切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 406 -410. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.04.016

临床研究

肝巨大血管瘤腹腔镜手术治疗策略及疗效
陈剑尉1, 洪跃飞2, 何进达3, 成俊1, 王成友1, 贾晨阳1,()   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院肝胆外科
    2. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院介入科
    3. 518000 深圳市龙华区人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-21 出版日期:2022-08-10
  • 通信作者: 贾晨阳
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市科技创新委员会学科布局课题(JCYJ20170817172116272)

Therapeutic strategy and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for giant hepatic hemangioma

Jianwei Chen1, Yuefei Hong2, Jinda He3, Jun Cheng1, Chengyou Wang1, Chenyang Jia1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
    2. Department of Interventional Treatment, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Longhua District People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2022-04-21 Published:2022-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Chenyang Jia
引用本文:

陈剑尉, 洪跃飞, 何进达, 成俊, 王成友, 贾晨阳. 肝巨大血管瘤腹腔镜手术治疗策略及疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 406-410.

Jianwei Chen, Yuefei Hong, Jinda He, Jun Cheng, Chengyou Wang, Chenyang Jia. Therapeutic strategy and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for giant hepatic hemangioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(04): 406-410.

目的

探讨腹腔镜手术治疗肝巨大血管瘤的手术策略及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年5月深圳大学第一附属医院行腹腔镜手术治疗的32例肝巨大血管瘤患者临床资料。其中男13例,女19例;平均年龄(41±8)岁。肝功能Child-Pugh分级均为A级;ICGR15为0.043±0.004;肝血管瘤直径(11.6±1.2)cm;Ⅰc型23例,Ⅱb型6例,Ⅱc型3例。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。观察患者手术及术后并发症发生情况。

结果

顺利完成腹腔镜手术28例,其中肝血管瘤剥除术10例,非解剖性肝切除术7例,解剖性肝切除术11例;中转开腹4例。腹腔镜手术时间(168±7)min,术中出血量中位数240(50~420)ml,术中输血3例。23例Ⅰc型单发巨大血管瘤,主要选择肝血管瘤剥除术。9例Ⅱ型多发肿瘤,均优先剥除或切除直径最大的主瘤体。11例患者主瘤体位于左半肝采用解剖性肝切除,5例主瘤体位于右半肝和3例主瘤体位于左半肝患者采用非解剖性肝切除,其余13例患者主瘤体位置较深或靠近重要解剖位置则采用血管瘤剥除术。术后住院时间(7.3±1.9)d。术后发生并发症4例,其中胆漏1例,胸腔积液3例,引流后痊愈。术后随访未见肝血管瘤复发。

结论

腹腔镜手术治疗肝巨大血管瘤创伤小、恢复快、安全有效,术中应根据血管瘤分型、位置等选择合理术式,积极预防术中出血,以保证手术安全。

Objective

To investigate surgical strategy and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for giant hepatic hemangioma.

Methods

Clinical data of 32 patients with giant hepatic hemangioma who underwent laparoscopic surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University from January 2017 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were male and 19 female, aged (41±8) years on average. Preoperative liver function of all patients was classified as Child-Pugh A. ICGR15 was 0.043±0.004. The diameter of hepatic hemangioma was (11.6±1.2) cm. 23 cases were classified as type Ⅰc, 6 cases of type Ⅱb and 3 cases of type Ⅱc. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was observed.

Results

28 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic surgery, including 10 cases of hepatic hemangioma dissection, 7 cases of non-anatomical resection and 11 cases of anatomical resection.4 cases were converted to open surgery. The laparoscopic operation time was (168±7) min and the median intraoperative blood loss was 240(50-420) ml. Intraoperative blood transfusion was performed in 3 cases. 23 patients with single giant type Ⅰc hemangioma mainly underwent hepatic hemangioma dissection. In9 cases with multiple type Ⅱ hemangioma, the main tumor with the largest diameter was dissected or resected primarily. 11 patients with the main tumor located in the left liver lobe received anatomical hepatectomy,5 cases with the main tumor located in the right liver lobe and 3 cases with the main tumor located in the left lobe received non-anatomical hepatectomy, and the remaining 13 cases with the main tumor deeply located or adjacent to vital anatomical sites underwent hepatic hemangioma dissection. The length of postoperative hospital stay was (7.3±1.9) d. 4 patients developed postoperative complications including bile leakage in 1 case and pleural effusion in 3 cases, and all were cured after drainage. No recurrence of hepatic hemangioma was noted during postoperative follow-up.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and efficacious procedure for giant hepatic hemangioma, which yields slight trauma and prompt recovery. Proper surgical methods should be selected according to the classification and location of hemangioma. Active interventions should be delivered to prevent the intraoperative bleeding and guarantee the safety of surgery.

表1 肝血管瘤分型[1]
表2 肝巨大血管瘤所在肝段及手术方式
[1]
国际肝胆胰协会中国分会肝血管瘤专业委员会. 肝血管瘤诊断和治疗多学科专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(8):705-710.
[2]
Marrero JA, Ahn J, Rajender Reddy K, et al. ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of focal liver lesions[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2014, 109(9):1328-1347.
[3]
Tang T, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Real-world data on the clinicopathological traits and outcomes of hospitalized liver hemangioma patients: a multicenter study[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(13):1067.
[4]
Farhat W, Ammar H, Said MA, et al. Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: a 10-year single center experience[J]. Ann Med Surg, 2021(69):102542.
[5]
Cai WL, Ma XM, Sun XH, et al. Surgical indication and strategy for liver hemangioma in the caudate lobe: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis with 137 patients[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2020, 18(1):123.
[6]
陈亚进,曹君. 从创新到标准化:腹腔镜肝切除术进展和展望(1990-2020)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(2):158-162.
[7]
Yang J, Du G, Shi B, et al. Is laparoscopic hepatectomy suitable for giant hepatic hemangioma larger than 10 cm in diameter?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(3):1224-1230.
[8]
Shin Y, Rhu J, Choi GS, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for liver cavernous hemangioma: a single-institutional comparative study[J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2020, 24(2):137-143.
[9]
Yan C, Li BH, Sun XT, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is superior to open procedures for hepatic hemangioma[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2021, 20(2):142-146.
[10]
尹新民,徐威,成伟,等. "两步分层法"腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术的临床应用价值[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 4(6):340-343.
[11]
刘荣,赵国栋. 肝左外叶切除"金标准"术式:腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 3(6):7-9.
[12]
陈亚进,陈捷. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术的技术要领——手术流程的标准化[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(5):481-485.
[13]
王雪飞,胡明根,赵国栋,等. 一种腹腔镜标准术式的探索:模式化腹腔镜左半肝切除术[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(3):1-5.
[14]
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2014, 21(10):745-753.
[15]
Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, et al. A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(12):5356-5363.
[16]
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, et al. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(1):13-17.
[17]
Halls MC, Berardi G, Cipriani F, et al. Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(9):1182-1191.
[18]
Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, et al. A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the Caudal approach[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(6):1226-1231.
[19]
曹君,陈亚进. 浅谈腹腔镜肝切除之入路[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(7):503-507.
[20]
Rajakannu M, Pascal G, Castaing D, et al. Revisiting the surgical management of giant hepatic hemangiomas: enucleation versus anatomical resection?[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2021, 11(3):321-326.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要