切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 600 -605. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.04.014

临床研究

抗凝血酶Ⅲ在门静脉高压症消化道出血急诊胃镜治疗时机选择中的参考作用
王旋1, 李甫1, 陈雪雯2, 黄金鑫1, 高浩3, 张晞文1, 余金钟4,()   
  1. 1 201203 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院肝胆胰外科
    2 201203 上海市皮肤病医院皮肤外一科
    3 201203 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院麻醉科
    4 201203 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院消化医学部内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-02 出版日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 余金钟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82204869)

Reference value of antithrombin Ⅲ in the timing of emergency gastroscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding in portal hypertension patients

Xuan Wang1, Fu Li1, Xuewen Chen2, Jinxin Huang1, Hao Gao3, Xiwen Zhang1, Jinzhong Yu4,()   

  1. 1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery , Department of Gastroenterology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
    2 Department Ⅰ of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai 201203, China
    3 Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Gastroenterology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
    4 Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2025-12-02 Published:2026-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Jinzhong Yu
引用本文:

王旋, 李甫, 陈雪雯, 黄金鑫, 高浩, 张晞文, 余金钟. 抗凝血酶Ⅲ在门静脉高压症消化道出血急诊胃镜治疗时机选择中的参考作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 600-605.

Xuan Wang, Fu Li, Xuewen Chen, Jinxin Huang, Hao Gao, Xiwen Zhang, Jinzhong Yu. Reference value of antithrombin Ⅲ in the timing of emergency gastroscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding in portal hypertension patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(04): 600-605.

目的

探讨门静脉高压症消化道出血胃镜治疗的时机及抗凝血酶Ⅲ在预测患者活动性出血中的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年8月至2025年3月在上海中医药大学附属曙光医院行急诊胃镜治疗的152例肝硬化门静脉高压症消化道出血患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男104例,女48例,年龄32~74岁,中位年龄57岁。根据是否检出活动性出血分为2组,分析消化道出血急诊检出率、麻醉实施率、再次治疗率、再出血率、止血成功率、并发症等;同时根据是否麻醉分为2组,分析麻醉对于门静脉高压症消化道出血急诊胃镜的影响;分析凝血功能主要指标与活动性出血的关系。

结果

本研究中152例患者出血检出率为48.0%(73/152);活动性出血组麻醉实施率为30.1%(22/73),明显低于无活动性出血组的60.8%(48/79)(χ2=14.321,P<0.05);活动性出血组再次治疗率为84.9%(62/73),明显高于无活动性出血组的40.5%(32/79)(χ2=31.732,P<0.05);再出血率为23.3%(17/73),明显高于无活动性出血组的10.1%(8/79)(χ2=4.782,P<0.05)。麻醉组再次治疗率为42.9%(30/70),明显低于未麻醉组的70.0%(64/82)(χ2=19.819,P<0.05);再出血率为8.6%(6/70),明显低于未麻醉组的23.2%(19/82)(χ2=5.857,P<0.05)。活动性出血组抗凝血酶Ⅲ为44.3(29.1,48.4)%,明显低于无活动性出血组的75.8 (55.9,88.3)%(Z=-6.095,P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,抗凝血酶Ⅲ对活动性出血具有一定预测诊断价值,AUC为0.786,灵敏度0.899、特异度0.784,准确率84.2%。抗凝血酶Ⅲ诊断的最佳界值50.9%。

结论

对于门静脉高压症消化道出血患者,当患者生命体征平稳时,完善术前准备和麻醉评估后再进行急诊胃镜治疗患者获益明显。抗凝血酶Ⅲ对患者活动性出血具有一定预测价值,可作为胃镜治疗时机选择的参考依据。

Objective

To investigate the timing of gastroscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding induced by portal hypertension and the application value of antithrombin Ⅲ in predicting active bleeding.

Methods

Clinical data of 152 cirrhosis-induced portal hypertension patients experiencing gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent emergency gastroscopy in Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from August 2018 to March 2025 were analyzed retrospectively. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 104 patients were male and 48 female, aged from 32 to 74 years, with a median age of 57 years. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether active bleeding was found. Emergency detection rate of gastrointestinal bleeding, implementation rate of anesthesia, re-treatment rate, rebleeding rate, hemostasis success rate and incidence of complications were analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were anesthetized or not. The impact of anesthesia on emergency gastroscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding was assessed in portal hypertension patients. The relationship between the main indexes of coagulation function and active bleeding was analyzed.

