切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 91 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.01.018

临床研究

胆囊息肉流行病学调查及其进展影响因素分析
张海森1, 叶金宝2, 高鹏飞1,()   
  1. 1. 363000 福建省漳州市,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇九医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)普通外科
    2. 363000 福建省漳州市,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇九医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)检验科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-06 出版日期:2023-02-10
  • 通信作者: 高鹏飞
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金(2020J01133)

Epidemiological investigation of polypoid lesions of gallbladder and influence factors of disease progression

Haisen Zhang1, Jinbao Ye2, Pengfei Gao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, No.909 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Forces of PLA (Southeast Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University), Zhangzhou 363000, China
    2. Clinical Laboratory, No.909 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Forces of PLA (Southeast Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University), Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2022-09-06 Published:2023-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Pengfei Gao
引用本文:

张海森, 叶金宝, 高鹏飞. 胆囊息肉流行病学调查及其进展影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 91-95.

Haisen Zhang, Jinbao Ye, Pengfei Gao. Epidemiological investigation of polypoid lesions of gallbladder and influence factors of disease progression[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 91-95.

目的

探讨胆囊息肉(PLG)的流行病学特征及其进展影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年12月在中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇九医院就诊的627例PLG患者临床资料。其中男343例,女284例;年龄21~70岁,中位年龄42岁。同时收集2020年1月300例健康体检者作为健康对照。所有入组人员患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。分析PLG患者的流行病学特征,比较PLG患者和健康对照者的一般资料。根据随访情况,将PLG患者分为进展组和无进展组。两组率的比较采用χ2检验。PLG进展的影响因素分析采用多因素Logistic回归分析。

结果

627例PLG患者中,30~40岁年龄段占比最高,其次为40~50岁年龄段,分别为38.4%和34.8%;男性略高于女性,男女占比为1.21∶1;办公室职员占比最高,为58.4%;单发息肉占比略高于多发息肉,分别为53.3%、46.7%;息肉直径在1~6 mm内占比63.3%;非宽基底型息肉占88.4%。PLG患者糖尿病、肥胖、脂肪肝、血脂升高占比明显高于健康对照者(χ2=13.646,21.567,17.758,19.046;P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,宽基底型息肉、血脂升高、BMI升高、长期熬夜是PLG进展的独立危险因素(OR=2.366,3.367,4.124,2.373;P<0.05)。

结论

宽基底型息肉、血脂升高、BMI升高和长期熬夜是PLG进展的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (PLG) and influence factors of PLG progression.

Methods

Clinical data of 627 PLG patients treated in the No.909 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Forces of PLA from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 343 patients were male and 284 female, aged from 21 to 70 years, with a median age of 42 years. 300 healthy subjects receiving physical examination in January 2020 were enrolled as healthy controls. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The epidemiological characteristics of PLG patients were analyzed. Baseline data of PLG patients and healthy controls were compared. According to the follow-up results, PLG patients were divided into the progression and non-progression groups. The rates of two groups were compared by Chi-square test. The influence factors of PLG progression were identified by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 627 PLG patients, the proportion of patients aged30-40 years was the highest (38.4%), followed by 40-50 years (34.8%). The male-to-female ratio was 1.21∶1. The proportion of office staff was the highest up to 58.4%. The proportion of single PLG was 53.3%, slightly higher than 46.7% of multiple PLG. The proportion of PLG with a diameter of 1-6 mm was 63.3%. Non-wide basal PLG accounted for 88.4%. The proportion of diabetes mellitus, obesity, fatty liver and elevated blood lipids in PLG patients was significantly higher than that in healthy controls (χ2=13.646, 21.567, 17.758, 19.046; P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that wide basal PLG, elevated blood lipids, increased BMI and long-term staying up late were the independent risk factors for PLG progression (OR=2.366, 3.367, 4.124, 2.373; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Wide basal PLG, elevated blood lipids, increased BMI and long-term staying up late are the risk factors for PLG progression.

表1 胆囊息肉患者流行病学分析
表2 PLG组与健康对照组一般情况比较
表3 胆囊息肉进展单因素分析
表4 胆囊息肉进展多因素Logistics回归分析
[1]
Marangoni G, Hakeem A, Toogood GJ, et al. Treatment and surveillance of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder in the United Kingdom[J]. HPB2012, 14(7):435-440.
[2]
McCain RS, Diamond A, Jones C, et al. Current practices and future prospects for the management of gallbladder polyps: a topical review[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(26):2844-2852.
[3]
Kim HS, Cho SK, Kim CS, et al. Big data and analysis of risk factors for gallbladder disease in the young generation of Korea[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(2):e0211480.
[4]
Myers RP, Shaffer EA, Beck PL. Gallbladder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management[J]. Can J Gastroenterol, 2016, 16(3): 187.
[5]
Fujiwara K, Abe A, Masatsugu T, et al. Effect of gallbladder polyp size on the prediction and detection of gallbladder cancer[J]. Surg Endos, 2021, 35(9):5179-5185.
[6]
Lee SR, Kim HO, Shin JH. Reasonable cholecystectomy of gallbladder polyp-10 years of experience[J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(1):332-337.
[7]
Ballouhey Q, Binet A, Varlet F, et al. Management of polypoid gallbladder lesions in children: a multicenter study[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 28(1):6-11.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科专业委员会.胆囊癌诊断和治疗指南(2019版)[J].中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(4): 243-251.
[9]
刘凯, 卢逸, 木斯他巴·买买提热依木, 等. 胆囊息肉样病变手术指征再思考——388例胆囊切除术回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(2):147-152.
[10]
宋彦伟, 程军, 罗威, 等. 胆囊息肉样病变直径对判断息肉性质的价值分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23(1):130-133.
[11]
Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, et al. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery-European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(9): 3856-3866.
[12]
Choi YS, Do JH, Seo SW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polypoid lesions in a healthy population[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(6):1370-1375.
[13]
Li Y, Zhao L, Yu D, et al. Metabolic syndrome prevalence and its risk factors among adults in China: a nationally representative cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(6):e0199293.
[14]
Zheng Y, Bai XS, Zhou Z, et al. Correlation of dyslipidemias and gallbladder polyps-a large retrospective study among Chinese population[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(1):181-185.
[15]
Kocaöz S, Turan G. Preneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder lesions detected after cholecystectomy[J]. Prz Gastroenterol, 2019, 14(3): 193-197.
[16]
陈善鹏, 王智翔, 张小弟, 等. 胆囊息肉样病变的流行病学及危险因素[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(2):441-443.
[17]
Kapadia S, Osler T, Lee A, et al. The role of preoperative high resolution manometry in predicting dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5):2365-2372.
[18]
Terzioğlu SG, Kılıç , Sapmaz A, et al. Predictive factors of neoplastic gallbladder polyps: outcomes of 278 patients[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2017, 28(3):202-206.
[19]
刘力玮, 姚贵宾, 白雪松, 等. 胆囊息肉形成相关风险因素的研究进展[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2020, 49(2):13-15, 19.
[20]
邓家琦, 张丽云, 杨超, 等. 胆囊息肉样病变的自然病程及相关危险因素分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(6):492-495.
[1] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[2] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[3] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[4] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[5] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[6] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[12] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[13] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[14] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[15] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
阅读次数
全文


摘要