切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 53 -58. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.01.012

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝癌肝切除术后不放置腹腔引流管的初步探讨
雷秋成1, 陈焕伟1,(), 王峰杰1, 邓斐文1, 李杰原1, 胡健垣1, 符荣党1, 甄作均1   
  1. 1. 528000 广东省佛山市第一人民医院肝脏胰腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-06 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 陈焕伟
  • 基金资助:
    2016年佛山市高校和医院科研基础平台项目(2016AG100561)

Preliminary study of non-abdominal drainage after hepatectomy for primary liver cancer

Qiucheng Lei1, Huanwei Chen1,(), Fengjie Wang1, Feiwen Deng1, Jieyuan Li1, Jianyuan Hu1, Rongdang Fu1, Zuojun Zhen1   

  1. 1. Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2020-11-06 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Huanwei Chen
引用本文:

雷秋成, 陈焕伟, 王峰杰, 邓斐文, 李杰原, 胡健垣, 符荣党, 甄作均. 肝癌肝切除术后不放置腹腔引流管的初步探讨[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 53-58.

Qiucheng Lei, Huanwei Chen, Fengjie Wang, Feiwen Deng, Jieyuan Li, Jianyuan Hu, Rongdang Fu, Zuojun Zhen. Preliminary study of non-abdominal drainage after hepatectomy for primary liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 53-58.

目的

探讨原发性肝癌(肝癌)肝切除术后不放置腹腔引流的可行性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年9月在广东省佛山市第一人民医院行肝切除术的201例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男172例,女29例;平均年龄(54±12)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据有无放置腹腔引流管将患者分为非引流组(78例)和引流组(123例)。比较两组术后腹腔积液、胆漏、出血、腹腔感染等并发症发生情况。两组术中出血量、住院时间比较采用秩和检验,并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

非引流组术中出血量300(1 450)ml,明显少于引流组的400(5 970)ml(Z=-2.293,P<0.05);术后住院时间为8(23)d,亦明显短于引流组的10(63)d(Z=-2.132,P<0.05)。非引流组、引流组并发症发生率分别为36%(28/78)、41%(51/123),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.620,P>0.05);两组术后超声引导下介入治疗患者分别为4、13例,差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=1.825,P>0.05)。两组均无发生术后30 d死亡。

结论

肝癌切除术后无需常规放置引流管,不放置腹腔引流管可缩短住院时间,促进患者快速康复。术中精细操作,严密止血,实施解剖性肝切除是术后安全的重要保障。术后需严密观察,必要时行介入治疗。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of non-abdominal drainage after hepatectomy for primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Clinical data of 201 PLC patients who underwent hepatectomy in the First People's Hospital of Foshan from January 2012 to September 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 172 patients were male and 29 female, aged (54±12) years on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were divided into the non-drainage (n=78) and drainage groups (n=123) according to whether abdominal drainage was performed. The incidence of postoperative complications, such as ascites, bile leakage, bleeding, and abdominal infection, were compared between two groups. Intraoperative bleeding volume and length of hospital stay were compared between two groups by using rank-sum test. The incidence of complications was analyzed by Chi-square test.

Results

In the non-drainage group, the intraoperative bleeding volume was 300(1 450) ml, significantly less than 400(5 970) ml in the drainage group (Z=-2.293, P<0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay was 8(23) d in the non-drainage group, significantly shorter than 10(63) d in the drainage group (Z=-2.132, P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the non-drainage and drainage groups were 36%(28/78) and 41%(51/123) without significant difference (χ2=0.620, P>0.05). In two groups, 4 and 13 cases received postoperative ultrasound-guided interventional therapy respectively without significant difference (χ2=1.825, P>0.05). No death occurred within postoperative 30 d in both group.

Conclusions

It is unnecessary to give routine abdominal drainage after hepatectomy for PLC. Non-abdominal drainage can shorten the length of hospital stay and accelerate recovery. Explicit operation, effective hemostasis and anatomical liver resection can guarantee the postoperative safety. Intimate observation is required after hepatectomy, and interventional treatment can be delivered if necessary.

