切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 312 -316. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.03.012

临床研究

Clavien-Dindo分级和并发症综合指数在高龄肝癌肝切除术安全性评估中的应用
朱任飞1, 冯秋琪2, 肖锋3, 陈志4, 杨帆5,†()   
  1. 1. 226006　南通大学附属南通第三医院肝胆外科；210029　南京医科大学第一附属医院肝胆中心
    2. 226006　南通大学附属南通第三医院肝胆外科
    3. 226006　南通大学附属南通第三医院病理科
    4. 226599　南京中医药大学附属如皋中医院普通外科
    5. 226001　上海大学附属南通医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-08 出版日期:2023-06-10
  • 通信作者: 杨帆
  • 基金资助:
    南通市市级科技计划项目(JCZ20119，JCZ21063); 南通市226人才项目(通委人才[2018]3)

Application of Clavien-Dindo classification and comprehensive complication index in safety evaluation of hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Renfei Zhu1, Qiuqi Feng2, Feng Xiao3, Zhi Chen4, Fan Yang5,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong 226006, China; Hepatobiliary Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong 226006, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong 226006, China
    4. Department of General Surgery, Rugao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Rugao 226599, China
    5. ICU, Nantong Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University, Nantong 226001, China
  • Received:2023-02-08 Published:2023-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Fan Yang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

朱任飞, 冯秋琪, 肖锋, 陈志, 杨帆. Clavien-Dindo分级和并发症综合指数在高龄肝癌肝切除术安全性评估中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 312-316.

Renfei Zhu, Qiuqi Feng, Feng Xiao, Zhi Chen, Fan Yang. Application of Clavien-Dindo classification and comprehensive complication index in safety evaluation of hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 312-316.

目的

探讨Clavien-Dindo分级和并发症综合指数（CCI）在高龄肝细胞癌（肝癌）肝切除患者安全性评估中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2013年8月至2019年8月南通大学附属南通第三医院行肝癌肝切除的96例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。根据年龄分为高龄组（≥70岁，35例）和对照组（<70岁，61例）。其中高龄组男29例，女6例；年龄70~82岁，中位年龄77岁；对照组男51例，女10例；年龄29~67岁，中位年龄43岁。分别采用Clavien-Dindo分级和CCI分析两组肝癌患者肝切除的并发症。两组患者围手术期数据比较采用t检验、秩和检验和χ2检验。

结果

高龄组合并高血压病、糖尿病分别为13、9例，对照组相应为5、4例，差异有统计学意义（χ2=12.232，6.971；P<0.05）。两组患者均手术顺利，无发生围手术期死亡。高龄组和对照组手术时间中位数分别为300（240）、390（650）min，差异无统计学意义（Z=-0.835，P>0.05）；平均术中出血量分别为（237±73）、（247±54）ml，差异无统计学意义（t=-0.791，P>0.05）。高龄组术后并发症Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅳ级分别为9、9、1例，对照组相应为14、16、1例，差异无统计学意义（Z=-0.279，P>0.05）；CCI评分分别为（16±8）、（16±9）分，差异亦无统计学意义（t=-0.071，P>0.05）。

结论

高龄肝癌肝切除术是安全的，Clavien-Dindo分级可指导危重患者处理，CCI可综合评估危险性，两者结合可更好地评估手术风险，避免严重并发症发生。

关键词: 癌，肝细胞, 肝切除术, 高龄, Clavien-Dindo分级, 并发症综合指数
Objective

To evaluate the application value of Clavien-Dindo classification and comprehensive complication index (CCI) in the safety assessment of hepatectomy in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 96 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy in Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University from August 2013 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were divided into the elderly group (≥70 years, n=35) and control group(<70 years, n=61). In the elderly group, 29 patients were male and 6 female, aged from 70 to 82 years, with a median age of 77 years. In the control group, 51 cases were male and 10 female, aged from 29 to 67, with a median age of 43 years. The complications of hepatectomy in two groups were analyzed with Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI. Perioperative data between two groups were compared by t test, rank-sum test andChi-square test.

Results

In the elderly group, 13 patients were complicated with hypertension and 9 cases of diabetes mellitus, and 5 and 4 correspondingly in the control group, where significant differences were observed (χ2=12.232, 6.971; P<0.05). The surgeries in patients of both groups were completed successfully, and no perioperative death occurred. The median operation time in the elderly and control groups was 300(240) and 390(650) min, respectively, with no significant difference (Z=-0.835, P>0.05). The average intraoperative blood loss was (237±73) and (247±54) ml in the elderly and control groups, with no significant difference(t=-0.791, P>0.05). In the elderly group, 9 patients were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ, 9 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅱ and 1 case of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅳ, and 14, 16 and 1 correspondingly in the control group, where no significant difference was observed (Z=-0.279, P>0.05). The CCI scores were 16±8 and 16±9 in the elderly and control groups, and no significant difference was observed (t=-0.071, P>0.05).

