切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 377 -383. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.03.020

综述

肝癌实体瘤治疗疗效评价系统的研究进展
马欢欢1, 马晨辉1, 邓小博1, 王博方1, 何普毅1, 王云鹏1, 许博1, 俞荣1, 王娜1, 陈昊2,()   
  1. 1. 730030 兰州大学第二医院(兰州大学第二临床医学院)
    2. 730030 兰州大学第二医院(兰州大学第二临床医学院);730030 兰州大学第二医院肿瘤外科;730030 兰州,甘肃省环境肿瘤学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-16 出版日期:2024-06-10
  • 通信作者: 陈昊
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82160129); 甘肃省科技重大专项(22ZD6FA054); 甘肃省重点人才项目(2019RCXM020); 甘肃省创新驱动助力工程项目(GXH20230817-14); 兰州市城关区科技计划项目(2020SHFZ0039,2020JSCX0073); 兰州大学第二医"萃英科技创新"计划项目(CY2017-ZD01); 兰州大学医学教育创新发展项目(lzuyxcx-2022-160); 兰州大学医学教育创新发展项目——精品教材培育项目(lzuyxcx-2022-45); 兰州大学医学教育创新发展项目——全英文课程建设培育项目(zuyxcx-2022-88)

Research progress in evaluation systems of solid tumor response for malignant solid liver tumors

Huanhuan Ma1, Chenhui Ma1, Xiaobo Deng1, Bofang Wang1, Puyi He1, Yunpeng Wang1, Bo Xu1, Rong Yu1, Na Wang1, Hao Chen2,()   

  1. 1. Lanzhou University Second Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University), Lanzhou 730030, China
    2. Lanzhou University Second Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University), Lanzhou 730030, China; Department of Surgical Oncology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, Lanzhou 730030, China
  • Received:2024-01-16 Published:2024-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Hao Chen
引用本文:

马欢欢, 马晨辉, 邓小博, 王博方, 何普毅, 王云鹏, 许博, 俞荣, 王娜, 陈昊. 肝癌实体瘤治疗疗效评价系统的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 377-383.

Huanhuan Ma, Chenhui Ma, Xiaobo Deng, Bofang Wang, Puyi He, Yunpeng Wang, Bo Xu, Rong Yu, Na Wang, Hao Chen. Research progress in evaluation systems of solid tumor response for malignant solid liver tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 377-383.

原发性肝癌(肝癌)是全球常见的恶性肿瘤之一,由于早期缺乏特异性的临床表现,大部分肝癌患者在确诊时就已处于中晚期,失去根治性手术的机会。中晚期肝癌常采用介入治疗和序贯靶向治疗以及免疫治疗等为主的综合性治疗。定期评估肿瘤的治疗疗效至关重要,既可以反映前期肿瘤治疗的有效性,又可以对后续的治疗提供指导作用。肝癌属于实体瘤,实体瘤的疗效评估系统从WHO标准、实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准(RECIST)等逐步发展至适合评估靶向治疗的mRECIST标准。随着肿瘤治疗模式的发展,传统评估体系在使用中暴露出许多问题,无法全面精准地评估肿瘤治疗疗效。因此亟须借助现有先进技术探索更全面精确的评估体系。本文将对肝癌等实体瘤的传统疗效评估体系进行综述。

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Due to lack of specific clinical manifestations during the early stage, most patients with liver cancer are diagnosed at middle and late stage, missing the opportunity of radical surgery. Interventional therapy, sequential targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other comprehensive therapies are mainly adopted for middle and late stage liver cancer. It is of significance to evaluate clinical efficacy on a regular basis, which can not only reflect the efficacy of preliminary treatment, but also provide guidance for subsequent treatment. Liver cancer belongs to solid tumor, and the evaluation systems of solid tumor response have gradually developed from WHO criteria, response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) to modified RECIST (mRECIST) which is suitable for evaluating targeted therapy. With the development of tumor treatment regimen, multiple problems have been identified in the use of traditional evaluation system, which fail to comprehensively and accurately evaluate clinical efficacy of tumor treatment. Therefore, it is urgent to employ existing advanced technologies to establish a more comprehensive and accurate evaluation system. In this article, traditional evaluation systems of solid tumor response inlcuding liver cancer were reviewed.

