切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 294 -299. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.03.009

所属专题: 临床研究

临床研究

陈氏绕肝悬吊技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用(附视频)
丹增阿旺1, 王超1, 次仁平措1, 曾成龙1, 杨振华1, 罗鑫1, 王宇蔚1, 张必翔1, 张斌豪1,()   
  1. 1. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肝脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-08 出版日期:2023-06-10
  • 通信作者: 张斌豪
  • 基金资助:
    湖北陈孝平科技发展基金会(CXPJJH11900001-2019325,CXPJJH121001-2021004)

Application of Chen's liver-hanging maneuver in robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy (video attached)

Awang Danzeng1, Chao Wang1, Pingcuo Ciren1, Chenglong Zeng1, Zhenhua Yang1, Xin Luo1, Yuwei Wang1, Bixiang Zhang1, Binhao Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2023-01-08 Published:2023-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Binhao Zhang
引用本文:

丹增阿旺, 王超, 次仁平措, 曾成龙, 杨振华, 罗鑫, 王宇蔚, 张必翔, 张斌豪. 陈氏绕肝悬吊技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 294-299.

Awang Danzeng, Chao Wang, Pingcuo Ciren, Chenglong Zeng, Zhenhua Yang, Xin Luo, Yuwei Wang, Bixiang Zhang, Binhao Zhang. Application of Chen's liver-hanging maneuver in robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy (video attached)[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 294-299.

目的

探讨陈氏绕肝悬吊技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年6月至2018年12月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院行腹腔镜右半肝切除术的17例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男13例,女4例;年龄19~74岁,中位年龄55岁;机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中应用陈氏绕肝悬吊技术5例(机器人悬吊组),机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术未应用陈氏绕肝悬吊技术4例(机器人无悬吊组),传统腹腔镜右半肝切除术并应用陈氏绕肝悬吊技术8例(腹腔镜悬吊组)。观察3组患者围手术期情况。3组建立绕肝悬吊时间、断肝时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间比较采用秩和检验;绕肝悬吊成功率比较采用Fisher确切概率法。

结果

机器人悬吊组均成功建立绕肝悬吊,成功率5/5,建立绕肝悬吊中位时间6(6)min;腹腔镜悬吊组成功建立绕肝悬吊6例,成功率6/8,建立绕肝悬吊中位时间12(11)min;使用机器人建立绕肝悬吊时间更短(Z=-2.487,P=0.013),成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.053)。两种手术建立绕肝悬吊过程中均未发生周围组织或血管意外损伤而引起大出血。机器人悬吊组、机器人无悬吊组、腹腔镜悬吊组断肝时间分别为65(80)、75(80)、50(50)min,术中出血量分别为225(450)、300(500)、225(340)ml,术后住院时间分别为8(12)、10(5)、13(12)d,3组比较差异均无统计学意义(H=2.784,0.538,1.857;P>0.05)。3组术后均未发生并发症,无术后30 d内死亡。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中应用陈氏绕肝悬吊技术是安全、可行的。与传统腹腔镜肝切除相比,机器人辅助下腹腔镜肝切除应用陈氏绕肝悬吊技术更加方便、快捷。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of Chen's liver-hanging maneuver in robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 17 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hepatectomy in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from June 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 13 patients were male and 4 female, aged from 19 to 74 years, with a median age of 55 years. In the robot-hanging group, Chen's liver-hanging maneuver was applied in robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy (n=5), whereas in the robot-no-hanging group, Chen's liver-hanging maneuver was not delivered during robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy (n=4). In the laparoscopy-hanging group, traditional laparoscopic right hepatectomy combined with Chen's liver-hanging maneuver was adopted (n=8). Perioperative conditions of patients were observed in 3 groups. The liver-hanging time, the time of liver dissection, intraoperative blood loss and the length of postoperative hospital stay among 3 groups were compared by rank sum test. The success rate of liver-hanging maneuver was compared by Fisher's exact test.

