切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 543 -548. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2025.04.007

专家论坛

胆总管探查切开取石一期缝合的顾虑与内置支撑管应用
黄长文()   
  1. 511500 广东省清远市,广州医科大学附属清远医院(清远市人民医院)肝胆胰脾外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-15 出版日期:2025-08-10
  • 通信作者: 黄长文
  • 基金资助:
    江西省自然科学基金(20202BABL206096)

Considerations of primary suture of common bile duct exploration and stone extraction and application of intraductal stenting tube

Changwen Huang()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Spleen Surgery, Qingyuan Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University (Qingyuan People’s Hospital), Qingyuan 511500, China
  • Received:2025-03-15 Published:2025-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Changwen Huang
引用本文:

黄长文. 胆总管探查切开取石一期缝合的顾虑与内置支撑管应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 543-548.

Changwen Huang. Considerations of primary suture of common bile duct exploration and stone extraction and application of intraductal stenting tube[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(04): 543-548.

胆总管切开探查取石后胆总管处理的方式还存在一定的争议。目前常见的处理方式是T管引流和胆总管一期缝合,胆总管一期缝合有更多的优势,也更符合加速康复外科理念,理应更广泛应用于临床。但临床实践中放置T管引流更被常规使用,术者对胆总管一期缝合可能还存在一些顾虑。把握好胆总管一期缝合的适应证,提高缝合技术,有选择地放置胆总管内置支撑管并掌握支撑管放置的要点,是取得胆总管一期缝合更安全、更优良预后的有效保障。

The management of common bile duct after common bile duct exploration and stone extraction remains controversial. At present, T-tube drainage and primary suture of common bile duct are commonly adopted. Primary suture of common bile duct has more advantages and is more in line with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, which deserves widespread clinical application. However, T-tube drainage is more commonly used in clinical practice because surgeon may still have concerns about primary suture of common bile duct. Understanding the indications, improving suturing techniques, selective placement of stenting tube in common bile duct and mastering the key of placement are effective guarantees for achieving primary suture of common bile duct with better safety and prognosis.

