切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 777 -782. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.05.013

临床研究

ICG在ERCP胆道显影中的最佳静脉注射剂量:一项剂量-效应关系研究
沈尔伦, 段世刚, 韩卓兴(), 陈春雷   
  1. 524000 广东省湛江市,广东医科大学附属第二医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-12 出版日期:2026-10-10
  • 通信作者: 韩卓兴
  • 基金资助:
    湛江市科技计划项目(2021A05111)

Optimal intravenous dose of ICG in ERCP: a dose-effect relationship study

Erlun Shen, Shigang Duan, Zhuoxing Han(), Chunlei Chen   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, China
  • Received:2026-04-12 Published:2026-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Zhuoxing Han
引用本文:

沈尔伦, 段世刚, 韩卓兴, 陈春雷. ICG在ERCP胆道显影中的最佳静脉注射剂量:一项剂量-效应关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 777-782.

Erlun Shen, Shigang Duan, Zhuoxing Han, Chunlei Chen. Optimal intravenous dose of ICG in ERCP: a dose-effect relationship study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(05): 777-782.

目的

探讨ERCP胆道显影中ICG最佳剂量和荧光强度、显影率之间的效应关系。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2023年12月至2024年10月在广东医科大学附属第二医院行ERCP并留置鼻胆管的36例胆总管结石患者。其中男21例,女15例;年龄22~89岁,中位年龄68岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。将入组患者随机分成3组,在术后拔除鼻胆管前30 min经过外周静脉缓慢注射ICG,ICG剂量分别为0.30、0.35、0.40 mg/kg。通过内窥镜荧光摄像系统采集胆汁图片,应用ImageJ软件对所采集的图像进行荧光强度的测定,计算该患者对应剂量的荧光强度、显影率等。对荧光效果进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)客观评价。相关性分析采用Pearson直线相关分析。采用ROC曲线分析荧光强度及VAS评分诊断价值等。

结果

0.30、0.35、0.40 mg/kg组患者30 min胆管显影分别为8、12、11例,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.039,P=0.040);荧光强度分别为70±9、99±13、97±16,荧光强度差异亦有统计学意义(F=18.93,P<0.01)。0.35 mg/kg组给药30 min后显影率为100%。荧光强度与剂量呈正相关(r=0.619,P<0.01)。对荧光效果进行的VAS评价显示,静脉注射ICG剂量为0.35 mg/kg和0.40 mg/kg时,100%患者可达到直观以上的显示效果;0.30 mg/kg时,60%达到直观以上显示效果。ROC曲线分析显示,胆汁中ICG荧光强度的AUC为0.942(95%CI:0.850~1.000,P<0.01),灵敏度为0.774,特异度为1.000;荧光效果VAS评价的AUC为0.735(95%CI:0.483~0.988,P>0.05),灵敏度为0.968,特异度为0.400。

结论

ICG在ERCP胆道显影中的最佳静脉注射剂量为0.35~0.40 mg/kg,在胆汁中可以达到最佳的显影率及荧光效果,其荧光强度具有较好的诊断价值。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the optimal dose of indocyanine green (ICG) and the fluorescence intensity and development rate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Methods

Thirty-six patients with common bile duct stones undergoing ERCP and indwelling nasobiliary drainage in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from December 2023 to October 2024 were enrolled in this prospective study. Among them, 21 patients were male and 15 female, aged from 22 to 89 years, with a median age of 68 years.The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were randomly divided into three groups. ICG was intravenously injected slowly at a dose of 0.30, 0.35 and 0.40 mg/kg at 30 min before postoperative removal of nasobiliary drainage, respectively. Bile images were collected by endoscopic fluorescence camera system. The fluorescence intensity of the collected images was measured by Image J software, and the fluorescence intensity and development rate at corresponding dose of the patient were calculated. The fluorescence effect was evaluated objectively by visual analogue scale (VAS). Correlation analysis was performed by Pearson linear correlation. The diagnostic value of fluorescence intensity and VAS score was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

In the 0.30 mg/kg, 0.35 mg/kg and 0.40 mg/kg dose groups, 8, 12 and 11 cases experienced 30-min development of bile ducts, and the differences were statistically significant(χ2=6.039, P=0.040), and the fluorescence intensities were 70±9, 99±13 and 97±16, and the differences were also statistically significant (F=18.93, P<0.01). The 30-min visualization rate in the 0.35 mg/kg group was 100%. The ICG fluorescence intensity and dose were positively correlated (r=0.619, P<0.01). The VAS evaluation showed that at intravenous ICG doses of 0.35 mg/kg and 0.40 mg/kg, 100% of patients achieved visualization above the intuitive level; at 0.30 mg/kg, 60% achieved visualization above that level. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ICG fluorescence intensity in bile was 0.942 (95%CI: 0.850-1.000, P<0.01), the sensitivity was 0.774 and the specificity was 1.000, respectively. The AUC of VAS score of fluorescence effect was 0.735 (95%CI: 0.483-0.988, P>0.05), the sensitivity was 0.968 and the specificity was 0.400, respectively.

