切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 296 -301. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.03.007

所属专题: 综述 临床研究

临床研究

肝硬化门静脉高压症治疗后再出血危险因素分析及预测模型构建
杨竞1, 周光文1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-23 出版日期:2024-06-10
  • 通信作者: 周光文
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81974076)

Risk factors and prediction model construction of post-treatment re-hemorrhage in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

Jing Yang1, Guangwen Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2024-01-23 Published:2024-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Guangwen Zhou
引用本文:

杨竞, 周光文. 肝硬化门静脉高压症治疗后再出血危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 296-301.

Jing Yang, Guangwen Zhou. Risk factors and prediction model construction of post-treatment re-hemorrhage in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 296-301.

目的

探讨影响肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血的危险因素,并构建列线图预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年1月上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院诊治的143例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男77例,女66例;平均年龄(56±12)岁;乙型病毒性肝炎后肝硬化109例。收集患者一般资料、既往病史及入院实验室检测结果等临床资料。随访时间为3年,以治疗后再出血为主要结局事件,根据是否发生再出血分为再出血组(32例)和未出血组(111例)。通过Logistic单因素和多因素回归分析确定再出血相关危险因素,使用逐步回归法进行变量筛选,R软件构建列线图预测模型,通过Bootstrap法进行内部验证,最后根据ROC曲线、校正曲线、临床决策曲线(DCA)分析验证模型的预测效能与临床有效性。

结果

Logistic单因素和多因素回归分析显示,年龄、体重、Child-Pugh分级>A级和手术治疗是肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血的独立影响因素(OR=1.048,0.947,5.980,0.238;P<0.05)。基于4个独立影响因素建立再出血的预测模型列线图,该预测模型ROC曲线下面积为0.806(验证后为0.811),均大于0.75,说明模型区分度较高;Brier分数为0.114(验证后为0.102),均小于0.25,R2为0.437(验证后为0.477),均大于0.4,说明模型校准度较好;模型的DCA曲线净获益均高于两条极端曲线,表明预测模型具有临床有效性。

结论

外科手术是防治肝硬化门静脉高压症患者再出血的重要手段,通过建立列线图预测模型,有助于临床早期识别肝硬化门静脉高压症治疗后再出血的高危患者。

Objective

To identify the risk factors of re-hemorrhage in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension after treatments, and to construct a nomogram prediction model.

Methods

Clinical data of143 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension treated in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2015 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 77 patients were male and 66 female, aged (56±12) years on average. 109 cases were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis after hepatitis B. Baseline data, medical history and laboratory examination results upon admission were collected. Follow-up time was 3 years. Re-hemorrhage after treatments was regarded as the main outcome event. All patients were divided into the re-hemorrhage (n=32) and non-hemorrhage groups (n=111) according to the incidence of re-hemorrhage. The risk factors of re-hemorrhage were identified by Logistic univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Relevant variables were screened by stepwise regression method. Nomogram prediction model was constructed by R software, and internal verification was carried out by Bootstrap method. Finally, the prediction efficiency and clinical effectiveness of this model were analyzed and validated based on the ROC curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Logistic univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that age, weight, Child-Pugh grading above grade A and surgical treatment were the independent influencing factors of re-hemorrhage in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension after treatment (OR=1.048, 0.947, 5.980, 0.238; P<0.05). Based on 4 independent influencing factors, the nomogram prediction model for re-hemorrhage was constructed. The area under the ROC curve of this prediction model was 0.806 (0.811 after validation), both of which were >0.75, indicating that this prediction model yielded high discrimination. Brier score was calculated as 0.114 (0.102 after validation), equally <0.25, and R2 was 0.437 (0.477 after validation), equally >0.4, suggesting that the model had high calibration. The net benefit of DCA curve of this model was higher than those of two extreme curves, indicating that the prediction model had clinical effectiveness.

