切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (04) : 224 -229. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2013.04.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

精准肝蒂离断技术在肝细胞肝癌解剖性肝段切除患者中的应用
仇毓东1,(), 周建新1, 冯伟1, 周铁1, 汪洋1, 毛谅1   
  1. 1. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-16 出版日期:2013-08-10
  • 通信作者: 仇毓东
  • 基金资助:
    国家传染病防治科技重大专项(2008ZX10002-26)

Precise pedicle transection in anatomical hepatic segmentectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma

Yu-dong QIU1,(), Jian-xin ZHOU1, Wei FENG1, Tie ZHOU1, Yang WANG1, Liang MAO1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2013-04-16 Published:2013-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yu-dong QIU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: QIU Yu-dong, Email:
引用本文:

仇毓东, 周建新, 冯伟, 周铁, 汪洋, 毛谅. 精准肝蒂离断技术在肝细胞肝癌解剖性肝段切除患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 02(04): 224-229.

Yu-dong QIU, Jian-xin ZHOU, Wei FENG, Tie ZHOU, Yang WANG, Liang MAO. Precise pedicle transection in anatomical hepatic segmentectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(04): 224-229.

目的

探讨精准肝蒂离断技术在肝细胞肝癌(肝癌)解剖性肝段切除患者中应用的安全性及临床疗效。

方法

本前瞻性研究采用非随机对照方法,选择2008年1月至2010年4月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肝胆外科行肝段切除术治疗的60例肝癌患者为研究对象。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。按肝切除方法将患者分为精准肝蒂离断组(精准组)和传统手术组(传统组),每组各30例。精准组患者男25例,女5例;年龄(51±14)岁;传统组患者男23例,女7例;年龄(52±12)岁。精准组术前行多层螺旋计算机体层摄影术(MSCT)三维血管重建,精确评估拟切除肝段的肝蒂分支和肝静脉段间分支的解剖位置。术中采取精细钳夹法切开肝实质,解剖、离断拟切除肝段的肝蒂,然后以超声定位肝静脉段间分支作为肝实质离断面,完成单一或联合肝段切除。传统组行常规术前检查及评估,术中按照超声定位肿瘤,以肝脏表面解剖标志确定肝段范围。以超声吸引刀切开肝实质,最后处理肝蒂,完成单一或联合肝段切除。两组患者术前、术中及术后临床资料中的计量资料比较采用t检验,分类资料比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

精准组与传统组患者的术前资料、术中出血量、术中输血量、手术时间、手术方式、术后肝功能指标、术后住院时间的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。精准组与传统组术后病理肿瘤切缘分别为(2.3±0.7)、(1.5±0.6)cm,差异有统计学意义(t=4.950,P<0.05)。精准组与传统组术后均未出现严重并发症,并发症发生率分别为23%(7/30)、50%(15/30),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.593,P<0.05)。精准组与传统组术后1年肿瘤复发率分别为10%(3/30)、17%(5/30),精准组的肿瘤复发率有所降低,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.577,P>0.05)。

结论

精准肝蒂离断技术在肝癌解剖性肝段切除中的应用有着与传统手术方法同样的安全性,且可减少术后并发症的发生,保证手术切缘阴性,有望降低术后复发率,提高肝癌的治愈率。

Objective

To investigate the safety and effect of precise pedicle transection in anatomical hepatic segmentectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).

Methods

Sixty HCC patients, who underwent hepatic segmentectomy in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University from January 2008 to April 2010, were enrolled in this prospective non-randomized controlled study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the procedure of hepatectomy: the precise pedicle transection group(precise group) and the traditional surgery group(traditional group) with 30 cases in each group. There were 25 males and 5 females in the precise group with the mean age of (51±14) years old and 23 males, 7 females in the traditional group with the mean age of (52±12) years old. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed in patients of precise group by multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). The anatomic constructions of hepatic pedicle branches and intersegmental branch of hepatic vein of liver segment to be resected were evaluated precisely. The liver parenchyma was split using precise clamping and the pedicle of liver segment was transected. The intersegmental branch of hepatic vein was positioned by ultrasonic as the section of liver parenchyma and single or combined segmental resection was performed. Patients in the traditional group received conventional preoperative examination and evaluation. The tumor was positioned by ultrasonic during the operation and the liver segment to be resected was confirmed according to the anatomical mark of liver. The liver parenchyma was split using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator(CUSA) and the pedicle was transected finally, single or combined segmental resection was completed. The comparison of measurement data of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative between two groups was conducted using t test. The comparison of classification data was conducted using Chi-square test or Fisher definite probability test.