表1 非引流组与引流组肝癌肝切除患者一般资料比较
表2 非引流组与引流组肝癌肝切除患者围手术期情况比较
表3 非引流组与引流组肝癌肝切除患者术后并发症比较(例)
[1]
Dan RG, Creţu OM, Mazilu O, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection. retrospective study on 133 patients[J]. Chirurgia, 2012, 107(6):737-741.
[2]
Sato M, Tateishi R, Yasunaga H, et al. Mortality and morbidity of hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, and embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a national survey of 54,145 patients[J].J Gastroenterol, 2012, 47(10):1125-1133.
[3]
Jin S, Fu Q, Wuyun G, et al. Management of post-hepatectomy complications[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(44):7983-7991.
[4]
伍晓汀, 周勇. 腹腔引流管的正确选择和合理应用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2005(1): 35-36.
[5]
Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(2):194-201.
[6]
饶建华, 吕凌, 王平, 等. 腹腔引流术在肝脏切除术后应用的必要性探讨[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2010, 25(4):303-305.
[7]
汪东文, 樊巍巍, 宋军, 等. 结肠癌根治切除术预防性放置腹腔引流管随机对照研究[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2010, 19(10):1129-1131.
[8]
程淇, 孙备, 姜洪池, 等. 胰十二指肠切除术后引流的必要性及其争议[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2016, 22(11):787-789.
[9]
Gillmore D, McSwain NJ, Browder IW. Hepatic trauma: to drain or not to drain?[J]. J Trauma, 1987, 27(8):898-902.
[10]
Andersson R, Saarela A, Tranberg KG, et al. Intraabdominal abscess formation after major liver resection[J]. Acta Chir Scand, 1990, 156(10):707-710.
[11]
陆录. 肝切除术后是否需要常规放置腹腔引流管[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2005.
[12]
Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? a multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research[J]. Surgery, 1999, 125(5):529-535.
[13]
Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, et al. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(6):1074-1084.
[14]
王君, 刘兵, 汪惠才. 胃癌术后腹腔引流有效性和安全性的系统评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2009(5):456-461.
[15]
中华医学会外科学分会肝脏外科学组. 肝脏解剖和肝切除手术命名以及肝血流阻断方法与选择原则[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(3):196-200.
[16]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2):205-213.
[17]
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(5):680-688.
[18]
Schein M, Rogers P, Assalia A. Schein's common sense emergency abdominal surgery[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
[19]
Franco D, Karaa A, Meakins JL, et al. Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage. results of a prospective study in 61 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1989, 210(6):748-750.
[20]
丁文斌, 倪创业, 壮麟, 等. 术后不放置腹腔引流管在肝癌切除手术患者加速康复外科中的应用[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(3):365-367, 384.
[21]
陈焕伟, 刘允怡, 甄作均, 等. 超声引导下以肝段为本的解剖性肝切除术[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2006, 12(6):378-380.
[22]
周超毅, 马金良, 荚卫东, 等. 实时超声导航下解剖性肝段切除在原发性肝癌治疗中的应用及疗效分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(1):6-12.
[23]
陈焕伟, 刘允怡, 蔡云峰, 等. 术中超声和超吸刀在解剖性肝切除中的作用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2010(S1):38-40.
[24]
陈焕伟, 廖珊, 王峰杰, 等. 解剖性肝切除治疗肝细胞癌的长期结果和预后影响因素分析:附90例报告[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2012, 18(2):110-114.
[25]
雷秋成, 符荣党, 邓斐文, 等. 肝切除术后不放置腹腔引流管的安全性与有效性Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 6(6):474-479.
[26]
Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Woerden V, Lodewick TM, et al. Abandoning prophylactic abdominal drainage after hepatic surgery: 10 years of no-drain policy in an enhanced recovery after surgery environment[J]. Dig Surg, 2017, 34(5):411-420.
[27]
Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, et al. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection[J]. Am J Surg, 1996, 171(1):158-162.
[28]
马丽, 佟银侠, 王亦秋, 等. 老年原发性肝癌患者术后是否需要预置腹腔引流管的探讨[J]. 中国临床研究, 2017, 30(9):1157-1161.
[29]
吴丽姿, 翁建莲, 谢莉萍. 肝癌患者肝部分切除术后不放置腹腔引流管的效果观察[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2018, 40(5):150-151.
[30]
Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Miyamoto Y, et al. Re-evaluation of the necessity of prophylactic drainage after liver resection[J]. Am Surg, 2011, 77(5):539-544.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[3] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[7] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[8] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[9] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[10] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[11] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[12] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?