切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04) : 210 -214. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.04.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

Glisson蒂横断式肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌
许鑫森1, 陈伟1, 张灵强1, 张晓刚1, 刘学民1, 于良1, 吕毅1, 刘昌1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-26 出版日期:2014-08-10
  • 通信作者: 刘昌
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81272644)

Hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Xinsen Xu1, Wei Chen1, Lingqiang Zhang1, Xiaogang Zhang1, Xuemin Liu1, Liang Yu1, Yi Lyu1, Chang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2014-05-26 Published:2014-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Chang Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Chang, Email:
引用本文:

许鑫森, 陈伟, 张灵强, 张晓刚, 刘学民, 于良, 吕毅, 刘昌. Glisson蒂横断式肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2014, 03(04): 210-214.

Xinsen Xu, Wei Chen, Lingqiang Zhang, Xiaogang Zhang, Xuemin Liu, Liang Yu, Yi Lyu, Chang Liu. Hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 03(04): 210-214.

目的

探讨Glisson蒂横断式肝切除术在治疗肝细胞癌(肝癌)中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2002年1月至2012年12月在西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院行根治性肝切除术的54例肝癌患者临床资料。根据手术方法将患者分为Glisson蒂横断式肝切除术组(Glisson组)和Pringle法肝切除术组(Pringle组),每组27例。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。Glisson组采用游离、阻断Glisson蒂后行肝切除术,Pringle组采用Pringle法阻断第一肝门后行肝切除术。观察两组术中情况、术后肝功能变化及并发症发生情况。术后患者接受随访,并进行生存分析。两组计量资料比较采用t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

Glisson组术中平均出血量为(135±57)ml,明显少于Pringle组的(248±87)ml(t=-5.62,P<0.05)。Glisson组患者术后1 d的TB为(23±5)μmol/L,明显低于Pringle组的(34±5)μmol/L(t=-8.08,P<0.05)。Glisson组术后发生出血2例、感染2例,Pringle组术后发生出血3例、感染1例、胆漏1例,两组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Glisson组患者1、3、5年累积生存率分别为89%、50%、39%,Pringle组相应为82%、55%、41%;Glisson组患者1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为89%、43%、34%,Pringle组相应为82%、47%、41%。两组累积生存率及无瘤生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.001,0.011;P>0.05)。

结论

Glisson蒂横断式肝切除术具有出血量少、肝损伤轻等优点,是治疗肝癌的安全、有效、可行的手术方法。

Objective

To investigate the application value of hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 54 patients with HCC undergoing radical hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2002 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical procedure, the patients were divided into hepatectomy with Glissonean pedicle transection group (Glisson group) and hepatectomy with Pringle maneuver (Pringle group) with 27 cases in each group. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. In Glisson group, hepatectomy was performed after Glissonean pedicles were dissected and occluded. In Pringle group, hepatectomy was performed after the first porta was occluded using Pringle maneuver. The intraoperative situation, the variation of liver function and incidence of complications after operation of two groups were observed. The patients received follow-up after operation and survival analysis was conducted. The comparison of measurement data between two groups was conducted using t test, the comparison of rates using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test, and the survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

The mean of intraoperative blood loss in Glisson group [(135±57) ml] was significantly less than that in Pringle group[(248±87) ml] (t=-5.62, P<0.05). The total bilirubin (TB) level 1 d after operation in Glisson group [(23±5) μmol/L] was significantly lower than that in Pringle group [(34±5) μmol/L] (t=-8.08, P<0.05). In Glisson group, postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 2 cases and infection in 2 cases. In Pringle group, postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 3 cases, infection in 1 case, and bile leakage in 1 case. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 3-, 5-year cumulative survival rates were 89%, 50%, 39% in Glisson group and were 82%, 55%, 41% in Pringle group. The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival rates were 89%, 43%, 34% in Glisson group and were 82%, 47%, 41% in Pringle group. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative survival rates and disease free survival rates between two groups (χ2=0.001, 0.011; P>0.05).

Conclusion

Hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection is a safe, effective, and feasible surgical procedure for HCC with advantages of less blood loss, milder liver damage.

表1 Glisson组与Pringle组肝癌患者手术情况的比较(±s)
表2 Glisson组与Pringle组肝癌患者术后肝功能的比较(±s)
图1 Glisson组和Pringle组患者术后累积生存率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
图2 Glisson组和Pringle组患者术后无瘤生存率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
[1]
Maluccio M, Covey A. Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2012, 62(6):394-399.
[2]
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64(1):9-29.
[3]
Qian NS, Liao YH, Cai SW, et al. Comprehensive application of modern technologies in precise liver resection[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2013, 12(3):244-250.
[4]
Ni JS, Lau WY, Yang Y, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare pringle manoeuvre with hemi-hepatic vascular inflow occlusion in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(8):1414-1421.
[5]
Ypsilantis P, Lambropoulou M, Anagnostopoulos C, et al. Pringle maneuver exacerbates systemic inflammatory response and multiple-organ injury induced by extended liver radiofrequency ablation[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2011, 30(11):1855-1864.
[6]
Strobel O, Büchler MW. Intermittent Pringle manoeuvre: no reduction of blood loss according to recent RCT[J]. Chirurg, 2012, 83(11):994.
[7]
Sanjay P, Ong I, Bartlett A, et al. Meta-analysis of intermittent Pringle manoeuvre versus no Pringle manoeuvre in elective liver surgery[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2013, 83(10):719-723.
[8]
Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1998, 5(3):286-291.
[9]
Fu SY, Lau WY, Li GG, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy[J]. Am J Surg, 2011, 201(1):62-69.
[10]
Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsubo T,et al. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis[J]. Surgery, 2001, 130(3):443-448.
[11]
Figueras J, Lopez-Ben S, Lladó L, et al. Hilar dissection versus the "glissonean" approach and stapling of the pedicle for major hepatectomies: a prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(1):111-119.
[12]
Atici AE, Kaya Y, Coskun T, et al. Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion impairs liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2003, 50(51):661-665.
[13]
Tanaka K, Shimada H, Matsuo K, et al. Intra-operative blood loss predicts complications after a second hepatectomy for malignant neoplasms[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(9):2668-2677.
[14]
Zhang JF, Shu ZJ, Xie CY, et al. Prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of seven staging systems (TNM, Okuda, BCLC, CLIP, CUPI, JIS, CIS) in a Chinese cohort[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3):e88182.
[15]
Page AJ, Cosgrove DC, Philosophe B, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, management, and prognosis[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2014, 23(2):289-311.
[16]
Ji B, Wang Y, Wang G, et al. Curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma using modified Glissonean pedicle transection versus the Pringle maneuver: a case control study[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2012, 9(10):843-852.
[17]
Fujii M, Shimada M, Satoru I, et al. A standardized safe hepatectomy: selective Glissonean transection using endolinear stapling devices[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007, 54(75):906-909.
[1] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[2] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[3] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 孙璐, 蒋亚玲, 陈凌君. 布托啡诺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经炎症和JAK2/STAT3信号通路的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 344-350.
[7] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[8] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[9] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[10] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?