切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 293 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.04.013

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

围手术期血浆输注对肝切除术后并发症影响及其相关因素
卢强1, 李青山1, 张静1, 任一凡1, 张谞丰1, 吕毅1,†()   
  1. 1. 710061　西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科　西安交通大学先进外科与工程研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-17 出版日期:2017-08-10
  • 通信作者: 吕毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81372582)

Effects and correlative factors of perioperative fresh frozen plasma transfusion on complications after hepatectomy

Qiang Lu1, Qingshan Li1, Jing Zhang1, Yifan Ren1, Xufeng Zhang1, Yi Lyu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University; Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2017-05-17 Published:2017-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yi Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Lyu Yi, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

卢强, 李青山, 张静, 任一凡, 张谞丰, 吕毅. 围手术期血浆输注对肝切除术后并发症影响及其相关因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(04): 293-297.

Qiang Lu, Qingshan Li, Jing Zhang, Yifan Ren, Xufeng Zhang, Yi Lyu. Effects and correlative factors of perioperative fresh frozen plasma transfusion on complications after hepatectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(04): 293-297.

目的

探讨围手术期新鲜冰冻血浆（FFP）输注对肝切除术后并发症影响及其相关因素。

方法

回顾性分析2009年8月至2015年9月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行肝切除术的613例患者临床资料。根据围手术期有否输注FFP将患者分为FFP输注组（FFP组）和FFP未输注组（对照组）。其中FFP组383例，男303例，女80例；平均年龄（53.0±1.0）岁。对照组230例，男173例，女57例；年龄（53.0±1.0）岁。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。采用倾向得分匹配（PSM）法对两组患者进行匹配，术后并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法，将患者临床参数纳入影响FFP输注的影响因素，相关因素分析采用Logistic回归。

结果

经过PSM之后共获得147对匹配患者，匹配后FFP组的术后总体并发症发生率为45.6%（67/147），明显高于对照组的33.3%（49/147） （χ2=4.61，P<0.05）。其中FFP组的术后腹腔积液发生率为31.3%（46/147），明显高于对照组的15.6%（23/147） （χ2=10.02，P<0.05）。Logistic回归分析显示，体重指数（BMI）≤18.50 kg/m2、美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）分级Ⅲ～Ⅳ级、ALB≤40 g/L、Plt≤100×109/L、手术时间>180 min、术中出血量>500 ml、有第一肝门阻断、半肝及半肝以上切除均为围手术期FFP输注的独立影响因素（OR=3.14，2.01，1.76，1.65，1.85，3.16，1.62，1.68；P<0.05）。

结论

围手术期FFP输注可增加肝切除术后腹腔积液的发生率，消瘦、麻醉耐受力差、手术范围大、术中出血量多为决定患者FFP输注的关键因素。

关键词: 肝切除术, 围手术期, 血浆, 术后并发症
Objective

To investigate the effects and correlative factors of perioperative fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion on complications after hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 613 patients who underwent hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between August 2009 and September 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients received perioperative FFP transfusion or not, the patients were divided into the FFP transfusion group (FFP group, n=383) andnon-FFP transfusion group (control group, n=230). In the FFP group, 303 cases were males and 80 were females, aged (53.0±1.0) years old on average. In the control group, 173 cases were males and 57 were females, aged (53.0±1.0) years old on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The patients were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) method, and the incidence of postoperative complications was compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test. Clinical parameters of the patients were included as the influencing factors of FFP transfusion, and the correlation analysis was conducted using Logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 147 pairs of patients were matched using PSM method. After the patients were matched, the incidence of postoperative overall complications and peritoneal effusion in the FFP group was respectively 45.6% (67/147) and 31.3% (46/147), signifantly higher than 33.3% (49/147) and 15.6% (23/147) in the control group (χ2=4.61, 10.02; P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that body weight index (BMI)≤18.50 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading Ⅲ-Ⅳ, ALB≤40 g/L, Plt ≤100×109/L, operation time >180 min, intraoperative blood loss >500 ml, the first hepatic portal occlusion, hemihepatectomy and major hepatectomy were the independent influencing factors of perioperative FFP transfusion (OR=3.14, 2.01, 1.76, 1.65, 1.85, 3.16, 1.62, 1.68; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Perioperative FFP transfusion can increase the incidence of peritoneal effusion after hepatectomy. Emaciation, poor tolerance to anesthesia, extensive surgical area and massive intraoperative blood loss are the pivotal factors of FFP transfusion.