表1 RECIST标准中直径、面积和体积变化的关系[10]
表2 AASLD-JNCI指南对肝癌靶病变疗效的常规RECIST和mRECIST评估[31]
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2]
Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2021, 7(1):6.
[3]
Jiang D, Zhang L, Liu W, et al. Trends in cancer mortality in China from 2004 to 2018: a nationwide longitudinal study[J]. Cancer Commun, 2021, 41(10):1024-1036.
[4]
Wang C, Vegna S, Jin H, et al. Inducing and exploiting vulnerabilities for the treatment of liver cancer[J]. Nature, 2019, 574(7777):268-272.
[5]
Jin H, Shi Y, Lv Y, et al. EGFR activation limits the response of liver cancer to lenvatinib[J]. Nature, 2021, 595(7869):730-734.
[6]
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment[J]. Cancer, 1981, 47(1):207-214.
[7]
Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Rubens RD, et al. Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer (an amendment)[J]. Br J Cancer, 1978, 38(1):201.
[8]
Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heusen JC, et al. Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 1977, 35(3):292-298.
[9]
Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer[J]. Cancer, 1976, 38(1):388-394.
[10]
James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999, 91(6):523-528.
[11]
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(3):205-216.
[12]
Park JO, Lee SI, Song SY, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2003, 33(10):533-537.
[13]
Plathow C, Klopp M, Thieke C, et al. Therapy response in malignant pleural mesothelioma-role of MRI using RECIST, modified RECIST and volumetric approaches in comparison with CT[J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(8):1635-1643.
[14]
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-247.
[15]
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase Ⅲ randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1):25-34.
[16]
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, et al. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(13):1753-1759.
[17]
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, de Castro Faria S, et al. CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: a quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 183(6):1619-1628.
[18]
Stacchiotti S, Collini P, Messina A, et al. High-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: tumor response assessment-pilot study to assess the correlation between radiologic and pathologic response by using RECIST and Choi criteria[J]. Radiology, 2009, 251(2):447-456.
[19]
Nathan PD, Vinayan A, Stott D, et al. CT response assessment combining reduction in both size and arterial phase density correlates with time to progression in metastatic renal cancer patients treated with targeted therapies[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2010, 9(1):15-19.
[20]
Smith AD, Lieber ML, Shah SN. Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(1):157-165.
[21]
Little RF, Pluda JM, Wyvill KM, et al. Activity of subcutaneous interleukin-12 in AIDS-related kaposi sarcoma[J]. Blood, 2006, 107(12):4650-4657.
[22]
Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O'Day S, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15(23):7412-7420.
[23]
Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski KM, et al. Personalized tumor response assessment in the era of molecular medicine: cancer-specific and therapy-specific response criteria to complement pitfalls of RECIST[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(4):737-745.
[24]
Nishino M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gargano M, et al. Developing a common language for tumor response to immunotherapy: immune-related response criteria using unidimensional measurements[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2013, 19(14):3936-3943.
[25]
Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(3):e143-152.
[26]
Hodi FS, Ballinger M, Lyons B, et al. Immune-modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (imRECIST): refining guidelines to assess the clinical benefit of cancer immunotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(9):850-858.
[27]
Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver[J]. J Hepatol, 2001, 35(3):421-430.
[28]
Lassau N, Koscielny S, Chami L, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to bevacizumab therapy at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with quantification-preliminary results[J]. Radiology, 2011, 258(1):291-300.
[29]
Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Kurtaran A, et al. Post-treatment imaging of liver tumours[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2007, 7 Spec No A(Special issue A):S28-36.
[30]
Riaz A, Miller FH, Kulik LM, et al. Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. JAMA, 2010, 303(11):1062-1069.
[31]
Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2010, 30(1):52-60.
[32]
Chiou VL, Burotto M. Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(31):3541-3543.
[33]
Champiat S, Dercle L, Ammari S, et al. Hyperprogressive disease is a new pattern of progression in cancer patients treated by anti-PD-1/PD-L1[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23(8):1920-1928.
[34]
Piñero F, Dirchwolf M, Pessôa MG. Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response assessment[J]. Cells, 2020, 9(6):1370.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[4] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
[5] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 302-307.
[6] 黄俊豪, 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 血小板相关参数对肝内胆管细胞癌根治性切除患者预后预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 308-312.
[7] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
[8] 沈佳佳, 何经雄, 王芳, 江艺, 潘凡, 张小进. ICG荧光引导腹腔镜射频消融在合并严重大结节肝硬化小肝癌患者治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 68-71.
[9] 张宇, 余灵祥, 杨永平, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 赵亮, 刘佳, 李鹏, 张宁, 任辉. 原发性肝癌Ⅲa期降期后肝切除临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 78-82.
[10] 张传海, 周毅, 王一帆, 马金良. 基于"红/黄交界线"胆囊板入路联合ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜解剖性肝切除(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 62-67.
[11] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[12] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[13] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[14] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[15] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
阅读次数
全文


摘要