切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 533 -537. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.06.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝切除联合淋巴结清扫对临床淋巴结阴性肝内胆管癌患者预后的价值
黄徐建1, 杨发才1, 李梦1, 刘小鹏1, 陈泰安1, 何毅1, 李强1, 徐建1, 杨刚1, 邬长康1, 熊永福1, 李敬东1,()   
  1. 1. 617000 四川省南充市,川北医学院附属医院肝胆外一科 川北医学院肝胆胰肠疾病研究所
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2020-12-10
  • 通信作者: 李敬东
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2019YJ0384); 南充市科技战略合作项目(NSMC20170413)

Prognostic value of hepatectomy combined with lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinical negative lymph node metastasis

Xujian Huang1, Facai Yang1, Meng Li1, Xiaopeng Liu1, Taian Chen1, Yi He1, Qiang Li1, Jian Xu1, Gang Yang1, Changkang Wu1, Yongfu Xiong1, Jingdong Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department Ⅰ of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Institute of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Intestinal Diseases of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 617000, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Published:2020-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Jingdong Li
引用本文:

黄徐建, 杨发才, 李梦, 刘小鹏, 陈泰安, 何毅, 李强, 徐建, 杨刚, 邬长康, 熊永福, 李敬东. 肝切除联合淋巴结清扫对临床淋巴结阴性肝内胆管癌患者预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 533-537.

Xujian Huang, Facai Yang, Meng Li, Xiaopeng Liu, Taian Chen, Yi He, Qiang Li, Jian Xu, Gang Yang, Changkang Wu, Yongfu Xiong, Jingdong Li. Prognostic value of hepatectomy combined with lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinical negative lymph node metastasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(06): 533-537.

目的

探讨肝切除联合淋巴结清扫对临床淋巴结阴性的肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者预后的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年2月川北医学院附属医院行根治性手术切除的142例临床淋巴结阴性ICC患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男77例,女65例;年龄23~78岁,中位年龄57岁。根据术中是否行淋巴结清扫分为淋巴结清扫组(LND组,86例)和非淋巴结清扫组(NLND组,56例),LND组根据术后病理提示进一步分为有淋巴结转移组(N1组,38例)和无淋巴结转移(N0组,48例),分析淋巴结清扫对ICC患者预后的影响。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

NLND、LND组行半肝切除和(或)尾状叶及肝外胆管切除分别为20、71例,LND组切除范围更大(χ2=29.233,P<0.05)。LND组术后平均住院时间为(19±10)d,明显长于NLND组的(16±5)d(t=3.961,P<0.05)。LND组1、3、5年累积生存率分别为82%、42%、20%,NLND组相应为89%、47%、34%,两组总体生存差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.846,P>0.05)。N1组1、3、5年累积生存率为63%、14%、0,N0组相应为93%、57%、28%。NLND组与N1组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.525,P<0.05),而NLND组与N0组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.300,P>0.05)。

结论

淋巴结清扫对临床淋巴结阴性ICC患者预后无明显改善,且增加了住院时间,应慎重考虑常规施行淋巴结清扫。

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic value of hepatectomy combined with lymph node dissection (LND) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients with clinical negative lymph node metastasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 142 ICC patients with negative lymph node metastasis who underwent radical resection in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2010 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of the patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 77 patients were male and 65 female, aged 23-78 years witha median age of 57 years. According to whether LND was performed during operation, all patients were divided into the LND group (n=86) and non-LND (NLND) group (n=56). Patients in LND group were further divided into the lymph node metastasis (N1) group (n=38) and non-lymph node metastasis (N0) group (n=48) according to postoperative pathological findings. The effect of LND upon the prognosis of ICC patients was evaluated. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Log-rank test.

Results

In NLND and LND groups, 20, 71 cases underwent hemihepatectomy and/or resection of caudate lobe, extrahepatic bile duct, respectively. The resection range in LND group was significantly larger than that in NLND group (χ2=29.233, P<0.05). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay in LND group was (19±10) d, significantly longer than (16±5) d in NLND group (t=3.961, P<0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates in LND group were 82%, 42% and 20%, which did not significantly differ from 89%, 47% and 34% in NLND group (χ2=0.846, P>0.05). In N1 group, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 63%, 14% and 0, and were 93%, 57% and 28% in N0 group.Significant difference was observed between the NLND and N1 groups (χ2=9.525, P<0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between the NLND and N0 groups (χ2=0.300, P>0.05).

Conclusions

LND does not improve the clinical prognosis of ICC patients with clinical negative lymph nodes metastasis, whereas it increases the length of hospital stay. Routine LND should be performed with discretion.

表1 NLND组与LND组肝内胆管癌患者临床病理特征比较
图1 临床淋巴结阴性肝内胆管癌患者根治性手术切除术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
[1]
Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2014, 60(6):1268-1289.
[2]
Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients[J]. Arch Surg, 2012, 147(12):1107-1113.
[3]
de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(23):3140-3145.
[4]
唐陈伟,童焕军,汤朝晖.肝内胆管癌的综合治疗[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019, 28(8):903-909.
[5]
国际肝胆胰学会中国分会,中华医学会外科学分会肝脏外科学组.胆管癌诊断与治疗——外科专家共识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014, 34(1):1-5.
[6]
Yoh T, Cauchy F, Le Roy B, et al. Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy for long-term outcomes in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study[J]. Surgery, 2019, 166(6):975-982.
[7]
Li DY, Zhang HB, Yang N, et al. Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(47):9084-9091.
[8]
Miyata T, Yamashita YI, Yamao T, et al. Clinical benefits of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective single-institution study[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(5):2673-2677.
[9]
Sotiropoulos GC, Bockhorn M, Sgourakis G, et al. R0 liver resections for primary malignant liver tumors in the noncirrhotic liver:a diagnosis-related analysis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2009, 54(4):887-894.
[10]
Bagante F, Spolverato G, Weiss M, et al. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: impact of lymphadenectomy on peri-operative outcomes[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(8):2551-2560.
[11]
Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2010, 26(3):269-273.
[12]
Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S, et al. Clinicopathological factors predicting outcome after resection of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(7):969-974.
[13]
Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Surgery, 2000, 127(5):498-505.
[14]
Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. World J Surg, 2005, 29(6):728-733.
[15]
Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S, et al. Value of lymph node dissection during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(11):1463-1466.
[16]
Adachi T, Eguchi S, Beppu T, et al. Prognostic impact of preoperative lymph node enlargement in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study by the Kyushu Study Group of Liver Surgery[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(7):2269-2278.
[17]
Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, et al. The role of lymphadenectomy for liver tumors: further considerations on the appropriateness of treatment strategy[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(2): 202-209.
[18]
Grobmyer SR, Wang L, Gonen M, et al. Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(2):260-264.
[19]
Sun HC, Zhuang PY, Qin LX, et al. Incidence and prognostic values of lymph node metastasis in operable hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of routine complete lymphadenectomy[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2007, 96(1):37-45.
[20]
Chang ME, Lei HJ, Chen MH, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors and implication of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 10-year experience at a tertiary referral center[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2017, 80(30):140-146.
[21]
Kim DH, Choi DW, Choi SH, et al. Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? a review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(4):666-675.
[22]
Doussot A, Lim C, Gómez-Gavara C, et al. Multicentre study of the impact of morbidity on long-term survival following hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(13):1887-1894.
[23]
Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?[J]. Lancet, 2001, 357(9255):539-545.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[8] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[9] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[10] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[11] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[12] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[13] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[14] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?