切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -24. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.01.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

索拉非尼在预防肝细胞癌肝移植患者术后肿瘤复发中的临床价值
谢占涛1, 孙建军1, 魏思东1, 徐化恩1, 赵会博1, 汤高枫1, 陈永峰1, 陈国勇1,()   
  1. 1. 450003 郑州人民医院肝胆胰腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-17 出版日期:2014-02-10
  • 通信作者: 陈国勇
  • 基金资助:
    郑州市博士创业基金(2013-62)

Clinical value of sorafenib in preventing tumor recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Zhantao Xie1, Jianjun Sun1, Sidong Wei1, Huaen Xu1, Huibo Zhao1, Gaofeng Tang1, Yongfeng Chen1, Guoyong Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2013-10-17 Published:2014-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Guoyong Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Guoyong, Email:
引用本文:

谢占涛, 孙建军, 魏思东, 徐化恩, 赵会博, 汤高枫, 陈永峰, 陈国勇. 索拉非尼在预防肝细胞癌肝移植患者术后肿瘤复发中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2014, 03(01): 21-24.

Zhantao Xie, Jianjun Sun, Sidong Wei, Huaen Xu, Huibo Zhao, Gaofeng Tang, Yongfeng Chen, Guoyong Chen. Clinical value of sorafenib in preventing tumor recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 03(01): 21-24.

目的

探讨索拉非尼在预防肝细胞癌(肝癌)肝移植患者术后肿瘤复发中的临床价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2010年3月至2012年7月在郑州人民医院肝胆胰腺外科行肝移植术,且超出加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)标准的41例肝癌患者。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男35例,女6例;年龄34~61岁,中位年龄49岁。按照患者自主选择是否术后应用索拉非尼,将患者分为索拉非尼组(9例)和对照组(32例)。索拉非尼组患者服用索拉非尼, 400 mg口服,每日2次;患者不能耐受不良反应时,调整为半量服用(200 mg口服,每日2次)。对照组患者术后未服用索拉非尼或肿瘤复发后改索拉非尼治疗。术后患者接受随访,随访期间记录患者肿瘤复发和存活情况。两组患者术后肿瘤复发率比较采用χ2检验,术后1、2年无瘤生存率和累积生存率比较采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

索拉非尼组患者术后肿瘤复发率3/9,其中2例为索拉非尼半量服用者。对照组患者术后肿瘤复发率47%(15/32),其中3例肝转移瘤行射频消融, 2例肺转移瘤行放射治疗(放疗), 2例肺转移瘤口服索拉非尼,其他8例多发转移未行治疗。两组患者肿瘤复发率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.523, P>0.05)。索拉非尼组患者无发生死亡,对照组12例死于肿瘤复发、转移。索拉非尼组和对照组患者术后2年无瘤生存率分别为67%、53%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.226, P>0.05);术后2年累积生存率分别为100%、63%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.126, P<0.05)。

结论

索拉非尼能提高超出UCSF标准肝癌肝移植患者的2年累积生存率,对预防术后肿瘤复发有一定价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of sorafenib in preventing tumor recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

A total of 41 patients with HCC beyond University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria receiving LT in Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou from March 2010 to July 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. There were 35 males and 6 females with age ranging from 34 to 61 years old and the median age of 49 years old. According to whether the patients chose sorafenib for treatment after operation, they were divided into sorafenib group (n=9) and control group (n=32). Patients were treated with sorafenib orally (400 mg) twice daily in sorafenib group, and half dose (200 mg) was given twice daily when the patients were intolerant to the adverse reactions. In control group, patients did not take sorafenib or changed to take sorafenib after tumor recurrence. Patients received follow-up after operation, and tumor recurrence and survival were recorded during the follow-up. The tumor recurrence rates after operation of two groups were compared using Chi-squane test. The postoperative 1-, 2-year disease-free survival and cumulative survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

