切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 302 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.03.008

所属专题: 综述 临床研究

临床研究

三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值
陈志坚1, 俞建达2, 池小斌1, 吕立志1, 陈永标1,()   
  1. 1. 350025 福州,第九〇〇医院肝胆胰外科
    2. 350025 福州,福建医科大学福总临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-22 出版日期:2024-06-10
  • 通信作者: 陈永标
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院院内课题青年孵化项目(2023QN07)

Application value of three-dimensional visualization technology in laparoscopic resection of huge liver tumors

Zhijian Chen1, Jianda Yu2, Xiaobin Chi1, Lizhi Lyu1, Yongbiao Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, No.900 Hospital, Fuzhou 350025, China
    2. Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350025, China
  • Received:2024-02-22 Published:2024-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Yongbiao Chen
引用本文:

陈志坚, 俞建达, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 302-307.

Zhijian Chen, Jianda Yu, Xiaobin Chi, Lizhi Lyu, Yongbiao Chen. Application value of three-dimensional visualization technology in laparoscopic resection of huge liver tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 302-307.

目的

探讨三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年7月至2021年6月在第九〇〇医院行肝巨大肿瘤切除术的50例患者临床资料。其中男19例,女31例;年龄38~65岁,中位年龄45岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。肿瘤直径10~17 cm,中位直径13 cm;良性肿瘤23例,恶性肿瘤27例。根据手术方法不同分为两组,其中联合组24例,采用三维可视化技术联合腹腔镜;对照组26例,采用开腹肝巨大肿瘤切除术。两组术中及术后情况比较采用t检验或χ2检验。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

两组手术均顺利,联合组无中转开腹。联合组术后第1天C-反应蛋白中位数为26(18,72) mg/L,明显低于对照组的57(44,81)mg/L(Z=-2.700,P<0.05);术后第1天平均术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间分别为(2.6±0.8)、(3.1±1.3)、(13±4)d,明显低于对照组的(3.1±1.1)、(4.4±1.6)、(16±6)d(t=-2.180,-3.137,-2.062;P<0.05)。联合组术后并发症发生率为25%(6/24),对照组为42%(11/26),差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.666,P>0.05)。联合组恶性肿瘤术后1、3、5年总体生存率和无瘤生存率分别为78.8%、52.5%、26.3%和57.1%、28.6%、0,对照组相应为70.6%、36.4%、12.1%和51.3%、22.0%、0,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.292,0.764;P>0.05)。

结论

三维可视化技术可对腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除患者进行术前精准评估,术中指导精确操作,降低炎症反应,加速术后康复。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technology in laparoscopic resection of huge liver tumors.

Methods

Clinical data of 50 patients who underwent huge liver tumor resection in No. 900 Hospital from July 2016 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 19 patients were male and 31 female, aged from 38 to 65 years, with a median age of 45 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The tumor diameter was ranged from 10 to 17 cm, with a median diameter of 13 cm. 23 patients were diagnosed with benign tumors and 27 cases of malignant tumors. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into two groups. In the combination group, 24 cases underwent three-dimensional visualization technology combined with laparoscopic resection. In the control group, 26 cases were treated with open resection of huge liver tumors. Intraoperative and postoperative conditions of patients betweentwo groups were compared by t test or Chi-square test. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test.

Results

All patients in two groups successfully completed the surgery, and no conversion to open surgery was reported in the combination group. In the combination group, the median C-reactive protein level at postoperative 1 d was 26(18, 72) mg/L, significantly lower than 57(44, 81) mg/L in the control group (Z=-2.700, P<0.05). At postoperative 1 d, the average time to first flatus, postoperative ambulation time and the length of postoperative hospital stay were (2.6±0.8), (3.1±1.3) and (13±4) d, significantly shorter than (3.1±1.1), (4.4±1.6) and (16±6) d in the control group (t= -2.180, -3.137, -2.062; P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the combination group was 25% (6/24) and 42% (11/26) in the control group, with no statistical significance between two groups (χ2=1.666, P>0.05). The postoperative 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates in the combination group were 78.8%, 52.5%, 26.3% and 57.1%, 28.6%, 0, and 70.6%, 36.4%, 12.1% and 51.3%, 22.0%, 0 in the control group, with no statistical significance between two groups (χ2=0.292, 0.764; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Three-dimensional visualization technology can be utilized to deliver accurate preoperative evaluation for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of huge liver tumors, and to guide accurate intraoperative operation, thus mitigating inflammatory reactions and accelerating postoperative rehabilitation.

