切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 339 -342. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.04.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

应用空白微球行TACE治疗肝癌临床疗效分析
张发林1,(), 雍昉1   
  1. 1. 528000 广东省佛山市第一人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-23 出版日期:2020-08-10
  • 通信作者: 张发林
  • 基金资助:
    佛山市科技局基金项目(2015AB00296)

Clinical efficacy of TACE with blank microspheres for liver cancer

Falin Zhang1,(), Fang Yong1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2020-03-23 Published:2020-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Falin Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Falin, Email:
引用本文:

张发林, 雍昉. 应用空白微球行TACE治疗肝癌临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 339-342.

Falin Zhang, Fang Yong. Clinical efficacy of TACE with blank microspheres for liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(04): 339-342.

目的

探讨应用空白微球行TACE治疗肝癌临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年6月在佛山市第一人民医院行TACE治疗的80例肝癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男53例,女27例;年龄38~82岁,中位年龄56岁。根据治疗方法不同将患者分为空白微球组和对照组,每组40例。空白微球组采用空白微球+表柔比星,对照组采用传统的碘化油乳剂+表柔比星。两组近期疗效、肿瘤坏死率、不良反应发生率比较采用χ2检验。癌症生存质量评分比较采用t检验。

结果

术后6个月空白微球组客观缓解率、肿瘤坏死率分别为83%(33/40)、85%(34/40),明显高于对照组的60%(24/40)、65%(26/40) (χ2=4.943,4.267;P<0.05)。术后6个月空白微球组生理健康、心理健康、社会功能、总体感觉评分分别为(87±8)、(86±8)、(87±8)、(87±8)分,明显高于对照组的(78±7)、(77±7)、(79±7)、(78±7)分(t=5.137,4.785,4.774,4.835;P<0.05)。空白微球组术后不良反应发生率5%(2/40),明显低于对照组的20%(8/40) (χ2=4.114,P<0.05)。

结论

应用空白微球行TACE治疗肝癌可有效提高患者的近期疗效和肿瘤坏死率,并可降低术后不良反应发生率。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with blank microspheres for liver cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 80 patients with liver cancer who underwent TACE from January 2016 to June 2018 at the First People's Hospital of Foshan were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 53 patients were male and 27 female, aged 38-82 years with a median of 56 years. The patients were assigned to blank microsphere group and control group according to different treatments, with 40 cases in each group. Patients in blank microsphere group received treatments of blank microsphere + epirubicin and patients in control group received treatments of traditional lipiodol emulsion + epirubicin. Comparisons of short-term outcome, tumor necrosis rate and incidence of adverse reaction between two groups were performed using Chi-square test. Comparison of scores of life quality after cancer survivorship was conducted using t test.

Results

The objective response rate and tumor necrosis rate at postoperative 6 months in blank microsphere group were 83%(33/40) and 85%(34/40), respectively, which were significantly higher than 60%(24/40) and 65%(26/40) in control group (χ2=4.943, 4.267; P<0.05). At postoperative 6 month, the scores of physical health, mental health, social functioning, and general well-being in blank microsphere group were 87±8, 86±8, 87±8 and 87±8 respectively, which were significantly higher than 78±7, 77±7, 79±7 and 78±7 in control group (t=5.137, 4.785, 4.774, 4.835; P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was 5%(2/40) in blank microsphere group, which was significantly lower than 20%(8/40) in control group (χ2=4.114, P<0.05).

Conclusions

TACE with blank microsphere for liver cancer can elevate the short-term curative efficacy and tumor necrosis rate and decrease the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.