Conclusions

It is safe to perform hepatectomy in elderly patients with HCC. Clavien-Dindo classification can help to treat critically ill patients. CCI can comprehensively evaluate the risk. The combination of two indexes can better evaluate the surgical risk and decrease the incidence of severe complications.

Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Hepatectomy, Elderly, Clavien-Dindo classification, Comprehensive complication index
表1 高龄组和对照组肝癌肝切除患者术前一般资料比较
组别 例数 性别（例） HBsAg阳性（例） 肝硬化（例） AFP[μg/L，M（QR）] sFLR（%，±s） 肿瘤直径[cm，M（QR）] Child-Pugh分级（例） CNLC分期（例）
男 女 A级 B级 Ⅰa期 Ⅰb期
高龄组 35 29 6 28 30 50（2 272） 74±10 3.8（2.4） 34 1 29 6
对照组 61 51 10 55 57 39（796） 73±8 3.0（2.0） 61 0 53 8
统计值   χ2=0.010 χ2=1.962 χ2=0.211 Z=0.887 t=0.805 Z=1.680 - χ2=0.290
P值   0.924 0.161 0.561 0.375 0.423 0.093 0.187 0.590
表2 高龄组和对照组肝癌肝切除患者术后并发症及Clavien-Dindo分级比较（例）
组别 例数 术后并发症 Clavien-Dindo分级
腹腔积液 腹腔出血 肝衰竭 胆漏 胸腔积液 肺部感染 切口感染 Ⅰ级 Ⅱ级 Ⅲ级 Ⅳ级 Ⅴ级
高龄组 35 11 1 2 1 3 1 1 9 9 0 1 0
对照组 61 23 1 3 1 4 1 1 14 16 0 1 0
统计值   χ2=0.158 - - - - - - Z=-0.279
P值   0.691 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.780
[1]
Yang A, Zhang P, Sun Z, et al. Lysionotin induces apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via caspase-3 mediated mitochondrial pathway[J]. Chem Biol Interact, 2021(344):109500.
[2]
Chen H, Jia W. Progress in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and peri-operation management[J]. Genes Dis, 2020, 7(3):320-327.
[3]
Macias RIR, Monte MJ, Serrano MA, et al. Impact of aging on primary liver cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and therapeutics[J]. Aging, 2021, 13(19):23416-23434.
[4]
Monden K, Sadamori H, Hioki M, et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2022, 22(1):63.
[5]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(2):143-168.
[6]
Yao J, Liang X, Liu Y, et al. Trends in incidence and prognostic factors of two subtypes of primary liver cancers: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based population study[J]. Cancer Control, 2022(29):10732748211051548.
[7]
Kim JM, Rhu J, Ha SY, et al. Realization of improved outcomes following liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 75 years and older[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2021, 101(5):257-265.
[8]
Yasukawa K, Shimizu A, Kubota K, et al. The survival benefit of surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: Shinshu University experience[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2021, 124(1):67-78.
[9]
Galun D, Bogdanovic A, Zivanovic M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after hepatectomy in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 229 cases from a developing country[J].J Hepatocell Carcinoma, 2021(8):155-165.
[10]
Tomita K, Koganezawa I, Nakagawa M, et al. A new preoperative risk score for predicting postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(6):1868-1876.
[11]
Xing H, Liang L, Wang H, et al. Multicenter analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. HPB, 2020, 22(9):1314-1323.
[12]
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-analysis[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 109(1):21-29.
[13]
Amato B, Aprea G, De Rosa D, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC in elderly patients: risks and feasibility[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2017, 29(Suppl 1):179-183.
[14]
Nitta H, Mitsuura C, Shiraishi Y, et al. Predictive model for postoperative pleural effusion after hepatectomy[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2021, 5(3):373-380.
[15]
Sakamoto K, Tamesa T, Tokuhisa Y, et al. Perioperative microbiologic monitoring of sputum on postoperative day one as a predictor of pneumonia after hepatectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19(9):1662-1667.
[16]
Chidley P, Foroudi F, Tacey M, et al. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced and high-risk breast cancer[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2021, 65(3):345-353.
[17]
Han J, Kim H, Han SH, et al. Hybrid appendectomy in pediatric appendicitis: a comparative analysis of single-port and multiport laparoscopic appendectomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(3):330-335.
[18]
Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, et al. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(1):1-7.
[19]
Naito S, Fujikawa T, Kouno N, et al. Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for super-elderly patients (aged≥80)? a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2022, 15(2):279-289.
[20]
Shen S, Kong J, Zhao J, et al. Outcomes of different surgical resection techniques for end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis with inferior vena cava invasion[J]. HPB, 2019, 21(9):1219-1229.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[13] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号