Conclusions

Surgery is an important approach to prevent and treat re-hemorrhage in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. Constructing nomogram prediction model contributes to identifying high-risk post-treatment re-hemorrhage patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension at early clinical stage.

表1 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血的Logistic单因素回归分析
表2 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血的Logistic多因素回归分析
图1 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血的列线图注:根据列线图,将治疗方式、年龄、体重和Child-Pugh评分垂直对应上方分数,4项分数值相加之和记为总分,下方与总分相对应的预测概率是肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血事件发生的风险概率
图2 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者治疗后再出血列线图模型评价曲线注:a为ROC曲线,b为校准曲线,c为临床决策曲线;AUC为曲线下面积
[1]
孙若楠,张春清. 食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血预防和治疗进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24(4): 607-610.
[2]
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases[J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(1): 310-335.
[3]
徐小元,丁惠国,令狐恩强, 等. 肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39(3): 527-538.
[4]
杨连粤,白雪莉. 肝硬化门静脉高压症食管、胃底静脉曲张破裂出血诊治专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(12): 1241-1247.
[5]
吕少诚,高沿航,王磊, 等. 肝硬化门静脉高压症多学科诊治(基于肝静脉压力梯度)专家共识[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(9): 2037-2044.
[6]
杨连粤. 门静脉高压症外科治疗进展与展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(2): 180-184, 190.
[7]
李涛,陈皓. 肝硬化门静脉高压症的肝移植治疗[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(3): 189-194.
[8]
Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(6): 550-558.
[9]
de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno Ⅶ-renewing consensus in portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 76(4): 959-974.
[10]
Vorobioff JD, Groszmann RJ. Prevention of portal hypertension: from variceal development to clinical decompensation[J]. Hepatology, 2015, 61(1): 375-381.
[11]
中国门静脉高压诊断与监测研究组(CHESS),中华医学会消化病学分会微创介入协作组,中国医师协会介入医师分会急诊介入专业委员会, 等. 中国肝静脉压力梯度临床应用专家共识(2018版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(12): 2526-2536.
[12]
Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease[J]. Hepatology, 2001, 33(2): 464-470.
[13]
Huo TI, Lin HC, Wu JC, et al. Proposal of a modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh scoring system and comparison with the model for end-stage liver disease for outcome prediction in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Liver Transpl, 2006, 12(1): 65-71.
[14]
徐小元,丁惠国,李文刚, 等. 肝硬化诊治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(11): 2408-2425.
[15]
Mauro E, Gadano A. What's new in portal hypertension?[J]. Liver Int, 2020, 40(Suppl 1): 122-127.
[16]
Ma JL, He LL, Li P, et al. Prognosis of endotherapy versus splenectomy and devascularization for variceal bleeding in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(6): 2620-2628.
[17]
吴振,尹琦,胡彦华. 脾切断流术后再发上消化道出血的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2020, 26(17): 3465-3470.
[18]
Zhou GP, Sun LY, Wei L, et al. Comparision between portosystemic shunts and endoscopic therapy for prevention of variceal re-bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Chin Med J, 2019, 132(9): 1087-1099.
[19]
Shao R, Li Z, Wang J, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient-guided laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularisation versus endoscopic therapy for secondary prophylaxis for variceal rebleeding in portal hypertension (CHESS1803): study protocol of a multicenter randomised controlled trial in China[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(6): e030960.
[20]
徐伟,涂兵. 断流术在肝硬化门静脉高压中的作用及争议[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(3): 670-672.
[21]
Carey EJ, Lai JC, Sonnenday C, et al. A North American expert opinion statement on sarcopenia in liver transplantation[J]. Hepatology, 2019, 70(5): 1816-1829.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 严华悦, 刘子祥, 周少波. 磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧激酶-1在恶性肿瘤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 452-456.
[3] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[4] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[7] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[8] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[9] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[10] 吴广迎, 张延娟, 秦鹏, 卢艳丽. 经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术预防上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 545-548.
[11] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[12] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要