切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 234 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.02.014

临床研究

胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石诊治并文献复习
游川, 李强, 李敬东()   
  1. 637000 四川省南充市,川北医学院附属医院肝胆外一科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-08 出版日期:2026-04-10
  • 通信作者: 李敬东
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2024YFHZ0052)

Diagnosis and treatments of biliary tract variations complicated with complex hepatolithiasis and literature review

Chuan You, Qiang Li, Jingdong Li()   

  1. Department Ⅰ of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Received:2025-08-08 Published:2026-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Jingdong Li
引用本文:

游川, 李强, 李敬东. 胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石诊治并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 234-241.

Chuan You, Qiang Li, Jingdong Li. Diagnosis and treatments of biliary tract variations complicated with complex hepatolithiasis and literature review[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(02): 234-241.

目的

探讨胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石手术处理的疗效,并文献复习。

方法

回顾性分析2024年4月在川北医学院附属医院接受手术治疗的1例胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石患者临床资料。患者女,36岁,因“上腹部疼痛不适1月余”入院。AST 88 U/L、ALT 217 U/L、TB 27.8 μmol/L、DB 11.2 μmol/L。上腹部MRI+MRCP示胆总管上中段、肝门部胆管及左右肝内胆管结石伴胆管扩张、胆管炎;胆道变异:右前叶与左肝管并行汇入肝总管,右后叶胆管扩张并于低位侧后方汇入胆总管;胆囊胆汁淤积。初步诊断:肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎;解剖性胆道变异,Couinaud分型Ⅳ型;肝功能不全;胆囊内胆汁淤积。患者签署手术知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。

结果

术前综合评估后于2024年4月10日全麻下行腹腔镜右半肝切除术+胆囊切除术+胆道镜探查取石术+胆管修补整形术+T管引流术。手术时间185 min,术中出血约100 ml,术中未输血。术后第10天康复出院。病理学检查未见癌变,(右半肝)部分肝细胞内见色素沉积,汇管区及小周边纤维增生,淋巴细胞浸润,肝内胆管扩张。患者出院后采取门诊和电话的方式随访,术后1个月T管造影等检查确定无结石残留后拔除T管。术后随访监测病情和预防复发。截至投稿日无复发。

结论

充分的术前评估、精细的术中操作、细致的术后管理可有效降低腹腔镜肝切除在治疗肝胆管结石和处理肝脏中胆管和血管解剖变异中的风险,提高手术的安全性和疗效。

Objective

To investigate surgical treatment and clinical efficacy of biliary tract variations complicated with complex hepatolithiasis, and perform literature review.

Methods

Clinical data of a patient diagnsed with biliary duct variations and complex hepatolithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College in April, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. A 36-year-old female patient was admitted due to "epigastric pain and discomfort for more than 1 month". AST level was 88 U/L, ALT 217 U/L, TB 27.8 μmol/L and DB 11.2 μmol/L, respectively. MRI and MRCP of the upper abdomen showed stones in the upper and middle common bile duct, hilar bile duct and left and right intrahepatic bile ducts complicated with bile duct dilatation and cholangitis. Biliary duct variations: the right anterior lobe and the left hepatic duct merged into the common bile duct in parallel, and the right posterior lobe bile duct dilated and merged into the common bile duct at the lower posterior end; and cholestasis. Preliminary diagnosis: intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones complicated with cholangitis; anatomical biliary variants, Couinaud segement Ⅳ; hepatic insufficiency; and cholestasis. The informed consent of this patient was obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received.

Results

After comprehensive evaluation before operation, laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, cholecystectomy, choledochoscopic exploration and lithotomy, bile duct repair and plasty combined with T tube drainage were performed under general anesthesia on April 10, 2024. The operation time was 185 min, intraoperative bleeding was estimated 100 ml, and no blood transfusion was delivered intraoperatively. The patient was discharged at postoperative 10 d. Pathological examination showed no sign of canceration. Pigment deposition was seen in partial cells of the right lobe, fibrous hyperplasia in portal area and surrounding area, lymphocyte infiltration and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation were also found. The patient was followed up by outpatient and telephone after discharge. T-tube cholangiography at postoperative 1 month confirmed no residual stones and T tube was removed subsequently. Postoperative follow-up was conducted to monitor the condition and prevent the recurrence. No recurrence has been reported as of the submission date.

