切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 582 -588. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2025.04.013

临床研究

远端胆管癌术后生存预后及其影响因素分析
王淼1, 贺佳佳1, 潘颖威2, 王小兰1, 姚袆1, 刘明宝1, 陆兮3, 苏丽洁1,()   
  1. 1100013 北京,解放军总医院京中医疗区苇子坑门诊部
    2100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心肝胆外科
    3100853 北京,解放军总医院整形修复外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-06 出版日期:2025-08-10
  • 通信作者: 苏丽洁

Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of distal cholangiocarcinoma after resection

Miao Wang1, Jiajia He1, Yingwei Pan2, Xiaolan Wang1, Hui Yao1, Mingbao Liu1, Xi Lu3, Lijie Su1,()   

  1. 1Weizikeng Outpatient of Jingzhong Medical District, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100013, China
    2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    3Department of Plastic Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2025-03-06 Published:2025-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Lijie Su
引用本文:

王淼, 贺佳佳, 潘颖威, 王小兰, 姚袆, 刘明宝, 陆兮, 苏丽洁. 远端胆管癌术后生存预后及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 582-588.

Miao Wang, Jiajia He, Yingwei Pan, Xiaolan Wang, Hui Yao, Mingbao Liu, Xi Lu, Lijie Su. Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of distal cholangiocarcinoma after resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(04): 582-588.

目的

探讨远端胆管癌(DCCA)术后生存预后及其影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2019年12月解放军总医院肝胆外科收治的116例行胰十二指肠切除术的DCCA患者临床病理资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男71例,女45例;年龄31~82岁,中位年龄65岁。随访其生存预后情况。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验,生存预后影响因素分析采用Cox多因素回归分析。

结果

DCCA患者术后1、3、5年总体生存率分别为75.2%、41.9%、31.5%。Cox多因素分析显示,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)表达水平(RR=1.600,95%CI:1.086~2.357)、淋巴结转移比率(MLNR) (RR=2.899,95%CI:1.365~6.158)和肿瘤分化程度(RR=2.009,95%CI:1.245~3.243)是影响DCCA术后远期生存的独立危险因素。MLNR=0患者1、3、5年生存率分别为83.0%、50.7%和42.5%,0<MLNR≤0.17患者相应为80.5%、37.4%和37.4%,而MLNR>0.17患者为48.2%、0和0,MLNR值越高患者预后越差(χ2=26.834,P=0.006)。EGFR阴性患者1、3、5年生存率分别为80.3%、50.3%和41.2%,弱阳性患者相应为81.3%、16.2%和16.2%,中度和强阳性患者为27.8%、0和0,EGFR表达越强,患者总体生存越差(χ2=20.848,P=0.017)。肿瘤高分化患者1、3、5年生存率分别为92.9%、68.8%和68.8%,中分化患者相应为83.8%、40.3%和32.3%,低分化患者为50.8%、19.8%和19.8%,分化程度越低患者预后越差(χ2=32.493,P=0.004)。

结论

胰十二指肠切除术仍是DCCA患者最佳治疗方式,MLNR、EGFR表达水平和肿瘤分化程度是影响DCCA患者术后生存的独立危险因素。MLNR越高预后越差,EGFR表达水平越高预后越差,肿瘤分化程度越低患者预后也越差。

Objective

To investigate the survival and prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCCA) and its prognostic factors.

Methods

Clinicopathological data of 116 DCCA patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2011 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 71 patients were male and 45 female, aged from 31 to 82 years, with a median age of 65 years. The survival and prognosis were followed up. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. The influencing factors of survival and prognosis were analyzed by multivariate Cox’s regression analysis.

Results

The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with DCCA after operation were 75.2%, 41.9% and 31.5%, respectively. Multivariate Cox’s regression analysis showed that the expression level of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (RR=1.600, 95%CI: 1.086-2.357), metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) (RR=2.899, 95%CI: 1.365-6.158) and degree of tumor differentiation (RR=2.009, 95%CI: 1.245-3.243) were the independent risk factors for long-term survival of DCCA patients after operation. The 1-,3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with MLNR=0 were 83.0%, 50.7% and 42.5%, and 80.5%, 37.4% and 37.4% for those with 0<MLNR≤0.17, and 48.2%, 0 and 0 for those with MLNR>0.17, respectively. The higher the MLNR, the worse the prognosis (χ2=26.834, P=0.006). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of EGFR-negative patients were 80.3%, 50.3% and 41.2%, and 81.3%, 16.2% and 16.2% for those with weak expression of positive EGFR, and 27.8%, 0 and 0 for those with moderate and high expression of positive EGFR, respectively. The higher the EGFR expression, the worse the overall survival (χ2=20.848, P=0.017). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of highly-differentiated DCCA patients were 92.9%, 68.8% and 68.8%, and 83.8%, 40.3% and 32.3% for those with moderately-differentiated DCCA, and 50.8%, 19.8% and 19.8% for those with poorly-differentiated DCCA, respectively. The lower the degree of tumor differentiation, the worse the prognosis (χ2=32.493, P=0.004).