Results

The detection rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in 152 patients was 48.0%(73/152). The implementation rate of anesthesia in the active bleeding group was 30.1%(22/73), significantly lower than 60.8%(48/79) in the non-active bleeding group (χ2=14.321, P<0.05). The re-treatment rate in the active bleeding group was 84.9%(62/73), significantly higher than 40.5%(32/79) in the non-active bleeding group (χ2=31.732, P<0.05). The rebleeding rate was 23.3%(17/73), significantly higher than 10.1%(8/79) in the non-active bleeding group (χ2=4.782, P<0.05). In the anesthesia group, the re-treatment rate was 42.9%(30/70), significantly lower than 70.0%(64/82) in the non-anesthesia group (χ2=19.819, P<0.05). The rebleeding rate was 8.6%(6/70), significantly lower than 23.2%(19/82) in the non-anesthesia group (χ2=5.857, P<0.05). In the active bleeding group, the antithrombin Ⅲ was 44.3(29.1, 48.4)%, significantly lower than 75.8 (55.9, 88.3)% in the non-active bleeding group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-6.095, P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that antithrombin Ⅲ had certain predictive and diagnostic value for active bleeding, with an AUC of 0.786, a sensitivity of 0.899, a specificity of 0.784 and an accuracy of 84.2%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of antithrombin Ⅲ diagnosis was 50.9%.

Conclusions

For patients with gastrointestinal bleeding induced by portal hypertension, significant clinical benefits can be obtained from emergency gastroscopy after full preoperative preparation and anesthesia evaluation when vital signs are stable. Antithrombin Ⅲ has certain predictive value for patients with active bleeding, which can be used as a reference marker for the timing of gastroscopy.