The tumor recurrence rate was 3/9 in sorafenib group including 2 cases of taking half dose sorafenib. The tumor recurrence rate was 47% (15/32) in control group including 3 cases with liver metastasis underwent radiofrequency ablation, 2 cases with pulmonary metastases underwent radiation therapy, 2 cases with pulmonary metastases took sorafenib, the other 8 cases with multiple metastases received no treatments. No significant difference was observed in tumor recurrence rates between two groups (χ2=0.523, P>0.05). No death was observed in sorafenib group, while in control group, 12 cases died of tumor recurrence or metastasis. The postoperative 2-year disease-free survival rates were 67%, 53% in sorafenib group and control group respectively and no significant difference was observed (χ2=2.226, P>0.05). The postoperative 2-year cumulative survival rates were 100%, 63% in sorafenib group and control group respectively and significant difference was observed (χ2=5.126, P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with HCC beyond UCSF criteria after LT, sorafenib can improve the 2-year cumulative survival rate and has a certain value in preventing tumor recurrence after operation.

[1]
Hanouneh IA,Macaron C,Lopez R, et al. Rate of tumor growth predicts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation in patients beyond Milan or UCSF criteria[J]. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43(10): 3813-3818.
[2]
Lei J,Yan L. Comparison between living donor liver transplantation recipients who met the Milan and UCSF criteria after successful downstaging therapies[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(11): 2120-2125.
[3]
Macaron C,Hanouneh IA,Lopez R, et al. Total tumor volume predicts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation in patients beyond Milan or UCSF criteria[J]. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(10): 4585-4592.
[4]
钱建平,李湘竑,朱碧丽, 等.肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发的防治策略[J].器官移植, 2012, 3(5): 295-300.
[5]
Chen GH. Liver transplantation in China: retrospect and prospect[J]. Chin Med J, 2009, 122(19): 2229-2230.
[6]
Fan J,Yang GS,Fu ZR, et al. Liver transplantation outcomes in 1,078 hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a multi-center experience in Shanghai, China[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2009, 135(10): 1403-1412.
[7]
Lei J,Yan L. Outcome comparisons among the Hangzhou, Chengdu, and UCSF criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation after successful downstaging therapies[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(6): 1116-1122.
[8]
Ahn SY,Lee HS,Kweon YO, et al. Sustained remission over 36 months of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after short-term sorafenib therapy[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2013, 58(5): 1428-1432.
[9]
Chung YH,Han G,Yoon JH, et al. Interim analysis of START: study in Asia of the combination of TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization) with sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma trial[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132(10): 2448-2458.
[10]
D'Angelo S,Secondulfo M,De Cristofano R, et al. Selection and management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sorafenib: recommendations and opinions from an Italian liver unit[J]. Future Oncol, 2013, 9(4): 485-491.
[11]
Song P,Gao J,Inagaki Y, et al. Biomarkers: evaluation of screening for and early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan and China[J]. Liver Cancer, 2013, 2(1): 31-39.
[12]
Song PP. Standardizing management of hepatocellular carcinoma in China: devising evidence-based clinical practice guidelines[J]. Biosci Trends, 2013, 7(5): 250-252.
[13]
Davis E,Wiesner R,Valdecasas J, et al. Treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2011, 17(Suppl 2): S162-S166.
[14]
Moroni M,Zanlorenzi L. Complete regression following sorafenib in unresectable, locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Future Oncol, 2013, 9(8): 1231-1237.
[15]
Palmer DH,Hussain SA,Smith AJ, et al. Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): impact of rationing in the United Kingdom[J]. Br J Cancer, 2013, 109(4): 888-890.
[16]
Waghray A,Balci B,El-Gazzaz G, et al. Safety and efficacy of sorafenib for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Clin Transplant, 2013, 27(4): 555-561.
[17]
Saab S,McTigue M,Finn RS, et al. Sorafenib as adjuvant therapy for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant recipients: feasibility and efficacy[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2010, 8(4): 307-313.
[18]
Yan J,Tan C,Gu F, et al. Sorafenib delays recurrence and metastasis after liver transplantation in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma with high expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase[J]. Liver Transpl, 2013, 19(5): 507-520.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[6] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[12] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?