Conclusions

The optimal intravenous dose of ICG in ERCP is ranged from 0.35 to 0.40 mg/kg, which can achieve the optimal development rate and fluorescence effect in bile. The fluorescence intensity yields good diagnostic value.

图1 ICG溶液剂量配置方法
表1 三组行ERCP留置鼻胆管的胆总管结石患者基本情况
图2 给药30 min后胆总管结石患者胆汁中ICG显影情况 注:a、b、c分别为0.30、0.35、0.40 mg/kg组,0.35 mg/kg组显影最清楚
图3 三组不同ICG剂量与荧光强度相关系数热力图
图4 ICG荧光效果VAS评价 注:a、b、c分别为ICG剂量0.30、0.35、0.40 mg/kg时视觉效果评价构成比;VAS为视觉模拟评分
图5 ICG荧光强度与荧光效果VAS评价的ROC曲线 注:VAS为视觉模拟评分
[1]
王懿, 陈康, 罗权能, 等. 近红外Ⅰ/Ⅱ区荧光成像技术在肝胆胰外科中的应用现状与展望[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2024, 36(3): 182-187, 192.DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2024.03.011.
[2]
张迪, 李建国. 三维血管重建联合荧光导航在腹腔镜解剖性肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ切除中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2026, 41(4): 362-364.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20251110-00580.
[3]
de Groot EL, Huisman A, van Solinge WW, et al. Fluorescein angiography leads to increased fluorescence of blood cells and may hamper routine haematology analysis of ophthalmology patients[J]. Int J Lab Hematol, 2022, 44(3): e91-e94.DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13741.
[4]
Horisberger K, Rössler F, Oberkofler CE, et al. The value of intraoperative dynamic liver function test ICG in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing staged hepatectomy: a pilot study[J]. Langenbeck's Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 264.DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02983-5.
[5]
Tangsirapat V, Kengsakul M, Udomkarnjananun S, et al. Surgical margin status outcome of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy in liver malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2024, 24(1): 181.DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02469-1.
[6]
Alfano MS, Molfino S, Benedicenti S, et al. Intraoperative ICG-based imaging of liver neoplasms: a simple yet powerful tool. Preliminary results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(1): 126-134.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6282-1.
[7]
Zhang YM, Shi R, Hou JC, et al. Liver tumor boundaries identified intraoperatively using real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2017, 143(1): 51-58.DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2267-4.
[8]
Wang X, Teh CSC, Ishizawa T, et al. Consensus guidelines for the use of fluorescence imaging in hepatobiliary surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(1): 97-106.DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004718.
[9]
Sherwinter DA. Identification of anomolous biliary anatomy using near-infrared cholangiography[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(9): 1814-1815.DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1945-z.
[10]
Pardo Aranda F, Gené Škrabec C, López-Sánchez J, et al. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: simplifying time and dose[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2023, 55(2): 249-253.DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.10.023.
[11]
Ladd AD, Zarate Rodriguez J, Lewis D, et al. Low vs standard-dose indocyanine green in the identification of biliary anatomy using near-infrared fluorescence imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2023, 236(4): 711-717.DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000553.
[12]
Palomba G, Dinuzzi VP, Sorrentino G, et al. Iatrogenic biliary leak treated by performing exploratory laparoscopic using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. A case report and review of literature[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2022, 11: S2239253X2203818X.
[13]
张欣, 徐怡琼, 罗艳, 等. 吲哚菁绿清除实验的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 上海医学, 2024, 47(5): 314-317.DOI: 10.19842/j.cnki.0253-9934.2024.05.012.
[14]
Patel-Sorrentino N, Mounier S, Benaim JY. Excitation-emission fluorescence matrix to study pH influence on organic matter fluorescence in the Amazon basin rivers[J]. Water Res, 2002, 36(10): 2571-2581.DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00469-9.
[15]
Plaza C, Brunetti G, Senesi N, et al. Molecular and quantitative analysis of metal ion binding to humic acids from sewage sludge and sludge-amended soils by fluorescence spectroscopy[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40(3): 917-923.DOI: 10.1021/es051687w.
