切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 563 -568. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.06.007

临床研究

头背侧入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性及有效性
雷光林1, 胡雄伟1, 王森1, 宋彪1, 洪智贤1,()   
  1. 1. 100039 北京,中国人民解放军总医院第五医学中心肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-23 出版日期:2022-12-10
  • 通信作者: 洪智贤
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大研究计划集成项目(92159305)

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic anatomical left liver resection via cranial-dorsal approach for hepatocellular carcinoma

Guanglin Lei1, Xiongwei Hu1, Sen Wang1, Biao Song1, Zhixian Hong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2022-08-23 Published:2022-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Zhixian Hong
引用本文:

雷光林, 胡雄伟, 王森, 宋彪, 洪智贤. 头背侧入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性及有效性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 563-568.

Guanglin Lei, Xiongwei Hu, Sen Wang, Biao Song, Zhixian Hong. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic anatomical left liver resection via cranial-dorsal approach for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(06): 563-568.

目的

探讨头背侧入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌(肝癌)的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年3月1日至2019年3月1日在中国人民解放军总医院第五医学中心行腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的20例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男11例,女9例;平均年龄(53±7)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据手术入路的不同分为常规组(10例)和头背侧入路组(10例)。头背侧入路组从头侧离断肝左静脉,同时从背侧打开Arantius韧带,全程显露肝中静脉主干,从头背侧向足侧离断肝实质,完成解剖性左半肝切除。比较两组围手术期、术后并发症发生率及术后生存率。两组手术时间等正态分布数据比较采用t检验,并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

头背侧入路组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间分别为(97±19)min、(104±21)ml、(5.5±1.2)d,明显少于常规组的(139±24)min、(155±26)ml、(8.0±1.9)d(t=-9.837,-11.429,-7.362;P<0.05)。头背侧入路组患者术后第1天的ALT、AST、TB、WBC、CRP分别为(232±26)U/L、(267±33)U/L、(28±3)μmol/L、(8.3±1.1)×109/L、(54±16)mg/L,明显低于常规组的(302±31)U/L、(328±36)U/L、(34±5)μmol/L、(11.5±2.3)×109/L、(73±18)mg/L(t=-12.362,-14.151,-9.370、-7.633,-8.641;P<0.05);而ALB为(35.2±1.1)g/L,明显高于常规组的(32.9±1.5)g/L(t=8.016,P<0.05)。头背侧入路组患者术后并发症发生率为2/10,明显低于常规组的6/10(χ2=6.387,P<0.05)。头背侧入路组术后无复发生存率明显优于常规组(χ2=4.532,P<0.05)。

结论

头背侧入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术可全程循肝中静脉主干离断肝实质,实现真正意义上的解剖性左半肝切除,安全、有效,可提高患者术后无复发生存率。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic anatomical left liver resection via cranial-dorsal approach in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 20 HCC patients who underwent laparoscopic anatomical left liver resection in the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from March 1, 2017 to March 1, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 11 patients were male and 9 female, aged (53±7) years on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different surgical approaches, all patients were divided into the conventional group (n=10) and cranial-dorsal approach group (n=10). In the cranial-dorsal approach group, the left hepatic vein was severed from the cranial side, the Arantius ligament was incised from the dorsal side, the middle hepatic vein trunk was exposed throughout the procedure and the hepatic parenchyma was severed from the cranial-dorsal side to the foot side to complete the anatomical left liver resection. Perioperative condition, postoperative complications and survival rate were compared between two groups. The operation time and normal distribution data between two groups were compared by t test. The incidence of complications between two groups was statistically compared by Chi-square test. Survival analysis was conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and the length of postoperative hospital stay in the cranial-dorsal approach group were (97±19) min, (104±21) ml and (5.5±1.2) d, significantly less than (139±24) min, (155±26) ml and (8.0±1.9) d in the conventional group (t=-9.837, -11.429, -7.362; P<0.05). In the cranial-dorsal approach group, the levels of ALT, AST, TB, WBC and CRP at postoperative 1 d were (232±26) U/L,(267±33) U/L, (28±3) μmol/L, (8.3±1.1)×109/L and (54±16) mg/L, significantly lower compared with (302±31) U/L, (328±36) U/L, (34±5) μmol/L, (11.5±2.3)×109/L and (73±18) mg/L in the conventional group (t=-12.362, -14.151, -9.370, -7.633, -8.641; P<0.05). The ALB in the cranial-dorsal approach group was (35.2±1.1) g/L, significantly higher than (32.9±1.5) g/L in the conventional group (t=8.016, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the cranial-dorsal approach group was 2/10, significantly lower than 6/10 in the conventional group (χ2=6.387, P<0.05). The recurrence-free survival rate in the cranial-dorsal approach group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (χ2=4.532, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic anatomical left liver resection via the cranial-dorsal approach can sever the liver parenchyma along the middle hepatic vein trunk throughout the whole procedure. It is a safe and efficacious anatomical left liver resection, which can enhance the postoperative recurrence-free survival rate.

