切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 731 -743. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.05.008

临床研究

基于氨死亡多组学分型构建肝癌预后模型及其相关机制研究
胡帅, 黄凯, 翟航, 徐俊明, 王继才, 洪生杰, 史宪杰()   
  1. 528406 深圳,中山大学附属第八医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-12 出版日期:2026-10-10
  • 通信作者: 史宪杰
  • 基金资助:
    新发突发与重大传染病防控国家科技重大专项(2026ZD01912500); 福田区卫生健康系统科研项目(FTWS049); 福田区重点专业基金项目(QZDZK-202413)

Construction of a prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on multi-omics subtyping of ammonia-induced cell death and mechanism exploration

Shuai Hu, Kai Huang, Hang Zhai, Junming Xu, Jicai Wang, Shengjie Hong, Xianjie Shi()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 528406, China
  • Received:2026-01-12 Published:2026-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Xianjie Shi
引用本文:

胡帅, 黄凯, 翟航, 徐俊明, 王继才, 洪生杰, 史宪杰. 基于氨死亡多组学分型构建肝癌预后模型及其相关机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 731-743.

Shuai Hu, Kai Huang, Hang Zhai, Junming Xu, Jicai Wang, Shengjie Hong, Xianjie Shi. Construction of a prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on multi-omics subtyping of ammonia-induced cell death and mechanism exploration[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(05): 731-743.

目的

基于氨死亡特征的多组学分子分型构建肝癌患者预后模型,探讨肿瘤微环境(TME)重塑机制与精准治疗策略。

方法

本研究整合癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)、国际癌症基因组联盟(ICGC)队列的常规转录组及多个单细胞转录组测序(scRNA-seq)数据集。首先利用单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)量化样本的氨死亡通路活性,并结合加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)鉴定关键氨死亡基因模块;随后最小绝对收缩与选择算子(Lasso)回归构建风险评分预后模型。进一步联合多种免疫浸润算法、单细胞调控网络(SCENIC)、细胞通讯推断(CellChat)及靶向药物敏感性预测,系统解析高风险TME的“内皮-髓系”免疫排斥重塑机制及合成致死干预靶点。相关性分析采用Pearson或Spearman相关系数。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

本研究基于TCGA-LIHC队列的371例样本数据,聚类分析共识别出17个基因共表达模块。将其中两个关键模块内的1 073个基因定义为氨死亡候选基因。功能富集分析显示,上述候选基因在生物学功能上与免疫调节密切相关。基于氨死亡相关基因成功构建具有独立预后价值的氨死亡风险评分预后模型,ROC分析显示该模型具有良好的预测效能,其预测肝癌1、3、5年生存率的AUC分别为0.855、0.824和0.787。ICGC队列外部验证证实了该模型在识别高侵袭性肝癌亚群及预后风险分层方面具有良好的跨队列一致性。高风险表型以TP53突变驱动的基因组不稳定性为主;TME呈现符合“免疫排斥”表型的宏观特征,存在“内皮-髓系”免疫排斥屏障,CD4+ 中央记忆T细胞(CD4+ Tcm)浸润明显下调;以单核细胞谱系为代表的抑制性髓系细胞明显上调,成纤维细胞及平滑肌细胞的浸润得分明显上调。TME内CD8+ T细胞处于未激活的静息状态,表现为终末效应亚群比例明显下调,而过渡态与初始态细胞相对富集。调控网络提示,高风险内皮细胞中MYC的异常激活可能通过ANGPTL/JAM信号轴促进髓系细胞招募,参与构筑物理与免疫双重屏障。治疗策略方面,高风险亚型肝癌对WEE1抑制剂(adavosertib)展现出明显的潜在敏感性。

结论

本研究构建了具有独立预后价值的氨死亡相关肝癌预后模型,该模型能够有效识别伴有TP53突变的高侵袭性肝癌亚型。高风险组肝癌的TME呈现典型的“内皮-髓系”免疫排斥特征,且伴随CD8+ T细胞的激活阻滞现象。WEE1抑制剂有望成为高风险肝癌患者的潜在靶向干预药物。

Objective

To construct a prognostic model for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on multi-omics subtyping of ammonia-induced cell death features, and to explore the mechanism of tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling and precision treatment strategy.

