脾脏肿瘤52例诊治体会[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2012, 20(2):102-104.
[2]
王卫东. 腹腔镜脾部分切除术的方法和技巧[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2017, 25(34):3021-3024.
[3]
Lackner K, Brecht G, Janson R, et al. The value of computer tomography in the staging of primary lymph node neoplasms (author's transl)[J]. Rofo, 1980, 132(1):21-30.
[4]
孙备, 李承. 脾脏功能的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2006, 14(7): 450-452.
[5]
Jaïs X, Ioos V, Jardim C, et al. Splenectomy and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension[J]. Thorax, 2005, 60(12):1031-1034.
[6]
Hassn AM, Al-Fallouji MA, Ouf TI, et al. Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2000, 87(3):362-373.
[7]
Hoeper MM, Niedermeyer J, Hoffmeyer F, et al. Pulmonary hypertension after splenectomy?[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1999, 130(6): 506-509.
[8]
Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states[J]. Lancet, 2011, 378(9785):86-97.
[9]
Guan YS, Hu Y. Clinical application of partial splenic embolization[J]. ScientificWorldJournal, 2014:961345.
[10]
Morgenstern L, Shapiro SJ. Partial splenectomy for nonparasitic splenic cysts[J]. Am J Surg, 1980, 139(2):278-281.
[11]
Poulin EC, Thibault C, DesCôteaux JG, et al. Partial laparoscopic splenectomy for trauma: technique and case report[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1995, 5(4):306-310.
[12]
胡友主, 王存川, 陈均, 等. 腹腔镜脾部分切除术1例[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2001, 7(6):101.
[13]
展翰翔, 徐建威, 胡三元. 腹腔镜部分脾切除术的手术策略与技巧[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2016, 21(8):570-572.
[14]
夏穗生. 我国脾脏外科的发展回顾[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2004, 24(12):705-707.
[15]
Bing Y, Sadula A, Xiu D, et al. Laparoscopic middle segment splenectomy for central splenic hemangioma: a case report[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2020(77):925-929.
[16]
Manciu S, Tudor S, Vasilescu C. Splenic cysts: a strong indication for a minimally invasive partial splenectomy. could the splenic hilar vasculature type hold a defining role? [J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(11): 3543-3550.
[17]
马靖, 王卫东, 刘清波,等. Habib 4X在腹腔镜脾部分切除术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志2020, 9(2):181-185.
[18]
王卫东, 陈小伍, 吴志强, 等. 腹腔镜手术治疗脾良性病变19例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(8):717-719.
[19]
Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, et al. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up[J]. Haematologica, 2014, 99(2): 392-398.
[20]
He S, He F. Predictive model of portal venous system thrombosis in cirrhotic portal hypertensive patients after splenectomy[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(3):4236-4242.
[21]
杜竞赛, 冯建明, 李建平,等. 脾切除术后患者的血液学改变及血栓防治的研究进展[J]. 国际输血及血液学杂志, 2016, 39(4):360-364.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要