[16]
Baldari L, Boni L, Kurihara H, et al. Identification of the ideal weight-based indocyanine green dose for fluorescent cholangiography[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(10): 7616-7624.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10280-x.
[17]
Ishizawa T, Bandai Y, Kokudo N. Fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial experience[J]. Arch Surg, 2009, 144(4): 381-382.DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.9.
[18]
Liu H, Kuang J, Xu Y, et al. Investigation of the optimal indocyanine green dose in real-time fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an ultra-high-definition 4K fluorescent system: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(7): 1903-1910.DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01557-w.
[19]
王潇宁, 吴硕东, 汪聪, 等. LC术中经静脉注射吲哚菁绿最佳给药剂量的探讨[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2022, 34(1): 4-9.DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2022.01.002.
[20]
Hanaki T, Goto K, Morimoto M, et al. Surgical administration of indocyanine green in hepatectomy for improved bile leakage detection[J]. Anticancer Res, 2022, 42(10): 4787-4793.DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15983.
[21]
Mohsen AA, Elbasiouny MS, Fawzy YS. Fluorescence-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new technique for visualization of biliary system by using fluorescein[J]. Surg Innov, 2013, 20(2): 105-108.DOI: 10.1177/1553350612442794.
[22]
Huang Z, Zeng S, Zeng X, et al. Efficacy of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis using 3D visualization combined with ICG fluorescence imaging: a retrospective cohort study[J]. World J Surg, 2024, 48(5): 1242-1251.DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12157.
[23]
Peng KA, Lekovic GP. Intraoperative fluorescence with second window indocyanine green enhances visualization during vestibular schwannoma surgery[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2022, 43(2): e259-e262.DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003400.
[24]
Strigalev M, Tzedakis S, Nassar A, et al. Intra-operative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in hepatobiliary surgery: a narrative review of the literature as a useful guide for the surgeon[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(1): 23-29.DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01388-1.
[1] 宁海洋, 武春慧, 刘妍, 许慧娟, 高婷婷, 李炘正. 吲哚菁绿在乳腺癌外科诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 174-178.
[2] 黄思敏, 曹良启. 内镜技术助力肝胆胰疾病精准诊疗的发展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-5.
[3] 徐竟益, 孙凯, 王爽, 吴柳盛, 梁悦华, 杨宇帆, 赵雨桐, 杨雷, 王文强, 闫军. 吲哚菁绿在肝胆胰外科中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 91-95.
[4] 谢启帆, 刘志烨, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 吲哚菁绿荧光引导机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 445-450.
[5] 郑海明, 廖祥伟, 黎文华, 翟颖, 郭阳, 周尊强, 宛新建. ERCP下胆管及胆囊内引流治疗急性胆囊炎合并胆管炎疗效及其预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 750-759.
[6] 刘立民, 张宗明, 刘卓. 胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的腹腔镜、胆道镜及内镜联合治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 692-701.
[7] 陈伶君, 吴小琴, 陶力, 郑丰平, 林显艺. 胆胰成像系统在胆总管结石ERCP取石中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 583-590.
[8] 杨春元, 邓旭, 王晶晶, 阳丹才让, 潘伟. 精准肝切除术技术进展与临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 261-265.
[9] 郑述昊, 李威威, 袁文康, 张超, 张冲. ICG荧光影像在肝脏肿瘤解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 257-260.
[10] 东小鸽, 樊海宁, 侯立朝, 杜凯豪, 刘海刚, 汪占金, 薛伟伟, 石亚超, 魏六木, 王展. 三维可视化技术、ICG荧光示踪和术中实时超声在肝癌个性化精准诊疗中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 181-189.
[11] 牛晓华, 黄长文. 腹腔镜肝切除平面探讨:多技术融合肝切除平面定位策略理论与实践[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 167-171.
[12] 王浩然, 刘心远, 樊华. ICG荧光成像技术在移植肝灌注及功能评估中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 912-918.
[13] 吴哲境, 李敬东. ICG荧光成像引导下腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性和有效性Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 852-859.
[14] 卜俊峰, 陈炜. ICG在肝切除术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 780-784.
[15] 王楚斯, 刘家伟, 卢逸, 汤照峰. ICG荧光显影在腹腔镜肝癌切除术中临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 549-553.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?