Methods

In this study, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), conventional transcriptome of International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) cohort and multiple single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets were integrated. Firstly, the activity of ammonia-induced cell death pathway of samples was quantified by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), and the modules of key ammonia-induced cell death genes were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The risk scoring prognostic model was constructed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression analysis. Multiple immune infiltration algorithms, SCENIC, CellChat and drug sensitivity prediction were employed to systematically analyze the "endothelial-myeloid" immune rejection remodeling mechanism of high-risk TME and synthesize lethal intervention targets. Correlation analysis was conducted by Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Based on the sample data of 371 cases in TCGA-LIHC cohort, 17 gene co-expression modules were identified by cluster analysis. 1 073 genes in two key modules were defined as candidate genes of ammonia-induced cell death. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the above candidate genes were closely associated with immune regulation in biological function. Based on the genes related to ammonia-induced cell death, a risk scoring prognostic model of ammonia-induced cell death with independent prognostic value was successfully constructed. ROC analysis demonstrated that the model possessed high predictive efficiency. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting the 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates of liver cancer was 0.855, 0.824 and 0.787, respectively. External validation of ICGC cohort confirmed that the model showed high cross-cohort consistency in identifying highly-invasive liver cancer subgroups and prognostic risk stratification. High-risk phenotype was mainly characterized with genomic instability driven by TP53 mutation. TME was characterized with "immune rejection" phenotype, with an "endothelial-myeloid" immune rejection barrier. The infiltration of CD4+ central memory T cells (CD4+ Tcm) was significantly down-regulated. Inhibitory myeloid cells represented by monocyte lineage were significantly up-regulated, and the infiltration scores of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells were also significantly up-regulated. CD8+ T cells in TME were in an inactive resting state, manifested with a significant decrease in the proportion of terminal effector subsets and relative enrichment of transitional and naive cells. The regulatory network suggested that abnormal activation of MYC in high-risk endothelial cells promoted the recruitment of myeloid cells probably through the ANGPTL/JAM signal axis and participated in the construction of physical and immune barriers. In terms of therapeutic strategies, HCC patients of high-risk subtypes showed significant potential sensitivity to WEE1 inhibitors (adavosertib).

Conclusions

In this study, a risk scoring prognostic model of ammonia-induced cell death with independent prognostic value is established, which can effectively identify high-risk HCC subtypes with TP53 mutation. TME in the high-risk group is characterized with typical "endothelial-myeloid" immune rejection, accompanied by activation blockade of CD8+ T cells. WEE1 inhibitors are expected to become potential targeted interventional drugs for high-risk patients.