Key words: Hepatectomy, Perioperative period, Plasma, Postoperative complication
表1 FFP组和对照组患者肝切除术前基线资料比较
参数 匹配前 匹配后
FFP组 对照组 统计值 P值 FFP组 对照组 统计值 P值
性别（例） ? ? χ2=1.260 >0.05 ? ? χ2=3.580 >0.05
? 男 303 173 ? ? 124 111 ? ?
? 女 080 057 ? ? 025 036 ? ?
年龄（岁，±s） 53.0±1.0 053.0±1.0 t=0.50 >0.05 052.0±1.0 54.0±1.0 0t=-1.28 >0.05
ASA分级（例） ? ? χ2=15.64 <0.05 ? ? χ2=0.400 >0.05
? Ⅰ～Ⅱ级 280 200 ? ? 125 121 ? ?
? Ⅲ～Ⅳ级 103 030 ? ? 022 026 ? ?
肿瘤直径（cm，±s） 07.0±0.2 005.4±0.2 t=5.65 <0.05 005.7±0.2 05.7±0.3 0t=-0.01 >0.05
AST（U/L，±s） 59±3 042±3 t=3.73 <0.05 046±3 44±4 t=0.45 >0.05
ALB（g/L，±s） 37.9±0.3 039.9±0.3 0t=-4.52 <0.05 039.3±0.4 39.4±0.4 0t=-0.10 >0.05
肝功能Child-Pugh分级（例） ? ? χ2=6.070 <0.05 ? ? χ2=0.510 >0.05
? A级 355 224 ? ? 144 142 ? ?
? B级 028 006 ? ? 003 005 ? ?
Hb（g/L，±s） 131.0±1.00 136.4±1.2 0t=-3.42 <0.05 135.4±1.7 134.1±1.50 t=0.57 >0.05
手术时间（min，±s） 261±50 194±5 t=8.94 <0.05 214±6 211±60 t=0.39 >0.05
术中出血量（ml，±s）第一肝门阻断（例） 978±48 0 363±24 t=8.16 <0.05 0 561±33 517±34 t=0.92 >0.05
263 127 χ2=11.23 <0.05 098 093 χ2=0.370 >0.05
手术方式（例） ? ? χ2=27.98 <0.05 ? ? χ2=0.490 >0.05
? 半肝以下切除 243 192 ? ? 112 117 ? ?
? 半肝及以上切除 140 038 ? ? 035 030 ? ?
表2 匹配后FFP组和对照组患者肝切除术后并发症比较（例）
参数 FFP组 对照组 χ2 P
总体并发症 67 49 4.61 <0.05
? 腹腔积液 46 23 10.020 <0.05
? 胸腔积液 11 14 0.39 >0.05
? 胆漏 04 05 0.12 >0.05
? 肝功能不全 04 01 1.83 >0.05
? 肺部感染 04 03 0.15 >0.05
? 腹腔感染 04 02 0.68 >0.05
? 败血症 04 00 - >0.05
? 术后出血 03 02 0.20 >0.05
? 伤口感染 01 01 <0.010 >0.05
? 肾功能不全 01 00 - >0.05
? 泌尿系统感染 00 01 - >0.05
? 其他 07 05 0.35 >0.05
并发症分级 ? ? 4.21 >0.05
? Ⅱ级 51 38 ? ?
? Ⅲ～Ⅴ级 16 11 ? ?
表3 613例患者肝切除围手术期FFP输注相关因素Logistic回归分析
参数 例数 单变量分析结果 多变量分析结果
OR（95% CI） P OR（95% CI） P
男性 476 1.24(0.84～1.83) <>0.050 ? ?
年龄>65岁 095 1.06(0.67～1.66) >0.05 ? ?
BMI≤18.50 kg/m2 421 2.18(1.09～4.39) <0.05 3.14(1.31～7.52) <0.05
ASA分级Ⅲ～Ⅳ级 133 2.42(1.55～3.77) <0.05 2.01(1.20～3.36) <0.05
ALB≤40 g/L 380 1.82(1.30～2.55) <0.05 1.76(1.15～2.70) <0.05
Plt≤100×109/L 179 1.52(1.05～2.20) <0.05 1.65(1.04～2.61) <0.05
手术时间>180 min 397 3.19(2.25～4.50) <0.05 1.85(1.19～2.86) <0.05
术中出血量>500 ml 281 5.44(3.73～7.95) <0.05 3.16(2.03～4.93) <0.05
第一肝门阻断（例） 390 1.78(1.25～2.47) <0.05 1.62(1.06～2.46) <0.05
半肝及半肝以上切除（例） 178 2.87(1.91～4.30) <0.05 1.68(1.01～2.81) <0.05
[1]
Ruzzenente A, Conci S, Valdegamberi A, et al. Role of surgery in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015, 19(15):2892-2900.
[2]
Roayaie S, Jibara G, Tabrizian P, et al. The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer[J]. Hepatology, 2015, 62(2):440-451.
[3]
Laurent C, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, et al. Influence of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal metastases[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(9):1131-1136.
[4]
Ito H, Are C, Gonen M, et al. Effect of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(6):994-1002.
[5]
Tanaka K, Kumamoto T, Nojiri K, et al. Impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after resection for colorectal liver metastases[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(Suppl 5):929-937.
[6]
Watson GA, Sperry JL, Rosengart MR, et al. Fresh frozen plasma is independently associated with a higher risk of multiple organ failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Trauma, 2009, 67(2):221-227.
