切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 17 -20. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.01.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

精准肝切除在巨大肝细胞癌中的应用价值
李勋1, 汤地1,(), 彭宝岗1, 姜春林1, 匡铭1, 梁力建1   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-03 出版日期:2015-02-10
  • 通信作者: 汤地
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2012B061700105)

Application value of precise hepatectomy in huge hepatocellular carcinoma

Xun Li1, Di Tang1,(), Baogang Peng1, Chunlin Jiang1, Ming Kuang1, Lijian Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2014-11-03 Published:2015-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Di Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Di, Email:
引用本文:

李勋, 汤地, 彭宝岗, 姜春林, 匡铭, 梁力建. 精准肝切除在巨大肝细胞癌中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 04(01): 17-20.

Xun Li, Di Tang, Baogang Peng, Chunlin Jiang, Ming Kuang, Lijian Liang. Application value of precise hepatectomy in huge hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(01): 17-20.

目的

探讨精准肝切除在巨大肝细胞癌(肝癌)中的临床应用价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2009年5月至2013年5月在中山大学附属第一医院行精准肝切除的110例巨大肝癌患者。其中男92例,女18例;年龄26~75岁,中位年龄48岁;肿瘤直径为10~21 cm。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者术前行薄层CT扫描,利用薄层CT扫描的原始数据,采用Myrian XP Liver三维手术模拟软件对患者肝脏、肿瘤及血管进行三维重建,计算标准残肝体积(SRLV),并进行模拟手术切除。手术采用常规游离肝脏后肝切除或前入路法下腔静脉前预置吊带肝切除术。观察患者术前模拟方案与术中实际实施方案的吻合率。比较患者术前预计SRLV与术中实际SRLV的差异。观察患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血量、住院时间及并发症发生情况。术前预计SRLV与术中实际SRLV比较采用t检验。

结果

患者术前拟实施方案与术中实际实施方案的吻合率为92.7%(102/110)。患者术前预计SRLV为(392±96) ml/m2,术中实际SRLV为(406±71)ml/m2,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.230,P>0.05)。患者手术时间中位数为200(150~375)min,术中出血量为500(150~2 000)ml,术中输血量为300(0~1 500)ml,术后住院时间为11(8~67)d。全组患者无围手术期死亡。患者术后并发症发生率为20.0%(22/110)。其中肝功能不全18例,予以护肝等对症治疗后治愈;胆漏3例,予以置管持续性引流后好转;腹腔出血1例,予再次手术止血。

结论

精准肝切除能更好地切除巨大肝癌,保留更多残肝体积,降低术后肝功能不全发生率,是治疗巨大肝癌有效、安全的方法。

Objective

To investigate the application value of precise hepatectomy in huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

The objects of this prospective study were 110 patients with huge HCC undergoing precise hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from May 2009 to May 2013. There were 92 males and 18 females with the age ranging from 26 to 75 years old and a median age of 48 years old. The range of tumor diameter was 10-21 cm. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and local ethical committee approval had been received. All patients underwent thin-slice computer tomography (CT) scan. The livers, tumors and vessels were three-dimensionally reconstructed using Myrian XP Liver surgery simulation software with the original data of thin-slice CT scan. The standard remnant liver volume (SRLV) was calculated, and the simulated operation was performed. Hepatectomy after conventional dissecting of the liver or hepatectomy with presetting hanging band in front of inferior vena cava through anterior approach were performed. The accordance rate of preoperative simulated operation plan and the actual performed intraoperative operation plan was observed. The difference between the predicted SRLV before operation and the actual measured SRLV was compared. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and complications were observed. The comparison of predicted SRLV and the actual measured SRLV was conducted using t test.

Results

The accordance rate of preoperative simulated operation plan and the actual intraoperative operation plan was 92.7% (102/110). The predicted SRLV before operation was (392±96) ml/m2, and the intraoperative actual measured SRLV was (406±71) ml/m2, where no significant difference was observed (t=-1.230, P>0.05). The median of operative time was 200 (150-375) min. The intraoperative blood loss was 500 (150-2 000) ml. The intraoperative blood transfusion was 300 (0-1 500) ml. The length of postoperative hospital stay was 11 (8-67) d. No perioperative death was observed. The incidence of postoperative complications was 20.0% (22/110). Eighteen cases suffered hepatic dysfunction and were cured by symptomatic treatments such as liver protection. Three cases suffered biliary leakage and were relieved by persistent catheter drainage. One case suffered abdominal bleeding and underwent the second surgery to stop bleeding.

Conclusions

Precise hepatectomy can help to better resect huge HCC, retain more residual liver volume, and reduce the incidence of postoperative hepatic dysfunction. It is an effective and safe method of treating huge HCC.

[1]
Min YW, Lee JH, Gwak GY, et al. Long-term survival after surgical resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with transarterial chemoembolization after propensity score matching[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 29(5):1043-1048.
[2]
李齐根,夏强,张建军,等.精准肝切除的应用及其价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2010, 9(1):24-27.
[3]
董家鸿,黄志强.倡导精准肝脏外科重现普罗米修斯神话[J].中华消化外科杂志,2010, 9(1):4-5.
[4]
董家鸿,唐茂盛,张文智,等.精准肝脏外科理念和技术对大范围肝切除围手术期安全性的影响[J].中华消化外科杂志,2013, 12(5):344-351.
[5]
宋天强,李慧锴,武强,等.精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的安全性及有效性[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2011, 17(7):547-549.
[6]
杜正贵,李波,冯曦,等.吲哚氰绿排泄试验及标准余肝体积与肝癌切除术后肝功能不全的相关性研究[J].中华外科杂志,2010, 48(3):189-192.
[7]
董家鸿,郑树森,陈孝平,等.肝切除术前肝脏储备功能评估的专家共识(2011版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011, 10(1):20-25.
[8]
Yang L, Xu J, Ou D, et al. Hepatectomy for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: single institute's experience[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(9):2189-2196.
[9]
Tsoulfas G, Mekras A, Agorastou P, et al. Surgical treatment for large hepatocellular carcinoma: does size matter?[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2012, 82(7/8):510-517.
[10]
Zhou YM, Li B, Xu DH, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial hepatectomy for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review[J]. Med Sci Monit,2011, 17(3):RA76-83.
[11]
姜春林,汤地,王晔,等.三维手术模拟系统在巨大肝癌精准肝切除中的应用[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012, 11(2):111-115.
[12]
杨世忠,张文智,蔡守旺,等.计算机辅助手术规划系统在精准肝切除中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2010, 9(1):31-34.
[13]
董家鸿,黄志强.精准肝切除——21世纪肝脏外科新理念[J].中华外科杂志,2009, 47(21):1601-1605.
[14]
张洪义,冯志强,张宏义,等.肝动脉造影在原发性肝癌精准肝切除术前评估中的作用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2012, 18(5):346-349.
[15]
李建平,杨军.精准肝切除研究进展[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2011, 17(5):434-436.
[16]
董家鸿,杨世忠,段伟东,等.精准肝脏外科技术在复杂肝脏占位性病变切除中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2009, 47(21):1610-1615.
[17]
劳向明,张亚奇,关远祥,等.肝癌术前ICGR15测定对肝脏储备功能的评估[J].癌症,2004, 23(10):1213-1217.
[1] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[2] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[3] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[4] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[5] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[6] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[7] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[8] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[9] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[10] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?