图1 加权基因共表达网络构建及肝癌氨死亡相关基因模块的富集分析 注:a为加权基因共表达网络分析软阈值筛选及无尺度拓扑拟合指数评估;b为加权基因共表达网络基因模块与氨死亡评分的Pearson相关性热图;c为关键模块氨死亡相关候选基因的GO功能富集分析;d为氨死亡相关候选基因的KEGG通路富集分析;GO为基因本体,KEGG为京都基因与基因组百科全书,WGCNA为加权基因共表达网络分析
图2 肝癌氨死亡相关预后风险模型的构建及其在训练集中的预测效能评估 注:a为基于148个预后相关基因的Lasso回归系数轨迹图;b为通过10折交叉验证确定Lasso回归的最佳惩罚参数λ,最终筛选出17个核心基因;c为癌症基因组图谱训练集中高风险组与低风险组患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线;d为评估风险评分预后模型预测1、3、5年生存率的时间依赖性ROC曲线;e为训练集患者的风险评分分布、生存状态散点图;f为17个核心基因的表达热图;Lasso为最小绝对收缩与选择算子,TCGA为癌症基因组图谱
图3 氨死亡相关风险评分在肝癌中的独立预后价值评估及临床列线图构建 注:a为结合风险评分与临床病理特征的多因素Cox比例风险回归森林图;b为整合独立预后因子构建的用于预测个体化1、3、5年生存概率的临床列线图;c为评估列线图预测准确性的校准曲线,虚线代表理想预测模型;d为国际癌症基因组联盟独立外部验证集中高、低风险组的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线验证
图4 基于氨死亡肝癌预后模型的高风险肝癌微环境景观与“内皮-髓系”屏障特征 注:a为肿瘤微环境细胞浸润组分差异图;b为核心细胞亚群的组间定量比较;TME为肿瘤微环境
图5 氨死亡高风险亚群呈现特异性的体细胞突变图谱与TP53高频突变特征 注:a为TCGA队列中高风险组(左)与低风险组(右)前20个高频突变驱动基因的瀑布图;b为高低风险组间差异突变基因的森林图;TP53突变在高风险组中呈现极明显的富集;TCGA为癌症基因组图谱数据库
图6 单细胞转录组测序揭示高风险肝癌微环境中CD8+ T细胞的潜在激活受阻特征 注:a为细胞类型聚类UMAP图;b为鉴定主要细胞群的经典标志基因分布;c为特定细胞谱系的降维聚类UMAP投影图;d为高低风险组间主要细胞亚群的总体浸润组分比例分析;e为高低风险组中主要宏观细胞组分的相对比例差异验证;f为提取CD8+ T细胞子集的高分辨率重聚类UMAP图;g为功能状态注释;h、i为CD8+ T细胞各功能亚群比例的组间统计;TME为肿瘤微环境;UMAP为统一流形逼近与投影
图7 氨死亡风险相关的肿瘤微环境代谢重构与CD8+ T细胞激活阻滞特征验证 注:a、b为CD8+ T细胞功能标志物在低风险与高风险组中的表达比例柱状图与表达丰度气泡图;c为核心尿素循环及氨解毒酶(CPS1、OTC、ASS1及GLS)在TCGA队列高、低风险组中的表达水平差异箱线图
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
[2]
郑荣寿, 陈茹, 韩冰峰, 等. 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46(3): 221-231.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035.
[3]
Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(20): 1894-1905.DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1915745.
[4]
Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, et al. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(7): 977-990.DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00252-7.
[5]
Ringelhan M, Pfister D, O'Connor T, et al. The immunology of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Nat Immunol, 2018, 19(3): 222-232.DOI: 10.1038/s41590-018-0044-z.
[6]
Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions[J]. Cancer Discov, 2022, 12(1): 31-46.DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1059.
[7]
Spinelli JB, Yoon H, Ringel AE, et al. Metabolic recycling of ammonia via glutamate dehydrogenase supports breast cancer biomass[J]. Science, 2017, 358(6365): 941-946.DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9305.
[8]
Dai W, Xu L, Yu X, et al. OGDHL silencing promotes hepatocellular carcinoma by reprogramming glutamine metabolism[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 72(5): 909-923.DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.015.
[9]
Keshet R, Szlosarek P, Carracedo A, et al. Rewiring urea cycle metabolism in cancer to support anabolism[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018, 18(10): 634-645.DOI: 10.1038/s41568-018-0054-z.
[10]
Lee JS, Adler L, Karathia H, et al. Urea cycle dysregulation generates clinically relevant genomic and biochemical signatures[J]. Cell, 2018, 174(6): 1559-1570. e22.DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.019.
[11]
Zhang H, Liu J, Yuan W, et al. Ammonia-induced lysosomal and mitochondrial damage causes cell death of effector CD8+ T cells[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2024, 26(11): 1892-1902.DOI: 10.1038/s41556-024-01503-x.
[12]
Eng CH, Yu K, Lucas J, et al. Ammonia derived from glutaminolysis is a diffusible regulator of autophagy[J]. Sci Signal, 2010, 3(119): e2000911.DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000911.
[13]
Leone RD, Powell JD. Metabolism of immune cells in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2020, 20(9): 516-531.DOI: 10.1038/s41568-020-0273-y.
[14]
Scharping NE, Rivadeneira DB, Menk AV, et al. Mitochondrial stress induced by continuous stimulation under hypoxia rapidly drives T cell exhaustion[J]. Nat Immunol, 2021, 22(2): 205-215.DOI: 10.1038/s41590-020-00834-9.
[15]
Ma X, Bi E, Lu Y, et al. Cholesterol induces CD8+ T cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Cell Metab, 2019, 30(1): 143-156.DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.04.002.
[16]
Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, et al. The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses[J]. CP Bioinformatics, 2016, 54: 1.30.1-1.30.33.DOI: 10.1002/cpbi.5.
[17]
Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9: 559.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559.
[18]
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent[J]. J Stat Softw, 2010, 33(1): 1-22.DOI: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01.
[19]
Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks[J]. Stat Med, 2013, 32(30): 5381-5397.DOI: 10.1002/sim.5958.
[20]
Zeng D, Ye Z, Shen R, et al. IOBR: multi-omics immuno-oncology biological research to decode tumor microenvironment and signatures[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 687975.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687975.