表1 头背侧入路组和常规组腹腔镜左半肝切除术患者术前一般资料比较
图1 常规组和头背侧入路组腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术手术图注:a示常规组传统腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术操作孔分布;b示常规组肝切除断面;c示头背侧入路组腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术操作孔分布;d示术中鞘外分离左肝蒂;e示术中悬吊肝左静脉并显露肝中静脉根部;f示头背侧入路组肝切除断面;MHV为肝中静脉,LHV为肝左静脉,LPV为门静脉左支,SPL为门静脉尾状叶支
表2 头背侧入路组和常规组腹腔镜左半肝切除术患者围手术期情况比较(±s
图2 头背侧入路组和常规组腹腔镜左半肝切除术患者术后Kaplan-Meier无复发生存曲线
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2]
Wei W, Zeng H, Zheng R, et al. Cancer registration in China and its role in cancer prevention and control[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(7):e342-349.
[3]
Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(15):1450-1462.
[4]
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, et al. Assessment of textbook outcome in laparoscopic and open liver surgery[J]. JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(8):e212064.
[5]
Ziogas IA, Evangeliou AP, Mylonas KS, et al. Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Health Econ, 2021, 22(4):585-604.
[6]
张永法, 王鲁. 腹腔镜肝切除术的现状与发展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(1):25-28.
[7]
林融风, 华永飞, 陆才德. 腹腔镜肝切除中转危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(7):590-592.
[8]
朱健康, 胡三元. 腹腔镜肝切除术临床研究现状[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2021, 26(12):881-884.
[9]
雷光林, 李媛媛, 洪智贤, 等. 吲哚菁绿荧光染色技术在肝细胞癌合并肝硬化患者中行腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术的应用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2019, 31(9):517-521.
[10]
张成武. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术的若干进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2020, 32(3):129-132, 147.
[11]
张努, 荚卫东, 王润东, 等. 解剖性肝切除对肝细胞癌伴微血管侵犯病人预后的影响[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(5):555-559.
[12]
华小斌, 卢正磊, 夏云连, 等. 腹腔镜超声下左半肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的近期预后及对肝功能的影响[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(7):780-788.
[13]
洪海杰, 蔡欣然, 陈敏敏, 等.腹腔镜解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的近、远期疗效分析[J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2021, 55(2):116-120.
[14]
周兵,孙勇,刘玲,等.程序化腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术的临床应用[J/OL].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(3):207-210.
[15]
王雪飞, 胡明根, 赵国栋, 等. 三步法断肝在完全腹腔镜左半肝切除中的应用研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(3): 168-172.
[16]
马洋, 瞿磊, 邓标, 等. 腹腔镜下不解剖肝门Endo-GIA离断左肝蒂行左半肝切除术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(6):464.
[17]
陈焕伟. 左肝蒂横断式腹腔镜左半肝切除术的新方法介绍[J].国际外科学杂志, 2018, 45(2):128-129, 146.
[18]
张焕庆, 江俊杰, 吴伟顶, 等. 腹腔镜循肝中静脉下腔静脉精准右半肝切除术临床应用研究进展[J]. 浙江医学, 2021, 43(21):2385-2388.
[19]
吴涛, 熊廷刚, 高绪照, 等. 循肝静脉入路精准肝切除术43例临床分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2018, 30(1):66-68.
[20]
Liao KX, Chen L, Ma L, et al. Laparoscopic middle-hepatic-vein-guided anatomical hemihepatectomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis: a 10-year case study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(2):881-888.
[21]
冉义洪, 张红卫, 陈亚进. 肝细胞癌腹腔镜大范围肝切除术后并发症分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2021, 25(5):328-333.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[11] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[12] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[13] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
阅读次数
全文


摘要