Results

There was no significant difference in the patients' preoperative data, amount of intraoperative bleeding, blood transfusion, duration of surgery, surgical procedures, postoperative liver function indexes as well as postoperative length of hospital stay(P>0.05). The length of tumor incisal edge in the precise group and traditional group were(2.3±0.7)cm, (1.5±0.6)cm respectively, and significant difference was observed between two groups (t=4.950, P<0.05) . No severe postoperative complication was observed in the precise group and traditional group. The incidences of postoperative complications of the precise group and traditional group were 23% (7/30) , 50% (15/30) respectively, and significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=4.593, P<0.05) . The 1-year HCC recurrence rate in precise group was lower than that in traditional group, but there was no significant difference between two groups [10% (3/30) vs. 17% (5/30) ; χ2=0.577, P>0.05].

Conclusions

The precise pedicle transection has the same safety as the conventional surgery in anatomic hepatic segmentectomy of HCC. It can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, ensure negative tumor incisal edge, reduce the postoperative recurrence rate and improve the curative rate for HCC.

图1 肝细胞肝癌患者MSCT血管三维重建门静脉Nakamura分型
图2 肝细胞肝癌患者术前MSCT血管三维重建显示肝Ⅴ段的两条肝蒂
图3 肝细胞肝癌患者行肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段切除术前MSCT发现肝Ⅶ段门静脉来源于右前叶及术中处理
表1 两组肝细胞肝癌患者肝切除术前实验室检测指标的比较(±s
表2 两组肝癌患者肝切除术中资料的比较(±s
表3 两组肝癌患者肝切除术后肝功能检测指标的比较(±s
[1]
Fan ST. Precise hepatectomy guided by the middle hepatic vein. Hepato-biliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2007, 6(4): 430-434.
[2]
董家鸿,黄志强.精准肝切除——21世纪肝脏外科新理念.中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(21): 1601-1605.
[3]
Llovet JM,Bruix J. Novel advancements in the management of hepatocel-lular carcinoma in 2008. J Hepatol, 2008, 48(Suppl 1): S20-S37.
[4]
吴孟超.原发性肝癌的诊断及治疗进展.中国医学科学院学报, 2008, 30(4): 363-365.
[5]
Liau KH,Blumgart LH,DeMatteo RP. Segment-oriented approach to liver resection. Surg Clin North Am, 2004, 84(2): 543-561.
[6]
刘允怡,余俊豪.肝段为本的肝切除手术.中华普通外科杂志, 2003, 18(2): 123-125.
[7]
Hasegawa K,Kokudo N,Imamura H, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg, 2005, 242(2): 252-259.
[8]
Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1998, 5(3): 286-291.
[9]
蔡守旺,谢于,杨世忠,等.持久美蓝染色法在精准肝切除中的应用价值.中华消化外科杂志, 2010, 9(1): 28-30.
[10]
仇毓东,朱新华,徐庆祥,等.精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的疗效评价.中华消化外科杂志, 2010, 9(1): 21-23.
[11]
仇毓东,朱新华,朱日祥,等.循肝中静脉精准半肝切除疗效的前瞻性研究.中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10(4): 256-259.
[12]
何鹏,仇毓东,丁义涛,等.脉动色素浓度测定法行ICG清除试验检测肝储备功能的准确性评价.中华肝胆外科杂志, 2007, 13(9): 588-590.
[13]
Wang Y,Qiu Y,He J, et al. Could temporal window for the computed tomography hepatic venography (CTHV) be extended: a comparative study between spectral and conventional CT using porcine models. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2012, 36(6): 690-694.
[14]
Lamadé W,Glombitza G,Fischer L, et al. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg, 2000, 135(11): 1256-1261.
[15]
Qiu Y,Zhu X,Zhu R, et al. The clinical study of precise hemihepatectomy guided by middle hepatic vein. World J Surg, 2012, 36(10): 2428-2435.
[16]
Nguyen KT,Gamblin TC,Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(5): 831-841.
[1] 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会. 肝细胞癌伴微血管侵犯诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 313-324.
[2] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[7] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[8] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[9] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[10] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[15] 王向前, 李清峰, 陈磊, 丘文丹, 姚志成, 李熠, 吴荣焕. 姜黄素抑制肝细胞癌索拉非尼耐药作用及其调控机制[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 729-735.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?