表1 空白微球组和对照组肝癌患者肝功能和细胞免疫功能比较(±s
表2 空白微球组和对照组肝癌患者肝区疼痛评分比较(分,±s
表3 空白微球组和对照组肝癌患者癌症生存质量评分比较(分,±s
[1]
Huppert P, Wenzel T, Wietholtz H. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of colorectal cancer liver metastases by irinotecan-eluting microspheres in a salvage patient population[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2014, 37(1):154-164.
[2]
冯超,赵剑波,陈勇,等.原发性肝癌切除术后预防性经肝动脉介入治疗:肝动脉化疗栓塞术和化疗灌注术比较[J].介入放射学杂志,2014, 23(8):679-682.
[3]
周官辉,孙军辉,张岳林,等.HepaSphere载药微球栓塞治疗不可切除肝癌15例[J].介入放射学杂志,2015, 24(10):869-872.
[4]
刘坤,伍强.射频消融和肝动脉化疗栓塞联合治疗中晚期肝癌的临床疗效[J].肝脏,2018, 23(7):620-622.
[5]
高飞,庞志刚,韩斌,等.肝动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融术治疗大肝癌的疗效及生存分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2016, 25(4):316-319.
[6]
常鹏,张洪义,肖梅,等.肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合微波消融治疗原发性大肝癌疗效观察[J].山东医药,2015, 55(7):51-53.
[7]
王晓,孙建明,肖兵.肝动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及安全性[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2015, 22(9): 1068-1070.
[8]
王亚勋,吴宝林,周军,等.载药微球与空白微球栓塞治疗原发性肝癌的对比分析研究[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2017, 26(6): 445-450.
[9]
杨雪玲,于海鹏,郭志.载药微球在肝癌经动脉化疗栓塞治疗中的应用研究新进展[J].中华医学杂志,2016, 96(7):589-592.
[10]
程红岩.肝癌介入治疗的现状与展望[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016, 32(1):3-8.
[11]
陈猛,陈晓明.2017年载药微球化疗栓塞治疗肝癌临床研究进展[J].循证医学,2018, 18(1):26-28.
[12]
冯众一,高鹏,谭文翔,等.原发性肝癌TACE介入治疗前后血清VEGF和bFGF水平变化及临床意义[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2015, 18(2):154-155, 158.
[13]
张英,邓俊,周颜,等.栓塞微球应用于肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗乏血供肝癌的临床观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2017, 24(5):533-536.
[14]
张志国,卢桂龙,宋春青.海藻酸钠微球在中晚期原发性肝癌TACE治疗中的应用[J].西南国防医药,2015, 25(10):1089-1092.
[15]
石小军,楼杰,朱德东.碘化油联合海藻酸钠微球颗粒双栓塞治疗原发性肝癌疗效观察[J].浙江医学,2015, 37(22):1853-1855.
[16]
李科,孔轶.进口碘化油TACE联合洛铂治疗晚期肝癌肺转移的临床疗效观察[J].实用癌症杂志,2018, 33(2):244-246.
[17]
赵邦利,崔新江,邢辉,等.碘化油联合微球经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝癌效果观察[J].山东医药,2018, 58(22):87-89.
[18]
吴岑江,唐楹,曾凡剑.原发性肝癌切除术后行肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗的疗效观察[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2018,12(2):111-114,123.
[19]
赵倩,颜志平.载药微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝癌研究进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2017, 26(11):1052-1056.
[20]
吴志远,丁晓毅,黄蔚,等.门脉粒子支架联合载药微球栓塞治疗肝癌7例[J].介入放射学杂志,2017, 26(2):161-165.
[21]
刘金,曹刚,张根山,等.国产CalliSpheres载药微球治疗原发性肝癌12例[J].介入放射学杂志,2017, 26(11):993-998.
[1] 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会. 肝细胞癌伴微血管侵犯诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 313-324.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 陆朝阳, 金也, 孙备. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-366.
[6] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[7] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[8] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[9] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[10] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[11] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[12] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[13] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[14] 王向前, 李清峰, 陈磊, 丘文丹, 姚志成, 李熠, 吴荣焕. 姜黄素抑制肝细胞癌索拉非尼耐药作用及其调控机制[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 729-735.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政司. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2024年版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 407-449.
阅读次数
全文


摘要