Conclusions

Comprehensive preoperative evaluation, careful intraoperative operation and attentive postoperative management can effectively reduce the risk of anatomic variations of bile duct and vessels during laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis, and enhance surgical safety and efficacy.

图1 一例胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石患者术前MRCP 注:胆道变异,左肝管与右前支直接汇合形成肝总管,右后支低位扩张并直接汇入胆总管
图2 一例胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石患者术中图片 注:a为暴露肝右后支胆管及结石;b为胆管解剖变异,左肝管与右前支直接汇合形成肝总管,右后支低位扩张并直接汇入胆总管;c为肝右动脉在肝总管前方紧贴肝总管走行,进入肝右叶;d为标记右半肝切肝线;e为胆道镜取石术;F为胆管整形;B6+7为右后肝管,B5+8为右前肝管,LHD为左肝管,RPPV为门静脉右后支,CBD为胆总管,RHA为肝右动脉,B1为肝尾状叶胆管
图3 一例胆道变异伴复杂肝胆管结石患者术后MRCP和T管造影 注:a为MRCP示术后T管和左肝管显示通畅;b为术后第10天T管造影示T管通畅,无结石残留
图4 以发病率为基础的ABVs分类系统[8] 注:ABVs为解剖性胆道变异,RA为右前支肝管,RP为右后支肝管,R为右肝管,L为左肝管,CHD为肝总管;括号内的值为95%置信区间,百分比表示在主要Meta分析中估计的比例
[1]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会, 国家卫生健康委员会公益性行业科研专项专家委员会. 肝胆管结石病微创手术治疗指南(2019版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(5): 407-413.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.05.001.
[2]
Zhu SY, Huang J, Li YJ, et al. Systematic appraisal of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2023, 33(6): 673-681.DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230.
[3]
Mortelé KJ, Ros PR. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 177(2): 389-394.DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770389.
[4]
Durchschein F, Schreiber F. Cholelithiasis in a patient with an anatomical variation of the cystic duct[J]. Endoscopy, 2012, 44(Suppl 2 UCTN): E280-E281.DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309921.
[5]
Keplinger KM, Bloomston M. Anatomy and embryology of the biliary tract[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2014, 94(2): 203-217.DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.01.001.
[6]
Koog C, Deok C, Ho M, et al. Evaluation of long-term results and recurrent factors after operative and nonoperative treatment for hepatolithiasis[J]. Surgery, 2009, 146(5): 843-853.DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.009.
[7]
Lorio E, Patel P, Rosenkranz L, et al. Management of hepatolithiasis: review of the literature[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2020, 22(6): 30.DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00765-3.
[8]
Janssen BV, van Laarhoven S, Elshaer M, et al. Comprehensive classification of anatomical variants of the main biliary ducts[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(5): 458-462.DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa147.
[9]
Gündüz N, Doğan MB, Alacagöz M, et al. Anatomical variations of cystic duct insertion and their relationship with choledocholithiasis: an MRCP study[J]. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med, 2021, 52(1): 202.DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00579-x.
[10]
Shukla R, Tsuchiya Y, Behari A, et al. Metagenomic analysis of biliary microbial flora in patients with gallbladder cancer or gallstones-associated chronic cholecystitis[J]. Cancer Invest, 2024, 42(6): 478-490.DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2361305.
[11]
翁仔淼, 吕珊珊, 葛广波, 等. 肠道菌β-葡萄糖醛酸苷酶抑制剂的研究进展[J]. 药学进展, 2018, 42(3): 177-186.
[12]
Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, et al. The utility of MRCP in preoperative mapping of biliary anatomy in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19(2): 209-215.DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10446.
[13]
Jaganathan S, Ray B, Velaga J. Our experience in tracking the tract: normal biliary anatomy and variants on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in living donor liver transplantation[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(2): e34695.DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34695.
[14]
Wang X, Zhao J, Wang L, et al. Relationship between papilla-related variables and post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a multicenter, prospective study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 35(12): 2184-2191.DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15135.
[15]
