切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 79 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.02.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

三维手术规划系统在原发性肝癌切除术前评估中的应用价值
黄利利1, 郑鹏飞1, 毛杰1, 李凡1, 郑永光1, 程志斌1,()   
  1. 1. 730030 兰州大学第二医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-29 出版日期:2014-04-10
  • 通信作者: 程志斌

Application value of three-dimensional surgery planning system in the preoperative evaluation of primary liver cancer resection

Lili Huang1, Pengfei Zheng1, Jie Mao1, Fan Li1, Yongguang Zheng1, Zhibin Cheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu 730030, China
  • Received:2013-12-29 Published:2014-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Zhibin Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cheng Zhibin, Email:
引用本文:

黄利利, 郑鹏飞, 毛杰, 李凡, 郑永光, 程志斌. 三维手术规划系统在原发性肝癌切除术前评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2014, 03(02): 79-83.

Lili Huang, Pengfei Zheng, Jie Mao, Fan Li, Yongguang Zheng, Zhibin Cheng. Application value of three-dimensional surgery planning system in the preoperative evaluation of primary liver cancer resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 03(02): 79-83.

目的

探讨三维手术规划系统在原发性肝癌(肝癌)切除术前评估中的应用价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2012年6月至2013年6月在兰州大学第二医院普通外科收治的44例肝癌患者。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男32例,女12例,平均年龄(60±12)岁。按照随机数字表法将患者随机分为计算机体层摄影血管造影术(CTA)组和三维手术规划组,并根据肿瘤大小、累及范围及既往手术史将两组进一步分为复杂肝癌亚组和非复杂肝癌亚组。CTA组的复杂肝癌亚组8例,非复杂肝癌亚组14例;三维手术规划组的复杂肝癌亚组6例,非复杂肝癌亚组16例。CTA组采用CTA对肝癌切除术进行术前评估。三维手术规划组采用肝脏三维手术规划系统对肝癌切除术进行术前评估。以手术所见作为金标准,观察CTA与三维手术规划系统对肝癌、肝癌与周围组织毗邻关系的显示情况,以及对12条腹腔血管、肝动脉变异、肿瘤侵犯血管、胆管扩张的显示率。分析三维手术规划系统预测的肿瘤体积与实际切除肿瘤质量的关系。非正态分布资料采用MQ25Q75)表示,两种检查方法的显示率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。三维手术规划系统预测的肿瘤体积与实际切除肿瘤质量的关系分析采用Spearman秩相关分析。

结果

两种方法均能显示肝癌病灶,三维手术规划系统还能清晰显示肝癌与周围组织的毗邻关系。在复杂肝癌患者中,CTA组对腹腔血管的显示率为81%(78/96),三维手术规划组为100%(72/72),差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.12,P<0.05)。CTA组对胆管扩张均未能显示,三维手术规划组对胆管扩张的显示率为3/6。在非复杂肝癌患者中,CTA组对腹腔血管的显示率为90%(151/168),三维手术规划组为100%(192/192),差异有统计学意义(χ2=20.39,P<0.05)。CTA组对胆管扩张均未能显示,三维手术规划组对胆管扩张的显示率为19%(3/16)。在复杂肝癌患者中,三维手术规划系统预测肿瘤体积的中位数为218(129,429)ml,实际切除肿瘤质量为194(112,429)g,两者呈正相关(r =0.943,P<0.05),平均误差率为6.5%。在非复杂肝癌患者中,三维手术规划系统预测肿瘤体积为368(89,560)ml,实际切除肿瘤质量为395(126,578)g,两者呈正相关(r =0.958,P<0.05),平均误差率为6.3%。

结论

与CTA相比,三维手术规划系统能更好地显示肿瘤与周围组织的毗邻关系、腹腔血管以及胆管扩张情况,并能较准确地预测肿瘤切除体积,尤其适用于复杂肝癌患者。

Objective

To investigate the application value of three-dimensional surgery planning system in the preoperative evaluation of primary liver cancer (PLC) resection.

Methods

A total of 44 patients with PLC [32 males and 12 females, mean age of (60±12) years old] in Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were enrolled in this prospective study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethics committee approval was received. According to random number table method, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: computed tomography angiography (CTA) group and three-dimensional surgery planning (3D) group. Subgroups of complex PLC and non-complex PLC were further defined in each group according to tumor size, tumor invasive extent and history of surgery. In CTA group, 8 cases was assigned in complex PLC subgroup and 14 cases in non-complex PLC subgroup, and 6, 16 cases respectively in 3D group. CTA was used in the preoperative evaluation of PLC resection in CTA group. Liver three-dimensional surgery planning system was used in the preoperative evaluation of PLC resection in 3D group. The intra-operative finding was taken as a gold standard. The visualization of PLC, the adjacent relationship between PLC and peripheral tissues, the display rates of 12 abdominal vessels, variation of hepatic artery, vascular invasion of tumor, cholangiectasis by CTA and three-dimensional surgery planning system were observed. The relationship between estimated tumor volume by three-dimensional surgery planning system and actual weights of resected tumor was analyzed. Non-normal distribution data were expressed in M(Q25,Q75). The display rates by 2 methods were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact probability test. The relationship between estimated tumor volume by three-dimensional surgery planning system and actual weights of resected tumor was analyzed using Spearman rank correlation analysis.

