切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 427 -433. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.04.013

所属专题: 临床研究

临床研究

基于160例患者CT三维重建的肝血管解剖变异分析
王建奇, 陈政良, 刘雨, 俞星新, 耿志达, 姜洪池, 梁英健()   
  1. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院肝脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-21 出版日期:2023-08-10
  • 通信作者: 梁英健
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省博士后科研启动基金(LBH-Z16100,LBH-Q20135)

Analysis of anatomical variation of hepatic vessels based on three-dimensional CT reconstruction in160 patients

Jianqi Wang, Zhengliang Chen, Yu Liu, Xingxin Yu, Zhida Geng, Hongchi Jiang, Yingjian Liang()   

  1. Department of Hepatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
  • Received:2023-02-21 Published:2023-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Yingjian Liang
引用本文:

王建奇, 陈政良, 刘雨, 俞星新, 耿志达, 姜洪池, 梁英健. 基于160例患者CT三维重建的肝血管解剖变异分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 427-433.

Jianqi Wang, Zhengliang Chen, Yu Liu, Xingxin Yu, Zhida Geng, Hongchi Jiang, Yingjian Liang. Analysis of anatomical variation of hepatic vessels based on three-dimensional CT reconstruction in160 patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(04): 427-433.

目的

采用CT三维(3D)重建技术探讨肝血管解剖变异类型和发生率。

方法

本研究对象为2017年9月至2020年7月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院接受腹部64排增强多层螺旋CT(MSCT)三维重建的160例成人患者。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男80例,女80例;年龄27~78岁,中位年龄54岁。将MSCT图像数据导入IQQA系统,创建肝动、静脉的3D重建,模拟目标节段,记录每例肝血管变异的类型和数量。

结果

肝动脉变异Hiatt分型1型130例,2型11例,3型10例,4型1例,5型1例,6型4例,7型1例,8型2例,9型0例。56.9%(91/160)的肝左静脉为主干型,双干型占30.0%(48/160),放射型占13.1%(21/160)。61.9%(99/160)的肝中静脉为S4段肝静脉汇入肝左静脉,36.9%(59/160)为S4段肝静脉汇入肝中静脉,1.2%(2/160)为S4段肝静脉独立汇入下腔静脉。74.4%(119/160)的肝右静脉为S6段肝静脉主干型,双干型占22.5%(36/160),三干型占3.1%(5/160)。脐裂静脉占比78.8%(126/160),其中53.2%(67/126)的脐裂静脉汇入肝左静脉根部,23.8%(30/126)汇入肝左静脉远端,13.5%(17/126)汇入肝中静脉根部,9.5%(12/126)汇入肝中静脉和肝左静脉之间部分。前裂静脉占比74.4%(119/160),其中94.1%(112/119)的前裂静脉汇入肝中静脉,5.9%(7/119)汇入肝右静脉。

结论

肝血管解剖变异具有极大的复杂性和偶然性,三维重建技术可指导外科医师选择最佳的手术方法和技术,提高手术安全性。

Objective

To investigate the type and incidence of anatomical variation of hepatic vessels by using three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction.

Methods

160 adult patients undergoing abdominal 64-slice enhanced multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) three-dimensional reconstruction in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from September, 2017 to July, 2020 were enrolled in this study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 80 patients were male and 80 female, aged from 27 to 78 years, with a median age of 54 years. MSCT imaging data were imported into IQQA system to perform 3D reconstruction of hepatic arteries and veins, to simulate the target segment and record the type and quantity of hepatic vascular variation in each patient.

Results

According to Hiatt classification of hepatic arterial variations, 130 cases were classified as HiattⅠ, 11 cases of HiattⅡ, 10 cases of Hiatt Ⅲ, 1 case of Hiatt Ⅳ, 1 case of Hiatt Ⅴ, 4 cases of Hiatt Ⅵ, 1 case of Hiatt Ⅶ, 2 cases of Hiatt Ⅷ and 0 case of Hiatt Ⅸ, respectively. The proportion of left hepatic vein with primary-trunk type was 56.9%(91/160), 30.0%(48/160) for dual-trunk type and 13.1%(21/160) for radial type. The main types of the middle hepatic vein included 61.9%(99/160) of segment 4 (S4) hepatic vein converging to the left hepatic vein, 36.9%(59/160) of S4 hepatic vein converging to the middle hepatic vein and 1.2%(2/160) of S4 hepatic vein independently converging to the inferior vena cava. The main types of the right hepatic vein consisted of 74.4%(119/160) of primary-trunk type S6 hepatic vein, 22.5%(36/160) of dual-trunk type and 3.1%(5/160) of triple-trunk type. The proportion of umbilical fissure vein was 78.8%(126/160), of which 53.2%(67/126) converging to the root of left hepatic vein, 23.8%(30/126) converging to the distal end of left hepatic vein, 13.5%(17/126) converging to the root of middle hepatic vein, and 9.5% (12/126) converging to the space between middle and left hepatic veins. Anterior fissure vein accounted for 74.4%(119/160), of which 94.1%(112/119) converging to the middle hepatic vein and 5.9%(7/119) converging to the right hepatic vein.

Conclusions

Anatomical variations of hepatic vessels are extremely complicated and accidental. 3D reconstruction technology can assist surgeons to choose the optimal surgical method and technique to improve the safety of surgery.

