切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 575 -582. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.04.011

临床研究

儿童门静脉海绵样变性的侧枝循环特征及Rex术疗效
彭宇明, 尹强(), 袁妙贤, 陈立健, 季春宜, 盛新仪, 谢惟心   
  1. 410007 长沙,湖南省儿童医院普外一科(儿童肝胆移植外科)
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-16 出版日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 尹强
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金资助联合项目(2025JJ80636); 长沙市自然科学基金项目(kq2208091); 湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2023JJ30329)

Characteristics of collateral circulation and efficacy of Rex shunt in children with cavernous transformation of the portal vein

Yuming Peng, Qiang Yin(), Miaoxian Yuan, Lijian Chen, Chunyi Ji, Xinyi Sheng, Weixin Xie   

  1. DepartmentⅠof General Surgery (Department of Pediatric Hepatobiliary Transplantation) , Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha 410007, China
  • Received:2026-01-16 Published:2026-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Yin
引用本文:

彭宇明, 尹强, 袁妙贤, 陈立健, 季春宜, 盛新仪, 谢惟心. 儿童门静脉海绵样变性的侧枝循环特征及Rex术疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 575-582.

Yuming Peng, Qiang Yin, Miaoxian Yuan, Lijian Chen, Chunyi Ji, Xinyi Sheng, Weixin Xie. Characteristics of collateral circulation and efficacy of Rex shunt in children with cavernous transformation of the portal vein[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(04): 575-582.

目的

探讨儿童门静脉海绵样变性(CTPV)特征性侧枝循环代偿路径的临床特点和肠系膜上静脉-门静脉左支搭桥(Rex术)的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年5月至2025年3月在湖南省儿童医院行Rex术的36例CTPV患儿。患儿家属均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男15例,女21例;年龄1.0~15.0岁,中位年龄4.6岁。原发性CTPV 33例,继发性CTPV 3例。临床表现为全血细胞减少3例,全血细胞减少合并脾大14例,消化道出血18例,无任何临床症状1例。术前腹部超声、腹部增强CT检查,明确诊断为CTPV,术前实施楔入法经肝静脉逆行门静脉造影(WHVP)评估肝内外门静脉发育情况。采用门静脉脱鞘吻合技术及个体化血管移植物选择策略实施经典Rex术和改良Rex术。术后规范抗凝及随访管理。观察患儿Rex手术情况及疗效。术前和术后的肝外门静脉压差比较采用t检验。

结果

36例患儿Rex术均获得成功,其中经典Rex术28例,改良Rex术8例。肝外门静脉压差由术前(30.4±2.6) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)降至术后(17.4±1.1) mmHg(t=30.66,P<0.001)。2例患儿术后乳糜漏,加强营养、抗感染和通畅引流后治愈。其余患儿术后恢复顺利出院,复查CT三维重建示门静脉通畅。随访时间5~84个月,中位随访时间26个月。4例术后出现搭桥血管栓塞,其中2例行了二次Rex术,分别获取患儿颈内静脉和肠系膜下静脉作为血管移植物;其余2例门诊随访观察。3例患儿术后发生搭桥血管狭窄,其中2例行介入下球囊扩张术,1例行血管支架植入术。34例患儿门静脉高压相关症状在半个月内明显缓解并消失,其余2例Plt和WBC未见恢复正常,但未发生食管下段胃底曲张静脉出血。

结论

Rex术能有效重建CTPV患儿的门静脉入肝血流,明显降低肝外门静脉高压。门静脉脱鞘吻合技术及个体化血管移植物选择是手术成功的关键,可明显提高血管吻合成功率及通畅率。

Objective

To investigate clinical characteristics of collateral circulation compensation pathway and evaluate clinical efficacy of meso-rex bypass (Rex shunt) in children with cavernous transformation of portal vein (CTPV).

Methods

Clinical data of 36 children with CTPV who underwent Rex shunt in Hunan Children's Hospital from May 2018 to March 2025 were analyzed retrospectively. The informed consents of the guardians of all children were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 15 patients were male and 21 female, aged from 1.0 to 15.0 years, with a median age of 4.6 years. 33 children were diagnosed with primary CTPV and 3 cases of secondary CTPV. Regarding clinical manifestations, 3 cases had pancytopenia, 14 cases of pancytopenia complicated with splenomegaly, 18 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, and 1 case without any symptoms. The diagnosis of CTPV was confirmed by preoperative abdominal ultrasound and enhanced CT scan. Preoperative wedged hepatic venous portography (WHVP) was performed to evaluate the development of intra-and extra-hepatic portal veins. Classical and modified Rex shunts were performed by portal vein sheath-free anastomosis and individualized vascular graft selection. Standardized anticoagulation and follow-up management were given after surgery. Children's conditions and surgical efficacy of Rex shunts were observed. Extra-hepatic portal vein pressure before and after Rex shunts was compared by t-test.