[1]
Fan L, Wang Y, Wu M, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure could be safely performed among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2023, 23(1): 486. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04149-w.
[2]
Wang Y, Huang Y, Shi C, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7): 4869-4877. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8.
[3]
Zhang HW, Chen YJ, Wu CH, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage[J]. Am Surg, 2014, 80(2): 178-181.
[4]
Sui X, Sui Z, Gu X, et al. Primary closure combined with C-tube drainage through cystic duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 972490. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.972490.
[5]
朱杰高, 吴鸿伟, 刘坤, 等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中经胆囊管胆总管探查诊治胆总管结石价值分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(4): 409-411. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2022.04.09.
[6]
张涛, 郭诗翔, 商阳阳, 等. 微创外科技术在肝外胆管结石治疗中应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 459-462, 468. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2021.04.26.
[7]
Jan Y, Hussain M, Aman Z, et al. Primary closure vs T-tube drainage following open choledochotomy for CBD (common bile duct) stones[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(3): e35846. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35846.
[8]
王义学. 腹腔镜胆总管探查胆总管一期缝合与T管引流治疗胆总管结石的效果对比[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2024, 18(2): 57-60. DOI: 10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2024.02.013.
[9]
Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR. T-tube drainage versus primary closure after open common bile duct exploration[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013(6): CD005640. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005640.pub3.
[10]
Zhu T, Lin H, Sun J, et al. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2021, 22(12): 985-1001. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2100523.
[11]
Podda M, Polignano FM, Luhmann A, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(3): 845-861. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4303-x.
[12]
禹正杨, 何生, 李静, 等. 胆总管切开探查术后一期缝合胆管的评价(附6个随机对照临床试验的meta分析)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2003, 23(1): 41-43. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2208.2003.01.016.
[13]
张正东, 侯亚峰, 刘付宝. 腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合与T管引流术比较研究[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 292-295. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4761.2023.04.015.
[14]
De Roover D, Vanderveken M, Gerard Y. Choledochotomy: primary closure versus T-tube. A prospective trial[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 1989, 89(6): 320-324.
[15]
Sheen-Chen SM, Chou FF. Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: is routine T-tube drainage necessary? A prospective controlled trial[J]. Acta Chir Scand, 1990, 156(5): 387-390.
[16]
杨彦, 张剑, 楼健颖, 等. 腹腔镜胆总管探查取石免留置鼻胆管引流一期缝合术临床疗效的多中心回顾性研究(附312例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(1): 68-75. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2018.01.017.
[17]
黄长文, 王开阳, 傅华群. 密切关注内镜下乳头括约肌切开术的并发症[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2011, 17(10): 793-796. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2011.10.001.
[18]
王垒, 黄鑫, 邓满军, 等. 贝叶斯网状Meta分析预测腹腔镜胆总管探查术后胆道内支架引流与单纯一期缝合的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(8): 849-855. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20200601-00405.
[19]
徐垚, 安东均, 王羊, 等. 胆总管探查内置自行脱落J管一期缝合与T管引流治疗胆总管结石的临床分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(11): 657-661. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2021.11.004.
[20]
王俊, 孙权. 胆总管探查后一期缝合并术中置胆道内支架引流术与T管引流术的比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2011, 20(8): 851-853.
[21]
邓晓军. 胆总管切开术内置引流支撑管、一期缝合胆总管(附21例报告)[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2004, 21(1): 79-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-930X.2004.01.036.
[22]
Joshi MR, Sharma SK. Laparoscopic primary repair of common bile duct: does the suture size matter[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2011, 9(1): 10-13.
[23]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会, 国家卫生健康委员会公益性行业科研专项专家委员会. 肝胆管结石病胆肠吻合术应用专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(5): 414-418. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.05.002.
[24]
中华医学会外科学分会. 胆道手术缝合技术与缝合材料选择中国专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(1): 15-20. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2019.01.05.
[25]
Deng M, Yan J, Zhang Z, et al. Greater than or equal to 8mm is a safe diameter of common bile duct for primary duct closure: single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Clin J Gastroenterol, 2022, 15(3): 513-521. DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01615-7.
[26]
刘允怡. 奥迪括约肌功能与胆道系统疾病的临床争议[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(1): 42-47. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20221028-00661.
[1] 庄洪财, 杨少华, 何超. 经皮经肝胆道镜取石术微创治疗胆总管结石的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 119-122.
[2] 陈浩, 林梁, 马克强, 黄健斌, 邱旭彬, 曹天生. 胆道镜下放置胆道支架在胆总管结石并急性胆管炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 110-114.
[3] 蔡茗, 俞亚红. 胆总管结石术后复发危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 438-442.
[4] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[5] 姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.
[6] 向华, 郭宇廷, 徐毅驰, 邱明, 孔琳, 杨钦喜, 何丽娜, 徐本劦. 比较腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查一期缝合鼻胆管引流与T管引流的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 73-75.
[7] 蒋文竹, 贾竞超, 周标, 何晓伟, 邓志成. 一期LCBDE+LC与分期ERCP+LC治疗无扩张的胆总管结石合并胆囊结石疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 423-429.
[8] 杜文成, 黄若楠, 孙翀, 李瑞, 徐成臣, 胡开泰, 崔磊, 王辉, 谢应海. ERAS理念在老年腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 416-422.
[9] 赵畅, 杨毅, 唐华勇, 肖群, 袁通立. 三镜联合与双镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 408-415.
[10] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[11] 滕达, 许悦, 张萌. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 537-542.
[12] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-50.
[13] 杨海龙, 邓满军, 樊羿辰, 徐梦钰, 陈芳德, 吴威浩, 张生元. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术一期缝合术后胆漏危险因素Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 545-550.
[14] 姚礼, 吴金秀, 唐流康, 谢峰. 胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 73-76.
[15] 冯其柱, 王思雨, 袁文康, 张超. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合在正常直径胆总管结石患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 68-72.
阅读次数
全文


摘要