Conclusions

Pancreaticoduodenectomy remains the optimal treatment for patients with DCCA. The expression levels of MLNR, EGFR and the degree of tumor differentiation are the independent risk factors of postoperative survival of DCCA patients. The higher the MLNR, the worse the prognosis. The higher the EGFR expression level, the worse the prognosis. The lower the degree of tumor differentiation, the worse the prognosis.

图1 DCCA患者术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线注:DCCA为远端胆管癌
表1 DCCA患者生存预后的影响因素分析
图2 DCCA患者不同分组的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线注:DCCA为远端胆管癌,MLNR为淋巴结转移比率,EGFR为表皮生长因子受体
[1]
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for hispanics/latinos, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2012, 62(5): 283-298. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21153.
[2]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.
[3]
Bertero L, Massa F, Metovic J, et al. Eighth edition of the UICC classification of malignant tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-what has changed and why?[J]. Virchows Arch, 2018, 472(4): 519-531. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2276-y.
[4]
Birgin E, Rasbach E, Reissfelder C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudate lobectomy for treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(5): 747-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.023.
[5]
Al Mahjoub A, Bouvier V, Menahem B, et al. Epidemiology of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma in the French population[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 31(6): 678-684. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001337.
[6]
Komaya K, Ebata T, Shirai K, et al. Recurrence after resection with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(4): 426-433. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10452.
[7]
Byrling J, Andersson R, Sasor A, et al. Outcome and evaluation of prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Ann Gastroenterol, 2017, 30(5): 571-577. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0169.
[8]
Maeta T, Ebata T, Hayashi E, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(11): 1549-1557. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10596.
[9]
Hoshimoto S, Hishinuma S, Shirakawa H, et al. Association of preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with poor outcome in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Oncology, 2019, 96(6): 290-298. DOI: 10.1159/000499050.
[10]
Kumamoto Y, Kaizu T, Tajima H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative morbidity in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2018, 9(4): 362-368. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1698.
[11]
Shin HR, Oh JK, Masuyer E, et al. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: an update focusing on risk factors[J]. Cancer Sci, 2010, 101(3): 579-585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01458.x.
[12]
Kawai M, Tani M, Kobayashi Y, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor for patients with resectable middle and distal bile duct carcinoma[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 199(4): 447-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.019.
[13]
Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T, et al. Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2015, 102(4): 399-406. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9752.
[14]
Yu JX, Li Y. The staging system of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer[J]. Clin Oncol, 2007, 19(4): 269-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.02.003.
[15]
Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(34): 8706-8712. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8852.
[16]
Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2003, 10(9): 1077-1085. DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.03.520.
[17]
Espín F, Bianchi A, Llorca S, et al. Metastatic lymph node ratio versus number of metastatic lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2012, 38(6): 497-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.01.012.
[18]
Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(4): 543-552. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000250423.43436.e1.
[19]
Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer[J]. Surgery, 2007, 141(5): 610-618. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.013.
[20]
Tamandl D, Kaczirek K, Gruenberger B, et al. Lymph node ratio after curative surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2009, 96(8): 919-925. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6654.
[21]
Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Perineural invasion in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact and treatment strategies[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(8): 1429-1439. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2251-0.
[22]
Kim BH, Kim K, Chie EK, et al. Long-term outcome of distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a 15-year experience in a single institution[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 49(2): 473-483. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2016.166.