Results

36 children successfully underwent Rex shunts, including 28 cases of classic Rex shunts and 8 cases of modified Rex shunts. Postoperative extra-hepatic portal vein pressure was decreased from (30.4±2.6) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) before surgery to (17.4±1.1) mmHg (t=30.66, P<0.001). Two children developed postoperative chylous leakage, which were cured after nutritional support, anti-infection and proper drainage. The remaining children were discharged after recovery. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction showed the patency of the portal veins. The follow-up duration was 5-84 months, with a median follow-up of 26 months. 4 children developed postoperative bypass graft embolization, and 2 of them underwent secondary Rex shunts, using internal jugular vein and inferior mesenteric vein as vascular grafts. The other 2 cases were observed during outpatient follow-up. 3 children were complicated with postoperative bypass graft stenosis, 2 of them received interventional balloon dilatation and 1 underwent stent implantation. In 34 children, the symptoms of portal hypertension were significantly relieved and absent within half a month. In the remaining 2 cases, Plt and WBC were not restored to normal, and no variceal bleeding in the lower esophageal fundus was observed.

Conclusions

Rex shunt can effectively reconstruct portal vein blood flow into the liver in children with CTPV, and significantly reduce extra-hepatic portal hypertension. Portal vein sheath-free anastomosis technique and individualized vascular graft selection determine surgical success, which evidently improve the success rate and patency rate of vascular anastomosis.

