切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 73 -76. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.01.014

所属专题: 临床研究

临床研究

胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用
姚礼1, 吴金秀1, 唐流康2, 谢峰2,()   
  1. 1. 200125 上海浦东新区浦南医院普通外科
    2. 200438 上海,海军军医大学附属东方肝胆外科医院胆道三科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-02-10
  • 通信作者: 谢峰
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金(16ZR1449200); 上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目(SHDC12017X14); 孟超英才开发计划(20200101)

Application of primary closure of common bile duct in laparoscopic and choledochoscopic treatment of gallstone disease complicated with common bile duct stones

Li Yao1, Jinxiu Wu1, Liukang Tang2, Feng Xie2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Punan Hospital, Shanghai 200125, China
    2. Department Ⅲ of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
  • Received:2022-10-31 Published:2023-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Feng Xie
引用本文:

姚礼, 吴金秀, 唐流康, 谢峰. 胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 73-76.

Li Yao, Jinxiu Wu, Liukang Tang, Feng Xie. Application of primary closure of common bile duct in laparoscopic and choledochoscopic treatment of gallstone disease complicated with common bile duct stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 73-76.

目的

探讨胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的临床应用价值。

方法

本研究对象为2018年7月至2021年12月在上海浦南医院收治的320例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男186例,女134例;年龄38~53岁,中位年龄46岁。根据随机数字表法将患者随机分为一期缝合组与T管引流组,各160例。采用四孔法进腹,腹腔镜胆囊切除,胆总管切开,胆道镜取石后分别行胆总管一期缝合和T管引流。观察两组患者围手术期情况和术后并发症发生情况。两组手术时间、术后住院时间等比较采用t检验,术后并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

两组患者均手术顺利,无中转开腹。一期缝合组平均手术时间、术后住院时间、住院费用分别为(100±9)min、(12.4±1.6)d、(2.9±0.3)万元,明显低于T管引流组的(113±11)min、(18.3±2.7)d、(3.5±0.5)万元(t=-4.545,-0.485,-3.577;P<0.05)。一期缝合组术后总并发症发生率为11.3%(18/160),T管引流组为10.0%(16/160),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.131,P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石术中,采用胆总管一期缝合安全、有效;与T管引流相比,其具有手术时间短、术后恢复快、住院费用低等优势,更加微创。

Objective

To evaluate the application of primary closure of common bile duct in the laparoscopic and choledochoscopic treatment of gallstone disease complicated with common bile duct stones.

Methods

Clinical data of 320 patients with gallstone disease complicated with common bile duct stones treated in Punan Hospital from July 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 186 patients were male and 134 female, aged from 38 to 53 years, with a median age of 46 years. According to the random number table method, all patients were randomly divided into the primary closure (n=160) and T-tube drainage groups (n=160). Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, common bile duct was incised, and primary closure of common bile duct and T-tube drainage were performed after choledochoscopic lithotomy. Perioperative conditions and postoperative complications were observed between two groups. The operation time and length of postoperative hospital stay were compared by t test. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The surgeries were completed successfully in all the patients, without conversion to open surgery. In the primary closure group, the average operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization expense were (100±9) min, (12.4±1.6) d and (2.9±0.3)×104 Yuan, significantly lower than (113±11) min, (18.3±2.7) d and (3.5±0.5)×104 Yuan in the T-tube drainage group (t=-4.545, -0.485, -3.577; P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications was 11.3%(18/160) in the primary closure group and 10.0%(16/160) in the T-tube drainage group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.131, P>0.05).

Conclusions

Primary closure of common bile duct is safe and effective in the laparoscopic and choledochoscopic treatment of gallstone disease complicated with common bile duct stones. Compared with T-tube drainage, it has multiple advantages including shorter operation time, faster postoperative recovery, lower hospitalization expense and less invasiveness.

表1 一期缝合组和T管引流组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者一般资料比较
表2 一期缝合组和T管引流组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者围手术期情况比较(±s
表3 一期缝合组和T管引流组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者并发症情况比较[例(%)]
[18]
Parra-Membrives P, Martínez-Baena D, Lorente-Herce JM, et al. Efficacy of fibrin-sealants in reducing biliary leakage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Cir Esp (Engl Ed), 2018, 96(7):429-435.
[19]
He MY, Zhou XD, Chen H, et al. Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(3):183-191.
[1]
黄志强, 黄晓强, 宋青. 黄志强胆道外科手术学[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2010:290-332.
[2]
Zhu T, Lin H, Sun J, et al. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2021, 22(12):985-1001.
[3]
Reinders JSK, Gouma DJ, Ubbink DT, et al. Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(9):2403-2411.
[4]
Wang Y, Huang Y, Shi C, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7):4869-4877.
[5]
March B, Burnett D, Gani J. Single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is this strategy feasible in Australia?[J]. Anz J Surg, 2016, 86(11):874-877.
[6]
Estellés Vidagany N, Domingo Del Pozo C, Peris Tomás N, et al.Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(5):1975-1982.
[7]
Zhan Z, Han H, Zhao D, et al. Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is feasible for elderly patients: 5-year experience at a single institution[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(1):110-115.
[8]
Asuri K, Bansal VK, Bagaria V, et al. Long-term outcomes following primary closure of common bile duct following laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration: experience of 355 cases at a tertiary care center[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2020, 30(6):504-507.
[9]
Gomez D, Cabrera LF, Villarreal R, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without intraoperative cholangiography:a case series from a referral center in Bogota, Colombia[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3):267-272.
[10]
刘东斌, 徐大华. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合术并发症及处理策略[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2015, 42(1):46-48.
[11]
Yildirim M, Dasiran F, Ozsoy U, et al. The efficiency of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in endoscopic retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-limited setting in a peripheral university hospital[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2021, 31(6): 665-671.
[12]
Palermo M, Fendrich I, Ronchi A, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using a single-operator cholangioscope[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(9):989-992.
[13]
Deng Y, Tian HW, He LJ, et al. Can T-tube drainage be replaced by primary suture technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2020, 405(8):1209-1217.
[14]
暨玲, 严俊斑, 张维建, 等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜探查一期缝合术操作技巧及胆漏的预防[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2010, 22(6):489-491.
[15]
Wu X, Huang ZJ, Zhong JY, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is safe for management of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2019, 18(6):557-561.
[16]
Yao C, Tian Y, Yao D, et al. T-tube-free single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy: a single centre experience[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(7/8):895-899.
[17]
Talamo G, Sucameli F, Imperatore M, et al. Is needlescopic cholecystectomy a safe way to improve mininvasiveness and cosmesis in young female patients?[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2019(34):129-133.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要