Chen XP, Zhang WJ, Cheng B, et al. Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a propensity score-matched cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(4): 1896-1903.DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001027.
[16]
Liu X, Min X, Ma Z, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 51: 151-163.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.016.
[17]
Lei J, Huang J, Yang X, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a systematic review and meta analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 51: 191-198.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.038.
[18]
靳浩, 崔敏. 光纤胆道镜引导下经皮肝穿刺胆道镜取石术治疗肝内胆管结石的研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(16): 54-56, 60.DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212138.
[19]
Wang W, Feng S, Li Z, et al. Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence navigation technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for complex hepatolithiasis[J]. BMC Surg, 2024, 24(1): 117.DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02411-5.
[20]
方程, 王飘, 苏松, 等. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像在再次胆道探查术中的对照研究[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 29(6): 711-715.
[21]
彭一晟, 何攀, 朱刚, 等. 吲哚菁绿荧光胆道成像技术在胆囊切除术中应用的荟萃分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2020, 26(12): 929-933.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20200210-00060.
[22]
Zhu J, Li G, Du P, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(3): 997-1005.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08052-y.
[23]
Lei C, Lu T, Yang W, et al. Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(11): 5918-5935.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08648-y.
[24]
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Li T, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3275-3286.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w.
[25]
Lan WF, Li JH, Wang QB, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(10): 4656-4669.DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32477.
[26]
谢伟选, 罗昆仑. 胆囊切除术联合腹腔镜下胆总管探查术后胆总管一期缝合与T管引流的疗效比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(2): 127-134.DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2019.02.001.
[1] 李兴贵, 杨明发. 加速康复外科策略在肝胆管结石肝切除术中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 219-223.
[2] 唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.
[3] 谢裕强, 庄丹, 林锡汉. 3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME术对术前CT成像血管变异患者的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 431-434.
[4] 陈祥, 吉韬, 董仁华. 解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石合并肝内胆管癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 200-203.
[5] 张江伟, 燕航, 薛武军, 郑瑾, 李潇, 王颖, 郝琳, 郭挺, 张颖, 丁小明. 基于三维重建技术优化开放式活体肾移植供肾切取术的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 136-140.
[6] 梁睿, 邱峰, 魏雪栋, 黄玉华, 侯建全. 左肾肿瘤、双下腔静脉伴双子宫一例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 159-160.
[7] 陈政, 曹亚娟, 王飞, 彭进, 罗东君, 黎兵华, 段云飞, 韩冰, 岳扬, 余德才. 去蒂法腹腔镜解剖性肝切除在肝胆管结石肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 15-18.
[8] 卜浩, 周洋, 成伟. 胆道镜经T管窦道取石网篮嵌顿12例分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 54-56.
[9] 栾天继, 曹定, 梅洪亮, 付航玮, 杨凯, 王丹, 尚作宏, 凌锋, 李支会, 张振雨, 胡逸林. 腹腔镜左半肝切除联合左肝管残端胆管探查取石治疗复杂肝左叶胆管结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 81-86.
[10] 李晓杰, 刘立宝, 胡昆鹏, 刘波, 王庆亮. ERAS理念下经皮经肝胆道镜碎石术治疗肝胆管结石病的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 487-492.
[11] 王文儿, 周国超, 付华, 陈晓明, 田潭平, 蔡融民, 田林, 胡凡博, 周旅, 宋新. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜解剖性肝切除治疗Ⅰ型肝胆管结石病中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 171-175.
[12] 张文君, 陈晓鹏, 鲍胜华, 冯之文. 腹腔镜规则性肝切除治疗肝胆管结石病经验总结[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 72-76.
[13] 杨健康, 周茂旭, 胡强, 何宗国, 顾亚奇. 超声引导下经皮经肝Ⅰ期胆道造瘘取石术与经皮经肝胆道镜治疗复杂肝胆管结石的结石清除效果及复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 61-66.
[14] 李金星, 陈志宏, 孙铭均, 孙岩岩, 党树伟, 李广恩, 彭书奇, 付大伟, 李宏伟, 李国东. 基于多层螺旋CT 的腹腔干解剖变异与新分型研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 756-763.
[15] 黄熙龙, 费书珂. 肝胆管结石病的微创治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(09): 725-729.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?