表1 消化道活动性出血组与无活动性出血组一般基线资料比较
表2 消化道活动性出血对门静脉高压症胃镜治疗操作影响(例)
表3 麻醉对门静脉高压症消化道出血胃镜治疗操作影响(例)
表4 两组门静脉高压症消化道出血患者主要凝血功能指标对比 [M(Q1Q3)]
图1 凝血指标对消化道活动性出血预测的ROC曲线 注:ATⅢ为抗凝血酶Ⅲ,APTT为活化部分凝血活酶时间
[1]
李盟, 郭亚楠, 黄恺, 等. 乙型肝炎肝硬化患者门静脉高压改善的组织学因素分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2025, 41(8): 1563-1570. DOI: 10.12449/JCH250815.
[2]
Zhang M, Huang S, Ye N, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with flupirtine-induced liver cirrhosis complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(5): 5582-5588.
[3]
Zhou YF, Xu Y, Ding YF, et al. Novel nomogram model for predicting 6-week mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. J Digest Diseases, 2022, 23(8-9): 516-526. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13137.
[4]
Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2024, 81: 116-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.04.052.
[5]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(2): 406-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024.
[6]
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases[J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(1): 310-335. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28906.
[7]
Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Hayes PC, et al. U. K. guidelines on the management of variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients[J]. Gut, 2015, 64(11): 1680-1704. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309262.
[8]
杨艳, 樊艳华, 房龙, 等. 内镜治疗食管胃静脉曲张早期再出血的影响因素分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29(3): 178-183.
[9]
Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: guideline recommendations from the international consensus group[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2019, 171(11): 805-822. DOI: 10.7326/m19-1795.
[10]
Hamarneh Z, Robinson K, Andrews J, et al. Transfusion strategies in upper gastrointestinal bleeding management: a review of South Australian hospital practice[J]. Intern Med J, 2020, 50(5): 582-589. DOI: 10.1111/imj.14440.
[11]
Hwang JH, Shergill AK, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014, 80(2): 221-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.023.
[12]
Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline-Update 2021[J]. Endoscopy, 2021, 53(3): 300-332. DOI: 10.1055/a-1369-5274.
[13]
练志威, 李丙生, 黄文峰. 急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者早期胃镜最佳时机的探讨[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2021, 26(11): 1360-1362, 1367.
[14]
李伟健. 不同时机行急诊胃镜对肝硬化相关食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的干预效果[J]. 广西医学, 2020, 42(16): 2104-2107.
[15]
Mousa N, Abdel-Razik A, Sheta T, et al. Endoscopic management of acute oesophageal variceal bleeding within 12 hours of admission is superior to 12-24 hours[J]. Br J Biomed Sci, 2021, 78(3): 130-134. DOI: 10.1080/09674845.2020.1857049.
[16]
de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno Ⅶ-Renewing consensus in portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 76(4): 959-974. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022.
[17]
廖茂湖, 谢春英. 不同时机急诊胃镜对肝硬化上消化道出血患者的临床治疗价值[J]. 白求恩医学杂志, 2018, 16(1): 61-62. DOI: 10.16485/j.issn.2095-7858.2018.01.028.
[18]
Lau JYW, Yu Y, Tang RSY, et al. Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(14): 1299-1308. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1912484.
[19]
Shung DL, Laine L. Review article: upper gastrointestinal bleeding-review of current evidence and implications for management[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2024, 59(9): 1062-1081. DOI: 10.1111/apt.17949.
[20]
Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology, 2024, 79(5): 1180-1211. DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000647.
[21]
Asghar S, Mustafa J, Rehman HU, et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after oesophageal variceal banding in cirrhotic patients at 4 weeks[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2023, 35(1): 99-103. DOI: 10.55519/jamc-01-10722.
[22]
Hshieh TT, Kaung A, Hussain S, et al. The international normalized ratio does not reflect bleeding risk in esophageal variceal hemorrhage[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(4): 254-258. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.161646.
[23]
张妍, 丁惠国. 肝硬化食管静脉曲张内镜治疗术后早期再出血的危险因素分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(9): 2087-2091.
[24]
Majumder R. Not so fast, antithrombin![J]. Blood, 2023, 141(16): 1907-1908. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023019793.
[25]
Bianchini EP. Antithrombin deficiency: no sugar, no diagnosis![J]. Blood, 2022, 140(2): 83-85. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022016677.
[26]
Fredenburgh JC, Weitz JI. News at Ⅺ: moving beyond factor Xa inhibitors[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2023, 21(7): 1692-1702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.04.021.
[27]
Farrell DH, McConnell KM, Zilberman-Rudenko J, et al. Antithrombin Ⅲ levels and outcomes among patients with trauma[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(8): e2427786. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27786.
[28]
Middeldorp S, Nieuwlaat R, Baumann Kreuziger L, et al. American Society of Hematology 2023 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: thrombophilia testing[J]. Blood Adv, 2023, 7(22): 7101-7138. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010177.
[29]
Chen D, Liao M, Wu XR, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14: 7645. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58294-2.
[30]
Elkrief L, Hernandez-Gea V, Senzolo M, et al. Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 9(9): 859-883. DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00155-9.
[31]
Ma XY, Cui Y, Fang JY, et al. Underdiagnosed cause of gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Gut, 2025, 74(3): 386-439. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332632.
[1] 李丁洋, 党晓卫. 脾动脉部分栓塞术治疗门静脉高压症合并脾功能亢进的精准实践与策略[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 79-84.
[2] 冯智杰, 袁甲, 程杰, 袁张红, 宋炎阳, 高晓鹏. 异位胰腺致十二指肠球部溃疡并发大出血一例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 199-200.
[3] 吴鹏, 许维, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 脾静脉近端结扎在腹腔镜脾切除术后预防门静脉血栓形成的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 59-62.
[4] 彭宇明, 尹强, 袁妙贤, 陈立健, 季春宜, 盛新仪, 谢惟心. 儿童门静脉海绵样变性的侧枝循环特征及Rex术疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 575-582.
[5] 王孟龙. 门静脉高压症的治疗选择策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 523-528.
[6] 张宇, 郑卫华, 张俊晶. 门静脉高压症的诊治及并发症研究现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 537-544.
[7] 王孟龙. 门静脉高压症肝脏血供改变对肝移植的影响与对策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 687-692.
[8] 张宏伟, 邢玉雪, 贾哲, 赫嵘, 张珂, 蒋力. 术前输注血小板在肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压症肝脾联合切除患者中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 576-581.
[9] 康欢, 高媛媛, 刘文雄. 丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼闭环反馈靶控输注系统对无痛胃肠镜检查患者体动反应及术野清晰度的优化作用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 274-277.
[10] 李晨阳, 汪涛, 徐忠瑞, 黄福秀, 李淑玲, 徐衍, 周旋, 赵慧, 张宁宁, 陈超. 急性下消化道出血患者安全出院风险评分的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 156-161.
[11] 石淑勤, 贾国法, 柯希权. 酚磺乙胺联合雷贝拉唑治疗溃疡性上消化道出血的临床疗效及对患者氧化应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 31-35.
[12] 张群青, 吴娟, 王妍. 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者肝脏血流动力学指标与门静脉压力梯度的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 616-620.
[13] 邹欢, 何斌, 赵斌, 屈霄. 内镜下尼龙绳联合钛夹止血治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 570-575.
[14] 乔燕, 陈湉, 施冬冬, 肖骥锋. 环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的量效关系研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 529-533.
[15] 董丽, 张永慧, 成德雷, 周春泽, 殷亮, 胡成文. 校正后低体质量指数与门静脉高压症患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 12-19.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?