图1 CTPV患儿Rex术的肝内门静脉系统评估 注:a为术前介入室采用楔入法经肝静脉逆行门静脉造影;b为Rex术中经肝圆韧带途径肝内门静脉造影;c为Rex术后经肠系膜上静脉途径门静脉造影;CTPV为门静脉海绵样变性
图2 CTPV患儿Rex术中情况 注:a为肝动脉鞘静脉网交通路径(箭头所示);b为曲张增粗的胃网膜静脉(箭头所示),直径5.5 mm;c为两段胃网膜静脉拼合成形(箭头所示),直径11 mm;CTPV为门静脉海绵样变性
图3 CTPV患儿Rex术中图片及术后肝内外门静脉CT三维重建 注:a为经典Rex术,利用颈内静脉搭桥(箭头所示);b为改良Rex术,利用胃网膜静脉搭桥(箭头所示);c为Rex术后肝内外门静脉三维重建图像,示门静脉通畅(箭头所示);CTPV为门静脉海绵样变性
[1]
Wei B, Huang Z, Tang C. Optimal treatment for patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein[J]. Front Med, 2022, 9: 853138. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.853138.
[2]
Martins de Mattos KD, Marra P, Carbone FS, et al. Non-anatomical revascularization of the portal vein in children with non-cirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2025, 55(6): 1308-1312. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-025-06218-1.
[3]
伊尔番·伊力哈尔, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉. 门静脉海绵样变性的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2024, 39(9): 729-733. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20231125-00355.
[4]
Layton BM, Lapsia SK. The portal vein: a comprehensive review[J]. Radiographics, 2023, 43(11): e230058. DOI: 10.1148/rg.230058.
[5]
Kaur P, Khanna R, Sood V, et al. Wedged hepatic vein portovenography for assessment of Rex vein patency in children with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2024, 79(2): 213-221. DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12282.
[6]
Wen Z, Wang J, Yang C, et al. Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?[J]. Front Pediatr, 2023, 11: 1135059. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1135059.
[7]
Campello E, Zanetto A, Prokopenko Y, et al. Activation of the contact system and intrinsic pathway in peripheral and portal venous circulations in liver cirrhosis[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2025, 125(12): 1195-1204. DOI: 10.1055/a-2507-2449.
[8]
Zeng X, Lian N, Wang X, et al. Abnormal anatomical landmarks: the guide points of laparoscopic Ladd's surgery for neonatal congenital intestinal malrotation[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(7): 4386-4391. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11764-8.
[9]
Alkhasov A, Komina E, Ratnikov S, et al. Surgical treatment of portal hypertension in children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2023, 33(12): 1231-1235. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0404.
[10]
Duseja A, Singh SP, De A, et al. Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) guidance paper on nomenclature, diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2023, 13(2): 273-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.11.014.
[11]
刘允怡. 肝切除与肝移植应用解剖学[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016.
[12]
Menéndez-Suso JJ, Rodríguez-Álvarez D, Sánchez-Martín M. Feasibility and utility of the venous excess ultrasound score to detect and grade central venous pressure elevation in critically ill children[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2023, 42(1): 211-220. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16057.
[13]
张金山, 李龙. Rex手术治疗胆总管囊肿术后门静脉海绵样变的应用研究[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1004-1008, 1013. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2019.12.004.
[14]
Zhang L, Zhu YJ, Wang XQ, et al. Efficacy and safety of precision-guided transjugular extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TEPS) in the management of cavernous transformation of the portal vein with portal hypertension: a case series[J]. Hepatol Int, 2024, 18(4): 1227-1237. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10656-8.
[15]
晏钢. 胃左静脉显像及其参数在肝硬化门脉高压监测中的应用[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2003(3): 187-188. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2003.03.039.
[16]
Zhang JS, Li L. Imaging features and clinical relevance of portal venous systems shown by extrahepatic portal angiography in children with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2020, 8(5): 756-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.11.016.
[17]
Ke Q, Wang Z, Huang X, et al. Splenic vein embolization as a feasible treatment for patients with hepatic encephalopathy related to large spontaneous splenorenal shunts[J]. Ann Hepatol, 2022, 27(5): 100725. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100725.
[18]
Godik O, Diehtiarova D. Rex shunt in children: could dysfunction be prognosed? A retrospective analysis[J]. Wiad Lek, 2023, 76(12): 2579-2586. DOI: 10.36740/wlek202312105.
[19]
Khamag O, Numanoglu A, Rode H, et al. Surgical management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children: advantages of MesoRex shunt compared with distal splenorenal shunt[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2023, 39(1): 128. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-023-05411-3.
[20]
de Ville de Goyet J, Lo Zupone C, Grimaldi C, et al. Meso-Rex bypass as an alternative technique for portal vein reconstruction at or after liver transplantation in children: review and perspectives[J]. Pediatr Transplant, 2013, 17(1): 19-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01784.x.
[21]
刘涛, 温哲, 梁奇峰, 等. Rex术治疗儿童门静脉海绵样变疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 8(5): 410-414. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.05.008.
[22]
Khan HH, Kaufman SS, Yazigi NA, et al. Outcomes of portosystemic shunts in children with and without liver transplantation[J]. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr, 2024, 27(1): 37. DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2024.27.1.37.
[23]
彭宇明, 尹强, 袁妙贤, 等. 儿童门静脉海绵样变性的临床特点及手术治疗策略[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2022, 21(5): 431-436. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202203043-007.
[24]
Soejima Y, Taguchi T, Matsuura T, et al. Rex shunt for portal vein thrombosis after pediatric living donor liver transplantation[J]. Ann Transplant, 2021, 26: e909493. DOI: 10.12659/aot.909493.
[1] 李丁洋, 党晓卫. 脾动脉部分栓塞术治疗门静脉高压症合并脾功能亢进的精准实践与策略[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 79-84.
[2] 王卫东. 贲门周围血管离断与左膈下静脉的保留[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 464-464.
[3] 吴金花, 辛国军, 田明国, 陈大治. 脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后早期门静脉系统血栓分布及其发生率[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 168-171.
[4] 吴鹏, 许维, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 脾静脉近端结扎在腹腔镜脾切除术后预防门静脉血栓形成的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 59-62.
[5] 张菊梅, 黄玉荣, 王迪迪, 李强, 吴霞, 杨杰. 腹腔镜脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症中对脾蒂血管的不同处理方式比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 643-646.
[6] 王飞, 陈政, 余德才, 曹亚娟. 原发性肝癌合并门静脉高压症的微创手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 306-310.
[7] 张宇, 郑卫华, 张俊晶. 门静脉高压症的诊治及并发症研究现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 537-544.
[8] 王孟龙. 门静脉高压症的治疗选择策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 523-528.
[9] 王孟龙. 门静脉高压症肝脏血供改变对肝移植的影响与对策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 687-692.
[10] 张宏伟, 邢玉雪, 贾哲, 赫嵘, 张珂, 蒋力. 术前输注血小板在肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压症肝脾联合切除患者中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 576-581.
[11] 石洋, 郭辉, 李坚. 门静脉高压症TIPS操作规范及其手术相关并发症处理[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 372-378.
[12] 张群青, 吴娟, 王妍. 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者肝脏血流动力学指标与门静脉压力梯度的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 616-620.
[13] 朱风尚, 舍玲, 丁永年, 杨长青. 五步疑问法在肝硬化门静脉高压症临床教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 116-118.
[14] 陈功海, 王广川, 张春清. 特发性非肝硬化门静脉高压症诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 132-138.
[15] 董丽, 张永慧, 成德雷, 周春泽, 殷亮, 胡成文. 校正后低体质量指数与门静脉高压症患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 12-19.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?