[23]
Wellner UF, Shen Y, Keck T, et al. The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival[J]. Surg Today, 2017, 47(3): 271-279. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1362-0.
[24]
Arai Y, Totoki Y, Hosoda F, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase fusions define a unique molecular subtype of cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Hepatology, 2014, 59(4): 1427-1434. DOI: 10.1002/hep.26890.
[25]
Javle M, Lowery M, Shroff RT, et al. Phase II study of BGJ398 in patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(3): 276-282. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5009.
[26]
Farshidfar F, Zheng S, Gingras MC, et al. Integrative genomic analysis of cholangiocarcinoma identifies distinct IDH-mutant molecular profiles[J]. Cell Rep, 2017, 19(13): 2878-2880. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.008.
[27]
Brandi G, Tavolari S, Biasco G. Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutics targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors[J]. Gastroenterology, 2012, 143(4): e20-1;authorreplye21. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.120.
[28]
Sato Y, Kinoshita M, Takemura S, et al. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis may be aberrantly activated in occupational cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Pathol Int, 2017, 67(3): 163-170. DOI: 10.1111/pin.12511.
[29]
Werneburg NW, Yoon JH, Higuchi H, et al. Bile acids activate EGF receptor via a TGF-alpha-dependent mechanism in human cholangiocyte cell lines[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2003, 285(1): G31-G36. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00536.2002.
[30]
Yoon J, Higuchi H, Werneburg NW, et al. Bile acids induce cyclooxygenase-2 expression via the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human cholangiocarcinoma cell line[J]. Gastroenterology, 2002, 122(4): 985-993. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.32410.
[31]
Zhang Z, Lai GH, Sirica AE. Celecoxib-induced apoptosis in rat cholangiocarcinoma cells mediated by Akt inactivation and Bax translocation[J]. Hepatology, 2004, 39(4): 1028-1037. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20143.
[32]
Yoshikawa D, Ojima H, Iwasaki M, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Cancer, 2008, 98(2): 418-425. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604129.
[33]
Groeschl RT, Nagorney DM. Portal vein reconstruction during surgery for cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2016, 32(3): 216-224. DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000259.
[34]
梁建伟, 赵平, 周志祥, 等. 中下段胆管癌切除后切缘阳性的意义及预后因素分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(9): 677-680. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2009.09.012.
[35]
Coelho R, Silva M, Rodrigues-Pinto E, et al. CA 19-9 as a marker of survival and a predictor of metastization in cholangiocarcinoma[J]. GE Port J Gastroenterol, 2017, 24(3): 114-121. DOI: 10.1159/000452691.
[36]
Tella SH, Kommalapati A, Yadav S, et al. Novel staging system using carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its implications on overall survival[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(5): 789-795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.016.
[1] 孙丕绛, 崔上, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路联合门静脉切除重建扩大清扫胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 482-482.
[2] 朱永慧, 桑迪, 张翠翠. 改良后腹膜优先原位LPD对壶腹部周围癌区域淋巴结清扫和并发症的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 372-375.
[3] 曾舒昊, 康博禹, 郑高赞, 郑建勇, 丰帆. 青年结直肠癌患者的临床病理特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 449-452.
[4] 李盼, 张华秦. 不同腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[5] 刘伟博, 李林, 张玉斌. ERAS理念下的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 278-281.
[6] 李鹏, 刘光世, 李涛. 基于黑色素瘤相关抗原A6在胃癌转移与预后的作用机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 282-284.
[7] 薛一博, 景冠华, 徐豪, 张云天, 束坤鹏, 石红林. 雄激素剥夺治疗后PSA动态变化预测前列腺癌进展为去势抵抗性前列腺癌的价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 454-459.
[8] 刘国路, 李乾, 王以金, 王苏贵, 胡好, 张璐. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与肾细胞癌患者术后预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 492-497.
[9] 罗瑞翔, 周祥福. 肾门肿瘤的肾部分切除术的手术选择和技术改良[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 521-527.
[10] 郄云凯, 张哲, 梁山, 吴周亮, 李雨竹, 付晨辉, 沈冲, 胡海龙. 经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术在T1期膀胱癌病理亚分期中的价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 303-308.
[11] 杨小钰, 樊雅欣, 苏奔, 毕蓉蓉, 张少言, 李翠, 吴定中, 鹿振辉, 邱磊. 支气管扩张症急性加重的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 457-462.
[12] 匡嘉文, 陈铁军, 龚远锋, 唐辉, 唐云强. TACE-HAIC联合仑伐替尼和PD-1抑制剂四联治疗Ⅲa期肝癌的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 554-560.
[13] 颜军, 周强, 郭诗翔. 海德堡三角清扫在胰腺癌外科治疗中应用的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 449-455.
[14] 郑秉礼, 彭洁, 孟塬. KRAS基因突变对可切除胰腺癌临床预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 456-462.
[15] 张铭燊, 胡永威, 陈德盛, 俞浩远, 梁智星, 陈玉涛, 叶林森, 李华, 杨扬. CEBPZOS通过调控肿瘤增殖与迁移促进肝癌进展的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 463-470.
阅读次数
全文


摘要