Results

In the robot-hanging group, liver-hanging maneuver was successfully performed with a success rate of 5/5, and the median time of liver-hanging maneuver was 6(6) min. In the laparoscopy-hanging group, liver-hanging maneuver was successfully conducted in 6 cases with a success rate of 6/8, and the median time of liver-hanging maneuver was 12(11) min. The median time of liver-hanging maneuver in the robot-hanging group was significantly shorter than that in the laparoscopy-hanging group (Z=-2.487, P=0.013), and no significant difference was observed in the success rate between2 groups (P=0.053). No accidental injury to surrounding tissues or blood vessels, or massive bleeding occurred during two surgical procedures. In the robot-hanging, robot-no-hanging and laparoscope-hanging groups, the time of liver dissection was 65(80), 75(80) and 50(50) min, the intraoperative blood loss were 225(450), 300(500) and 225(340) ml, and the length of postoperative hospital stay were 8(12), 10(5) and 13(12) d, respectively. No significant differences were noted among 3 groups (H=2.784, 0.538, 1.857; P>0.05). No postoperative complications or death occurred with postoperative30 d in 3 groups.

Conclusions

It is safe and feasible to apply Chen's liver-hanging maneuver in robot-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Compared with traditional laparoscopic hepatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy combined with Chen's liver-hanging maneuver is more convenient and faster.

表1 机器人悬吊组、腹腔镜悬吊组、机器人无悬吊组腹腔镜右半肝切除术患者一般资料
表2 机器人悬吊组、腹腔镜悬吊组、机器人无悬吊组腹腔镜右半肝切除术患者围手术期情况
[1]
Reich H, Mcglynn F, DeCaprio J, et al. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1991, 78(5 Pt 2):956-958.
[2]
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital[J]. Arch Surg, 2003, 138(7):777-784.
[3]
Kitisin K, Packiam V, Bartlett DL, et al. A current update on the evolution of robotic liver surgery[J]. Minerva Chir, 2011, 66(4):281-293.
[4]
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(4): 619-629.
[5]
Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D. A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(3): 862-875.
[6]
Zhu P, Liao W, Zhang WG, et al. A prospective study using propensity score matching to compare long-term survival outcomes after robotic-assisted, laparoscopic or open liver resection for patients with BCLC Stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005380[Epub ahead of print].
[7]
Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, et al. A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(7):1214-1224.
[8]
Yang HY, Rho SY, Han DH, et al. Robotic major liver resections: surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections[J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2021, 25(1):8-17.
[9]
Zhu P, Liao W, Ding ZY, et al. Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(9): 1778-1787.
[10]
Belghiti J, Guevara OA, Noun R, et al. Liver hanging maneuver: a safe approach to right hepatectomy without liver mobilization[J].J Am Coll Surg, 2001, 193(1):109-111.
[11]
Wu TJ, Wang F, Lin YS, et al. Right hepatectomy by the anterior method with liver hanging versus conventional approach for large hepatocellular carcinomas[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(7):1070-1078.
[12]
Ogata S, Belghiti J, Varma D, et al. Two hundred liver hanging maneuvers for major hepatectomy: a single-center experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(1):31-35.
[13]
陈孝平, 吴在德, 裘法祖. 肝脏双悬吊技术在原位右半肝切除术中的应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2007(6):344-345.
[14]
Chen XP, Zhang WG, Lau WY, et al. Right hepatectomy using the liver double-hanging maneuver through the retrohepatic avascular tunnel on the right of the inferior vena cava[J]. Surgery, 2008, 144(5):830-833.
[15]
Dokmak S, Ben Safta Y, Ftériche FS, et al. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy with the hanging maneuver for multiple hepatocellular adenomas[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(12):3800-3801.
[16]
Liddo G, Buc E, Nagarajan G, et al. The liver hanging manoeuvre[J]. HPB, 2009, 11(4):296-305.
[17]
Chu H, Cao G, Tang Y, et al. Laparoscopic liver hanging maneuver through the retrohepatic tunnel on the right side of the inferior vena cava combined with a simple vascular occlusion technique for laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(6): 2932-2938.
[18]
Troisi RI, Montalti R. Modified hanging maneuver using the goldfinger dissector in laparoscopic right and left hepatectomy[J]. Dig Surg, 2012, 29(6):463-467.
[19]
Kim JH, Ryu DH, Jang LC, et al. Lateral approach liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical liver resections[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(8):3611-3617.
[20]
Kim JH. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy using modified liver hanging maneuver: technical evolution from caudal approach toward ventral approach[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(8):1343-1349.
[21]
赵頔, 叶进冬, 李华丽, 等. 肝脏三维可视化重建技术在儿童复杂肝母细胞瘤肝切除术中的应用价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(9):2130-2135.
[1] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[13] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[14] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[15] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
阅读次数
全文


摘要