图1 160例患者肝动脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a~h分别为1~8型肝动脉变异,其中1型为正常型,2型为替代或副LHA来自LGA,3型为替代或副RHA来自SMA,4型为双替代型,5型为CHA来自SMA,6型为CHA来自CA,7型为RLHA来自CHA,8型为RRHA来自GDA;LHA为肝左动脉,MHA为肝中动脉,RHA为肝右动脉,LGA为胃左动脉,SMA为肠系膜上动脉,CHA为肝总动脉,CA为腹腔动脉,SA为脾动脉,RLHA为替代肝左动脉,RRHA为替代肝右动脉,GDA为胃十二指肠动脉
表1 Hiatt肝动脉解剖类型和本研究比较[例(%)]
图2 160例患者肝左静脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a为主干型,大多数分支合并为主干;b为双干型,S2段肝静脉和S3段肝静脉合并形成主分支;c为放射型,主干短,静脉分支呈径向排列;LHV为肝左静脉
图3 160例患者肝中静脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a为汇入肝左静脉类型;b为汇入肝中静脉类型;c为独立汇入下腔静脉类型
图4 160例患者肝右静脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a为S6段肝静脉(V6)主干型,b为双干型,c为三干型;RHV为肝右静脉
图5 160例患者脐裂静脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a为UFV流入LHV根部,b为UFV流入LHV远端,c为UFV流入MHV根部,d为UFV流入MHV和LHV之间部分;UFV为脐裂静脉,LHV为肝左静脉,MHV为肝中静脉
图6 160例患者前裂静脉的解剖变异类型示意图注:a为AFV汇入RHV;b为V8和AFV独立汇入MHV,且AFV汇入MHV根部;c为V8和AFV独立汇入MHV,且V8汇入MHV根部;d为V8和AFV共干汇入MHV;AFV为前裂静脉,RHV为肝右静脉,MHV为肝中静脉,V8为S8段肝静脉
[1]
Juza RM, Pauli EM. Clinical and surgical anatomy of the liver:a review for clinicians[J]. Clin Anat, 2014, 27(5):764-769.
[2]
Ishigami K, Zhang Y, Rayhill S, et al. Does variant hepatic artery anatomy in a liver transplant recipient increase the risk of hepatic artery complications after transplantation?[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 183(6):1577-1584.
[3]
Koc Z, Ulusan S, Oguzkurt L, et al. Venous variants and anomalies on routine abdominal multi-detector row CT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 61(2):267-278.
[4]
Fang CH, You JH, Lau WY, et al. Anatomical variations of hepatic veins: three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 200 subjects[J].World J Surg, 2012, 36(1):120-124.
[5]
Nakamura S, Tsuzuki T. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1981, 152(1):43-50.
[6]
Sharma M, Sood D, Singh Chauhan N, et al. Inferior right hepatic vein on routine contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen: prevalence and correlation with right hepatic vein size[J]. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(9):735.e9-735.e14.
[7]
Cho A, Okazumi S, Yoshinaga Y, et al. Relationship between left biliary duct system and left portal vein: evaluation with three-dimensional portocholangiography[J]. Radiology, 2003, 228(1):246-250.
[8]
Cho A, Ryu M, Kinoshita T, et al. Radiological anatomy of the medial segmental bile duct of the liver assessed by CT cholangiography[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2003, 50(52):945-948.
[9]
Xu G, Chen C, Zheng W, et al. IQQA-3D imaging interpretation and analysis system-guided single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomical sub-segmentectomy (LS1+2a+b)[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(9):5515-5521.
[10]
Xu G, Chen C, Zheng W, et al. Application of the IQQA-3D imaging interpretation and analysis system in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy: a series study[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(5):2058-2066.
[11]
Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Pomfret EA, et al. Impact of multidetector CT on donor selection and surgical planning before living adult right lobe liver transplantation[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176(1):193-200.
[12]
Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1 000 cases[J]. Ann Surg, 1994, 220(1):50-52.
[13]
Elias H, Petty D. Gross anatomy of the blood vessels and ducts within the human liver[J]. Am J Anat, 1952, 90(1):59-111.
[14]
Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT. The surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1957, 105(3):310-318.
[15]
Makuuchi M. Surgical treatment for HCC--special reference to anatomical resection[J]. Int J Surg, 2013, 11 Suppl 1:S47-49.
[16]
Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1985, 161(4):346-350.
[17]
Joechle K, Vega EA, Okuno M, et al. Middle hepatic vein roadmap for a safe laparoscopic right hepatectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(1):296.
[18]
Kim JH. Ventral approach to the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic hemihepatectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(1):290.
[19]
Taniai N, Machida T, Yoshida H, et al. Role of the anterior fissure vein in ventral or dorsal resection at segment 8 of liver[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(5):664-669.
[20]
Cho A, Okazumi S, Makino H, et al. Anterior fissure of the right liver--the third door of the liver[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2004, 11(6):390-396.
[21]
Cho A, Yamamoto H, Kainuma O, et al. Extended left hepatectomy of the left and middle hepatic venous drainage areas along the anterior fissure[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 200(1):186-190.
[22]
Strasberg SM. Terminology of liver anatomy and liver resections: coming to grips with hepatic Babel[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1997, 184(4):413-434.
[23]
López-Andújar R, Moya A, Montalvá E, et al. Lessons learned from anatomic variants of the hepatic artery in 1,081 transplanted livers[J]. Liver Transpl, 2007, 13(10):1401-1404.
[24]
张东, 王志鑫, 赵乾, 等. 三维可视化技术在肝多房棘球蚴病中的应用进展[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39(2):457-462.
[25]
Miyazawa M, Aikawa M, Okada K, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection using a monopolar soft-coagulation device to provide maximum intraoperative bleeding control for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(4):2157-2158.
[26]
Ichida A, Hasegawa K, Takayama T, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing two vessel-sealing devices with crush clamping during liver transection[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(13):1795-1803.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[3] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[6] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[7] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[8] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[9] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 罗迎吉星, 隗瑞丽, 王天晓, 黄笳, 徐力, 孙永亮, 杨志英. 开放、腔镜、机器人辅助肝血管瘤剥除术治疗巨大肝血管瘤对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 277-283.
[12] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?