[7]
Subramanian A, Berbari EF, Brown MJ, et al. Plasma transfusion is associated with postoperative infectious complications following esophageal resection surgery: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2012, 26(4):569-574.
[8]
Harvey AR, Basavaraju SV, Chung KW, et al. Transfusion-related adverse reactions reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module, United States, 2010 to 2012[J]. Transfusion, 2015, 55(4):709-718.
[9]
O'Shaughnessy DF, Atterbury C, Bolton Maggs P, et al. Guidelines for the use of fresh-frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and cryosupernatant[J]. Br J Haematol, 2004, 126(1):11-28.
[10]
Shiba H, Ishida Y, Haruki K, et al. Negative impact of fresh-frozen plasma transfusion on prognosis after hepatic resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013, 33(5):2723-2728.
[11]
Martin RC 2nd, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, et al. The use of fresh frozen plasma after major hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: is there a standard for transfusion?[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 196(3):402-409.
[12]
Tomimaru Y, Wada H, Marubashi S, et al. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion does not affect outcomes following hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(44):5603-5610.
[13]
Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute renal failure- definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group[J]. Crit Care, 2004, 8(4):R204-212.
[14]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2010, 53(3):397-417.
[15]
Kauffmann R, Fong Y. Post-hepatectomy liver failure[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2014, 3(5):238-246.
[16]
Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies[J]. Multivariate Behav Res, 2011, 46(3):399-424.
[17]
Yang L, Stanworth S, Hopewell S, et al. Is fresh-frozen plasma clinically effective? an update of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Transfusion, 2012, 52(8):1673-1686.
[18]
Bagante F, Spolverato G, Ruzzenente A, et al. Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of perioperative blood transfusion for liver resection[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(10):2481-2489.
[19]
Dupuis C, Michelet D, Hilly J, et al. Predictive factors for homologous transfusion during paediatric scoliosis surgery[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2015, 34(6):327-332.
[20]
Stangenberg L, Curran T, Shuja F, et al. Development of a risk prediction model for transfusion in carotid endarterectomy and demonstration of cost-saving potential by avoidance of "type and screen"[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 64(6):1711-1718.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[4] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[5] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[10] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[13] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[14] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[15] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号