表1 联合组和对照组肝巨大肿瘤患者术前一般情况比较
图1 一例腹腔镜肝肿瘤切除患者术前CT及三维重建注:a、b分别为CT横断面和冠状面,示肝右叶巨块型肝癌;c为肝脏三维重建模型;d为门静脉右支分割模型;e为预切除平面;f为肿瘤切除后的肝脏形态
表2 联合组和对照组肝巨大肿瘤患者围手术期情况比较
图2 联合组和对照组肝巨大恶性肿瘤患者术后总体生存与无瘤生存Kaplan-Meier曲线
[1]
梁霄,徐虹霞,周海燕, 等. 加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜肝切除术中的实践:邵医模式[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2019, 31(11):641-645.
[2]
Cheung TT, Dai WC, Tsang SH, et al. Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 110 patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity analysis at a single center[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(4):612-620.
[3]
Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(5):856-863.
[4]
Kwon Y, Cho JY, Han HS, et al. Improved outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in posterosuperior segments of the liver[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(4):1178-1185.
[5]
Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Tsuchida A, et al. Precision anatomy for minimally invasive hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery: PAM-HBP Surgery Project[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(1):1-3.
[6]
Ciria R, Berardi G, Nishino H, et al. A snapshot of the 2020 conception of anatomic liver resections and their applicability on minimally invasive liver surgery. a preparatory survey for the Expert Consensus Meeting on Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(1):41-50.
[7]
Troisi RI, Berardi G, Morise Z, et al. Laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis: multicentre propensity score-matched study[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(2):196-204.
[8]
Cheung TT. Laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis-the path towards standard of care[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2018, 7(1):68-69.
[9]
Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX, et al. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 1∶1 matched analysis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2021, 124(4):560-571.
[10]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政司. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J/OL]. 肝癌电子杂志, 2022, 9(1):1-22.
[11]
Yang J, Du G, Shi B, et al. Is laparoscopic hepatectomy suitable for giant hepatic hemangioma larger than 10 cm in diameter?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(3):1224-1230.
[12]
蔡秀军. 腹腔镜肝切除的现状与展望[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2014, 43(6):646-651.
[13]
Keating GM. Sorafenib: a review in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Target Oncol, 2017, 12(2):243-253.
[14]
Huang YJ, Lin KH, Chen YY, et al. Feasibility and clinical effectiveness of three-dimensional printed model-assisted nuss procedure[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 107(4):1089-1096.
[15]
Fang CH, Tao HS, Yang J, et al. Impact of three-dimensional reconstruction technique in the operation planning of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(1):28-37.
[16]
Witowski JS, Pędziwiatr M, Major P, et al. Cost-effective, personalized, 3D-printed liver model for preoperative planning before laparoscopic liver hemihepatectomy for colorectal cancer metastases[J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2017, 12(12):2047-2054.
[17]
Madurska MJ, Poyade M, Eason D, et al. Development of a patient-specific 3D-printed liver model for preoperative planning[J]. Surg Innov, 2017, 24(2):145-150.
[18]
Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD, et al. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2013, 19(12):1304-1310.
[19]
Witowski J, Budzyński A, Grochowska A, et al. Decision-making based on 3D printed models in laparoscopic liver resections with intraoperative ultrasound: a prospective observational study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(3):1306-1312.
[20]
周元龙,李山山,张珂, 等. 三维可视化技术在肝脏外科解剖教学中的进展[J]. 解剖科学进展, 2020, 26(1):121-122.
[21]
陈志坚,蓝伟锋,池小斌, 等. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤术前评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(1):44-47.
[22]
中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国加速康复外科临床实践指南(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(9):961-992.
[23]
Kuroda S, Kihara T, Akita Y, et al. Simulation and navigation of living donor hepatectomy using a unique three-dimensional printed liver model with soft and transparent parenchyma[J]. Surg Today, 2020, 50(3):307-313.
[24]
Hallet J, Gayet B, Tsung A, et al. Systematic review of the use of pre-operative simulation and navigation for hepatectomy: current status and future perspectives[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2015, 22(5):353-362.
[25]
Ariizumi S, Takahashi Y, Kotera Y, et al. Novel virtual hepatectomy is useful for evaluation of the portal territory for anatomical sectionectomy, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2013, 20(3):396-402.
[26]
Mise Y, Tani K, Aoki T, et al. Virtual liver resection: computer-assisted operation planning using a three-dimensional liver representation[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2013, 20(2):157-164.
[27]
Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the "new era": the Nagoya University experience[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2010, 17(4):449-454.
[28]
徐耀博,吴斌全. 三维可视化技术结合术中超声在可切除肝癌腹腔镜手术的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(4):273-277.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要