Results

PLC lesions could be both visualized by 2 methods. The adjacent relationship between PLC and peripheral tissues could also be clearly visualized by three-dimensional surgery planning system. For patients with complex PLC, the display rate of abdominal vessels was 81% (78/96) in CTA group, and was 100% (72/72) in 3D group, where significant difference was observed (χ2=15.1, P<0.05). Cholangiectasis could not be visualized in CTA group and the display rate of cholangiectasis was 3/6 in 3D group. For patients with non-complex PLC, the display rate of abdominal vessels was 90% (151/168) in CTA group, and was 100% (192/192) in 3D group, where significant difference was observed (χ2=20.39, P<0.05). Cholangiectasis could not be visualized in CTA group and the display rate of cholangiectasis was 19% (3/16) in 3D group. For patients with complex PLC, the median estimated tumor volume by three-dimensional surgery planning system was 218(129,429)ml and the actual weights of resected tumor was 194(112,429)g, where positive correlation was observed (r =0.943, P<0.05) with an average error rate of 6.5%. For patients with non-complex PLC, the estimated tumor volume by three-dimensional surgery planning system was 368(89,560)ml and the actual weights of resected tumor was 395(126,578)g, where positive correlation was observed (r =0.958, P<0.05) with an average error rate of 6.3%.

Conclusions

Compared with CTA, three-dimensional surgery planning system can better display the adjacent relationship between tumor and peripheral tissues, abdominal vessels, cholangiectasis and estimate the volume of resected tumor more accurately. It is especially suitable for patients with complex liver cancer.

[1]
樊嘉,王征.原发性肝癌的手术切除[J].中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(3): 167-168.
[2]
Garcea G,Maddern GJ. Liver failure after major hepatic resection[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2009, 16(2): 145-155.
[3]
方驰华,李克晓,范应方, 等.医学图像三维可视化系统在精准肝切除中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10(1): 29-32.
[4]
杨秉辉.第四届全国肝癌学术会议概况及关于原发性肝部诊断标准及分期问题的讨论[J].中华普通外科杂志, 2000, 15(4): 238-239.
[5]
Kew MC. Epidemiology of chronic hepatitis B virus infection, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatitis B virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Pathol Biol, 2010, 58(4): 273-277.
[6]
Schütte K,Bornschein J,Malfertheiner P. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiological trends and risk factors[J]. Dig Dis, 2009, 27(2): 80-92.
[7]
Lau WY,Lai EC. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and recent advances[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2008, 7(3): 237-257.
[8]
Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
[9]
张思维,郑荣寿,李霓, 等.中国肝癌发病的趋势分析和预测[J].中华预防医学杂志, 2012, 46(7): 587-592.
[10]
董家鸿,黄志强.精准肝切除——21世纪肝脏外科新理念[J].中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(21): 1601-1605.
[11]
刘胜,张同华,胡惠良, 等.64层螺旋CT在肝癌介入治疗中的应用价值[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2012, 10(6): 517-518,封2.
[12]
刘四斌,胡道予,谢欢, 等.MSCTA和DSA对肝脏肿瘤血管评估的比较[J].放射学实践, 2009, 24(12): 1317-1319.
[13]
张瑞池,贾翠宇,李雪琴, 等.肝总动脉变异的多层螺旋CT血管造影表现[J].实用放射学杂志, 2012, 28(3): 396-398, 428.
[14]
张华,苗重昌,刘永保.肝动脉变异的多层螺旋CT血管成像研究[J].科技信息, 2013(15): 473-474.
[15]
林科灿,刘景丰,曾金华, 等.虚拟肝脏手术规划应用于肝切除术的研究[J].中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(3): 185-188.
[16]
姜春林,汤地,王晔, 等.三维手术模拟系统在巨大肝癌精准肝切除中的应用[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2012, 11(2): 111-115.
[17]
Radtke A,Sotiropoulos GC,Molmenti EP, et al. Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections: when is it helpful? a single-center experience over an 8-year period[J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 252(5): 876-883.
[18]
杨世忠,张文智,蔡守旺, 等.计算机辅助手术规划系统在精准肝切除中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2010, 9(1): 31-34.
[19]
关连越,杨永生,刘宏宇, 等.多层螺旋计算机体层摄影术三维重建在肝细胞肝癌患者治疗中的应用价值[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 2(1): 7-13.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[13] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?