切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 324 -327. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.04.020

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

18F-FDG PET/CT延迟显像在原发性肝癌诊断中的应用价值
张峰1, 谢良骏1, 曹素娥1, 查悦明1, 程木华1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院核医学科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-10 出版日期:2017-08-10
  • 通信作者: 程木华
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2016A020215070)

Application value of 18F-FDG PET/CT delayed imaging in diagnosis of primary liver cancer

Feng Zhang1, Liangjun Xie1, Su'e Cao1, Yueming Zha1, Muhua Cheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2017-03-10 Published:2017-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Muhua Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Cheng Muhua, Email:
引用本文:

张峰, 谢良骏, 曹素娥, 查悦明, 程木华. 18F-FDG PET/CT延迟显像在原发性肝癌诊断中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(04): 324-327.

Feng Zhang, Liangjun Xie, Su'e Cao, Yueming Zha, Muhua Cheng. Application value of 18F-FDG PET/CT delayed imaging in diagnosis of primary liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(04): 324-327.

目的

探讨18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)的正电子发射计算机断层显像(PET)/CT延迟显像在原发性肝癌(肝癌)中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年10月至2016年12月在中山大学附属第三医院接受诊治的80例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男62例,女18例;平均年龄(58±12)岁。根据肿瘤直径大小分为小肝癌组(30例)、结节肝癌组(23例)和大肝癌组(27例)。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者静脉注射18F-FDG造影剂40~60 min后行早期PET/CT显像,2 h后行延迟PET/CT显像,测定两次显像中病灶最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)。观察并比较小肝癌组、结节型肝癌组、大肝癌组的早期和延迟显像情况及不同时期显像变化。3组SUVmax比较采用单因素方差分析和LSD-t检验,两组比较采用t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

结节型肝癌组的早期像、延迟像SUVmax分别为5.1±1.9、5.5±2.3,明显高于小肝癌组的3.9±1.4、4.3±2.0(LSD-t=2.60,2.03;P<0.05);而低于大肝癌组的6.9±2.6、8.5±2.9(LSD-t=-2.82,-4.08;P<0.05)。大肝癌组延迟像SUVmax明显高于早期像组(t=2.05,P<0.05)。大肝癌组延迟像SUVmax较早期像明显升高患者百分率为93%(25/27),明显高于小肝癌组、结节型肝癌组的53%(16/30)、61%(14/23) (χ2=10.85,7.28;P<0.05)。

结论

随肿瘤直径增加,延迟像18F-FDG摄取明显增加,采用18F-FDG PET/CT延迟显像技术可提高肝癌尤其大肝癌的检出率。

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT delayed imaging in the diagnosis of primary liver cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 80 patients with primary liver cancer who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between October 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 62 cases were males and 18 were females, aged (58±12) years old on average. According to the tumor diameter, the patients were divided into the small liver cancer group (n=30), nodular liver cancer group (n=23) and large liver cancer group (n=27). The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. PET/CT early imaging was performed on the patients at 40-60 min after they were intravenously injected with contrast agent 18F-FDG, and PET/CT delayed imaging was performed at 2 h later. The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the lesions in two imagings were detected. The early imaging, delayed imaging and the imaging changes at different stages were observed and compared among three groups. The SUVmax values were compared among three groups using one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test, and were compared between two groups using t test. The rates were compared using Chi-square test.

Results

The SUVmax values of the early imaging and delayed imaging were respectively 5.1±1.9 and 5.5±2.3 in the nodular liver cancer group, significantly higher than 3.9±1.4 and 4.3±2.0 in the small liver cancer group (LSD-t=2.60, 2.03; P<0.05), whereas significantly lower than 6.9±2.6 and 8.5±2.9 in the large liver cancer group (LSD-t=-2.82, -4.08; P<0.05). The SUVmax value of the delayed imaging in the large liver cancer group was significantly higher than that of the early imaging (t=2.05, P<0.05). The percentage of patients with SUVmax values of the delayed imaging higher than that of the early imaging was 93%(25/27) in the large liver cancer group, significantly higher than 53%(16/30) in the small liver cancer group and 61%(14/23) in the nodular liver cancer group (χ2=10.85, 7.28; P<0.05).

Conclusions

The 18F-FDG uptake of the delayed imaging increases significantly along with the tumor diameter increases. Application of 18F-FDG PET/CT delayed imaging can elevate the detection rate of liver cancer, especially large liver cancer.