[21]
Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, et al. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer[J]. Genome Res, 2018, 28(11): 1747-1756.DOI: 10.1101/gr.239244.118.
[22]
Lu Y, Yang A, Quan C, et al. A single-cell atlas of the multicellular ecosystem of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 4594.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32283-3.
[23]
Ma L, Hernandez MO, Zhao Y, et al. Tumor cell biodiversity drives microenvironmental reprogramming in liver cancer[J]. Cancer Cell, 2019, 36(4): 418-430. e6.DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.007.
[24]
Zhang Q, He Y, Luo N, et al. Landscape and dynamics of single immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cell, 2019, 179(4): 829-845. e20.DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.003.
[25]
Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(13): 3573-3587. e29.DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048.
[26]
Korsunsky I, Millard N, Fan J, et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony[J]. Nat Methods, 2019, 16(12): 1289-1296.DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0.
[27]
Aibar S, González-Blas CB, Moerman T, et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering[J]. Nat Methods, 2017, 14(11): 1083-1086.DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4463.
[28]
Jin S, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Zhang L, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 1088.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9.
[29]
Maeser D, Gruener RF, Huang RS. oncoPredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data[J]. Brief Bioinform, 2021, 22(6): bbab260.DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab260.
[30]
Garnelo M, Tan A, Her Z, et al. Interaction between tumour-infiltrating B cells and T cells controls the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(2): 342-351.DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310814.
[31]
Berkers CR, Maddocks ODK, Cheung EC, et al. Metabolic regulation by p53 family members[J]. Cell Metab, 2013, 18(5): 617-633.DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.019.
[32]
Dang CV. MYC on the path to cancer[J]. Cell, 2012, 149(1): 22-35.DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003.
[33]
Hirai H, Iwasawa Y, Okada M, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents[J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2009, 8(11): 2992-3000.DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0463.
[34]
Matheson CJ, Backos DS, Reigan P. Targeting WEE1 kinase in cancer[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 37(10): 872-881.DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.06.006.
[35]
O'Neil NJ, Bailey ML, Hieter P. Synthetic lethality and cancer[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2017, 18(10): 613-623.DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.47.
[1] 严雨楼, 洪晟乾, 苏显, 王硕, 祁付珍, 徐建波. 不同手术操作腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 326-330.
[2] 李牧言, 张树庚, 刘连新. 腹腔镜全尾状叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 323-323.
[3] 李优伟, 荣冬梅, 张宗明. 外泌体在胆管癌诊疗中的价值研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 823-830.
[4] 沈宏年, 陆含笑, 张硕, 项洁, 杨军. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关HCC的临床诊治与预防措施[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 831-837.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政司. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2026年版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 443-507.
[6] 罗希, 汤永生, 鲁旭, 李华. 免疫时代中晚期肝癌治疗新格局:联合策略、转化突破与精准预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 508-514.
[7] 林婉琪, 任芳菲, 钟伟航, 杨卿, 马玲, 陈海丽, 向莎, 陈孟娇, 朱丽萍, 何心念, 张献玲. 基于多维度评估的前瞻性干预策略在肝癌肝移植围手术期的应用及效果[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 612-618.
[8] 叶林森, 杨扬. 进展期肝癌治疗困境与探索:综述与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 290-298.
[9] 陈丽君, 黎建绪, 梁世雄, 向邦德. 原发性肝癌放疗策略与应用展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 299-306.
[10] 王泽宁, 费振浩, 陈业盛, 孙志为. 基于肝癌体积-时间窗的个体化TACE-MWA序贯治疗策略及其机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 307-316.
[11] 周正, 胡帅, 谢茂云, 郑希彦, 刘婷, 林志群, 陈贤清, 杜飞, 史宪杰. 可切除肝癌围手术期辅助治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 317-325.
[12] 石亚超, 魏六木, 东小鸽, 樊海宁, 侯立朝, 杜凯豪, 汪占金, 薛伟伟, 刘海刚, 王展. 肝癌多模式诊断研究进展与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 326-336.
[13] 李旭柯, 熊培尧, 杨子良, 敖玉凤, 徐立. 肿瘤包绕型血管在接受仑伐替尼治疗肝癌患者生存预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 346-354.
[14] 王逸敏, 刘爱连. 免疫微环境调控直肠癌淋巴结转移的机制及其相关影像学研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 349-355.
[15] 林佳仪, 黄颖. Treg细胞在结直肠癌中的作用机制及靶向治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 356-360.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?