切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (06) : 354 -358. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.06.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

钇- 90微球经动脉放疗栓塞治疗不可切除原发性肝癌疗效的Meta分析
李慕行1, 张谞丰1, 程继文1, 朱迎1, 王万里1, 董健1, 龙志达1, 吕毅1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院肝胆外科 西安交通大学先进外科技术与工程研究所
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-24 出版日期:2014-12-10
  • 通信作者: 吕毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81127005)

Effect of Yttrium-90 microsphere transarterial radioembolization for unresectable primary liver cancer: a Meta-analysis

Muxing Li1, Xufeng Zhang1, Jiwen Cheng1, Ying Zhu1, Wanli Wang1, Jian Dong1, Zhida Long1, Yi Lyu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2014-07-24 Published:2014-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Yi Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lyu Yi, Email:
引用本文:

李慕行, 张谞丰, 程继文, 朱迎, 王万里, 董健, 龙志达, 吕毅. 钇- 90微球经动脉放疗栓塞治疗不可切除原发性肝癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2014, 03(06): 354-358.

Muxing Li, Xufeng Zhang, Jiwen Cheng, Ying Zhu, Wanli Wang, Jian Dong, Zhida Long, Yi Lyu. Effect of Yttrium-90 microsphere transarterial radioembolization for unresectable primary liver cancer: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 03(06): 354-358.

目的

评价钇-90微球经动脉放疗栓塞(TARE)治疗不可切除原发性肝癌(肝癌)的疗效。

方法

在Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CENTRAL)和EMBASE数据库中检索2009年1月至2013年12月文献,英文检索词主要包括radioembolization、transarterial radioembolization、TARE、selective internal radiation therapy、SIRT、Yttrium-90、90Y、chemoembolization、transarterial chemoembolization、TACE及hepatocellular carcinoma、HCC、liver cancer、liver tumor、liver neoplasm。辅以手工检索查找相关文献。将纳入文献的数据合并后,根据不同治疗方法将患者分为TARE组和经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)组,提取患者肿瘤治疗反应情况和1、2、3年生存率的数据。采用Q检验进行文献异质性检验,采用绘制漏斗图和线性回归模型检验发表偏倚。

结果

经过筛选纳入的5篇文献质量为中高水平,共计591例患者,TARE组292例,TACE组299例。采取固定效应模型进行Meta分析,TARE组患者对肿瘤治疗反应优于TACE组(RR=1.50,P<0.05)。TARE组患者2、3年生存率高于TACE组(RR=1.56,2.04;P<0.05)。

结论

与TACE相比,TARE能明显提高不可切除肝癌患者的肿瘤治疗反应率和远期生存率。

Objective

To assess the effect of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using Yttrium-90 microsphere for unresectable primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Literature from January 2009 to December 2013 were searched in the Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CENTRAL) and EMBASE databases with the search terms mainly including: radioembolization, transarterial radioembolization, TARE, selective internal radiation therapy, SIRT, Yttrium-90, 90Y, chemoembolization, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, liver cancer, liver tumor, liver neoplasm and with the assistance of manual searching. Data of the included literature were merged and the patients were divided into TARE group and TACE group according to the different treatments. The data of tumor therapeutic response and 1-, 2-, 3-year survival rates were collected. Literature heterogeneity inspection was conducted by Q test. Publication bias was tested by drawing funnel plot and linear regression model.

Results

Five articles were included after screening with the quality of medium to high. There were totally 591 cases with 292 in TARE group and 299 in TACE group. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed effect model. Tumor therapeutic response was observed better in TARE group, compared with that in TACE group (RR=1.50, P<0.05). The 2-, 3-year survival rates in TARE group were significantly higher than those in TACE group (RR=1.56, 2.04; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with TACE, TARE can obviously improve the tumor therapeutic response rate and long-term survival rate of patients with unresectable PLC.

表1 TARE与TACE治疗不可切除肝癌Meta分析入选文献基本情况
图1 TARE组与TACE组肝癌患者肿瘤治疗反应比较的Meta分析森林图
图2 TARE组与TACE组肝癌患者1年生存率比较的Meta分析森林图
图3 TARE组与TACE组肝癌患者2年生存率比较的Meta分析森林图
图4 TARE组与TACE组肝癌患者3年生存率比较的Meta分析森林图
[1]
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2):69-90.
[2]
Meza-Junco J, Montano-Loza AJ, Liu DM, et al. Locoregional radiological treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: which, when and how?[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2012, 38(1):54-62.
[3]
沈海洋,刘瑞宝.钇90微球经肝动脉选择性放射治疗肝肿瘤应用现状[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2009, 23(6):582-585.
[4]
Giammarile F, Bodei L, Chiesa C, et al. EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011, 38(7):1393-1406.
[5]
Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres[J]. Hepatology, 2009, 49(4):1185-1193.
[6]
Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A, et al. A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization[J]. Am J Transplant, 2009, 9(8):1920-1928.
[7]
Kooby DA, Egnatashvili V, Srinivasan S, et al. Comparison of yttrium-90 radioembolization and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2010, 21(2):224-230.
[8]
Lance C, Mclennan G, Obuchowski N, et al. Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22(12):1697-1705.
[9]
Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L, et al. Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2011, 140(2):497-507.
[10]
Moreno-Luna LE, Yang JD, Sanchez W, et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2013, 36(3):714-723.
[11]
吕毅,张谞丰.肝细胞肝癌的多学科协作组概念及其实践[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2013, 2(1):1-3.
[12]
Wigg AJ, Palumbo K, Wigg DR. Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review of radiobiology and modeling projections indicate reconsideration of its use[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010, 25(4):664-671.
[13]
Sangro B, Salem R, Kennedy A, et al. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the evidence and treatment recommendations[J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2011, 34(4):422-431.
[14]
Ray CJ Jr, Battaglia C, Libby AM, et al. Interventional radiologic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost analysis from the payer perspective[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2012, 23(3):306-314.
[15]
李少华,陈敏山.经皮穿刺肝动脉化疗栓塞在肝细胞肝癌根治性切除术后的应用[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2013, 2(5):281-284.
[16]
Sangro B, Iñarrairaegui M, Bilbao JI. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2012, 56(2):464-473.
[17]
刘允怡,赖俊雄,刘晓欣.钇90微球治疗原发性肝癌[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2011, 27(4):348-350.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[3] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[4] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[5] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[6] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[7] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[8] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[9] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[10] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[11] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[12] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[13] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[14] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[15] 陈安, 冯娟, 杨振宇, 杜锡林, 柏强善, 阴继凯, 臧莉, 鲁建国. 基于生物信息学分析CCN4在肝细胞癌中表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 702-707.
阅读次数
全文


摘要