[1]
焦作义,俞泽元.原发性肝癌外科治疗进展[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2016,5(5):281-284.
[2]
Ding J, Wang H. Multiple interactive factors in hepatocarcinogenesis[J]. Cancer Lett, 2014, 346(1):17-23.
[3]
陈建国,陈万青,张思维,等.中国2003-2007年肝癌发病率与死亡率分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2012,33(6):547-553.
[4]
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2):69-90.
[5]
王振光,王洋洋.PET/CT显像在肝细胞肝癌诊断中的研究进展[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2015,39(2):175-179.
[6]
白璐,尚进,刘翔,等.18F-FDG PET/CT显像对原发性肝癌分化程度和临床分期的评估价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2015,31(12):2037-2040, 2045.
[7]
丛文铭,胡锡琪,孙耘田,等.原发性肝癌规范化病理诊断方案专家共识[J].肝脏,2011,16(3):244-246.
[8]
董辉,丛文铭.提高肝癌规范化病理诊断水平,为临床精细化治疗保驾护航-《原发性肝癌规范化病理诊断指南(2015年版)》解读[J].中国普通外科杂志,2016,25(7):939-943.
[9]
丛文铭,吴孟超.小肝癌临床病理学研究进展与展望[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2011,17(5):353-356.
[10]
Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SM, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases using dual-time-point FDG PET/CT scans in patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2011, 13(3):565-572.
[11]
宋红俊,姚之丰,胡四龙,等.18F-脱氧葡萄糖PET/CT显像在肝细胞癌经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术后残留病灶诊断和预后判断中的价值[J].肿瘤影像学,2014(1):34-39, 44.
[12]
Liu S, Wah Chan K, Tong J, et al. PET-CT scan is a valuable modality in the diagnosis of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and a summary of recent literature[J]. QJM, 2011, 104(6):477-483.
[13]
李艳丽,刘国兵,程登峰,等.肝癌的代谢类和受体类核医学显像剂研究进展[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2016,24(8):619-623.
[14]
Sharma B, Martin A, Zerizer I. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in liver imaging[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2013, 34(1):66-80.
[15]
Chotipanich C, Kunawudhi A, Promteangtrong C, et al. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using C11 choline PET/CT: comparison with F18 FDG, contrast enhanced MRI and MDCT[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 17(7):3569-3573.
[16]
郝珊瑚,王治国,张彤,等.18F-FDG PET/CT利尿延迟显像在膀胱恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值[J].现代肿瘤医学,2015,23(12):1711-1714.
[17]
王洋洋,王振光,李大成,等.18F-FDG PET/CT诊断原发性肝癌和肝转移瘤的价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2015(1):77-81.
[18]
Boussouar S, Itti E, Lin SJ, et al. Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma using diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients on waiting-list for liver transplantation[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2016, 16(1):4.
[19]
Liu TQ, Fan J, Zhou L, et al. Effects of suppressing glucose transporter-1 by an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide on the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2011, 10(1):72-77.
[20]
吴冰,韩磊,姜磊.18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像在肝细胞肝癌诊断中的应用价值[J].中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2014,34(1):58-59.
[1] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[2] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[3] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[4] 浦凌宵, 诸俊浩, 陶亮, 王峰, 王萌, 管文贤. 低黏附性胃癌PET/CT影像学特征和脂代谢相关机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-260.
[5] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[6] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[7] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[8] 林小勇, 张兰霞, 曾庆劲, 贺需旗, 谭雷, 郭光辉, 龙颖琳, 李凯, 吴宇轩. 负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的初步应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 694-698.
[9] 雷永琪, 刘新阳, 杨黎渝, 铁学宏, 俞星新, 耿志达, 刘雨, 陈政良, 惠鹏, 梁英健. 肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤合并贫血一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 710-718.
[10] 欧阳佳裕, 李刚, 贺露瑶, 罗娜. 双层探测器光谱CT在早期原发性肝癌中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 557-561.
[11] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 302-307.
[12] 黄俊豪, 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 血小板相关参数对肝内胆管细胞癌根治性切除患者预后预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 308-312.
[13] 马欢欢, 马晨辉, 邓小博, 王博方, 何普毅, 王云鹏, 许博, 俞荣, 王娜, 陈昊. 肝癌实体瘤治疗疗效评价系统的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 377-383.
[14] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
[15] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
阅读次数
全文


摘要